Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
The Lone Badger
Sep 24, 2007

HookedOnChthonics posted:

Genuinely v. curious what you imagine ‘well constructed armor’ that weighs less than the greatcoat you already carry for when it rains and the hair that is already growing out of your head might look like.

Well, looking at the earlier example of musket balls braided into your hair. Lead is a terrible material for armour, it's soft and very heavy and spheres aren't a great shape either. If we take the same weight of steel and make a light mail coif (using thin wire and wide rings to keep weight down) then you've got something that is substantially more protective, sits more evenly on the head, and which can be taken off.

Edit: I'm overcomplicating this. Essentially my question boils down to: people who don't want to be hit with swords used to wear specifically constructed items made of iron, treated leather etc. In the era we now discuss some people have decided that they don't really care about swords any more since they'll probably get shot, and wear no armour. Some other people in this era still don't want to be hit with swords - what has changed that they now favour using multi-purpose items to prevent this rather than purpose-built items?

The Lone Badger fucked around with this message at 10:57 on Sep 21, 2018

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

HEY GUNS
Oct 11, 2012

FOPTIMUS PRIME

sullat posted:

It's funny how youtube thinks that the next videos I want to watch are Nazi propaganda.
i watch religious poo poo, folk music, and rap, and get nazi propaganda

HEY GUNS
Oct 11, 2012

FOPTIMUS PRIME
also cloth actually does dull a blade p quick

the braids with bullets in them just look rad

HEY GUNS
Oct 11, 2012

FOPTIMUS PRIME

The Lone Badger posted:

Edit: I'm overcomplicating this. Essentially my question boils down to: people who don't want to be hit with swords used to wear specifically constructed items made of iron, treated leather etc. In the era we now discuss some people have decided that they don't really care about swords any more since they'll probably get shot, and wear no armour. Some other people in this era still don't want to be hit with swords - what has changed that they now favour using multi-purpose items to prevent this rather than purpose-built items?
these people are trying to keep their weight down for the speed and endurance of their horse

Fangz
Jul 5, 2007

Oh I see! This must be the Bad Opinion Zone!

The Lone Badger posted:

Well, looking at the earlier example of musket balls braided into your hair. Lead is a terrible material for armour, it's soft and very heavy and spheres aren't a great shape either. If we take the same weight of steel and make a light mail coif (using thin wire and wide rings to keep weight down) then you've got something that is substantially more protective, sits more evenly on the head, and which can be taken off.

Edit: I'm overcomplicating this. Essentially my question boils down to: people who don't want to be hit with swords used to wear specifically constructed items made of iron, treated leather etc. In the era we now discuss some people have decided that they don't really care about swords any more since they'll probably get shot, and wear no armour. Some other people in this era still don't want to be hit with swords - what has changed that they now favour using multi-purpose items to prevent this rather than purpose-built items?

There's a bunch of factors:

1. There's no longer the infrastructure available to construct enough custom built armour to outfit a large number of units.

2. These soldiers are not calling the shots in terms of their uniform. They can't just go get a cuirass, their commanders will shout at them for not being in uniform, and remind them that they are *light cavalry*, the heavy cavalry are *those guys*.

3. Most of the time, armour isn't worth it in this period. More than 99.99% of your time is not spent fighting, so the whole armour stuff isn't worth it. It's uncomfortable, it's expensive, it has to be looked after... Then one day you realise that you might get into a battle tomorrow, you are in a real risk of being stabbed - that's when people need psychological reassurance, and that's mainly what these improvisations offer.

Geisladisk
Sep 15, 2007

sullat posted:

It's funny how youtube thinks that the next videos I want to watch are Nazi propaganda.

I find it more than a little distressing how Youtube keeps trying to steer me into far right propaganda via recommendations. Most of my Youtube views are music, history (both milhist and non), video games, and miniature painting. Music and miniature painting doesn't seem to lead to any awful poo poo, but gaming and history - Especially WW2 history - seems to be tightly linked to far right poo poo in Youtube's algorithm.

Were I a non-political person without much critical thinking, it would be awfully easy to click on one of these videos out of curiosity and be persuaded by ten minutes of slick propaganda. And if I'd sit through one of these videos, the algorithm would flag me as liking Nazi poo poo and start pushing ever more of it, leading me down a rabbit hole. This isn't even a hypothetical, I've seen this exact situation play out with family members.

Youtube's algorithm prioritizes engagement above all else - After all, Youtube just wants to put ads in front of eyeballs - and conspiracy theorists and far-right people tend to watch a whole lot more Youtube than the average person. So the algorithm places more weight on these videos than others, because they give Youtube more ad revenue. It could even create a feedback loop where growing far-right popularity results in more views on far-right propaganda, resulting in the algorithm giving those videos ever greater weight.

And the far-righters themselves are acutely aware of this and are gaming the algorithm - Videos critical of far-right movements are disliked by organized online groups, resulting in Youtube's algorithm giving them less weight, and thus less viewership.

The unsettling thing is that at no point did a human working for Youtube decide to promote this content - It was an entirely unexpected and amoral decision made by a piece of artificial intelligence designed only to maximize revenue, and an unintended side effect is that Youtube is actively pushing far-right propaganda specifically to people vulnerable to it.

something something capitalism fascism

Geisladisk fucked around with this message at 11:33 on Sep 21, 2018

Fangz
Jul 5, 2007

Oh I see! This must be the Bad Opinion Zone!
Do your bit for the war effort, dislike and blacklist every nazi channel you see.

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008

Epicurius posted:

Well, obviously, you have to feed troops, and sometimes it's not feasible to cook meals for them. So, you give them field rations, for them to carry around with them. They need to be light, calorically dense, and preservable. The US stated giving soldiers prepared ration packs in 1907 with the "Iron ration', which was basically this compressed bar made from wheat and bullion that soldiers could eat raw or boil in water.

I really hope you mean bouillon here and not, like, gold.

KYOON GRIFFEY JR
Apr 12, 2010



Runner-up, TRP Sack Race 2021/22

The Lone Badger posted:

Well, looking at the earlier example of musket balls braided into your hair. Lead is a terrible material for armour, it's soft and very heavy and spheres aren't a great shape either. If we take the same weight of steel and make a light mail coif (using thin wire and wide rings to keep weight down) then you've got something that is substantially more protective, sits more evenly on the head, and which can be taken off.

Edit: I'm overcomplicating this. Essentially my question boils down to: people who don't want to be hit with swords used to wear specifically constructed items made of iron, treated leather etc. In the era we now discuss some people have decided that they don't really care about swords any more since they'll probably get shot, and wear no armour. Some other people in this era still don't want to be hit with swords - what has changed that they now favour using multi-purpose items to prevent this rather than purpose-built items?

you're putting four musket (probably carbine) balls at the end of four braids the incremental weight is negligible and it's created using found items in the soldier's kit and i really doubt that you are going to make a light mail coif of the same weight. plus steel is loving expensive, and soldiers are inexpensive.

i think you're overestimating the amount of agency that your average hussar has in terms of their equipment

to respond to your edit: 1) cost - there were units that used more armor (cuirassiers in particular) and they were loving expensive as hell, and didn't do most of the jobs of cavalry better 2) size of armies - instead of manufacturing maybe a few thousand of these things, you now have a demand for tens of thousands, maybe more, of these things. that creates a manufacturing challenge in addition to a cost problem. 3) conscription and centralized distribution of uniforms, arms, and equipment 4) weight 5) the risk of being hit by a sword is still a lot lower than in previous wars and is far lower than the risk of being shot

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

feedmegin posted:

I really hope you mean bouillon here and not, like, gold.

Well duh, obviously! That was the gold ration.

Epicurius
Apr 10, 2010
College Slice

feedmegin posted:

I really hope you mean bouillon here and not, like, gold.

Early field rations were really expensive... Yes, I meant bouillon.

Cessna
Feb 20, 2013

KHABAHBLOOOM

sullat posted:

It's funny how youtube thinks that the next videos I want to watch are Nazi propaganda.

Huh - the Nazis HATED All Quiet on the Western Front.

SeanBeansShako
Nov 20, 2009

Now the Drums beat up again,
For all true Soldier Gentlemen.

Siivola posted:

Who's going to pay for this well-constructed armour?

The state until their arms contractors whine at them that the current proofing system just is too much and they could save so much more money if they downgrade the quality of the materiel just a bit~

Cessna posted:

Huh - the Nazis HATED All Quiet on the Western Front.

They murdered the writers sister after he fled Germany. Understatement now, but utter bastards.

SeanBeansShako fucked around with this message at 14:36 on Sep 21, 2018

Tunicate
May 15, 2012

Fangz posted:

Do your bit for the war effort, dislike and blacklist every nazi channel you see.

downvotes still count as engagement on youtube

SeanBeansShako
Nov 20, 2009

Now the Drums beat up again,
For all true Soldier Gentlemen.

Don Gato posted:

My top recommendation was a video titled "Native American Genocide was a Myth!" and I hate everyone that it exists.

It's like you go to a middle of the road but very diverse place to eat and the waiter asking you if you would like your rejected suggested meal with a slightly different sauce. Except the sauce is hate and ignorance and you don't want it.

Fangz
Jul 5, 2007

Oh I see! This must be the Bad Opinion Zone!

Tunicate posted:

downvotes still count as engagement on youtube

Oh, huh.

Well, blacklisting channels still help at least. It's not engagement if you never see videos from a channel again.

Libluini
May 18, 2012

I gravitated towards the Greens, eventually even joining the party itself.

The Linke is a party I grudgingly accept exists, but I've learned enough about DDR-history I can't bring myself to trust a party that was once the SED, a party leading the corrupt state apparatus ...
Grimey Drawer

Fangz posted:

Do your bit for the war effort, dislike and blacklist every nazi channel you see.

Reporting their channel for showing Nazi-Propaganda might help more in this case.

Cessna
Feb 20, 2013

KHABAHBLOOOM

FishFood
Apr 1, 2012

Now with brine shrimp!

zoux posted:

Whoa the dude that grabs the wire and then BOOM just hands. Surprised you could be that graphic in 1930. This is also right after movies start having sound, I imagine the constant barrage of explosions and gunfire would've been really impactful to a 1930's era film goer.

A couple of pages ago, but I love this movie. My local library showed it in their theater a few years ago and that movie is still horrifying when projected at that size and with that sound level. I was pretty shocked when I saw it, I grew up watching Hays Code movies so seeing something that visceral and unsettling from that era was something else. I you haven't seen the original All Quiet in the Western Front you absolutely should.

Also, the only effective anti-war movie is Jarhead because there's no combat, just "hurry up and wait" and PTSD.

Ensign Expendable
Nov 11, 2008

Lager beer is proof that god loves us
Pillbug

HEY GUNS posted:

i watch religious poo poo, folk music, and rap, and get nazi propaganda

Folk -> Volk -> Volkisch

I'm sorry you had to find out this way

Arban
Aug 28, 2017

The winged hussars would be taking battle-selfies if they had the technology, wouldn't they.

:thunk:

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

Arban posted:

The winged hussars would be taking battle-selfies if they had the technology, wouldn't they.

:thunk:

Future battlefield archeologists will be looking for GoPros. Well, Syrian civil war has taught that they will get scavenged and uploaded as propaganda immediately, so maybe not. On that note Abu Hajaar and friends should be post-humously awarded for the best anti-war movie of 2016.

Nenonen fucked around with this message at 16:36 on Sep 21, 2018

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

golden bubble posted:

It's been out on the civilian market for a while, but it's finally arrived at the US military. The pizza MRE is here. How did they come up with the idea of the MRE? Is it just a natural outgrowth of the obsession with scientific food in the later 20th century?

I have a thread on MREs and other military food and beverages here. My post on the history of rations:

quote:

As anyone who's even glanced at history would notice, humanity only started its current pace of rapid expansion and technological/cultural evolution in (relatively) extremely recent times. For a very long time, major advancement in food science was on the level of better farming methods or the slow introduction of new foods (like the Columbian Exchange). Food preservation methods worldwide were pretty stagnant for centuries or even millennia and relied on a few basic methods for most of the world:

1. Drying
2. Salting
3. Pickling
4. Freezing (if you had access to snow and ice)
5. Fermentation

Food science and nutrition, likewise, didn't really grasp beyond some easily observable results (like "Maybe we shouldn't eat nothing but bread to stay alive" or "Hm, our slaves do better when they eat more vegetables instead of just scraps of pork and fat") until the mid and late 19th century when scientists like Louis Pasteur conclusively proved that sterilization could stymie food contamination and bacterial growth (as opposed to the old belief in germs spontaneously appearing out of nowhere). Pasteurization and other food preservation methods allowed for longer lasting foods, and the 20th century development of mechanical and chemical-based refrigeration allowed fresh foods to be easily kept in virtually any climate. But before then, you were stuck with a handful of types of meals.


(http://www.lore-and-saga.co.uk/)

To start with, Ancient Roman soldiers carried cooking equipment with them and were expected to make their own meals. That golden saucepan-looking thing is a patera, which acted as a combination drinking vessel, frying pan, and food bowl. Bread could be baked at forts in dome-shaped ovens and both regular loaves of bread and bucellatum (a hard cracker) were carried in general rations; every soldier was given a ration of about 830 grams (1.8 pounds) of unmilled wheat per day for grinding and cooking themselves. Other than that, the actual ingredients were a free for all. Salted and dried meat was always a thing, just like it was back home. Sausages were a common method of meat preservation and making use of trimmings in Rome, so you could expect to see those show up in the mess. Beef was uncommon, as cattle were prized as draft animals and usually only older or injured ones would be slaughtered for food. Historically milk didn't keep well until the creation of pasteurization and common refrigeration, so dairy products would have been hard cheese. Handheld querns (carried on mules, preferably) could be used to grind up grain at camp for baking into crude flatbread or porridge, but it was fully possible to just boil and eat the grain if you were lazy or too busy. Soldiers hunted, fished, farmed, and occasionally pillaged the locals to add whatever was available in the immediate area. Live animals like a herd of cattle could be brought along with a legion, as they provided other resources (like hide and bone) when slaughtered. Wine was the preferred beverage in Rome, but expensive wines were obviously not going to end up in the hands of regular troops. You'd be more likely to find posca, made by mixing low quality or sour wine (or even wine that's turned to vinegar) with water, herbs, and possibly honey. Posca was the common drink of the poor in Rome anyway and it kept discipline to give soldiers crappy watered-down wine (or "wine") instead of something high in alcohol. It also had the benefit of preventing scurvy by providing Vitamin C, a disease that plagued soldiers for a very long time due to lack of knowledge of nutrition.

Actual recipes of the poor and soldiers in Rome aren't known to nearly as high a degree as the recipes of the rich. Who would bother writing down what a farmer ate? Nonetheless, some information is known about what soldiers cooked for themselves. Porridge made from barley, emmer, wheat, or spelt would be the simplest dish and modified with meat like bacon, whatever herbs and spices soldiers could get their hands on, olive oil, and vegetables (including what was foraged or pillaged by the legion). Meat preparation in this period (after washing the salt off) was typically either roasting on a spit, boiling, grilling, or browning in a frying pan. Since rations weren't specially prepared and packaged for soldiers, it was "anything goes" for how you wanted to cook. Toss some bacon in a pan with carrots and sprinkle herbs over the top? Probably done! Boil ground pork with some olive oil to top your gruel with? Go right ahead! The only limitation is your imagination...and, you know, having the ingredients. This could be helped by the longstanding tradition of sutlers, merchants who would follow the army and sell privately to soldiers.

This is kinda how military rations went for most of the past millennium. Soldiers were assigned grain products, meat, cheese, whatever fruit and vegetables was actually available, and the local alcoholic beverage (contrary to common belief, plain water was still drank). Soldiers often had the responsibility of cooking their own food, sometimes beginning with slaughtering the animal it came from. Here we enter the realm of American rations, as a lot of easily available literature covers how they evolved and it mirrors what happened in Europe.

The United States first standardized a garrison ration in the early years of its existence, during and shortly after the Revolutionary War. This ration consisted of:

* Salt beef, salt pork, or salt fish
* Beans, peas, or some other vegetable equivalent
* Bread or flour
* Milk or cheese
* Rice or cornmeal (still called "Indian meal" then)
* Beer, spruce beer, or cider

Soldiers were still preparing their own food and animals were still accompanying the troops, but there was now some idea of what they should nominally be fed. One major flaw was a real lack of fresh food; almost everything was either preserved or shelf stable (like plain grain or flour). This did nothing to keep the soldiers from getting sick or malnourished, and supply lines and food storage methods were still too primitive to reliably get the best stuff to the boys in blue. It wouldn't be until the American Civil War that things really changed, as the country was firmly in the throes of the Industrial Revolution and the Union could more reliably provide a specific ration:

Per Soldier

* 20 oz. of fresh beef, salt beef, or salt pork
* 12 oz. of hardtack in camp or garrison or 16 oz. of hard bread at sea, on campaign, or on the march
* 1 oz. compressed cube of desiccated mixed vegetables or a 1.5 oz. compressed cube of desiccated potatoes if supplemental foods were unavailable

Per 100 rations

* 8 qts of beans or peas
* 10 lbs of rice or hominy
* 10 lbs of green coffee beans or 8 lbs of roasted coffee beans
* 10 lbs of sugar
* 2 qts of salt
* 1 gallon of vinegar

At least, this is what they were supposed to get. In practice, supply line problems meant that soldiers often went without something or had substitutes. You'll also notice that I specified "the Union" up there. The Confederate economic situation is a way bigger topic, but suffice to say they were in a really lovely economic position from start to finish and their troops struggled to get everything they needed. It wasn't unknown for Union and Confederate soldiers to privately trade Northern coffee for Southern tobacco, as the Confederates often had to make substitute coffee from roasted chicory root or acorns. Another major difference was the greater presence of peanuts in Southern rations, which were locally grown.

The frontier foods eaten by soldiers in the Indian Wars on the plains to the west were basically the same. Monotonous and bad tasting, but now supplemented by native-style trail rations like pemmican or jerky (often bison). Pemmican is sort of like a processed form of jerky, made by shredding the dried meat, pounding it into powder, and mixing it with rendered fat and optionally some berries and rolling it into balls or bars. An almost identical diet (with the inclusion of canned food) continued into the Spanish-American War, where food spoilage or outright lack of food was estimated to kill 14 soldiers for every one killed in battle. Serious changes were necessary, but the US military ended up in a much more openly neutral stance leading up to the Great War and didn't really make any huge changes. It even downsized to less than 100,000 active duty soldiers as of 1914. The sudden entry into World War I finally gave everyone the kick in the rear end needed to improve.



Since 1907, the US Army already had the Iron Ration. This was the emergency personal ration carried by every soldier to provide a day of food. It consisted of three 3 oz. cakes made by mixing wheat with beef bouillon powder, three 1 oz. bars of chocolate, and some salt and pepper all in a sealed tin packet. Upon America's entry into the war, the Trench Ration was introduced. This was nothing but canned foods sealed in canvas-covered tin box. As you can expect it was bulky and heavy to cart around and the soldiers (as they often did until recently) grew tired of the monotony. The Reserve Ration was introduced the same year, first as a supplemental and then replacement (in 1922) of the Iron Ration. The Reserve Ration set the tone for most of the 20th century: canned meat and bread, coffee with sugar, salt, and some loose tobacco (later, commercial cigarettes). This ration continued to evolve, with items being removed or added, until 1938.

World War II brought the famous letter system for rations:

* A-rations are freshly made food at the base mess hall, basically identical to home cooking or restaurant kitchen stuff.
* B-rations are prepared meals made in field kitchens with shelf stable preserved foods (canned, dried, or otherwise requiring no refrigeration)
* C-rations are individual ready-to-eat canned meals carried by soldiers.



C-rations were the proverbial bread and butter of World War II soldiers, as they were eaten any time they were away from base without a field kitchen. C-rations may get mocked, but they were revolutionary compared to other nations. Most of the rest of the world was still following the same standard from the 19th century or even earlier, with soldiers simply being assigned a certain amount of particular foods and having it tossed at them. The Japanese gain extra inconvenience points for actually making soldiers cook their own food in their mess kits on a regular basis, rather than just away from base, and outright expecting soldiers to forage, fish, hunt, and steal from the locals to supplement what they got. The Germans and Soviets both suffered massive supply difficulties when each had the upper hand, to the point where German soldiers at the Battle of the Bulge were struggling just to get basic amounts of canned pork and hard bread to avoid hunger pangs.

On the other hand, the American love of standardization and excellent industrial and logistics capability allowed them to provide plenty of mass produced food. C-rations were divided into a handful of specific menus with a unique combination of meat item, bread, dessert, and supplementals like candy and coffee. Field kitchens were so common that the American mess kit resembles a folding, round lunch tray only really suitable for having food ladled into it (whereas the German mess kit that almost everyone in Europe and Japan copied was a small pot with a lid that served as a small frying pan and eating bowl). Everyone got standardized meals at all times, with little need to forage around or try to bayonet a trout.

There were a few other rations, like 5-in-1 and 10-in-1 group feeding rations, and some experimental designs like the Assault Lunch (a bunch of candy and snacks for high calorie feeding on short notice) and the Type X (a secretive experimental ration for commando operations and invasions), but the most famous are D-rations and K-rations.



D-rations were developed by Hershey as a high-calorie emergency food bar for soldiers and pilots. The ingredients are easily available and the recipe publicly available, so feel free to make your own. The requirements unfortunately specified a bland taste to prevent the 600 calorie bar from being casually eaten as a snack, and Hershey erred too far on the side of unpalatability and created something so bitter that most soldiers hated it. The recipe also created an incredibly thick paste that became tooth-breakingly hard after cooling in the molds. As you can see on the wrapper, it was advised that you eat it slowly over a long period of time or melt it into a hot chocolate drink instead of just trying to shove the whole thing in your face.



K-rations are one of the few total flops in ration design. They were designed for commandos and paratroopers to provide a very light, compact, and nutritionally balanced meal. They had lightweight components like candy, D-ration bars (or regular chocolate bars), bouillon cubes, canned meat (including Spam!), and dextrose or malted milk tablets. Unfortunately, the rations were tested in the United States in very easy and relaxing marching conditions and declared good to go before being sent to soldiers living and fighting constantly in the jungle. The K-rations didn't provide nearly as much caloric content or nutrients as the soldiers actually needed, and the soldiers in nations like Burma who ended up living on them for extended periods of time suffered from malnutrition and major weight loss.

The Vietnam War saw minor changes, so minor that the new Meal, Combat, Individual rations were still called C-rations by the soldiers.



MCI rations were practically the same as the old C-rations, just with more menu variety and components. Like the C-ration, they were derided as monotonous and bad tasting. The military partnered with, of all companies, the McIlheny Company that makes Tabasco Sauce to send copies of the Charlie Ration Cookbook to Vietnam. The book came with a miniature bottle of Tabasco and had recipes that could be made using just Tabasco and C-ration components. They also included optional ingredients like flour, cooking oil, and new meats like chicken that the soldiers were expected (with the aid of racist caricatures in the book) to pilfer from the locals if given the opportunity. War never changes, I guess.

MCIs lasted up until the 1980s officially (no clue when the last stocks were sold or eaten, though). The Meal, Ready-to-Eat was introduced as special issue in 1982 and standard issue in 1986 as a replacement for the canned diet.



The early MREs were mostly different from MCIs in how they were packaged and had a fairly similar set of menus. The major difference was that flexible pouches replaced cans and everything was compacted to easily fit in a tear-open bag. Unlike many foreign rations which are packaged for 24 hours, an MRE is a single meal. If you're living off of them, 3 per day is what you'll likely need if you're engaged in high activity. In practice, the military continues to feed from kitchens when not out in the field working or fighting. The Tailored Operational Training Meal (TOTM) is a slightly cheaper variant of the MRE that acts as a sort of sack lunch substitute while on base, and they're sold for low prices to anyone with access to the Exchange stores in the same way that you'd buy microwave meals around here. Since the 90s, every ration has also included a Flameless Ration Heater that reacts with water to heat up the pouches placed inside.

These aren't the only rations in American use, despite the prominence of the MRE. The Meal, Cold Weather and Long Range Patrol ration are nearly identical lightweight rations with freeze-dried entrees (think Mountain House). They're meant for use in extremely cold or hot weather where normal MRE components and cooking methods are unsuitable, or for special forces units that require very lightweight food.



The First Strike Ration is the same concept as the canceled WW2 Assault Lunch. It consists of ready-to-eat foods that require no cooking (such as Bridgford pocket sandwiches, Starkist tuna pouches, candy, and nuts) for those action-packed days when you can't really sit down and eat with a spoon or try to cook anything.


New developments are still ongoing. The most noticeable is that MRE menus evolve every year; new menus are brought in and old or unpopular ones are taken out. Whereas the C-rations and MCI rations had a generic Midwest American diet, MREs are always incorporating new ethnic cuisines like Mexican, Indian, and Chinese and the various regional American cuisines to appeal to a wider variety of soldiers. Experiments are being conducted with waterless ration heaters, which merely require exposure to air to spontaneously heat. The most promising and infamous development is likely MRE pizza, which is expected to hit the bags in 2017. It's surprisingly hard to actually make shelf stable pizza.

HEY GUNS
Oct 11, 2012

FOPTIMUS PRIME
you can eat carrots in whatever period you want but pre-17th c they have to be purple, the orange ones are modern

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008

HEY GUNS posted:

you can eat carrots in whatever period you want but pre-17th c they have to be purple, the orange ones are modern

What if you're reenacting the Nazca Empire?

FastestGunAlive
Apr 7, 2010

Dancing palm tree.
Awesome post chitoryu. I’d like to mention that in addition to modern MREs we have t rats (tray rations?) which are sealed trays that get heated up in hot water in field kitchens. Still get that weird MRES vacuum seal taste and smell but it’s generally a nicer alternative to an MRE. The b rats you mention reminded me of them, although these are just ready meals in a single tray to allow buffet style/mass serving rather than canned/preserved goods.

Mr Luxury Yacht
Apr 16, 2012


One of the better YouTubers who taste test MREs and 'vintage' rations (steve1989mre), managed to find a British Boer War era iron ration. Canned chocolate and preserved meat.

Surprisingly, parts of the meat were still edible in a technical sense after 118 years (as in it tasted weird, but still vaguely meaty and he didn't get sick). Ditto for the civil war era hard tack he found. Food preservation can be a hell of a thing.

I wish I could find as much joy in something as that guy has in eating old freeze dried food from the 70s. The excitement he had at finding edible mid-cold war era fudge dessert was just so heartwarming.

Mr Luxury Yacht fucked around with this message at 18:49 on Sep 21, 2018

wdarkk
Oct 26, 2007

Friends: Protected
World: Saved
Crablettes: Eaten
Link?

Mr Luxury Yacht
Apr 16, 2012



https://youtu.be/jZoHuMwZwTk

Nuclear War
Nov 7, 2012

You're a pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty girl
Re field kitchens: a few years ago I wandered bleary eyed and exhausted over to a UK reservist unit on exercise with my own unit and there was a fat guy in a wifebeater within the cordon cooking bacon like I'd wandered into some weird pub. Since then I've always just assumed thats how it works in the British army.

FastestGunAlive
Apr 7, 2010

Dancing palm tree.
Cross trained with the Thai Marines and they had a field kitchen with a cook who would go to the village every day to get ingredients. I always made sure to just happen to be around their position at dinner time so I could be offered some rice and chicken feet. Way better than MREs.

My grandpa (born in the Philippines) worked as a supply sergeant in the US Army during Korea. He and a fellow Filipino “requisitioned” a truck full of winter clothes and visited a nearby Philippine Army unit, who were not prepared for the Korean winter, to trade for some home cooking

Getting food from your allies - a military and family tradition

sullat
Jan 9, 2012
Do US troops still have to wait for contractors to show up before they can get hot food?

Mr Enderby
Mar 28, 2015

Nuclear War posted:

Re field kitchens: a few years ago I wandered bleary eyed and exhausted over to a UK reservist unit on exercise with my own unit and there was a fat guy in a wifebeater within the cordon cooking bacon like I'd wandered into some weird pub. Since then I've always just assumed thats how it works in the British army.

I was in the cadet force at school, and we went out to a few training camps with the regular British army. I remember the canteen food being so loving good. Mountains of chips with every meal. Curry with diced raw onion and dried coconut. Lasagna with garlic bread, and more chips. All in unlimited quantities. For a sixteen year old, it was stodge heaven.

Also when we went out on exercises, we got 24 hour ration packs, but we were only out for the night, so you got to eat 4,000 calories in about fourteen hours, then come back to baked beans, sausage, fried bread and eggs for breakfast.

In retrospect it was probably all pretty grim, but it certainly beat boarding school food. These days I can eat chips whenever I want, but I can't buy hunger.

bewbies
Sep 23, 2003

Fun Shoe

sullat posted:

Do US troops still have to wait for contractors to show up before they can get hot food?

This...hasn't ever been the case? Most company/battery/troop size units have a couple of cooks and a mobile kitchen. They actually make some pretty good stuff.

sullat
Jan 9, 2012

bewbies posted:

This...hasn't ever been the case? Most company/battery/troop size units have a couple of cooks and a mobile kitchen. They actually make some pretty good stuff.

It was apparently a problem in the initial invasion
of Iraq, at least I remember it being reported as such. Troops would get to where they were stationed and be stuck eating MREs because the contractors that were to provide food and laundry didn't show up because it was too dangerous.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

bewbies posted:

This...hasn't ever been the case? Most company/battery/troop size units have a couple of cooks and a mobile kitchen. They actually make some pretty good stuff.

Also MREs come with flameless ration heaters, so if you have water and you're not lazy you can get a hot meal with little effort. It may not be a tray full of pork chops or something, but it's hot and tastes no worse than commercial canned food.

Agean90
Jun 28, 2008


just watched florida man eat a chunk of beef that's older than the Titanic, thanks thread!

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

Agean90 posted:

just watched florida man eat a chunk of beef that's older than the Titanic, thanks thread!

Not gonna lie, I would too if I could find it for sale or trade. I've run through most of the easily available international MREs and all the old ones are pretty much just gross old Vietnam C-rations.

Mazz
Dec 12, 2012

Orion, this is Sperglord Actual.
Come on home.

Agean90 posted:

just watched florida man eat a chunk of beef that's older than the Titanic, thanks thread!

Just spent like an hour going through some, his attitude about it all is just hilarious and makes it that much better.

Reading about that MRE pizza and how long to get right, seeing that on there was neat.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Milo and POTUS
Sep 3, 2017

I will not shut up about the Mighty Morphin Power Rangers. I talk about them all the time and work them into every conversation I have. I built a shrine in my room for the yellow one who died because sadly no one noticed because she died around 9/11. Wanna see it?

chitoryu12 posted:

I have a thread on MREs and other military food and beverages here. My post on the history of rations:

This thread was great but it's a shame we've run out of easily/cheaply available foreign rations

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5