Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
zeroprime
Mar 25, 2006

Words go here.

Fun Shoe

RaySmuckles posted:

fox news was a boycott because of that dude's house getting broken into i think

I see you've completely dispensed with even pretending to prevaricate around the facts. They knocked on the door and left a placard.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

No Safe Word
Feb 26, 2005

RaySmuckles posted:

dude i'm not commenting on the event, just what i'd heard the boycott was for

I'm just repeating things that are provably false because they support my point you guys

RaySmuckles
Oct 14, 2009


:vapes:
Grimey Drawer

eke out posted:

it's weird how you keep repeating right wing talking points by accident

cool, i'm a socialist tho

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006

RaySmuckles posted:

dude i'm not commenting on the event, just what i'd heard the boycott was for

well, you did comment on the event, just hopelessly inaccurately and regurgitating a bullshit line from Tucker Carlson in doing so

not worth investigating how that happened any closer, imo

eke out
Feb 24, 2013



Jaxyon posted:

Hahaha you thought Trump was going to overturn something that gets him money/saves him money?

Or to a lesser extent, Clinton?

you can't really overturn citizen's united through legislation, it's an opinion about what the constitution allows for not just some statutory interpretation

Crow Jane
Oct 18, 2012

nothin' wrong with a lady drinkin' alone in her room

RaySmuckles posted:

cool, i'm a socialist tho

Then stop repeating right wing talking points :shrug:

axeil
Feb 14, 2006

Radish posted:

Especially since it seems like it was all a show anyway and the locations had been preselected way earlier than this gross contest implied.

Yeah NYC and NoVa were the obvious picks from the start. NYC's the biggest city on the east coast and NoVA puts Amazon close to the AWS server farm out in Herndon, WaPo, and the government in general.

It pisses me off that you had a whole bunch of dying midwestern towns absolutely throwing themselves at Amazon and offering them no taxes forever sorts of deals. It reminded me of how disgusting sport team stadium deals are.

skylined!
Apr 6, 2012

THE DEM DEFENDER HAS LOGGED ON

RaySmuckles posted:

fox news was a boycott because of that dude's house getting broken into i think

If there was any more doubt of your willingness to carry water for fascists, lol

Demon Of The Fall
May 1, 2004

Nap Ghost
It was announced today that Nashville is getting 5k corporate Amazon jobs, so that’s cool and good for the city.

RaySmuckles
Oct 14, 2009


:vapes:
Grimey Drawer
typically when i end a sentence with "i think" its a sort of non-committal acknowledgement that i'm not posting something i think of as "a hard truth;" more like second-hand knowledge

i generally use that principle when reading other peoples' posts too

you guys can feel free to use that too




like do you think i'm gonna feel bad that you idiots are misperceiving me as some sort of fascist enabler? lol

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

haveblue posted:

That's the great thing about the Trump administration, we're finally getting binding precedent on the parts of the government that have up until now merely adhered to the tradition that the people involved aren't giant pissy assholes.

Yeah, realistically (and speaking in general, not just as wrt journalism) we now need all laws to get much more explicit just to deal with the fact that an entire branch of government now has a policy of never operating in good faith. It’s the laws vs. men conflict distilled to textbook form. Because not only is the aristocrat in charge a tyrant, or a traitor, or corrupt/incompetent, but we really hit the trifecta.

yronic heroism fucked around with this message at 19:12 on Nov 13, 2018

Kimsemus
Dec 4, 2013

by Reene
Toilet Rascal

Demon Of The Fall posted:

It was announced today that Nashville is getting 5k corporate Amazon jobs, so that’s cool and good for the city.

Much needed in the state of TN too. TN and the brain drain for lack of white collar jobs is real.

cr0y
Mar 24, 2005



Lol Papadopolous tried to raise $250,000 via gofund me.

Over the last 4 months he has raised $14,000

Ague Proof
Jun 5, 2014

they told me
I was everything
https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1062340665785417728

Party Plane Jones posted:



ah garrison you are truly the worst

Going to crosspost my compilation of Ben Garrison's endorsements:

52.2% - 45.8%
55.6% - 42.8%
59.9% - 41.2%
50.1% - 47%
70.1% - 29.9%
60.3% - 3.4%

Bonus:
https://twitter.com/grrrgraphics/status/937691156359520256

RaySmuckles posted:

do you all remember when obama was going to revoke Fox News' white house press pass?

i seem to remember everyone thinking that was a good thing

SocketWrench
Jul 8, 2012

by Fritz the Horse

Fritz Coldcockin posted:

How the hell is Aslan so stupid as to think that Republicans care about expanding voting rights? Has he been paying attention?

This is what happens when you huff Trump brand hair spray

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006

RaySmuckles posted:

typically when i end a sentence with "i think" its a sort of non-committal acknowledgement that i'm not posting something i think of as "a hard truth;" more like second-hand knowledge

i generally use that principle when reading other peoples' posts too

hi y'all, it's me, the savvy socialist media consumer. who else thinks hunting down the antifa thugs that thermited Tucker Carlson's house with flying vivisection drones is bae?

Chimp_On_Stilts
Aug 31, 2004
Holy Hell.

Blitz7x posted:

I must be crazy. I remember distinctly that overturning Citizens United being both Hillary and Trump's platforms and thinking "well at least that piece of poo poo is going to be gone no matter what"

Has Trump back pedaled?

Trump is acting in bad faith.

He will say whatever helps himself the most, then do whatever helps himself the most. Even if they're contradictory.

Saying he will end Citizens United wins him votes, then not actually getting rid of it wins him money.

So, he hasn't "backpedaled" so much as he's just made statements he has absolutely no intention of following up on because following up isn't in his personal best interest.

Everything he says and does must be viewed in the light of him being a bad faith actor and a liar.

InsertPotPun
Apr 16, 2018

Pissy Bitch stan

cr0y posted:

https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1062354632477835264?s=19

Its gonna be a new sexual assault victim coming out against Mueller!

Two weeks. This is over a prison sentence of TWO WEEKS.

Unzip and Attack
Mar 3, 2008

USPOL May

Main Paineframe posted:

Presumably, if the press had reacted less strongly, it would have become a trend.

It's rare to see such a pure, crystalline form of a logical fallacy in the wild.

No Safe Word
Feb 26, 2005

RaySmuckles posted:

typically when i end a sentence with "i think" its a sort of non-committal acknowledgement that i'm not posting something i think of as "a hard truth;" more like second-hand knowledge

i generally use that principle when reading other peoples' posts too

you guys can feel free to use that too




like do you think i'm gonna feel bad that you idiots are misperceiving me as some sort of fascist enabler? lol
hey how about doing some research and maybe put a bit of effort into posting instead of just putting anything out there that sounds convenient, k

Xombie
May 22, 2004

Soul Thrashing
Black Sorcery

RaySmuckles posted:

like do you think i'm gonna feel bad that you idiots are misperceiving me as some sort of fascist enabler? lol

I don't think you have any place telling other people they are "misperceiving" things.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

eke out posted:

it's weird how you keep repeating right wing talking points by accident

Tucker's allegations got like ten times as much mainstream media coverage as both the protesters' response and the actual police reports proving he lied had gotten, so it's not terribly shocking that some people didn't get the memo.

Dick Trauma
Nov 30, 2007

God damn it, you've got to be kind.

Getting blocked by that Nazi shitstain makes me proud.

skylined!
Apr 6, 2012

THE DEM DEFENDER HAS LOGGED ON

RaySmuckles posted:

typically when i end a sentence with "i think" its a sort of non-committal acknowledgement that i'm not posting something i think of as "a hard truth;" more like second-hand knowledge

i generally use that principle when reading other peoples' posts too

you guys can feel free to use that too




like do you think i'm gonna feel bad that you idiots are misperceiving me as some sort of fascist enabler? lol

Accepting and disseminating the fascists’ version of reality - apparently not enabling fascism.

SocketWrench
Jul 8, 2012

by Fritz the Horse
edit: Sorry, just saw the request

SocketWrench fucked around with this message at 19:19 on Nov 13, 2018

Jarmak
Jan 24, 2005


For all the bickering in this thread this screams political theater to me:

AOC gets continued exposure as a firebrand, fires up the base by protesting and furthermore making the progressive wing feel like they "won" something.

Pelosi gets to signal she's willing to be dragged along with the progressive agenda, perhaps mellowing her opposition from the left without alienating her centrist allies. No one is going to buy Pelosi waking up one morning and being Bernie Sanders, she's alienate the center and the left won't believe her... let AOC play troublemaker and it gives Pelosi cover and invests in the profile of an up and comer... all at the expensive of conceding something she already supported.

Kimsemus
Dec 4, 2013

by Reene
Toilet Rascal

SocketWrench posted:

The one guy that doesn't take Trump's bullshit lies at face value and sits down and shuts up. "He's just a bully"

What the gently caress is this?

This was in response to a person asking why *I* specifically did not like him. It was a personal judgment and it predates Trump.

empty whippet box
Jun 9, 2004

by Fluffdaddy

Crow Jane posted:

Apparently it was out of solidarity with poor persecuted Tucker Carlson, in some rear end-backwards kind of way

This is somehow more embarrassing than being tangled up in federal investigations

Wicked Them Beats
Apr 1, 2007

Moralists don't really *have* beliefs. Sometimes they stumble on one, like on a child's toy left on the carpet. The toy must be put away immediately. And the child reprimanded.

Jarmak posted:

For all the bickering in this thread this screams political theater to me:

AOC gets continued exposure as a firebrand, fires up the base by protesting and furthermore making the progressive wing feel like they "won" something.

Pelosi gets to signal she's willing to be dragged along with the progressive agenda, perhaps mellowing her opposition from the left without alienating her centrist allies. No one is going to buy Pelosi waking up one morning and being Bernie Sanders, she's alienate the center and the left won't believe her... let AOC play troublemaker and it gives Pelosi cover and invests in the profile of an up and comer... all at the expensive of conceding something she already supported.

Yup, pure political theater.

The Dems need to do it more often.

Ytlaya
Nov 13, 2005

edit: Ah, didn't see LK's post about this conversation ending until after making this post!

Kimsemus posted:

The only difference between Anderson Cooper and any Fox News talking head is network affiliation. I'm an MSNBC guy myself, but I think you're a dipshit if you view ANY cable news network and don't immediately take it with a grain of salt. If you want the news, check out Reuters or the AP. Anything else is news entertainment and you're a stupid moron if you think CNN is somehow better for it.

Even Reuters/the AP aren't exactly "objective/unbiased" (since such a thing isn't possible in the first place - there's always going to be an inherent bias to stuff like how frequently or rarely your report on certain topics, the language you use, etc). It's just important that people always be aware of what the ideological slant might be of the organizations in question (and for most organizations widely perceived as more "objective," the slant is either a pro-status quo one and/or a partisan Democratic one). You can simultaneously acknowledge this and still think FOX News is worse, simply because the ideology it reflects is worse, but given the ideology reflected by CNN/MSNBC/WaPo/NYTimes/etc is also pretty bad* there's not really some fundamental distinction there that makes those things "news" in a way FOX isn't.

ALL OF THIS BEING SAID, I think it's okay to exclude FOX, but the reason it's okay isn't because FOX is propaganda (since that's a trait shared by other news organizations as well). It's okay just because FOX reflects very noxious ideology. While one can argue that it's dangerous to allow press organizations to be excluded like that, that's basically already the case under the status quo - there's not infinite access and only major organizations (which mostly share a bunch of the same ideology) have access, so press is already being excluded. So there's always going to be bias inherent to who is allowed to take some of the administration's limited time to ask questions, etc. Under these circumstances, you may as well push against those whose ideology you think is harmful having this access (and for those who you agree with).

* One needs only look back to the prelude to the Iraq War to realize that those other organizations also function as propaganda

Ytlaya fucked around with this message at 19:37 on Nov 13, 2018

RaySmuckles
Oct 14, 2009


:vapes:
Grimey Drawer

skylined! posted:

Accepting and disseminating the fascists’ version of reality - apparently not enabling fascism.

i wouldn't go so far as "accepting" though i suppose there is a valid critique of disseminating

i just assume everything i hear from the right is some sort of trumped up lie so when i repost what i think they said, its under of the pretense of "this is what they said"

but hey, this isn't c-spam and y'all don't know me so i guess that's my bad for assuming

RaySmuckles fucked around with this message at 19:24 on Nov 13, 2018

skeleton warrior
Nov 12, 2016


Pollyanna posted:

Lemme guess - Pelosi is going to use this as an excuse to shut AOC out of any future party activities and/or screw her over?

I know you desperately want to prove you’re being persecuted by mainstream Democrats, but it’s more likely Pelosi coordinated this whole thing with AOC than that she’s sharpening knives to stab her with

Edit: or, y’know, what Jarmak said. This thread moves faster than I can type

skeleton warrior fucked around with this message at 19:23 on Nov 13, 2018

RaySmuckles
Oct 14, 2009


:vapes:
Grimey Drawer

skeleton warrior posted:

I know you desperately want to prove you’re being persecuted by mainstream Democrats, but it’s more likely Pelosi coordinated this whole thing with AOC than that she’s sharpening knives to stab her with

agreed, AOC wouldn't just stroll into another congressperson's office and show them up without some sort of tacit permission. certainly not the potential future speaker's, unless she was really really awesome

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Chimp_On_Stilts posted:

Trump is acting in bad faith.

He will say whatever helps himself the most, then do whatever helps himself the most. Even if they're contradictory.

Saying he will end Citizens United wins him votes, then not actually getting rid of it wins him money.

So, he hasn't "backpedaled" so much as he's just made statements he has absolutely no intention of following up on because following up isn't in his personal best interest.

Everything he says and does must be viewed in the light of him being a bad faith actor and a liar.

A good article on this, though kinda already known to the folks posting in this thread

https://theconcourse.deadspin.com/this-is-all-donald-trump-has-left-1830329753

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

skeleton warrior posted:

I know you desperately want to prove you’re being persecuted by mainstream Democrats, but it’s more likely Pelosi coordinated this whole thing with AOC than that she’s sharpening knives to stab her with

It’s kind of amazing how many goons believe political theatre is gospel with the ferver of any Boomer grandma on Facebook.

RaySmuckles
Oct 14, 2009


:vapes:
Grimey Drawer

Ytlaya posted:

Even Reuters/the AP aren't exactly "objective/unbiased" (since such a thing isn't possible in the first place - there's always going to be an inherent bias to stuff like how frequently or rarely your report on certain topics, the language you use, etc). It's just important that people always be aware of what the ideological slant might be of the organizations in question (and for most organizations widely perceived as more "objective," the slant is either a pro-status quo one and/or a partisan Democratic one). You can simultaneously acknowledge this and still think FOX News is worse, simply because the ideology it reflects is worse, but given the ideology reflected by CNN/MSNBC/WaPo/NYTimes/etc is also pretty bad* there's not really some fundamental distinction there that makes those things "news" in a way FOX isn't.

ALL OF THIS BEING SAID, I think it's okay to exclude FOX, but the reason it's okay isn't because FOX is propaganda (since that's a trait shared by other news organizations as well). It's okay just because FOX reflects very noxious ideology. While one can argue that it's dangerous to allow press organizations to be excluded like that, that's basically already the case under the status quo - there's not infinite access and only major organizations (which mostly share a bunch of the same ideology) have access, so press is already being excluded. So there's always going to be bias inherent to who is allowed to take some of the administration's limited time to ask questions, etc. Under these circumstances, you may as well push against those whose ideology you think is harmful having this access (and for those who you agree with).

* One needs only look back to the prelude to the Iraq War to realize that those other organizations also function as propaganda

i worry about ideological critique because what happens when the other side has the power to use it against me and the people i support? i wouldn't want to see "imaginary popular socialist network" get barred from things for ideological reasons either.

Unzip and Attack
Mar 3, 2008

USPOL May

RaySmuckles posted:

fox news was a boycott because of that dude's house getting broken into i think

By all means keep posting more lies. It's fine, everything is the same and nothing matters!

EDIT: this is such an amazing example of someone who plays language games and just keeps doubling down rather than admit they posted falsehoods

"I didn't say I believed the lie 100% before spreading it!"

Unzip and Attack fucked around with this message at 19:29 on Nov 13, 2018

The Glumslinger
Sep 24, 2008

Coach Nagy, you want me to throw to WHAT side of the field?


Hair Elf
https://twitter.com/marceelias/status/1062388112188416004

Rick Scott withdraws his lawsuit after getting slapped around by a judge yesterday

RaySmuckles
Oct 14, 2009


:vapes:
Grimey Drawer

Unzip and Attack posted:

By all means keep posting more lies. It's fine, everything is the same and nothing matters!

chill out, man

are you one of those "nothingmatters" posters i keep hearing about? no wonder people are so fed up with you people

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SocketWrench
Jul 8, 2012

by Fritz the Horse

RaySmuckles posted:

typically when i end a sentence with "i think" its a sort of non-committal acknowledgement that i'm not posting something i think of as "a hard truth;" more like second-hand knowledge

i generally use that principle when reading other peoples' posts too

you guys can feel free to use that too




like do you think i'm gonna feel bad that you idiots are misperceiving me as some sort of fascist enabler? lol

Honestly as the newer inductee to this horse poo poo, if you'd been anything but a liar and goalpost moving bitch through the last few pages, I might buy your excuse. Given the track record though, "I think" is just a way to cover your rear end when the thread tries to beat you silly again

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply