Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

Vincent Van Goatse posted:

Foot fetishists debunking it immediately is a new twist, though.

Ima make one less joke at foot fetishist's expense this year in recognition.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

LionArcher
Mar 29, 2010


AlternateNu posted:

I'm seriously concerned there will be an attempt on her life in the mean time if she maintains this level of energy and coverage.

I was thinking the same thing last night. She’s so freaking good at answering the BS though. That 60 minute interview was so eye opening at how biased the media is against actually left leaning ideas.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010
They going to fact check him live?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/all/new-territory-trump-s-address-proves-newsworthy-networks-see-risks-n956261

quote:

NBC News also weighed its ability to fact-check the president's speech, something it is planning to do aggressively.

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.
https://twitter.com/evansiegfried/status/1082764099270905856

Skex
Feb 22, 2012

The great thing about the thousands of slaughtered Palestinian children is that they can't pull away when you fondle them or sniff their hair.

That's a Biden success story.

LionArcher posted:

I was thinking the same thing last night. She’s so freaking good at answering the BS though. That 60 minute interview was so eye opening at how biased the media is against actually left leaning ideas.

I think that a lot of posters here really don't have a good appreciation of just how effective the Right's propaganda machine was prior to the advent of the Internet. When there were only network TV and people were limited to real world meetings or books, when you had to dig around far and wide to find anything remotely resembling leftist writings. It simply wasn't a thing. And the isolation of looking at the world and recognizing the insanity while and not seeing others who think like you and how utterly demoralizing that was. Long before you had access to good leftist thinking and content online, long before the podcasts and social media we were limited to finding books on the subject, they weren't common as they weren't particularly popular, I mainly found them from reading some of the few vaguely leftist folks who managed to get platforms such as Molly Ivin's.

I mean hell the whole start of AL Frankin's political campaign came from his "why not me?" book which was more a hatchet piece on the Republicans than it was a serious policy discussion.

While I'm sure most here view them as centrist poo poo holes at this point things like Act Blue, Moveon and DailyKos were instrumental in building the movements that have pushed more leftists policy discussions into the public sphere. Unfortunately most of the elected Democratic Politicians are still operating under the old paradigm which is why they haven't been pushing more leftist policies all along. I mean it's not like there haven't been politicians pushing such policies they just weren't winning elections because the media had managed to limit the debate by acting as a gatekeeper for what is and isn't reasonable discourse.

That's part of why I'm more forgiving of Democrat Politicians than many here, (yes even the bad ones) because probably the best analogy I have for the Democratic establishment from the last 30 years is that they are like an abused spouse who has been gas lit, lied to, lied about, attacked endlessly and mercilessly by the Republicans and their complicit media.

These younger pols like AOC who grew up in the post Internet Age who's political range has been expanded by the work done by the older leftists who broke through the media bubble to shift the debate aren't having that poo poo anymore, these are kids who were raised as it were to respect themselves enough to not take any poo poo. Meanwhile some of those older Dems are trying to warn them to keep their heads down lest they too get beat which is pretty much how I see the hand wringing :decorum: mashers from the party.

The thing is that abusers don't get better on their own and acquiescence to their demands only teaches them that abuse will get them what they want so they have no incentive to change their behavior in fact it simply rewards them. So the new wave is doing what they need to be doing it's just that the old Dems have been conditioned so strongly that they haven't realized that the situation has changed. That the debate is no longer constrained in the way that it was when the range of acceptable discussion was set by the owners of the media.

The bad side is that the Right Discovered the Internet as well but at least this time we're no longer hopelessly outgunned the way we were through the 70s, 80s, 90s and 00s. The dysfunction of the system is so much more obvious and more and more people are starting to identify the correct source of our problems (the existence of the Rich).

This puts my thinking in this strange place where Trump and the rise of Fascism worldwide worries me immensely, at the same time I see the cultural zeitgeist moving in a good direction as more and more people are getting fed up with the bullshit and hatred coming from the Right and noticing the effects of Climate change and beginning to grasp the seriousness of the problem.

I think the rise of strong leftist Democrats is both reassuring and inevitable. It's a sign that things are finally starting to catch and these people aren't ready to compromise or surrender and if they can keep the momentum and the voters continue to have their backs there are good things on the way.

To bring this back to the thread itself, Chris Hayes had a good segment last night about Warren's campaigning in Iowa last night particularly contrasting the questions asked by the media vs those asked by the actual people. The media were asking process and horse race questions while the people were asking good policy questions and frankly after seeing that and hearing her answers I'm feeling pretty positive on Warren. She's showing a lot more charisma than I thought she had and has a good command of the issues even threading the needle on a question with regard to abortion that somehow ended up being asked by a friend of hers that she disagrees on the issue about (the friend is a single issue anti-abortion voter) where she gave a very good respectful response while reinforcing her position as supporting a woman's right to autonomy over her own body.

I'm liking what I'm seeing so far, it will be interesting to see where the others position themselves.

LionArcher
Mar 29, 2010


Skex posted:

I think that a lot of posters here really don't have a good appreciation of just how effective the Right's propaganda machine was prior to the advent of the Internet. When there were only network TV and people were limited to real world meetings or books, when you had to dig around far and wide to find anything remotely resembling leftist writings. It simply wasn't a thing. And the isolation of looking at the world and recognizing the insanity while and not seeing others who think like you and how utterly demoralizing that was. Long before you had access to good leftist thinking and content online, long before the podcasts and social media we were limited to finding books on the subject, they weren't common as they weren't particularly popular, I mainly found them from reading some of the few vaguely leftist folks who managed to get platforms such as Molly Ivin's.

I mean hell the whole start of AL Frankin's political campaign came from his "why not me?" book which was more a hatchet piece on the Republicans than it was a serious policy discussion.

While I'm sure most here view them as centrist poo poo holes at this point things like Act Blue, Moveon and DailyKos were instrumental in building the movements that have pushed more leftists policy discussions into the public sphere. Unfortunately most of the elected Democratic Politicians are still operating under the old paradigm which is why they haven't been pushing more leftist policies all along. I mean it's not like there haven't been politicians pushing such policies they just weren't winning elections because the media had managed to limit the debate by acting as a gatekeeper for what is and isn't reasonable discourse.

That's part of why I'm more forgiving of Democrat Politicians than many here, (yes even the bad ones) because probably the best analogy I have for the Democratic establishment from the last 30 years is that they are like an abused spouse who has been gas lit, lied to, lied about, attacked endlessly and mercilessly by the Republicans and their complicit media.

These younger pols like AOC who grew up in the post Internet Age who's political range has been expanded by the work done by the older leftists who broke through the media bubble to shift the debate aren't having that poo poo anymore, these are kids who were raised as it were to respect themselves enough to not take any poo poo. Meanwhile some of those older Dems are trying to warn them to keep their heads down lest they too get beat which is pretty much how I see the hand wringing :decorum: mashers from the party.

The thing is that abusers don't get better on their own and acquiescence to their demands only teaches them that abuse will get them what they want so they have no incentive to change their behavior in fact it simply rewards them. So the new wave is doing what they need to be doing it's just that the old Dems have been conditioned so strongly that they haven't realized that the situation has changed. That the debate is no longer constrained in the way that it was when the range of acceptable discussion was set by the owners of the media.

The bad side is that the Right Discovered the Internet as well but at least this time we're no longer hopelessly outgunned the way we were through the 70s, 80s, 90s and 00s. The dysfunction of the system is so much more obvious and more and more people are starting to identify the correct source of our problems (the existence of the Rich).

This puts my thinking in this strange place where Trump and the rise of Fascism worldwide worries me immensely, at the same time I see the cultural zeitgeist moving in a good direction as more and more people are getting fed up with the bullshit and hatred coming from the Right and noticing the effects of Climate change and beginning to grasp the seriousness of the problem.

I think the rise of strong leftist Democrats is both reassuring and inevitable. It's a sign that things are finally starting to catch and these people aren't ready to compromise or surrender and if they can keep the momentum and the voters continue to have their backs there are good things on the way.

To bring this back to the thread itself, Chris Hayes had a good segment last night about Warren's campaigning in Iowa last night particularly contrasting the questions asked by the media vs those asked by the actual people. The media were asking process and horse race questions while the people were asking good policy questions and frankly after seeing that and hearing her answers I'm feeling pretty positive on Warren. She's showing a lot more charisma than I thought she had and has a good command of the issues even threading the needle on a question with regard to abortion that somehow ended up being asked by a friend of hers that she disagrees on the issue about (the friend is a single issue anti-abortion voter) where she gave a very good respectful response while reinforcing her position as supporting a woman's right to autonomy over her own body.

I'm liking what I'm seeing so far, it will be interesting to see where the others position themselves.

Just wanted to say this is a great post, and generally where my views on things fall too. (Though I know a few rich people that do more than their fair share... but they also would agree with the tax increase etc...)

fool of sound
Oct 10, 2012
e: whoops

mistaya
Oct 18, 2006

Cat of Wealth and Taste

AOC on team Abolish Ice I see. :swoon:

She sounded fine on the audio only I listened to, it's kind of a shame she has to babysit her notes so that the right wing pus machine doesn't latch onto one off-figure in an entire interview of them.

e: gently caress this is the wrong thread and I can't find any news. I'm sorry. :(

mistaya fucked around with this message at 04:12 on Jan 9, 2019

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

mistaya posted:

e: gently caress this is the wrong thread and I can't find any news. I'm sorry. :(

I got you fam.

https://twitter.com/metesohtaoglu/status/1082585573993431040?s=21

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer
https://twitter.com/ap_politics/status/1082857277084893184?s=21

The mainstream American media are collaborators and fools and they deserve to burn.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010
Prediction: Trump will see this as weakness and up his demands killing the deal

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1082890991500255232

Telsa Cola
Aug 19, 2011

No... this is all wrong... this whole operation has just gone completely sidewaysface

Lightning Knight posted:

https://twitter.com/ap_politics/status/1082857277084893184?s=21

The mainstream American media are collaborators and fools and they deserve to burn.

Its darkly hilarious that basically the only thing both parties generally agree on is that the media is horrible trash and that something needs to be done.

tetrapyloctomy
Feb 18, 2003

Okay -- you talk WAY too fast.
Nap Ghost

Lightning Knight posted:

https://twitter.com/ap_politics/status/1082857277084893184?s=21

The mainstream American media are collaborators and fools and they deserve to burn.

"Trump deserves blame because he has stupid demands, but what about the Democrats who refuse to capitulate with the stupid demands?!"

awesmoe
Nov 30, 2005

Pillbug

tetrapyloctomy posted:

"Trump deserves blame because he has stupid demands, but what about the Democrats who refuse to capitulate with the stupid demands?!"

the tweet has at least generated a decent amount of backlash and discussion about how to improve the journalistic value of fact checks, and how to distinguish fact checks as they're generally thought of (calling someone out when they're attempting to mislead) from 'fact checks' providing information which would only be useful to a person who recently awoke from a 30 year coma

Lil Mama Im Sorry
Oct 14, 2012

I'M BACK AND I'M SCARIN' WHITE FOLKS
"that earns 3 pinnochios" - the greatest media on earth

Jerry Manderbilt
May 31, 2012

No matter how much paperwork I process, it never goes away. It only increases.
im pretty sure that AP's twitter is run by a chud given their long, long track record

Lil Mama Im Sorry
Oct 14, 2012

I'M BACK AND I'M SCARIN' WHITE FOLKS
https://twitter.com/propornot/status/1082471500077092864?s=19


thank god for this service

Squalid
Nov 4, 2008


I've noticed this usage myself and it definitely stands out. I don't think Russian media uses words like neocon as a slur, but rather they directly try and associate the word with things/people that are unpopular to give the terms negative connotations. That is to say they are primarily propagandizing against neoconservatism as a concept. This often results in tweets and statements that are logically a bit garbled and nonsensical, but conveying a literal statement of fact isn't the point. The point is just to create an emotional association between <bad thing> and neoliberalism.

edit: here's an example of what I mean in a tweet by a Russian account that pretends to be a black Republican woman

https://mobile.twitter.com/Treshiq/status/1072183909121589249

This tweet is referring to Brett Kavanaugh and is calling him a neocon after he declined to hear a case challenging public funding of planned parenthood. This should leave anyone politically aware scratching their heads, because of course neoconservatism refers to a collection of ideas about foreign policy regarding an aggressive right and willingness interfere abroad, and theoretically has little to with judicial theory or planned parenthood.

My guess though is that whoever manages these accounts noticed there were trending tweets expressing upset over this decision among conservatives, so they sought to use it as an opportunity to insert their own message into the conversation while pretending to share concerns about this court case.

Squalid fucked around with this message at 17:13 on Jan 9, 2019

Taerkar
Dec 7, 2002

kind of into it, really

Telsa Cola posted:

Its darkly hilarious that basically the only thing both parties generally agree on is that the media is horrible trash and that something needs to be done.

That they do, but for pretty much diametrically opposed reasons.

"You're not buying into our fantasy enough!" vs "You're giving their fantasy too much credit/time"

Helsing
Aug 23, 2003

DON'T POST IN THE ELECTION THREAD UNLESS YOU :love::love::love: JOE BIDEN

Skex posted:


That's part of why I'm more forgiving of Democrat Politicians than many here, (yes even the bad ones) because probably the best analogy I have for the Democratic establishment from the last 30 years is that they are like an abused spouse who has been gas lit, lied to, lied about, attacked endlessly and mercilessly by the Republicans and their complicit media.


*Sighing* "We did 20 hot takes, and that was the best one"

LtStorm
Aug 8, 2010

You'll pay for this, Shady Shrew!


https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...m=.744eb2ccc5ac

Our big wet Terrorist in Chief continues to show off his masterful negotiation skills by taking the government hostage.

LtStorm fucked around with this message at 23:34 on Jan 9, 2019

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010
Lol

DC Water Board contemplates cutting off water to the White House due to a missed 5 million dollar payment.
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/01/dc-water-board-debates-whether-can-cut-off-white-house-service-trump-admin-misses-payment/

Really wish Omarossa was still there to troll Trump with these numbers. Apparently Pelosi and Schumer had higher ratings than Trump.

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/424560-pelosi-schumer-response-tops-trump-speech-in-preliminary-ratings

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010
Lol. How long can the TSA realistically last before they collapse and air travel grinds to a halt?

https://mobile.twitter.com/LSDiPalma/status/1083072904705835008

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

Charlz Guybon posted:

Lol. How long can the TSA realistically last before they collapse and air travel grinds to a halt?

https://mobile.twitter.com/LSDiPalma/status/1083072904705835008

by tomorrow or Saturday.

silicone thrills
Jan 9, 2008

I paint things
Today is payday and when people realize they can't even do the "hey we got paid lets go to the bar" - poo poo's gonna get real. That was like a religion when I worked in low paying jobs.

The Glumslinger
Sep 24, 2008

Coach Nagy, you want me to throw to WHAT side of the field?


Hair Elf

silicone thrills posted:

Today is payday and when people realize they can't even do the "hey we got paid lets go to the bar" - poo poo's gonna get real. That was like a religion when I worked in low paying jobs.

You saw that Federal workers are getting paystubs that literally say $0.00 on them?

https://twitter.com/repmarkpocan/status/1083420548661694464

silicone thrills
Jan 9, 2008

I paint things

The Glumslinger posted:

You saw that Federal workers are getting paystubs that literally say $0.00 on them?

https://twitter.com/repmarkpocan/status/1083420548661694464

Yep. I saw that, its completely hosed. Talk about rubbing it in their faces.

Christoph
Mar 3, 2005

Telsa Cola posted:

Its darkly hilarious that basically the only thing both parties generally agree on is that the media is horrible trash and that something needs to be done.

And yet the media is going to get billions of dollars from both parties during the endless election season regardless of how much they suck.

Mister Mind
Mar 20, 2009

I'm not a real doctor,
But I am a real worm;
I am an actual worm
Wrap it up, Ocasio-Cortezailures.

https://twitter.com/adamjohnsonNYC/status/1083465050067746816

Adar
Jul 27, 2001

Joe Lieberman was literally not the future of Connecticut for Lieberman

Mister Mind
Mar 20, 2009

I'm not a real doctor,
But I am a real worm;
I am an actual worm

Adar posted:

Joe Lieberman was literally not the future of Connecticut for Lieberman

I really wish that had kept on going.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010
Seems like a good trend.

https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1083517703774720005

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010
DOOM!

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-doomsday-scenario-heres-what-happens-if-the-shutdown-drags-on/ar-BBS3i6P?ocid=ientp

quote:

The country would face an economic hellscape if the government shutdown lasts "months or even years," as the president has suggested it might, experts tell NBC News.

The doomsday scenario might be unlikely — the longest the federal government has ever shut down is 21 days, a record that will fall if the current closure lasts until Saturday — but it is chilling.

Loading...


"We'll be in no man's land," Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, told NBC News.

If the worst were to happen, experts say the devastating impact would be widespread:
38 million low-income Americans lose food stamps
6 million face an uncertain timetable for collecting tax refunds
2 million without rental assistance and facing possible eviction
800,000 paycheck-less federal employees plunged into dire financial straits
Shuttered parks and museums while overstressed airports cause tourism to tank
Federal court system slows to a crawl
Disaster relief money doesn't get to storm-ravaged areas
Lapsed FDA and EPA inspections lead to dangerous outbreaks
Private companies looking to go public are stuck in limbo
Stock market plummets

The end isn't near — yet. But if the standoff persists — talks blew up at the White House on Wednesday — and Congress and President Donald Trump can't reach a deal on raising the debt ceiling in a few months, "it's game over — you'll have a pretty severe recession," Zandi said, adding that given the trade war with China, and Brexit looming, "you could start seeing some pretty dark scenarios" worldwide.

WITHOUT FOOD, HOMES

By the end of February, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, run by the Department of Agriculture, would be out of funding — meaning almost 40 million low-income Americans could find themselves struggling to pay for food, said Joseph Brusuelas, chief economist for the accounting firm RSM US.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development, meanwhile, has already seen 1,150 contracts with private landlords housing low-income tenants lapse. Another 500 will expire by the end of this month, and another 550 by the end of February, the agency says.

Funding for rental assistance for millions of tenants could be at risk as soon as next month.

"The near-term impact is people getting evicted, having their heat turned off and not having enough food," Brusuelas said.

Drawn out over time, that could amount to a sizable hit on the GDP. Loss of the SNAP benefits could mean $60 billion less in direct spending in a year, and indirect spending of another $48 billion, which could shave a full percentage point off the country's economic growth, he explained.

Others might find themselves with less money in their pockets.

The IRS has said it won't be able to pay tax refunds during the shutdown, although the Office of Management and Budget said on Monday that it would. Less than 10,000 workers — about 12 percent of IRS staff — are working during the shutdown.

The agency is coming up with a plan to call back more employees, but they'll face an avalanche of backed-up work — by Feb. 2 of last year, the agency had already received over 18 million returns and processed 6.1 million refunds.

"The people who are waiting on those refunds could face some real consequences," said Michael Pearce, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics.

Then there are the 800,000 government employees who aren't getting paid during the shutdown — even though about half of them still have to work.

"Workers are going to to start walking out and find better paying jobs," Brusuelas said. If they don't, some will be in danger of not being able to pay their rents or mortgages and losing their homes — creating a drag on the economy.

TOURISM DEVASTATED

No-shows by airport workers — including TSA agents and air traffic controllers — would mean delays and canceled flights, hurting business dealings and tourism.


Tourism would also continue to fall at national parks, a third of which were closed when the shutdown went into effect. Others were kept open — but, without staffing, human waste has piled up in bathrooms and along popular trails.

Some parks are planning to stay open by tapping into collection fees that were meant to be used for future park projects. Raiding those funds is unsustainable and will hamper future development plans, said Emily Douce, director of budget and appropriations for the National Parks Conservation Association.

In the meantime, parks are losing the $400,000 in daily fees they typically collect — and neighboring communities aren't benefiting from the average $20 million a day that visitors spend there.

PUBLIC IN DANGER

The Food and Drug Administration has already stopped most food inspections, raising the risk of salmonella, E. coli and listeria outbreaks.

"That puts our food supply at risk," said Sarah Sorscher, deputy director of regulatory affairs at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a consumer advocacy group.

The Environmental Protection Agency, where only 700 of 13,000 employees are working during the shutdown, has scaled back inspections, with senior officials focusing only on properties where "the threat to human life or property is imminent."

Areas that have already been affected by hurricanes and storms are facing additional problems because of the shutdown, with emergency recovery funds reportedly tied up in bureaucratic red tape.

It seems unimaginable, but if the impasse continues into October, more vital federal agencies would be forced to shut down, and new dangers would loom. Among the agencies that would turn their lights off is the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

A more immediate worry: The federal court system will run out of money by Jan. 18, and will have to cut back operations.

STOCK SHOCK

The longer the shutdown goes on, the more likely it is to affect the stock market, experts said.

Analysts had been looking forward to a string of valuable multibillion companies that were expected to go public early this year. But now, as many as 40 initial public offerings are backlogged because the Securities and Exchange Commission doesn't have the staff to review them.

"The market was waiting for this huge avalanche of IPOs," said John Coffee Jr., director of the Center on Corporate Governance at Columbia Law School. "All of this stuff is on hold. The market is fluctuating wildly, and this is going to remove a stimulus."

Even with no end to the shutdown in sight, Brusuelas predicted that public outrage will lead to one soon enough.

"Workers are going to start walking out," he said. "People will take to the streets."

Charlz Guybon fucked around with this message at 01:47 on Jan 11, 2019

Spoeank
Jul 16, 2003

That's a nice set of 11 dynasty points there, it would be a shame if 3 rings were to happen with it
NOT MY STOCKS

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010
Lol

https://twitter.com/seungminkim/status/1083421811084324864

Shimrra Jamaane
Aug 10, 2007

Obscure to all except those well-versed in Yuuzhan Vong lore.

Until she has to vote on it, then she’ll support it.

Star Man
Jun 1, 2008

There's a star maaaaaan
Over the rainbow

I don't know whether to laugh or cry if Trump and/or the number of Republican senators needed to make a veto-proof spending bill hold this thing out long enough over a loving crappy fence to crash the economy.

Bugsy
Jul 15, 2004

I'm thumpin'. That's
why they call me
'Thumper'.


Slippery Tilde

Dapper_Swindler posted:

by tomorrow or Saturday.

https://twitter.com/ShimonPro/status/1083555966606626816

Coming soon to an airport near you.

DACK FAYDEN
Feb 25, 2013

Bear Witness

Shimrra Jamaane posted:

Until she has to vote on it, then she’ll support it.
That's actually completely free for her to come out against, right? The constituency who least cares about the southern border has got to be in Alaska.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

fool of sound
Oct 10, 2012

DACK FAYDEN posted:

That's actually completely free for her to come out against, right? The constituency who least cares about the southern border has got to be in Alaska.

all the culture warrior types dont care about the border, as such. they just want the Win

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply