|
Shame Boy posted:
Nah it's fine now. Australia still has shockingly bad internet but NZ has joined the rest of the world in terms of speed. It's still expensive though but prices are lower now than they were 5 years ago so e: shittiest page snipe ever, here: voiceless anal fricative has issued a correction as of 23:16 on Nov 8, 2018 |
# ? Nov 8, 2018 23:12 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 22:31 |
|
starkebn posted:but they seems so transparently added to tank bills people don't like yeah that's specifically called a "poison pill" and is used just for that. It's really funny though when one side completely misjudges poo poo like Dems: "Sure, we're okay with dismantling the Iran deal and with it the last of Obama's legacy.... IF YOU ALSO SANCTION RUSSIA!!!!" Republicans: "Okay" Dems: "B-but..!"
|
# ? Nov 8, 2018 23:12 |
|
starkebn posted:this isn't really the right place for this, but why on earth can such disparate things be amendments to bills? Shouldn't amendments be about the substantial legislation being passed? Not "Should we ban offshore drilling? And oh, that means we can also take you grannies' medication when she has her 70th birthday" how do you judge what's relevant? does the legislature vote on it? then you've just moved the vote on the amendment to a vote on whether the amendment should be voted on, adding an opportunity for succ to go "i would have voted for it if it had actually come up but we couldn't bring it to the floor tee-hee" or conversely "i didn't vote for it, i only made sure that it got a fair up-or-down vote" does the committee from which the legislation originated vote on it? then you need to rework how committees work or it will only take one succ to torpedo any bill does an appointed scholar or panel thereof make the call? if they're appointed for long terms you've got all the problems of the supreme court, even if they're appointed per session it basically codifies the hastert rule do you just limit the length of bills? most things considered at the federal or state level are pretty loving complex, this limits the ability of the government to actually fix things rather than just "the congress resolves that x should not be dicks" it also opens up plenty of general fuckery like "this is a budget bill not a foreign policy bill, amending the line item for bombs to include 'shall not be sold on to Saudi Arabia if we know they're going to be dropped on Yemen' is outside the purview" or "senator manchin agrees with us that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant, so even though you can probably whip him to vote for the clean air act as a whole you're not getting action on global warming in it" it's also both deeply antidemocratic, and opens the pandora's box of allowing a legislature to restrict a future legislature's actions - there's a reason that even the most hallowed traditional rules of the house and senate are re-passed each session and technically optional, while actual hard restrictions on their powers derive from either explicit constitutional provisions (nominally the will of the people) or the ability of other branches to refrain from enforcing.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2018 23:15 |
|
Mandoric posted:how do you judge what's relevant? Seems like something for the judiciary. It's another "only in America" problem so handwaving about "oh what can be done???" is a bit silly.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2018 23:19 |
|
bike tory posted:Seems like something for the judiciary. It's another "only in America" problem so handwaving about "oh what can be done???" is a bit silly. so you're suggesting judicial review for every amendment, in a system which has decade-long struggles (not just in america, but worldwide) over the small fraction of bills which are passed and found objectionable for other reasons? and you're suggesting it be done by legacy appointees, ie that for the next 40 years bret kavanaugh and his four closest friends retain entirely subjective, not even bound by precedent or constitutional law but purely based on judgment calls, over anything a blue house and senate want to do under president sanders in 2026, or a that other red house and senate want to do under general secretary carter in 2054? and you want this so much you're willing to enshrine the legal theory that congresses can restrain future congresses, which moves the bar for the constitutional amendment process down to 218 reps and 50 senators? so once you get your way we can immediately have permanent paygo and bans on universal healthcare/recognizing trans individuals/ever decriminalizing drugs?
|
# ? Nov 8, 2018 23:33 |
|
Whoa dude you're extrapolating pretty insanely, take some deep breaths or step away from the keyboard or something
|
# ? Nov 8, 2018 23:38 |
|
the important thing is that our current system of wildly attaching unrelated things to each other in order to cynically ensure they pass is good
|
# ? Nov 8, 2018 23:39 |
|
Frog Act posted:the important thing is that our current system of wildly attaching unrelated things to each other in order to cynically ensure they pass is good Yeah, look at Florida. They accidentally banned indoor vaping trying to save offshore drilling. The system works.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2018 23:42 |
|
bike tory posted:Whoa dude you're extrapolating pretty insanely, take some deep breaths or step away from the keyboard or something nah, your idea's just that already-hashed-over and unfortunate
|
# ? Nov 8, 2018 23:43 |
|
bike tory posted:It's another "only in America" problem so handwaving about "oh what can be done???" is a bit silly.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2018 23:44 |
|
if we convened a commission of the wisest political scientists and asked them to concoct a system for parliamentary procedure, they would reconstruct our current system exactly because anything else means judicial review for everything and is obviously madness
|
# ? Nov 8, 2018 23:44 |
|
Judiciary oversight would be cool, but not in a pre-modern country like the US where so called judges are just thuggish enforcers for various
|
# ? Nov 8, 2018 23:47 |
|
When the Confederates were writing up their Constitution (ie, taking the US Constitution and writing in more SLAVERY R GUD), they actually made bill riders illegal. "Every law or resolution having the force of law, shall relate to but one subject, and that shall be expressed in the title."
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 01:20 |
|
Byzantine posted:When the Confederates were writing up their Constitution (ie, taking the US Constitution and writing in more SLAVERY R GUD), they actually made bill riders illegal. I can't see why this isn't enough
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 01:37 |
|
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 01:53 |
|
ok i laughed at this one
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 01:55 |
|
i could lick a peach scoop for hours
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 02:20 |
|
Taintrunner posted:the defenses of slavery before emancipation are pretty incredible “we’re like, doing them a favor, maaaaan” This is still a thing I see in Australia today whenever aboriginal groups try to push for stuff like protection of sacred sites - 'Those [insert slur] should be more grateful instead of gunking up the legal system over a bunch of lovely cave scratchings'. bike tory posted:e: shittiest page snipe ever, here: Both his hands are full so he can't actually operate the device.
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 02:31 |
|
Moridin920 posted:Yeah riders are dumb bullshit but lol they're not new nor illegal Yeah they showed me that in civics class to demonstrate a fillibuster but it was more like 'oh, even in the 50s nobody gave a poo poo about what their voters wanted'
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 02:48 |
|
bike tory posted:Nah it's fine now. Australia still has shockingly bad internet but NZ has joined the rest of the world in terms of speed. It's still expensive though but prices are lower now than they were 5 years ago so Well that's good to know, though I don't think they can really do much about latency unless they change the speed of light and that tends to be the thing I gripe about the most Anyway my friend lives in northern California which is currently very much on fire. One town over is Paradise, California, which is a great name because it produced this picture: global_warming.png
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 03:29 |
|
Shame Boy posted:Well that's good to know, though I don't think they can really do much about latency unless they change the speed of light and that tends to be the thing I gripe about the most paradise is a shithole. its also exactly like the town i live in but a little hillier and less mountainy. we're not on fire but we do have the cool thing where its 40 degrees and windy but wont rain or snow so its still extreme fire danger
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 03:59 |
|
TheMostFrench posted:This is still a thing I see in Australia today whenever aboriginal groups try to push for stuff like protection of sacred sites - 'Those [insert slur] should be more grateful instead of gunking up the legal system over a bunch of lovely cave scratchings'. You can watch porn with both your hands full. E: Well I can at least heeyyyoooooo
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 04:00 |
|
Shame Boy posted:Well that's good to know, though I don't think they can really do much about latency unless they change the speed of light and that tends to be the thing I gripe about the most Eh again, it's not that bad. Unless you're into actual pro-tier gaming you'll find enough people and competition playing on NZ/Aus servers with sub-100ms latencies.
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 04:23 |
|
Larry Parrish posted:paradise is a shithole. Yeah I'm aware that everything around Chico is rural meth wasteland, the point is it's a sign that says "Paradise" which is on fire
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 05:33 |
|
bike tory posted:Eh again, it's not that bad. Unless you're into actual pro-tier gaming you'll find enough people and competition playing on NZ/Aus servers with sub-100ms latencies. I'm not actually all that into online games tbh I'm just a super dork that does super dork networking bullshit as a hobby. I'd probably be fine with NZ internet but I'm spoiled right now with a fiber connection that can ping my VPS up in New Jersey in <10ms. I haven't seen pings over 100ms very often at all since I left my parents' lovely DSL years ago, so that would take some... adjustment
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 05:46 |
|
Picture thread sucks with only one or two pictures a page.
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 07:20 |
|
https://twitter.com/ConnorSouthard/status/1060765747088113664
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 09:10 |
|
Frog Act posted:lmao yeah man, good luck with that, hope things go your way in uh....denmark or whatever I'm trying hard to parse this post as a non-American. It appears that most of your brains are so broken that the prospect of living and thriving in a different country is hilarious and unthinkable. I assure you it happens. Also, Copenhagen seemed like a pretty livable city when I was there.
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 09:58 |
|
It's just that some of us have people in our lives that we give a poo poo about so maybe it's hard to imagine saying 'peace yall' and moving to a place that's 20 years behind on neoliberalism rule
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 13:59 |
|
gently caress
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 14:02 |
|
Failed Imagineer posted:I'm trying hard to parse this post as a non-American. It appears that most of your brains are so broken that the prospect of living and thriving in a different country is hilarious and unthinkable. I assure you it happens. Also, Copenhagen seemed like a pretty livable city when I was there. It's because a lot of people have the mindset that America is a place you aspire to move to, not from. To them it would be like winning the lottery and immediately giving all the money away, or something.
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 14:20 |
|
AvesPKS posted:It's because a lot of people have the mindset that America is a place you aspire to move to, not from. To them it would be like winning the lottery and immediately giving all the money away, or something. So winning the lottery and they just dump 265 million dollars worth of Monopoly money on your doorstep?
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 14:25 |
|
Failed Imagineer posted:I'm trying hard to parse this post as a non-American. It appears that most of your brains are so broken that the prospect of living and thriving in a different country is hilarious and unthinkable. I assure you it happens. Also, Copenhagen seemed like a pretty livable city when I was there. same poo poo that's killing america is gonna come to kill europe when it's done with us over here look at what happens to the UK post-brexit for a preview of what is gonna happen to the continent
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 14:47 |
|
SpaceGoku posted:same poo poo that's killing america is gonna come to kill europe when it's done with us over here europe doesn't even have to wait that long. just look at hungary, poland, russia, and italy. Plus france is completely hosed next election.
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 14:54 |
|
Fluoride Jones posted:europe doesn't even have to wait that long. just look at hungary, poland, russia, and italy. Plus france is completely hosed next election. yeah I've been saying similar to my euro friends, who all want to cling to their idea of themselves as a european moderate who is so much more civilized than the barbaric americans with their trump president the 20s and 30s of this century are going to make the 30s and 40s of last century look like a table reading
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 15:24 |
|
SpaceGoku posted:yeah I've been saying similar to my euro friends, who all want to cling to their idea of themselves as a european moderate who is so much more civilized than the barbaric americans with their trump president Uhhh, tables can't read , they don't have eyes???????
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 15:33 |
|
quote:The epidemic has been described as a "uniquely American problem". The structure of the US healthcare system, in which people not qualifying for government programs are required to obtain private insurance, favors prescribing drugs over expensive therapies.
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 15:42 |
|
That reminds me, I'm super glad that easily available fentanyl wasn't a thing back when I was a heavy drug user in college because I'd totally be dead. The most recent F-Plus episode is has a story from a guy who was confused that his acid blotters weren't doing anything, then posts a day later with "I'm an idiot, I mixed up my acid blotters with my fentanyl blotters! I just got back from the hospital, silly me" and I'm just thinking "christ that sounds like something I'd do back then "
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 17:14 |
|
Also going by that graph I wonder if you can see other economic boom/bust cycles on the graph of cocaine use, like you can clearly see it suddenly drop around 2007/2008 while other drugs mostly kept on trucking, I assume because it's the happy drug you do when you want to feel like a rich rear end in a top hat
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 17:18 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 22:31 |
|
Larry Parrish posted:It's just that some of us have people in our lives that we give a poo poo about so maybe it's hard to imagine saying 'peace yall' and moving to a place that's 20 years behind on neoliberalism rule Yeah, but OP obviously doesn't so what's your point. Also, hilariously Americo-centric worldview there - yes of course Europe is just America, but 20 years behind... Mate we already did fascism, we invented that poo poo
|
# ? Nov 9, 2018 18:08 |