|
AlternateAccount posted:I think it was CD-ROM drives, but geez, definitely feels like a movie you couldn't really make today. Dennis Miller as a techbro was worth the price of admission.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2018 20:20 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 08:07 |
|
Do movie taglines still exist? Was their original purpose just to psyche people up for the film?
|
# ? Sep 8, 2018 19:12 |
|
Yeah, they still exist. Some movies have multiple taglines. And pretty much. They're meant to be short and attention grabbing, make you think more about the film in regards to what the tagline means. It's an enticement to go see the picture and find out.
|
# ? Sep 8, 2018 20:53 |
|
Edge of Tomorrow's tagline was so much better than the real title that the latter is practically gone from home media: Live. Die. Repeat.
|
# ? Sep 8, 2018 22:23 |
|
Krankenstyle posted:Edge of Tomorrow's tagline was so much better than the real title that the latter is practically gone from home media: Live. Die. Repeat. I still prefer the original title from the book/manga. All You Need is Kill.
|
# ? Sep 8, 2018 22:37 |
|
The Meg had some pretty good taglines, their marketing department was on the ball. They even had a floor decal of a shark's mouth at the base of our escalator so it looked like you were heading into the jaws.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2018 02:35 |
|
Krispy Wafer posted:Dennis Miller as a techbro was worth the price of admission. Agree, but I have a major affection for Dennis Miller which I think 99% of the world does not share.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2018 05:07 |
|
Not a question but a recommendation: I finally saw 2001: A Space Odyssey in 70mm. I'd been wanting to see that movie on a big screen my whole life. This year is the 50th anniversary of its release and it's currently traveling around, I strongly suggest you see it if you have the chance! What a great experience. The effects still amazing, even fifty years on. It's so cool to see a movie that has that level of care and craft but still comes across as so seamless.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2018 06:18 |
|
Van Dis posted:Not a question but a recommendation:
|
# ? Sep 9, 2018 14:04 |
|
Weren't the backgrounds photos?
|
# ? Sep 9, 2018 14:15 |
|
Teenage Fansub posted:Weren't the backgrounds photos? quote:Doug Trumbull: "To camouflage the varying light transmission rates between rolls of the front projection screen material on the giant 40- by 90-foot screen, the material was cut up into small, irregular pieces and pasted up at random so that slight variations in the transmission rates would merge with cloud shapes or be lost altogether in brilliant sunlight effects.”
|
# ? Sep 9, 2018 14:32 |
|
got any sevens posted:The Meg had some pretty good taglines, their marketing department was on the ball. They even had a floor decal of a shark's mouth at the base of our escalator so it looked like you were heading into the jaws. The best tagline ever was the one for the 1962 Manchurian Candidate:
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 04:16 |
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:The best tagline ever was the one for the 1962 Manchurian Candidate No.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 04:43 |
What are some examples of sequel films where the sequel was done significantly later, by a different team? 2010 and Blade Runner 2049 are the obvious examples, but I'm sure there are others.
|
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 06:45 |
|
The Color of Money
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 06:54 |
|
Psycho II is one of the first examples I can think of.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 06:59 |
|
Babysitter Super Sleuth posted:What are some examples of sequel films where the sequel was done significantly later, by a different team? 2010 and Blade Runner 2049 are the obvious examples, but I'm sure there are others. Blues Brothers 2000 Superman Returns (sorta) Edit: I haven't seen any of the seqiels, but maybe Halloween H20 Oh and Star Wars Force Awakens of loving course. Air Skwirl fucked around with this message at 07:40 on Sep 10, 2018 |
# ? Sep 10, 2018 07:32 |
|
Babysitter Super Sleuth posted:What are some examples of sequel films where the sequel was done significantly later, by a different team? 2010 and Blade Runner 2049 are the obvious examples, but I'm sure there are others. Not significantly later, but Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan was produced by Paramount's television division, as opposed to the clusterfuck that was The Motion Picture.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 07:58 |
|
Blues Brothers 2k was still Landis and Aykroyd. The Thing prequel fits both criteria.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 10:10 |
|
Predator (1987) Predator 2 (1990) +3 years Predators (2010) +20 years The Predator (2018) +8 years The 20 year jump might count? e: also you have to ignore the avp movies, but that's just good praxis. Carthag Tuek fucked around with this message at 10:36 on Sep 10, 2018 |
# ? Sep 10, 2018 10:15 |
|
Fantasia was 1940 and Fantasia 2000 was 1999/2000, if that counts (it might not, since the second one wasn't continuing a story from the first). There's a number of Disney DTV sequels to their animated movies that sometimes came out decades after the original movies and didn't tend to be coming from the same creative crew. Return to Oz was about 40 years after The Wizard of Oz and as I recall it's presented as a sequel.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 10:25 |
|
Wall Street Money Never Sleeps and Basic Instinct 2 are recent examples.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 13:42 |
|
Coaaab posted:The Color of Money The Color of Money is probably the best example since The Hustler had an older established actor (Gleason) with the hot new actor (Newman) and then Color of Money had the older established actor (Newman) with the hot new actor (Cruise). So now all we need is Cruise in a 3rd movie with whatever passes for the hottest new actor (comedy Shia LaBeouf option). Also most people who watch Color of Money probably have no idea there even was another movie, which is about as overdue and obscure as you can get for a sequel.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 14:08 |
|
Similarly, Sleuth (1972) had the older Laurence Olivier vs. the younger Michael Caine. The 2007 remake had the now older Michael Caine vs. the younger Jude Law.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 14:13 |
|
Why even remake Sleuth when the original one is basically perfect?
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 14:19 |
|
Babysitter Super Sleuth posted:What are some examples of sequel films where the sequel was done significantly later, by a different team? 2010 and Blade Runner 2049 are the obvious examples, but I'm sure there are others. There are any number of direct to video sequels that match this criteria (eg Road House 2, A Christmas Story 2, Hard Target 2), most of which are trash, but some, like Issac Florentine Undisputed sequels and John Hyams' Universal Soldier sequels, immensely improve on the originals.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 14:44 |
|
Peter Hyams, who directed the original Universal Soldier movie, came back for his son's Universal Soldier movies as cinematographer.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 14:47 |
|
yeah i know it's said like every other week here but those last 2 universal soldier movies were at least 50x better than they ever should have been and even toe the "actual decent movies" water
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 14:48 |
|
There was also 10 years between The Hand that Rocks the Cradle and its sequel, Cradle 2 the Grave, which had a completely different cast and crew.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 15:28 |
|
Wheat Loaf posted:There was also 10 years between The Hand that Rocks the Cradle and its sequel, Cradle 2 the Grave, which had a completely different cast and crew. Funny how they rushed out the third installment the same year with Tomb Raider – The Cradle of Life.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 16:45 |
|
Parachute posted:yeah i know it's said like every other week here but those last 2 universal soldier movies were at least 50x better than they ever should have been and even toe the "actual decent movies" water
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 16:52 |
|
Does Bad Lieutenant and Port of Call New Orleans count.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2018 17:17 |
|
Babysitter Super Sleuth posted:What are some examples of sequel films where the sequel was done significantly later, by a different team? 2010 and Blade Runner 2049 are the obvious examples, but I'm sure there are others. The Conversation and Enemy of the State.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2018 08:08 |
|
ruddiger posted:The Conversation and Enemy of the State. Omg I never saw the connection before! That's great
|
# ? Sep 11, 2018 08:42 |
|
ruddiger posted:The Conversation and Enemy of the State. wee-bey-reaction.gif
|
# ? Sep 11, 2018 15:54 |
|
ruddiger posted:The Conversation and Enemy of the State.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2018 16:32 |
ruddiger posted:The Conversation and Enemy of the State. holy poo poo piss
|
|
# ? Sep 11, 2018 16:45 |
|
Trying to remember the name of a film. -Made within the last 20 years -Takes place almost entirely on an spaceship; dark, industrial feel -Earth's having a bad time; a handful of survivors are trying to find a new home -The mission's evidently been disrupted by sabotage; man vs man theme -Plot twist at the end involving an ocean and escape pods One of the crew members has hid from the others that they've been on their destination for years; they are at the bottom of the sea in a clement alien world. A pair of heroes discovers this in a confrontation near the end, dispatches our villain, and surfaces using escape pods.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2018 18:06 |
|
Dominoes posted:Trying to remember the name of a film. Pandorum? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandorum
|
# ? Sep 11, 2018 18:11 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 08:07 |
|
Nailed it. After looking it up by title now, it seems as if the monster bits weren't especially memorable!
|
# ? Sep 11, 2018 18:31 |