|
In my last installment on porting a huge mess of java spaghetti without comments or even a readme into python, my boss gave the go-ahead to spend time on it as it's critical for business files. Today it's not worth the time. I mean that happens sure, but at least don't be mad at me for giving time estimates that might be accurate (or at least not overly optimistic). This working at a startup poo poo-show in general is getting to me. Business needs are made up on a whim, then changed on another whim. Our partner in France is either incompetent, doesn't make enough from our business for us to be worth their time or both. Today, after asking in writing about an assignment, my boss put it in writing that he found me provoking. The silver lining I guess is that I can keep it, show it to his boss and say: "This poo poo is why I'm out".
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 21:57 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 18:57 |
|
What's the rationale for porting from Java to Python?
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 00:10 |
|
bob dobbs is dead posted:for the top of the line sql server paying retail, assuming a pizza box server, it costs more to license the thing w/ the top of the line license than to send it to space Edit: licensing 3 beefy sql servers is 1/5th of my yearly cloud budget and I hate it. freeasinbeer fucked around with this message at 02:45 on Sep 5, 2018 |
# ? Sep 5, 2018 01:57 |
|
redleader posted:There's AWS in Plain English. I agree that AWS names are meaningless, but many of these are somehow worse. Like, S3=>"Amazon Unlimited FTP Server" is loving crazy. VPC=>"Amazon Virtual Colocated Rack" is confusing. Lambda=>"AWS App Scripts" is sort of OK in that "App Scripts" seems equally meaningless. RDS=>"Amazon SQL" is terrible. Etc.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 04:36 |
|
rt4 posted:What's the rationale for porting from Java to Python? It’s easier to onboard student assistants who are willing to work loads of hours for pennies alternatively: this startup is awful so why shouldn't the software be? champagne posting fucked around with this message at 09:05 on Sep 5, 2018 |
# ? Sep 5, 2018 06:00 |
|
Handsome Wife posted:Are you dead-set on using Cosmos? It is expensive but there are other options for hosted DBs on Azure. The "basic" tier Azure SQL instance is like $5/month, and if you need a document store you could use something like this to get Mongo running on Azure. Oh no I'm not like IT HAS TO BE COSMOS, I'd prefer MongoDB tbh. I didn't realize you could install it on Azure. Is it just as pricey to run though?
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 08:08 |
|
Found in a jobposting today posted:Knowledge of No-SQL databases like Cassandra, mangoDB etc
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 12:23 |
|
Ape Fist posted:Oh no I'm not like IT HAS TO BE COSMOS, I'd prefer MongoDB tbh. I didn't realize you could install it on Azure. Is it just as pricey to run though? Nothing is as pricey as cosmos db, except maybe google cloud spanner.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 12:27 |
|
Munkeymon posted:This applies equally to AWS, FYI. You're probably just used to it because you've been using it long enough, but we just started using it recently and it's not that straightforward. I'm thinking specifically about a ten minute discussion we had about which storage option was right for a new workload I was going to saddle a service with. Much of that was synchronizing knowledge about what the various options are supposed to be for.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 14:00 |
|
Ape Fist posted:Oh no I'm not like IT HAS TO BE COSMOS, I'd prefer MongoDB tbh. I didn't realize you could install it on Azure. Is it just as pricey to run though? You can just throw Mongo on a VM. You could even spin up a Mongo Docker container on an Azure Container Instance, but the pricing on that is more complicated to figure out. If you look something like image I linked to from the Azure Marketplace, you can spin up a basic VM with 20 GB of disk space for ~$14/month.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 14:39 |
|
If you're not working with Ligatures turned on are you even a real developer?
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 22:06 |
|
Ape Fist posted:If you're working with Ligatures turned on, are you even a real developer? FTFY
|
# ? Sep 6, 2018 07:38 |
|
Keetron posted:Hmmmm, smells fruity. I learned today that a major company in my city is heavily reliant on MongoDB and they never setup authentication on it until they hired a new devops person (who now works for us) and promptly turned in her notice when the CTO shrugged and told her not to change anything.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 01:20 |
|
geeves posted:I learned today that a major company in my city is heavily reliant on MongoDB and they never setup authentication on it until they hired a new devops person (who now works for us) and promptly turned in her notice when the CTO shrugged and told her not to change anything. It still doesn't sound like they set up authentication.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 01:57 |
|
That's sounds reasonable if it's only available in the local network where the application lives
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 14:23 |
geeves posted:I learned today that a major company in my city is heavily reliant on MongoDB and they never setup authentication on it until they hired a new devops person (who now works for us) and promptly turned in her notice when the CTO shrugged and told her not to change anything. The number of unauthenticated mongo DBs just chilling exposed to the web is painfully high
|
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 16:19 |
|
rt4 posted:That's sounds reasonable if it's only available in the local network where the application lives Good luck with that after your network is breached. Or the intern ngrok's your server to the world.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2018 19:26 |
|
rt4 posted:That's sounds reasonable if it's only available in the local network where the application lives Be mindful of where you buy concert tickets. Your card info may be web scaled.
|
# ? Sep 8, 2018 00:16 |
|
I'd never heard of ngrok before, holy poo poo that is scary
|
# ? Sep 8, 2018 03:27 |
|
My Rhythmic Crotch posted:I'd never heard of ngrok before, holy poo poo that is scary
|
# ? Sep 8, 2018 17:29 |
|
My Rhythmic Crotch posted:I'd never heard of ngrok before, holy poo poo that is scary Thirded. Who the gently caress would allow remote access this transparent into their network? What port do they work on, I can block it by default even at home.
|
# ? Sep 8, 2018 20:02 |
|
It's randomly assigned iirc. This is the officially recommended way of testing inbound Twilio integrations.
|
# ? Sep 8, 2018 20:08 |
|
rt4 posted:It's randomly assigned iirc. This is the officially recommended way of testing inbound Twilio integrations. Well, I guess what service will not be used by my company.
|
# ? Sep 8, 2018 20:10 |
|
I think it’s just that integration with a lot of services is them hitting your public endpoint, so it’s tough to develop and test that integration on a local machine.
|
# ? Sep 8, 2018 20:37 |
|
That's almost like a parody of the software industry in 2018. I have no idea what all of these moving parts do, how they work, or what third-party services they use so it's best to just expose it all to the internet so it "just works".
|
# ? Sep 9, 2018 00:06 |
|
To be fair, I think they reasonably assume anyone running a weird NAT punchthrough HTTP proxy development tool will ensure they isolated from the real internal corporate network.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2018 02:31 |
|
smackfu posted:I think it’s just that integration with a lot of services is them hitting your public endpoint, so it’s tough to develop and test that integration on a local machine. I honestly thought docker was great for that. Exposing to the public because it is easy just sounds stupid. Found on the internet today:
|
# ? Sep 9, 2018 07:33 |
|
I can't see a funny mongodb thing and not post this: https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/PYTHON-532
|
# ? Sep 9, 2018 16:47 |
|
Its hard to laugh at mongo (which they deserve) when that bug report is just so embarrassing.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 05:45 |
|
Xik posted:Its hard to laugh at mongo (which they deserve) when that bug report is just so embarrassing. it's funny because they actually were running coverity and you know, that mike guy in the bug report who was "born a tech writer" has a degree in computer science from princeton, so you'd think between the combination of those two things you wouldn't get a bug like that
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 13:28 |
|
Bruegels Fuckbooks posted:it's funny because they actually were running coverity and you know, that mike guy in the bug report who was "born a tech writer" has a degree in computer science from princeton, so you'd think between the combination of those two things you wouldn't get a bug like that Given their track record I would never make such a generous assumption
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 13:51 |
|
What other mongodb shenanigans are out there?
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 15:56 |
|
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16833100/why-does-the-mongodb-java-driver-use-a-random-number-generator-in-a-conditional
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 17:13 |
Today in "bugs that should have taken 15 minutes instead of three hours", Chicken Wing spends a long rear end time trying to figure out why hibernate isn't persisting an object to the DB despite every possible combination of .save(), .persist(), and .flush(). After furiously combing google, even more furiously combing through library code, and roping in the local hibernate guru, he says "hey maybe I should check the DAO that's throwing the error instead of the DAO that's 'not saving the object'"code:
|
|
# ? Sep 12, 2018 19:20 |
Hibernate is cool but also I think I hate it
|
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 20:23 |
|
ChickenWing posted:Hibernate is cool but also I think I hate it That's how I feel about most ORMs.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 20:38 |
|
My belief is that relations are not objects, so if you're using an ORM to manage things in a way that lets you treat relations as objects, you'd better be getting some really powerful magic to make up for the pain you'll experience at the parts where things don't quite match up.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 22:41 |
|
Bongo Bill posted:My belief is that relations are not objects, so if you're using an ORM to manage things in a way that lets you treat relations as objects, you'd better be getting some really powerful magic to make up for the pain you'll experience at the parts where things don't quite match up. Can you give a more specific example of what you're trying to say?
|
# ? Sep 13, 2018 23:58 |
|
Bruegels Fuckbooks posted:Can you give a more specific example of what you're trying to say? Nope.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2018 01:27 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 18:57 |
|
Bruegels Fuckbooks posted:Can you give a more specific example of what you're trying to say?
|
# ? Sep 14, 2018 04:06 |