Doctor Spaceman posted:

https://twitter.com/gritfish/status/1058942485957816321

ExecuDork posted:

Where in NSW? And where were you working? UNE is pretty international and seems more multicultural than, say, most of New England.

My contract is for 3 years and my fiancé will be doing her PhD at UNE, also for 3 years. So maybe we'll get chased out by the howling mob in 2022. We're pretty frickin' white, though, so we might be able to hide our filthy foreign SJW ways for a little while.

SMILLENNIALSMILLEN posted:

Haha did everybody miss this?

https://twitter.com/Republic_Nauru/status/1055365744223895552?s=19

What us going on in that first picture?

quote:

Peta Credlin
November 3, 2018 11:00pm
Subscriber only

IF you’d thought that so much of this talk about desperate asylum seekers on Nauru and Manus is just cover for a racket, you’d be right, at least for some of them.

Last week it transpired that 71 of the boat people on Nauru have refused an offer of resettlement in the US. These are people who have been found to be refugees with a “well-founded fear of persecution” in their homeland, and they’ve been on Nauru for five years already.

Yet they’ve knocked back America. If Nauru is the hellhole of rampant, suicide-inducing mental illness that the refugee activists claim, why would 71 boat people refuse to go to the “land of the free”?

These are refugees who supposedly can’t go back home. They’ve been stuck on this supposed prison island for five years (although I’ve been there, and I dispute it’s anything like how it gets described in the media here, mostly by people who’ve never set a foot on the place); yet they say no to the US? For people who are allegedly desperate, they’re incredibly picky about which safe, new, First World country they’ll accept.

There are millions of people languishing in refugee camps, particularly vulnerable women and children, who would grab the chance of life in America — but not these 71.

Apparently, these refugees knocked back the US when they heard they would have to work and would not receive welfare. They’re not even economic migrants; they’re welfare migrants, forum shopping for best taxpayer-funded lifestyle.

And this is precisely why the Morrison government needs to be very careful about giving in to the bleeding-heart lobby and bringing all the boat people with children to Australia. Once they’re here, refugee activists and their lawyers will make it impossible for them to go back to Nauru. Sort out medical issues, of course; allow it to be a backdoor entry ruse, no way!

To date, 46 babies have been born in Nauru and what you don’t want is the unintended consequence of children being used as an immigration bargaining chip, or loaded on to leaky boats in the first place.

Last week we had another glimpse into how courts and tribunals are being manipulated to get around our immigration rules, but it wasn’t for people who’d risked their lives to come to Australia in leaky boats.

Instead, it was confirmed that more than 200 Commonwealth Games athletes and officials (mostly from African countries) have applied for asylum in Australia. Their country thought highly enough of them to send them abroad as sports ambassadors but now they’re saying that they can’t go back because of fear of persecution. And as usual, our system is accommodating them.

After their initial applications were refused, 184 of them are appealing the decision and, like the boat people on Nauru and Manus, they’re largely being sustained by you the taxpayer.

So far $300,000 has been spent on legal aid and $1.3 million keeping them in detention or supporting them in the community. And there’ll be millions and millions more spent, before these cases are dealt with.

Our system is absurdly generous. Yes, we are a decent country where people are given a fair go. But when boat people in Australia’s care knock back America because they can’t go on welfare and Commonwealth Games athletes milk the system to stay in Australia, we are being taken for a ride. At least Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton and Attorney-General Christian Porter have now commissioned ex-High Court judge Ian Callinan to review the administrative appeals system to stop it from being gamed.

The basic problem, though, is that all of our systems are set up to give the bad guy the benefit of the doubt. No one wants Australia to stop being Australian, and to lose that easygoing generosity of spirit and welcome for people who come here to have a go and join the team. But we really must get better at sorting out the sheep from the goats. And it shouldn’t take small armies of taxpayer-funded lawyers to do it.

Right now, our court system has immigration appeals listed right out until 2021. It’s not good that people won’t have their cases heard for three years; but it’s even worse that immigration applicants don’t mind, because they’re looked after by the taxpayer in the meantime, and have opportunities to get married, have children and otherwise make it harder and harder for them to be sent back.

If it’s time to clear the offshore processing centres, it’s also time to change the definition of who can claim asylum and who is a refugee. At the very least, if you’ve come here under false pretences, or if you’ve skipped through several countries before landing in Australia, you’re not an asylum seeker and you can’t be a refugee; you’re a would-be economic migrant and should be sent straight back home. It is fair enough to want to live here, who wouldn’t? But apply like thousands of other people do and come through the front door.

SMILLENNIALSMILLEN posted:

Haha did everybody miss this?

https://twitter.com/Republic_Nauru/status/1055365744223895552?s=19

What us going on in that first picture?

Anidav posted:

quote:

NOTE: I was planning to make an announcement soon about my career. Given this post - and the wilful misreporting about Sky - I should make absolutely clear that my plans were made and discussed with many relevant people BEFORE Ross was sacked. What has happened and what I will do are unrelated.

I would blow Dane Cook posted:

After melting down about Ross Cameron, Andrew bolt posted this:


https://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andrew-bolt/in-defence-of-sacked-ross-cameron/news-story/13fda6fc2b2f868e5510a7717111dacd

SMILLENNIALSMILLEN posted:

Seriously what is up with that picture and it's shadow tree?


https://twitter.com/hypnoyouellie/status/1055708239688421376?s=19

https://twitter.com/hypnoyouellie/status/947643487427600384?s=19

ModernMajorGeneral posted:

This talking point of 'Detention camps are good, look at all the mental health services refugees have access to' is breaking new ground in stupidity.

I guess ''Australia treats Indigenous people well, look at all the money we spend on their health services' is not that different.

SMILLENNIALSMILLEN posted:

What us going on in that first picture?

SMILLENNIALSMILLEN posted:

hambeet posted:

gently caress he's gonna run for parliament

hambeet posted:

gently caress he's gonna run for parliament

SMILLENNIALSMILLEN posted:

Seriously what is up with that picture and it's shadow tree?


https://twitter.com/hypnoyouellie/status/1055708239688421376?s=19

https://twitter.com/hypnoyouellie/status/947643487427600384?s=19

You Am I posted:

Ah Queensland. Probably tries to filter out the fluoride in their water.

Zenithe posted:

Jokes on you. Some parts of QLD don't have fluoride in the water

You Am I posted:

Looks like a bad use of the lasso tool in Photoshop

Ah Queensland. Probably tries to filter out the fluoride in their water.
Not for the Liberal Party, he's been kicked out of it. That leaves One Nation, KAP or Independent.

quote:

All sporting codes, clubs and civic groups when playing the anthem should announce - as a mark of respect for our flag, nation and forebears - particularly the ANZACs and our soldiers - a request that Australians stand for the playing of the anthem.

Divisive Muslim-Australian and boxer Anthony Mundine sought to promote his bout with working class Australian boxing success story Jeff Horn using divisive identity politics. Mundine said Horn had got to where he was due to 'white privilege' and that Mundine would not stand for the Australian national anthem at their bout, saying it was a 'white supremacy' song. Our Facebook polldemonstrated that Australians strongly disagree and believe Australians should stand for the national anthem.

The Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet protocols for playing the anthem are deficient, merely saying it is 'customary to stand'. There is no positive expectation or direction from the PM's office that Australians should be asked to stand out of respect.

Knorth posted:

https://twitter.com/Lobes/status/1057850507446763520

quote:

Cameron: So I wanted to ask my co-host Rowan, is China a strategic threat to Australia?

Rowan Dean: Of course it is.

Ross Cameron: What evidence do you rely upon?

Rowan Dean: Because it is not a democracy, it is a totalitarian dictatorship, therefore by definition, absolute power will corrupt somewhere down the line - maybe it already has -any democracy must approach a non-democracy with caution. You’d be silly not to...