|
mycomancy posted:Easy, the person who has hoarded resources that equal a small town's population's savings, that's who's evil. small?
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 17:25 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 11:03 |
|
Jeff Bezos has hoarded the wealth equivalent to the GDP of a medium-sized country, not the savings of a small town lol E: beaten
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 17:33 |
|
qkkl posted:Who's more evil, the person who doesn't want to share, or the person who wants to kill the person who doesn't want to share? The person who doesnt want to share.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 17:34 |
|
mycomancy posted:Easy, the person who has hoarded resources that equal a small town's population's savings, that's who's evil. What has Bezos done that would constitute an act of class warfare? For example I would consider hiring Pinkertons to massacre employees who are striking to be an act of class warfare.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 17:34 |
|
qkkl posted:What has Bezos done that would constitute an act of class warfare? For example I would consider hiring Pinkertons to massacre employees who are striking to be an act of class warfare. hoarding enough wealth to be considered a god and waging war against his employees who want to unionize is class warfare
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 17:36 |
|
qkkl posted:Who's more evil, the person who doesn't want to share, or the person who wants to kill the person who doesn't want to share? The person who stole value from others and now pretends it's mean to force him to "share"
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 17:38 |
|
qkkl posted:What has Bezos done that would constitute an act of class warfare? For example I would consider hiring Pinkertons to massacre employees who are striking to be an act of class warfare. Keeping a workforce of underprivileged people in a state of controlled poverty that makes them barely above slaves in agency. Also gently caress you.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 17:39 |
|
qkkl posted:What has Bezos done that would constitute an act of class warfare? For example I would consider hiring Pinkertons to massacre employees who are striking to be an act of class warfare. lol he’s literally said he has so much money he doesn’t know what to do with it at the same time that his employees are living out of their cars without healthcare
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 17:42 |
|
bob dobbs is dead posted:small? Look I was posting on the toilet, sorry I didn't quote exact figures. But yeah qkkl please go gently caress yourself with your sealioning
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 17:43 |
|
I'd be more scared of someone who wants to kill than someone who doesn't want to share. Imagine what other things that person might want to kill for.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 17:51 |
|
qkkl posted:I'd be more scared of someone who wants to kill than someone who doesn't want to share. Imagine what other things that person might want to kill for. gently caress off oval office.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 17:53 |
|
qkkl posted:I'd be more scared of someone who wants to kill than someone who doesn't want to share. Imagine what other things that person might want to kill for. yes you should be afraid and make sure to share so they don't get mad and come for you
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 17:55 |
|
qkkl posted:I'd be more scared of someone who wants to kill than someone who doesn't want to share. Imagine what other things that person might want to kill for. the only reason the person who doesn't want to share doesn't want to kill you is because you make the things that they own and don't want to share.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 17:55 |
|
qkkl posted:I'd be more scared of someone who wants to kill than someone who doesn't want to share. Imagine what other things that person might want to kill for. gently caress off. Bezos has caused untold amounts of human suffering for his own selfish greed.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 17:57 |
|
The "share" dialog is a ploy to reduce massive wealth inequality to the level of children squabbling over a toy. Bezos et al. aren't "not sharing," they're extracting wealth and value out of their workers and hoarding it. How many suicides have they caused? How many children cannot live up to their full potential because their households have been disrupted by this wealth extraction? loving the lot of them along with their apologists.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:01 |
|
Quote isn't edit
mycomancy has issued a correction as of 18:09 on Nov 4, 2018 |
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:02 |
|
Quote isn't edit v2, goddamn I'm bad at posting today.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:09 |
|
qkkl posted:I'd be more scared of someone who wants to kill than someone who doesn't want to share. Imagine what other things that person might want to kill for.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:11 |
|
qkkl posted:What has Bezos done that would constitute an act of class warfare? Look at this post lmao
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:13 |
|
Not sharing will cause the death of many others.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:15 |
|
qkkl posted:I'd be more scared of someone who wants to kill than someone who doesn't want to share. Imagine what other things that person might want to kill for. This is kind of the point.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:16 |
|
qkkl posted:I'd be more scared of someone who wants to kill than someone who doesn't want to share. Imagine what other things that person might want to kill for. You'd be right to be scared you piss stain.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:16 |
|
qkkl posted:I'd be more scared of someone who wants to kill than someone who doesn't want to share. Imagine what other things that person might want to kill for. this isn’t a binary though because not sharing kills people
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:17 |
|
qkkl posted:I'd be more scared of someone who wants to kill than someone who doesn't want to share. Imagine what other things that person might want to kill for. keep shaking bootlicker
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:18 |
|
mycomancy posted:The "share" dialog is a ploy to reduce massive wealth inequality to the level of children squabbling over a toy. What would the workers be doing if they weren't being exploited by capital? Any worker that doesn't work for themselves is going to be exploited by their employer, because otherwise there would be no point in hiring people if you have to pay them exactly the value that they produce. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:21 |
|
qkkl posted:What would the workers be doing if they weren't being exploited by capital? Any worker that doesn't work for themselves is going to be exploited by their employer, because otherwise there would be no point in hiring people if you have to pay them exactly the value that they produce. goddamn you have a real lack of imagination dude
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:24 |
|
qkkl posted:What would the workers be doing if they weren't being exploited by capital? Any worker that doesn't work for themselves is going to be exploited by their employer, because otherwise there would be no point in hiring people if you have to pay them exactly the value that they produce. burrrrrrrrrrrr durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr hyuk
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:25 |
|
qkkl posted:What would the workers be doing if they weren't being exploited by capital? Any worker that doesn't work for themselves is going to be exploited by their employer, because otherwise there would be no point in hiring people if you have to pay them exactly the value that they produce. gently caress off sealion, I'm not explaining Marxist theory to you.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:26 |
|
qkkl posted:What would the workers be doing if they weren't being exploited by capital? Any worker that doesn't work for themselves is going to be exploited by their employer, because otherwise there would be no point in hiring people if you have to pay them exactly the value that they produce.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:26 |
|
I feel like it's kind of rare for someone posting in defense of capitalism to explicitly say that exploiting people is cool and good
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:27 |
|
qkkl posted:What would the workers be doing if they weren't being exploited by capital? Lmao
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:27 |
|
i'd be flying around being a bounty hunter in space right now if it wasnt for the fact i had to staff the american outfitters for 4 hours a week with my 8th part time job
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:28 |
|
'Without our feudal lord whose lands would we farm??' but unironically just lmao
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:29 |
|
qkkl posted:What would the workers be doing if they weren't being exploited by capital? Any worker that doesn't work for themselves is going to be exploited by their employer, because otherwise there would be no point in hiring people if you have to pay them exactly the value that they produce. Real answer: A little bit of exploitation is inevitable and can be tolerated. Like owners earning a bit more than their workers. Exploitation to the point people are stuck in an endless cycle of poverty isn't fine. Like owners earning 100x what their indentured servants are paid.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:45 |
|
qkkl posted:What would the workers be doing if they weren't being exploited by capital? Any worker that doesn't work for themselves is going to be exploited by their employer, because otherwise there would be no point in hiring people if you have to pay them exactly the value that they produce. What if, get this, the workers owned the means of production? Can't be exploited when you're working for yourself.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:49 |
|
Ok I came up with a reason why an employer would want to hire workers even if they had to be paid exactly the value they created. The situation would be where alone the employer could not produce any value, but with the combined efforts of workers some value could be produced, so if the employer was also one of the workers then they'd get some small value out of hiring workers. The tricky part is determining how much value each worker produces, because you want to pay them exactly the value they produce, otherwise they're either being given wealth they didn't produce or are having wealth extracted from them. Bezos detractors are merely arguing that the value he creates is much less than the value he is given.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:54 |
|
qkkl posted:Ok I came up with a reason why an employer would want to hire workers even if they had to be paid exactly the value they created. The situation would be where alone the employer could not produce any value, but with the combined efforts of workers some value could be produced, so if the employer was also one of the workers then they'd get some small value out of hiring workers. this reason is stupid and youre stupid
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:55 |
|
if youre some kind of a gimmick or something its really bad and not funny but also not infuriating because im sure youll be dead in the first days of climate change wars due to letting everyone have your stuff since you cant work for it
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:56 |
|
qkkl posted:Ok I came up with a reason why an employer would want to hire workers even if they had to be paid exactly the value they created. The situation would be where alone the employer could not produce any value, but with the combined efforts of workers some value could be produced, so if the employer was also one of the workers then they'd get some small value out of hiring workers. If there was some way that you could jump up your own rear end in a top hat and vanish I'd suggest you do that.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 18:58 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 11:03 |
|
World War Mammories posted:I feel like it's kind of rare for someone posting in defense of capitalism to explicitly say that exploiting people is cool and good yall keep takin the bait
|
# ? Nov 4, 2018 19:01 |