|
my bony fealty posted:I mean Marx and Engels were basically trust fund babies What exactly do you mean by leftward tendencies because squinting at his wikipedia page he seems rather like an American liberal. The only thing on the page that sounds remotely "leftist" is associating with ALBA and being generally friendly with Venezuela and Cuba, the most superficial leftward tendencies I can possible conceive. I don't see any indication that he was interested in revolutionary changes to ownership of the means of production.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:03 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 06:28 |
Jealous Cow posted:Lock her up! this is definitely happening: https://twitter.com/mtsw/status/1064666642951622656
|
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:04 |
|
Squalid posted:lol, just looking over some of the sources on the wikipedia article, Zelaya's dad spent four years in prison during the eighties after a bunch of campesino's were mysteriously tortured and murdered on his property. He was pardoned by the junta then in power before he even got to trial. sins of the father. Lenin's parents were tsarists what's your point
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:04 |
|
FizFashizzle posted:And of course Ivanka Trump was using her personal email account for government business. Lock Her Up <sorry, couldn't resist>
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:06 |
|
Ague Proof posted:Cops are Trumplovers, like the ones who went in to arrest Stormy Daniels under a false pretext. I know this guy. He's big in the Crypto-Currency crap.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:07 |
|
VitalSigns posted:lol your position is that the complete absence of any evidence for a claim has no bearing on the likelihood of its veracity? Well go call the antivax folks, they'll be pleased to learn their worldview is validated! Hey dumbshit the absence of evidence for a claim has no bearing on it's veracity if that claim is virtually unprovable by it's nature, this is basic poo poo here. By your dipshit standards here it's been proven the Russians didn't influence the election because we can't prove the specific votes that were changed by their actions, that that would be a lot easier to prove than what was the specific source of information used for a murder in the middle of a warzone by unidentified individuals we don't have access to. People on that list were killed, we know that. My own loving good friend was brutally murdered along with his fiancee while his extended family was forced to watch just a few month after those leaks and for the rest of my life I'll never know if that gently caress Manning had anything to do with how they found him. Also you're example isn't one of lying, his assertion was the individual was killed because of information in the leaks, he doesn't have to have been named in the leak for the leak to have led to his death but the Judge decided that wasn't strong enough of a claim. None of the information was thrown out like you originally claimed, the judge considered the danger he put innocent people in and the lengths to US had to go to to try to protect people put in danger by the leaks during the trial.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:08 |
|
my bony fealty posted:sins of the father. Lenin's parents were tsarists what's your point Are you loving kidding me dude. He's the scion of one of the wealthiest landowning familes of Honduras, he even ran the motherfucking "Honduran Council of Private Enterprise" before becoming president. There were swirling rumors of embezzlement around him for years. He's a prototypical caudillo.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:10 |
|
Ague Proof posted:https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1064618476508246017 Nate takes what he does really seriously and gets kinda salty about people making predictions they should have solid indication were poo poo predictions.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:14 |
IIRC, isn't Rasmussen is always wrong by about the same amount, which weirdly makes them a fairly reliable pollster once you adjust for it?
|
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:19 |
|
eke out posted:this is definitely happening: Look she only a CHILD. How can she be expected to keep up on such minor issues as email security?? poo poo, I can't even name the last time we heard anything about emails. Also this story, like every loving story about these ghouls, came out weeks if not months ago. Hellworld is constant reruns.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:21 |
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/IlhanMN/status/1063831710025035779 Amazing
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:22 |
|
Farchanter posted:IIRC, isn't Rasmussen is always wrong by about the same amount, which weirdly makes them a fairly reliable pollster once you adjust for it? Yeah their house effect is pretty constant but statisticians don't like huge unexplained systematic errors in their data that they need to blindly correct for.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:25 |
|
People saying that Republicans are going to react to Omar fighting the ban on hats by wearing ridiculously over-sized cowboy hats seem to be sadly overestimating Republicans, in my opinion. I figure they'll just start wearing white hoods, then claiming its racist if you point out any problems with it.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:26 |
|
Feinne posted:Nate takes what he does really seriously and gets kinda salty about people making predictions they should have solid indication were poo poo predictions. Nate is still super pissed that the enormous election prediction industry he created out of nothing in 2008 was "discredited" in 2016 by a ton of morons who don't understand statistics.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:26 |
|
I'm just here to get in on posting BUT HER EMAILS / LOCK HER UP before a mod tells us to knock it off. seriously though who gives a poo poo
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:27 |
|
I think I love her. Christ alive, those comments...what absolute racist fucks. They are blathering on about if someone wore a Christian hat the Left would lose their minds. Also that...the first ammendment doesnt cover hijabs??? First I have heard that one lol
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:29 |
|
FBS posted:I'm just here to get in on posting BUT HER EMAILS / LOCK HER UP before a mod tells us to knock it off. Its basically just us mocking the media for letting them let Republicans set the tone of entire loving election on a non-issue. Also Ivanka having the gall to claim she didn't know she wasn't allowed to use her personal email for government business after that campaign
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:29 |
|
friendbot2000 posted:I think I love her.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:32 |
|
Fulchrum posted:People saying that Republicans are going to react to Omar fighting the ban on hats by wearing ridiculously over-sized cowboy hats seem to be sadly overestimating Republicans, in my opinion. I figure they'll just start wearing white hoods, then claiming its racist if you point out any problems with it. they are going to wear MAGA hats
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:32 |
|
Stereotype posted:they are going to wear MAGA hats That would be giving up the game, wouldn't it?
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:33 |
|
Fulchrum posted:People saying that Republicans are going to react to Omar fighting the ban on hats by wearing ridiculously over-sized cowboy hats seem to be sadly overestimating Republicans, in my opinion. I figure they'll just start wearing white hoods, then claiming its racist if you point out any problems with it. Who is saying this? As the only person in the world making comically large cowboy hats by hand and sourced by using only artisanal cowboys I’m ok with this being their “revenge”
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:34 |
|
Stereotype posted:Nate is still super pissed that the enormous election prediction industry he created out of nothing in 2008 was "discredited" in 2016 by a ton of morons who don't understand statistics. Which would include us, considering all the people who nearly had heart attacks on November 6. friendbot2000 posted:I think I love her. What the gently caress is a Christian hat?
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:34 |
|
There's gonna be a buncha wailing and gnashing of teeth about tacky ten commandment slabs and bigot bakers because few things get the old white contingent off like religious bullshit
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:35 |
|
friendbot2000 posted:I think I love her. You know, I've been feeling old lately so it was kind of nice to see a bunch of people arguing "when I was a kid we were taught to use the right silverware and keep your elbows off the table!" I mean, I know there's a racist undercurrent to it but at least I was able to say "yeah, I'm not THAT old."
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:35 |
|
OK I'll bite. I like her a lot, this whole blue wave has been amazing. But a dress code is a dress code. Plus separation of church and state, I suspect they don't allow Jewish congressmen to wear yarmulkes either, so why should this be different?
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:36 |
|
Fulchrum posted:Which would include us, considering all the people who nearly had heart attacks on November 6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitre ???
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:36 |
|
Skyarb posted:OK I'll bite. I like her a lot, this whole blue wave has been amazing. But a dress code is a dress code. Plus separation of church and state, I suspect they don't allow Jewish congressmen to wear yarmulkes either, so why should this be different? Wow, you do bite.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:37 |
|
Fulchrum posted:What the gently caress is a Christian hat? A poorly thought out argument.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:37 |
|
Skyarb posted:OK I'll bite. I like her a lot, this whole blue wave has been amazing. But a dress code is a dress code. Plus separation of church and state, I suspect they don't allow Jewish congressmen to wear yarmulkes either, so why should this be different? Who the gently caress cares what head coverings they wear in the chamber? It does not negatively affect the lives of any American, nor does it affect business getting done. She should be able to wear her head scarf, Jewish members should be able to wear yarmulkes if they desire, I don't know if there's any sort of traditional Christian head covering but that should be fine too. Hell, wear one of those little beanies with the propellers for all I care, who gives a poo poo?
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:38 |
|
Fulchrum posted:Which would include us, considering all the people who nearly had heart attacks on November 6.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:38 |
|
Your Taint posted:Who the gently caress cares what head coverings they wear in the chamber? It does not negatively affect the lives of any American, nor does it affect business getting done. She should be able to wear her head scarf, Jewish members should be able to wear yarmulkes if they desire, I don't know if there's any sort of traditional Christian head covering but that should be fine too. Hell, wear one of those little beanies with the propellers for all I care, who gives a poo poo? Honestly, I think congress might be better if we forced everyone to wear those propeller hats
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:39 |
|
Your Taint posted:Who the gently caress cares what head coverings they wear in the chamber? It does not negatively affect the lives of any American, nor does it affect business getting done. She should be able to wear her head scarf, Jewish members should be able to wear yarmulkes if they desire, I don't know if there's any sort of traditional Christian head covering but that should be fine too. Hell, wear one of those little beanies with the propellers for all I care, who gives a poo poo? You're thinking of a Cornette.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:40 |
|
Im buying this one. It matches my Supersoldier face bandana.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:41 |
|
Skyarb posted:OK I'll bite. I like her a lot, this whole blue wave has been amazing. But a dress code is a dress code. Plus separation of church and state, I suspect they don't allow Jewish congressmen to wear yarmulkes either, so why should this be different? Sometimes rules are loving stupid and should be turned over. Wasn't it just last year that the congressional dress code was under fire because DC had a horrible heat wave and women were being removed from the chamber over sleeveless dresses?
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:41 |
|
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1064679820724973568 Dems pick up another seat https://twitter.com/CATargetBot/status/1064672664256565248 Also getting closer to another CA pickup
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:42 |
|
Fulchrum posted:Which would include us, considering all the people who nearly had heart attacks on November 6. yeah, they exist, but its mostly habbits and bonnets for women. my girlfriend used to be mennonite and she wore a bonnet. she hated it.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:42 |
|
silicone thrills posted:Sometimes rules are loving stupid and should be turned over. Wasn't it just last year that the congressional dress code was under fire because DC had a horrible heat wave and women were being removed from the chamber over sleeveless dresses? OK that's fair. I think I was misreading the article and was assuming that the presumption was wanting to make religious exceptions as opposed to just getting rid of the dress code all together. I support the latter but do not support the former.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:43 |
|
The Glumslinger posted:https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1064679820724973568 Does this affect pelosi math or no
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:44 |
|
https://twitter.com/reillyadam/status/1064673143112036352
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:44 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 06:28 |
|
Headscarves are big with orthodox catholics
|
# ? Nov 20, 2018 01:45 |