|
The two voxs are my favorite posters.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 00:18 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 13:18 |
|
The death penalty should be administered to all collaborators in the current system of capital - note that the capitalists themselves can live, because they are animalistic creatures who cannot rise above their basal instincts of greed and lust. Those who have educated themselves and can exist outside of capital (e.g., lawyers, accountants, consultants) have made a conscious choice to exacerbate inequality and the theft of wealth from the working class for meager material rewards. tl;dr - guillotine all big law associates
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 01:50 |
|
Sab0921 posted:The death penalty should be administered to all collaborators in the current system of capital - note that the capitalists themselves can live, because they are animalistic creatures who cannot rise above their basal instincts of greed and lust. Actuaries are okay though right?
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 01:59 |
|
Capital punishment is only just when carried out by drone or commando raid and all other methods are cruel and/or unusual. (Fight me.)
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 02:10 |
|
We should just kill everyone, humanity can’t be trusted
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 02:32 |
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:Also if my goat is stolen, and I later find it at someone’s house and that person can’t produce a witness to say they bought the goat from a merchant, then they should be put to death. If a man builds a house, and it collapses within a year of construction, the builder will pay for it. If ir collapses and kills the buyer's wife, he shall pay 5 mina of silver. If it kills the buyer's son, his son will be put to death. If it kills the buyer, he shall be put to death.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 03:02 |
|
Hoshi posted:Actuaries are okay though right? Sorry no - actuaries are often used as a tool of manipulation by the capital class to remove promised benefits from working people. Actuaries will be first, their assets will be used to fund pension plans.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 03:40 |
|
sullat posted:If a man builds a house, and it collapses within a year of construction, the builder will pay for it. If ir collapses and kills the buyer's wife, he shall pay 5 mina of silver. If it kills the buyer's son, his son will be put to death. If it kills the buyer, he shall be put to death. If a judge try a case, reach a decision, and present his judgment in writing; if later error shall appear in his decision, and it be through his own fault, then he shall pay twelve times the fine set by him in the case, and he shall be publicly removed from the judge's bench, and never again shall he sit there to render judgment.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 04:06 |
Hot Dog Day #91 posted:The two voxs are my favorite posters. thankee, thankee. Any consideration of death penalty policy should bear in mind that current death penalty methods are inhumane in part because of efforts by anti-death penalty advocates to make other methods impossible. This is a direct parallel (I mean really direct, down to threatening airlines) to animal rights groups poo poo.
|
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 04:39 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:thankee, thankee. I hereby disavow this vox.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 04:51 |
|
It is a far worse punishment to spend the rest of your life in a maximum security prison than being killed by the state. But if the state is going to do it, a bullet to the head is better than how we do it.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 04:52 |
|
Yeah but if you think about it, everyone is going to die eventually so killing somebody is really just taking an indeterminate amount of their already limited existence away, so its NBD REALLY
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 05:12 |
Vox Nihili posted:I hereby disavow this vox. Alas, by responding to my post you have established joinder.
|
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 05:32 |
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:If a judge try a case, reach a decision, and present his judgment in writing; if later error shall appear in his decision, and it be through his own fault, then he shall pay twelve times the fine set by him in the case, and he shall be publicly removed from the judge's bench, and never again shall he sit there to render judgment. If a barkeeper does not accept corn according to gross weight in payment of a drink, but takes money, and the price of the drink is less than that of the corn, she shall be convicted and thrown into the water.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 05:35 |
|
blarzgh posted:Yeah but if you think about it, everyone is going to die eventually so killing somebody is really just taking an indeterminate amount of their already limited existence away, so its NBD REALLY “A death sentence, properly imposed, is merely a slightly premature cardiac event at a hunting lodge but with greater forewarning for the convenience of the family of the condemned for funerary planning.” We find no procedural deficiencies in this matter and therefore AFFIRM the judgment of Texas/Florida/Mississippi/Alabama. Justice Thomas, concurring: I would also hold that a Viagra overdose is not only neither cruel nor unusual, but is, in fact, the most humane form of euthanasia when administered with a reasonable amount of coke can-themed pornographic imagery.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 06:09 |
|
Did I venture into the weed thread?
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 06:17 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:thankee, thankee. I'd like to see some examples, but presented in the same form as Dorothy Parker's Resume.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 06:33 |
|
Tokelau All Star posted:Did I venture into the weed thread? A quick check of the weed thread shows they have an obsession with the ideal amounts of product burn-off, doseage, and customer satisfaction, so no.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 06:33 |
|
yronic heroism posted:A quick check of the weed thread shows they have an obsession with the ideal amounts of product burn-off, doseage, and customer satisfaction, so no. That sounds right up D-Vox's alley.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 06:37 |
|
sullat posted:If a man builds a house, and it collapses within a year of construction, the builder will pay for it. If ir collapses and kills the buyer's wife, he shall pay 5 mina of silver. If it kills the buyer's son, his son will be put to death. If it kills the buyer, he shall be put to death. Phil Moscowitz posted:If a judge try a case, reach a decision, and present his judgment in writing; if later error shall appear in his decision, and it be through his own fault, then he shall pay twelve times the fine set by him in the case, and he shall be publicly removed from the judge's bench, and never again shall he sit there to render judgment. sullat posted:If a barkeeper does not accept corn according to gross weight in payment of a drink, but takes money, and the price of the drink is less than that of the corn, she shall be convicted and thrown into the water. I have to say, the United States Code is loving weird.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 06:37 |
|
In contrast, this is the thread for bitter, resentful slackers who hate their day jobs and will die at the age of 43.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 06:57 |
|
Since this is the "cool" people's thread now, here's one from the public defender playlist https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBOucGAkFAw
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 07:27 |
|
Had my first not guilty this week hell yeah. Literally the wrong man lmao, like wasn't even close.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 07:34 |
|
Nice work! Who/what did you cross on? How did it go down?
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 07:37 |
|
If this is not on any prosecutor’s playlist they need to file more dismissals, for failure to get laid. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GGXzlRoNtHU
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 07:47 |
|
yronic heroism posted:If this is not on any prosecutor’s playlist they need to file more dismissals, for failure to get laid. Who the gently caress can stand listening to that poo poo? It's horrible. Even dubstep is less annoying.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 08:03 |
|
Nice piece of fish posted:Who the gently caress can stand listening to that poo poo? It's horrible. Even dubstep is less annoying. Prosecutors
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 08:08 |
|
Cruel and unusual
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 08:20 |
|
Tokelau All Star posted:Nice work! Who/what did you cross on? How did it go down? It technically got thrown out at the pretrial stage when the "strong prosecution case" included a video of another man doing the crime. I made my submissions that this would be the case, Judge chewed me out for not talking to police first (lmao they werent going to do poo poo unless the judge ordered them) and then the police got lovely telling the judge "nuh uh, check out this footage we have". Judge said fine, see you wednesday and we will settle this. The next day police quietly released him, and the day after that I did my victory lap in court telling the judge "I believe my colleagues will be tendering no evidence to these charges" sat down and enjoyed the show. Client spent 4 nights locked up for his troubles though.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 08:50 |
|
algebra testes posted:It technically got thrown out at the pretrial stage when the "strong prosecution case" included a video of another man doing the crime. Question: Can you then sue for compensation due to unjustified incarceration? Also, nice job man.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 08:56 |
|
Nice piece of fish posted:Question: Can you then sue for compensation due to unjustified incarceration? Also, nice job man. Yup, our court outcome letter included a section about how he should come speak to us about that. Despite the fact I had clients in tears, clients lie to my face and the usual public defender stuff, that win is keeping me going for a while.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 08:59 |
|
algebra testes posted:Yup, our court outcome letter included a section about how he should come speak to us about that. Good, that's reassuring. What's the going rate per day? Ours hovers around 4-5000 USD per day of unjustified incarceration.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 09:03 |
|
Good prosecutors listen to Sondheim.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 10:57 |
|
Vox Nihili posted:I hereby disavow this vox. Cosigned.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 12:34 |
joat mon posted:That sounds right up D-Vox's alley. I generally find TCC too upsetting. Lots of Folk Law in there. Hot Dog Day #91 posted:Cosigned.
|
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 23:04 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:thankee, thankee. this is not true the vast majority of movement on death penalty methods is the state wishing to minimize the gore and horror of killing someone and turn it from a bloody spectacle into a bloodless procedure because people will not tolerate the bloody spectacle anymore it is not hard to behead someone or to shoot them in the head or to hang them, but that's too openly brutal and not sterile enough for modern sensibilities to preserve a willingness to kill people
|
# ? Sep 8, 2018 00:11 |
|
https://twitter.com/srl/status/1038109978182209539/photo/1
|
# ? Sep 8, 2018 01:13 |
|
Things like this is why you have a country-wide official language
|
# ? Sep 8, 2018 01:20 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:thankee, thankee. No, the real problem is that any just death penalty system would be too resource-intensive to deliver. It’s inhumane by its very nature.
|
# ? Sep 8, 2018 01:38 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 13:18 |
|
So. Slightly emboldened Bc new judge, in open court, mocked/chastised that firm I hate for one of its bullshit attempts to sanction me. “Then we have (case). You had time to file nonsense and demand a hearing about certification dates. But you don’t have time to order transcripts? Please.” Counsel now on file (same firm. No mercy. Work for that psycho and you get what you deserve) wants to get a scheduling order. Me: you gonna try to sanction me too? Him: uh.... I’m new here. Me: i’d say third time’s the charm but... you guys are 0 for 5 now. ActusRhesus fucked around with this message at 02:07 on Sep 8, 2018 |
# ? Sep 8, 2018 01:44 |