|
BrigadierSensible posted:gently caress this loving poo poo-stained fuckwitted entitled arseweasel all the way to hell! go back to reddit
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 15:41 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 18:04 |
|
GoldStandardConure posted:If Lobster Mobster wins I will buy Don Dongington a lobster dinner. What's a matter Mcfly? You chicken?
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 21:22 |
Bak-gurrrk!
|
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 22:05 |
|
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 22:11 |
|
https://twitter.com/michael47818552/status/1062443408420028416?s=21
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 23:21 |
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/theage/status/1062825124259397634
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 23:23 |
|
Ladies and gents, Vic Labor
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 23:37 |
|
I'm not sure what to make of this. Isn't she a dream LNP candidate given this story, or is the story bullshit?
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 23:41 |
|
can't keep on message
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 23:42 |
|
Recoome posted:Ladies and gents, Vic Labor Maybe if the Greens would stop doing everything in their power to gently caress Labor over then Labor would preference them higher?
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 23:44 |
|
Recoome posted:Ladies and gents, Vic Labor Greens too
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 23:47 |
|
monkeu posted:Maybe if the Greens would stop doing everything in their power to gently caress Labor over then Labor would preference them higher?
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 23:47 |
|
I heard a rumour that Vic Greens were specifically loving disabled people for ~bike lanes~, could anyone please confirm or deny?
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 23:48 |
|
Recoome posted:I heard a rumour that Vic Greens were specifically loving disabled people for ~bike lanes~, could anyone please confirm or deny? Greens wanted both and Labor tried to wedge them for one or the other. (Other being disabled access for tram stops)
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 23:52 |
|
monkeu posted:Maybe if the Greens would stop doing everything in their power to gently caress Labor over then Labor would preference them higher? The Greens decided they were a real party and tried to play politics against the red death machine. Dumb move.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 23:54 |
|
So you're telling me the Queensland greens are the most non offensive?
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 23:54 |
|
JBP posted:I'm not sure what to make of this. Isn't she a dream LNP candidate given this story, or is the story bullshit? She's actually unhinged. I saw her Facebook before it was taken down and it was prime nuffy content. Not even dog whistle, just outright batshit loony.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 23:56 |
|
Whitlam posted:She's actually unhinged. I saw her Facebook before it was taken down and it was prime nuffy content. Not even dog whistle, just outright batshit loony. Yeah I've seen her face before and filed it under loonies, was just wondering why this is the thing that made her quit or get pushed out.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2018 23:57 |
|
JBP posted:I'm not sure what to make of this. Isn't she a dream LNP candidate given this story, or is the story bullshit? In a marginal seat you dont want utter wingnuts.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 00:05 |
|
JBP posted:Yeah I've seen her face before and filed it under loonies, was just wondering why this is the thing that made her quit or get pushed out. My guess would be she's crazy enough and the seat is marginal enough they decided to cut their losses because she was doing more harm than good. Incidentally I understand the Greens in Footscray are now focussing almost exclusively on Huong Truong and not talking about Angus.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 00:07 |
|
Recoome posted:I heard a rumour that Vic Greens were specifically loving disabled people for ~bike lanes~, could anyone please confirm or deny? A tram stop redevelopment was being expanded to support disabled passengers but the proposed design would have made things more dangerous for cyclists. The council (some of which but not all are Greens) pushed back and asked for a revised design that allowed for disability access while also keeping safety for cyclists. Despite this being a reasonable request and they type of thing councils do all the time some decided to make this into an anti-Greens message.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 00:35 |
|
JBP posted:Why is the only Vic leadership debate on Foxtel? I know both candidates want to control their own narratives and doing actual media appearances is deemed risky, but you'd think Andrews would want a pulpit to wreck Guy's horseshit from. Then again it'll probably be a redshirts blah blah meaningless idiot fest so... Yeah this’ll probably be a trainwreck for Labor. Why they’d even agree to do it with the deck stacked against them is mind-boggling. A public debate with a cross section of commentators and journos running it would be ideal, but a Sky News run one? Terrible idea. At least it’s only going to have a circulation of ~200 people.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 00:41 |
|
Dude McAwesome posted:At least it’s only going to have a circulation of ~200 people. That's why they agreed to do it on Fox. Guy needs the debate (and everything else) to go perfectly in order to win. Andrews just needs to coast to the finish line. There's no upside to having a debate at all for Andrews, so they may as well minimize the impact that it will have by agreeing to do it on a platform that no one is likely to see.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 01:11 |
|
I’m a little bit concerned by it. Talking live Guy actually comes across as pretty knowledgeable on policy, and the audience is going to be stacked with Dorothy Dixer questions too.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 01:15 |
|
hiddenmovement posted:That's why they agreed to do it on Fox. Guy needs the debate (and everything else) to go perfectly in order to win. Andrews just needs to coast to the finish line. There's no upside to having a debate at all for Andrews, so they may as well minimize the impact that it will have by agreeing to do it on a platform that no one is likely to see. I would think publicly rolling Guy would be useful in marginals and worth the risk.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 01:17 |
|
monkeu posted:Maybe if Labor would stop doing everything in their power to gently caress non-whites over then the Greens would be less combative? fixed that for you
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 01:27 |
|
Anidav posted:So you're telling me the Queensland greens are the most non offensive? by virtue of having no power or money we have managed to keep our scandals pretty low key, and get a lot of the processes to deal with them in place before they happen. doesn't mean they don't happen. winning seats will make us a bigger target both for media and for internal dickheads, so watch this space?
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 01:28 |
|
Don Dongington posted:fixed that for you It would be simple to play some ball with Andrews but they want inner city rich electorates to switch. It's just politics now.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 01:35 |
|
Anidav posted:So you're telling me the Queensland greens are the most non offensive? As someone who has seen my local Greens candidate and realised she is a the stereotype white-with-dreads professional student (at least she was last time I paid attention to her) they're non offensive because they aren't a threat to anyone.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 01:37 |
|
Recoome posted:I heard a rumour that Vic Greens were specifically loving disabled people for ~bike lanes~, could anyone please confirm or deny? Deny, their proposal was for what the CBD has, dual use bike/and disabled access. Since they voted against the 'only wheelchair access' option which would have blocked bike access, the rwm has launched into 'Greens hate the disabled'
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 01:40 |
|
hambeet posted:What's a matter Mcfly? You chicken? 300 chickens
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 01:50 |
|
JBP posted:It would be simple to play some ball with Andrews but they want inner city rich electorates to switch. It's just politics now. Like Albo and friends haven't spent the last 5 years trying to meme on the greens and tbh spend as much time criticising them as they do the Liberals. It's because of poo poo like this: https://www.theguardian.com/austral...4sv2fwo-VyNzkhY "But if we do that, how are we supposed to reach across the aisle and heal these wounds? Decorum is the only answer to th-OW! CHRISTENSEN BIT ME! THE MOTHERFUCKER LITERALLY BIT MY HAND JESUS CHRI-"
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 01:51 |
|
JBP posted:I would think publicly rolling Guy would be useful in marginals and worth the risk. Even if he does curb stomp Guy it will barely be reported on. And any points Guy does score will be parroted and celebrated by The Hun, 3AW et al. Democracy as intended I guess.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 01:52 |
|
Unless one of them shits their pants it won't make a bit of difference, especially because nobody will be watching.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 01:54 |
|
Gridlocked posted:As someone who has seen my local Greens candidate and realised she is a the stereotype white-with-dreads professional student (at least she was last time I paid attention to her) they're non offensive because they aren't a threat to anyone. Central Qld labor: come to the pub and win a meat tray Central Qld Greens: a quote from Neil in The Young Ones posted to social media
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 01:59 |
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:Unless one of them shits their pants it won't make a bit of difference, especially because nobody will be watching. What if they poo poo their pants for fear of Muslims?
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 02:07 |
|
Ahaha I got a pamphlet from her in the mail the other day and it was just crime, crime, LABOR RORTS, crime, crime.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 02:07 |
|
asio posted:Central Qld labor: come to the pub and win a meat tray tbf if the central qld greens go to a pub someone will shoot them
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 02:14 |
|
Synthbuttrange posted:Deny, their proposal was for what the CBD has, dual use bike/and disabled access. Since they voted against the 'only wheelchair access' option which would have blocked bike access, the rwm has launched into 'Greens hate the disabled' I know the full story, it was a lukewarm soft troll, sorry
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 02:45 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 18:04 |
|
Recoome posted:I heard a rumour that Vic Greens were specifically loving disabled people for ~bike lanes~, could anyone please confirm or deny? I heard a rumour that
|
# ? Nov 15, 2018 02:54 |