|
Brazilianpeanutwar posted:Also Christopher walken I know Walken (appropriately) gets a pass on almost everything, but there's no way Schreck was supposed to be that one guy's father. Just slapping a white wig on Walken was the most thing in that movie. Edit: Apparently he was 49 in that movie? Huh. That hair still looked like a cheap Halloween prop. Eclipse12 has a new favorite as of 23:04 on Dec 18, 2018 |
# ? Dec 18, 2018 23:01 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 21:28 |
|
Bruce in Batman vs Superman is extremely hosed up but not the fun kind of manic thrill hosed up Keaton is and more a very depressing and worrying hosed up. Who even gives a poo poo about Justice League (film) Bruce.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 01:17 |
|
My favorite thing about him in JL was him slamming a 12oz glass of whiskey like it's no big deal.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 02:35 |
|
Stupid_Sexy_Flander posted:My favorite thing about him in JL was him slamming a 12oz glass of whiskey like it's no big deal. idk, JL Batffleck sounds pretty relatable to me
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 02:40 |
|
CaptainCrunch posted:As if that wasn’t enough, Fox-as-Electro’s thoughts are audible in the actual soundtrack to the film. Seriously, that movie is so loving good for this reason alone. Electro was too amazing and almost made up for the lovely goblin thing.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 04:44 |
|
I loved all the practical effects and stunts in Amazing Spider-Man, if nothing else. The Raimi movies would've been much better if they'd done more of that. The early 2000s cgi is the worst part now.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 05:39 |
|
Imagined posted:I loved all the practical effects and stunts in Amazing Spider-Man, if nothing else. The Raimi movies would've been much better if they'd done more of that. The early 2000s cgi is the worst part now. It was terrible at the time, too.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 06:20 |
|
Affleck was a really good Batman and I say this as a man who finds Affleck a 7 out of 10 at best
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 06:31 |
|
LITERALLY A BIRD posted:idk, JL Batffleck sounds pretty relatable to me Wasn't it a bit too on point given Affleck's personal life? That said I'm down with drunk Batman.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 06:52 |
|
"Santa Claus: The Movie" is a pretty presumptuous title.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 07:46 |
|
Stupid_Sexy_Flander posted:My favorite thing about him in JL was him slamming a 12oz glass of whiskey like it's no big deal. That wasn’t acting,he just didn’t realise the cameras were rolling etc etc.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 07:56 |
|
I really loathe the Cersei character in Game of Thrones because she's so boring and one note. She's basically a way worse version of Atia from Rome. Atia is not only ruthless, but loyal to her family while also being really funny. Also Rome had way more potential than Game of Thrones. If only it had the same support from HBO.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 07:58 |
|
LITERALLY A BIRD posted:idk, JL Batffleck sounds pretty relatable to me I'm surprised there aren't more straight up alcoholics superheroes like Tony Stark or Carol Danvers, you don't see the kind of poo poo they do and don't hit a dozen bottles to keep your sanity
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 11:58 |
|
Samuringa posted:I'm surprised there aren't more straight up alcoholics superheroes like Tony Stark or Carol Danvers, you don't see the kind of poo poo they do and don't hit a dozen bottles to keep your sanity Did Watchmen have any superheroes who were driven to drink? Seems like a missed trick otherwise.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 12:22 |
|
Rascar Capac posted:Did Watchmen have any superheroes who were driven to drink? Seems like a missed trick otherwise. Wasn't the Mothman from the Minutemen team in the 30s an alcoholic? I remember one of the Nite Owl autobiography chapters explaining how he had all these addictions, then when he was targeted by McCarthy he had a complete mental breakdown on top of it.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 12:26 |
|
Imagined posted:I loved all the practical effects and stunts in Amazing Spider-Man, if nothing else. The Raimi movies would've been much better if they'd done more of that. The early 2000s cgi is the worst part now.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 12:47 |
|
Imagined posted:I loved all the practical effects and stunts in Amazing Spider-Man, if nothing else. The Raimi movies would've been much better if they'd done more of that. The early 2000s cgi is the worst part now. I think it's just my irrational hatred of Tobey Maguire that makes me like the 2 amazing movies so much better than the Raimi ones. At least I like Michael Keaton though.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 13:06 |
|
Ghaha that is pretty bad,i still remember spiderman 1 at the cinema like it was yesterday,the way the webs fired and thwipped still makes me giddy,and the heroic music,and i was tearing up at uncle bens last moments,great movie. Also macy gray lol.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 13:16 |
|
Exact shot I was thinking of. Raimi couldn't manage a single shot of 1/4 of Spidy's body, from the back, barely even 'swinging' without it looking like trash. It's painfully obvious it's a dummy, and Kristen's not doing anything to sell the fact that she's supposed to be high in the air, not just a foot off the floor. Also, the 'wind' changes direction, based on her hair, even though it looks like she's supposed to be going in the same direction the whole time.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 14:26 |
|
DrBouvenstein posted:Exact shot I was thinking of. Raimi couldn't manage a single shot of 1/4 of Spidy's body, from the back, barely even 'swinging' without it looking like trash. It's painfully obvious it's a dummy, and Kristen's not doing anything to sell the fact that she's supposed to be high in the air, not just a foot off the floor. These are all features, imo. I think we have completely different ideas on what does or does not constitute a 'flaw' in a cheesy superhero movie directed by Evil Dead's Sam Raimi. That movie took the entire concept about as serious as one should. It's goofy. It's fun. It's for kids.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 15:16 |
|
Into the Spiderverse is the best Spider-Man movie now anyway. Everyone go see that.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 15:25 |
|
Harton posted:Yeah Keaton was pretty incredible as Batman. I recently watched the first 2 again after a long time and was pretty blown away how different child me remembered them. The scene posted earlier of him flipping out on the joker is the only way to play the character that makes any sense. I don’t really remember any other Bruce Wayne/Villain interactions in other movies. I’m sure they happened, but this dude is obviously psychotic in his reaction. I’m sure if it happens in other movies Bruce plays it cool to not blow his cover or something. I think it's funny that in Batman 89 despite wearing body armor, he can be knocked down by gunfire, but by the time we get to BvS, he can take point blank gunshots to the head and be fine. DrBouvenstein posted:Exact shot I was thinking of. Raimi couldn't manage a single shot of 1/4 of Spidy's body, from the back, barely even 'swinging' without it looking like trash. It's painfully obvious it's a dummy, and Kristen's not doing anything to sell the fact that she's supposed to be high in the air, not just a foot off the floor. Have you ever watched a Raimi film? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9wVzDytTFU
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 15:32 |
|
DrBouvenstein posted:Exact shot I was thinking of. Raimi couldn't manage a single shot of 1/4 of Spidy's body, from the back, barely even 'swinging' without it looking like trash. It's painfully obvious it's a dummy, and Kristen's not doing anything to sell the fact that she's supposed to be high in the air, not just a foot off the floor. I think it’s an endearingly naff shot.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 15:33 |
|
Davros1 posted:I think it's funny that in Batman 89 despite wearing body armor, he can be knocked down by gunfire, but by the time we get to BvS, he can take point blank gunshots to the head and be fine. I like Raimi movies, but I'm not huge on his Spiderman movies. I think comparing Darkman to Spiderman isn't exactly fair. There was a 10 year gap between the movies, in which technology progressed a ton, and there was also a $110M difference between the budgets. The CGI in Spiderman should have looked better in my opinion. In addition, purposefully looking cheesy works for something like the DocOc attack, that was quintessential Raimi. With the Darkman clip you posted, it worked because the movie was channeling Looney Tunes pretty hard core. The swinging scene in Spiderman looking like crap just makes it look like crap.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 15:50 |
|
Davros1 posted:I think it's funny that in Batman 89 despite wearing body armor, he can be knocked down by gunfire, but by the time we get to BvS, he can take point blank gunshots to the head and be fine. Wow i watched darkman alot as a kid and i don't remember this even slightly,i should watch it again.They made a sequel didn't they? was it poo poo?
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 16:03 |
|
Brazilianpeanutwar posted:Wow i watched darkman alot as a kid and i don't remember this even slightly,i should watch it again.They made a sequel didn't they? was it poo poo? Two sequels. They ain't the greatest, but they have some moments. And Larry Drake hamming it up in the second one. Arnold Vosloo couldn't bring the insanity like Neeson could though. There was also a half hour, unaired TV pilot that was a basic retelling of the movie. The four spin off novels were better in my opinion.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 16:12 |
|
Davros1 posted:Two sequels. They ain't the greatest, but they have some moments. And Larry Drake hamming it up in the second one. Arnold Vosloo couldn't bring the insanity like Neeson could though. oh poo poo arnold vosloo! i'm in! love that guy!
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 16:14 |
|
Davros1 posted:I think it's funny that in Batman 89 despite wearing body armor, he can be knocked down by gunfire, but by the time we get to BvS, he can take point blank gunshots to the head and be fine. Hes wearing the inner suit of what he fought Superman in, blocking a point blank bullet is like the bare minimum of what it would need to do.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 16:20 |
|
Barudak posted:Hes wearing the inner suit of what he fought Superman in, blocking a point blank bullet is like the bare minimum of what it would need to do. Looked like the same suit to me Brazilianpeanutwar posted:oh poo poo arnold vosloo! i'm in! love that guy! The thing that cracked me up the most, is the DVD for DARKMAN III: DIE DARKMAN DIE, was so barebones, it didn't even have a MENU screen! Davros1 has a new favorite as of 16:43 on Dec 19, 2018 |
# ? Dec 19, 2018 16:38 |
|
Davros1 posted:Two sequels. They ain't the greatest, but they have some moments. And Larry Drake hamming it up in the second one. Arnold Vosloo couldn't bring the insanity like Neeson could though. Yeah, the second one has Larry Drake coming back from the dead and kidnapping a mad scientist so he can get him to manufacture laser guns, which he then sells to this neo-Nazi gang, leading to them going: "A toast to the right to bear arms!" "The far-right."
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 16:43 |
|
The fact Darkman 3 gets the DIE DARKMAN DIE treatment keeps it as a childhood favorite. R.E. alcoholic superheroes: I'm a little disappointed that Tony Stark doesn't have the alcoholic subplot but it's a Marvel movie so I doubt they'll breach that subject & go all Leaving Las Vegas with him. The Comedian in Watchmen is depicted as a drunk, which is in line with the comics.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 16:48 |
|
re: Darkman sequels. Darkman III was filmed before Darkman II due to actor availability, then their release was postponed, because, having been originally earmarked to go direct to video, Universal was briefly considering releasing them to theaters.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 17:01 |
|
Davros1 posted:I think it's funny that in Batman 89 despite wearing body armor, he can be knocked down by gunfire, but by the time we get to BvS, he can take point blank gunshots to the head and be fine. Batman essentially became Iron Batman in those 30 years so it kinda makes sense
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 17:24 |
|
Imagined posted:What's up with Aunt May getting younger and hotter with every reboot. This IIMM is MY IIMM. Peter is a teenager. Why the gently caress would his aunt be 90 billion years old? Great Aunt, maybe, but they never call her that. She's his Aunt. I'm nearing 40 and my mom isn't even 70 yet, why the gently caress would her sister be DECADES older? I graduated highschool the same year my Aunt turned 50, and my mom didn't have me young, she was in her 30s.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 17:30 |
|
Rascar Capac posted:Did Watchmen have any superheroes who were driven to drink? Seems like a missed trick otherwise. I don't think the Comedian drank alone in his apartment because he was real happy about his life. Mothman was an alkie though.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 17:34 |
|
Kruller posted:This IIMM is MY IIMM. Peter is a teenager. Why the gently caress would his aunt be 90 billion years old? Great Aunt, maybe, but they never call her that. She's his Aunt. I'm nearing 40 and my mom isn't even 70 yet, why the gently caress would her sister be DECADES older? I graduated highschool the same year my Aunt turned 50, and my mom didn't have me young, she was in her 30s. Rosemary Harris (Aunt May in Raimiverse) was 80 at the time of release of Spiderman 3. Sally Field (Amazing) was 66 at release of Amazing 1. Marisa Tomei was 52 at first appearance in Civil War, 53 at Homecoming. Factually, Marisa Tomei's is the appropriate age for an Aunt to a High Schooler, not an 80 year old geriatric.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 18:09 |
|
A lot of people just drop the "great" from great-aunt, which I guess I always assumed was the case in Raimi's Spiderman(I don't really know anything about Spiderman in the comics).
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 18:15 |
|
Aunt May is related by marriage, not blood. Ben was Peter's father's brother. All you gotta do is depict Ben an appropriate age for the 4 minutes of screentime he gets, and he was just into grannys. Boom, fixed.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 18:50 |
|
I had a friend who's siblings were 20+ years older than him. His parents were in their 60s when he was in middle school. So one of his aunt's was 75 when he was a freshman. Stuff can get weird but having the actor be around 55 makes the most sense.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 19:02 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 21:28 |
|
There are comics where Uncle Ben and Aunt May are shown adopting the toddler Peter and they look to be in their 60s, maybe edging into their 70s. Peter's parents are usually portrayed as being in their 30s when they disappeared, so Ben would be maybe 30 years older than his younger brother.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2018 19:07 |