|
STAC Goat posted:They're "rebooting" Suicide Squad? Like "everyone on that team is dead or escaped and we have a new set of expendable characters" reboot or "please forget that that other movie exists as we recast characters and retcon stuff" reboot? idk where that article got 'rebooted' from, there's no signs it's anything but a normal-rear end sequel
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 03:16 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 08:09 |
|
An animated theatrical Batman Beyond movie is reportedly in the works. https://thegww.com/report-warner-bros-developing-animated-batman-beyond-movie-for-theatrical-release/ quote:After concept art of an unknown animated Batman movie was posted on r/DCEULeaks, The GWW did some digging and learned that the Warner Animation Group is working on an animated Batman Beyond movie that will be receiving a theatrical release. That actually sounds like a solid way to compete with the Spider-Verse movies.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 03:30 |
|
STAC Goat posted:They're "rebooting" Suicide Squad? Like "everyone on that team is dead or escaped and we have a new set of expendable characters" reboot or "please forget that that other movie exists as we recast characters and retcon stuff" reboot? More like "only Deadshot, Harley, and The Wall wil return".
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 03:33 |
|
STAC Goat posted:They're "rebooting" Suicide Squad? Like "everyone on that team is dead or escaped and we have a new set of expendable characters" reboot or "please forget that that other movie exists as we recast characters and retcon stuff" reboot? I don't understand why there is going to be another Suicide Squad in the first place. No one wanted the first one, and no one liked it. Suicide Squad was a god awful movie. While it made a profit, it didn't bring in note worthy box office numbers.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 03:38 |
|
Suicide Squad’s box office numbers were the definition of noteworthy. That thing stayed in theaters for like two months.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 03:40 |
|
harley quinn was the costume that halloween, get outta here with that 'no one liked it'
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 03:42 |
|
The MSJ posted:More like "only Deadshot, Harley, and The Wall wil return". Well no one else even makes sense to return besides maybe Flag and Joker. That's why I asked because like if they were just casting a new Waller and even a new Deadshot and full on rebooting that would be super weird. But like if they're just gonna pretend the last one didn't happen and only keep the stuff that worked that makes sense. edit: And yeah, SS might have been a bad movie but Harley was a full on thing. But I assumed she had spunoff to her own thing/Birds of Prey. STAC Goat fucked around with this message at 03:49 on Jan 31, 2019 |
# ? Jan 31, 2019 03:46 |
|
People who saw the Birds of Prey teaser and thinks that "WB did not their lesson from Suicide Squad and Aquaman" are hilarious. No, they learned everything from making those two movies (and Wonder Woman), that's why Birds of Prey is happening.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 03:57 |
|
I said come in! posted:I don't understand why there is going to be another Suicide Squad in the first place. No one wanted the first one, and no one liked it. Suicide Squad was a god awful movie. While it made a profit, it didn't bring in note worthy box office numbers. It made three quarters of a billion dollars and won an Academy award.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 05:53 |
|
I said come in! posted:I don't understand why there is going to be another Suicide Squad in the first place. No one wanted the first one, and no one liked it. Suicide Squad was a god awful movie. While it made a profit, it didn't bring in note worthy box office numbers. Wow.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 05:55 |
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:It made three quarters of a billion dollars and won an Academy award. And Robbie is great in the role. Soft reboot or direct sequel, I’m glad she’s getting another go with it.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 05:55 |
|
I said come in! posted:I don't understand why there is going to be another Suicide Squad in the first place. No one wanted the first one, and no one liked it. Suicide Squad was a god awful movie. While it made a profit, it didn't bring in note worthy box office numbers. No. YOU didn’t want the first one. YOU didn’t like it. The public did. The same public that eats up most of Marvels poo poo.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 05:59 |
|
Detective No. 27 posted:An animated theatrical Batman Beyond movie is reportedly in the works. that concept art is really bad. otherwise not opposed to an animated film, just I was getting hype for an imaginary actual film with michael keaton as old batman.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:02 |
|
Vintersorg posted:No. In fact, by BO numbers, it would outgross fully half of the MCU, both worldwide and domestically.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:03 |
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:It made three quarters of a billion dollars and won an Academy award. God I thought the first two responses were hilarious but then this happened.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:07 |
|
I said come in! posted:God I thought the first two responses were hilarious but then this happened. To quote Scott Steiner, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for you.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:11 |
|
I said come in! posted:God I thought the first two responses were hilarious but then this happened. It was indeed hilarious when people pointed that you were wrong, an idiot and a wrong idiot.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:18 |
|
I Before E posted:To quote Scott Steiner, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for you. The user opinion is very divided according to Metacritic, IMDB, and Rotten Tomatoes. It's not the best comic book movie of all time because it won an academy award, and some people wore costumes from a villain that has always been iconic, that this thread is all of a sudden randomly pretending it to be. Snowman_McK posted:It was indeed hilarious when people pointed that you were wrong, an idiot and a wrong idiot. This didnt happen though.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:19 |
|
I said come in! posted:It's not the best comic book movie of all time because it won an academy award I said come in! posted:This didnt happen though.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:24 |
|
I said come in! posted:The user opinion is very divided according to Metacritic, IMDB, and Rotten Tomatoes. There is no reason to assume any correlation between general audience reaction and self-submitted online user scores. You might as well cite bird entrails.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:28 |
|
Sir Kodiak posted:There is no reason to assume any correlation between general audience reaction and self-submitted online user scores. You might as well cite bird entrails. Be right back, there's a weird looking bird outside my house.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:28 |
|
Sir Kodiak posted:There is no reason to assume any correlation between general audience reaction and self-submitted online user scores. You might as well cite bird entrails. It's more credible than someone wore a costume one Halloween, as was cited earlier.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:33 |
|
I said come in! posted:It's more credible than someone wore a costume one Halloween, as was cited earlier. Nah, those scores provide zero information about general audience reactions. They are more credible than nothing. At best, something might be equally useless. Like, it could be the case we just don't know what people think. That's actually the default. Sir Kodiak fucked around with this message at 06:48 on Jan 31, 2019 |
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:41 |
|
The ubiquity of a Halloween costume actually seems like a pretty decent gauge if you're talking about something's cultural impact. It's also an odd thing to latch onto after a post full of provably wrong statements.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:51 |
|
I said come in! posted:It's more credible than someone wore a costume one Halloween, as was cited earlier. Dude, you said this I said come in! posted:I don't understand why there is going to be another Suicide Squad in the first place. No one wanted the first one, and no one liked it. Suicide Squad was a god awful movie. While it made a profit, it didn't bring in note worthy box office numbers. It was a wrong, stupid thing. Well, a couple of them, actually.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:54 |
|
Ammanas posted:our netflix rates keep increasing so we can watch (once, with reservations) a 90 million dollat zombie CASINO HEIST movie? On one hand that concept is kind of interesting. On the other hand https://twitter.com/IraeNicole/status/1090621021890232325
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:55 |
|
Snowman_McK posted:It was a wrong, stupid thing. Well, a couple of them, actually. If that is what you want to pretend go ahead.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:56 |
|
I said come in! posted:If that is what you want to pretend go ahead. Only two things you said were true. That it made a profit and that you thought it was a bad movie.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:58 |
|
RatHat posted:On one hand that concept is kind of interesting. Pirate Jet posted:If you read the actual article and the interview with Matthijs it’s quoting io9 clarifies that was back in 2011 when Matthijs was directing and is no longer in the Snyder version. surprise, we're beyond people even being able to watch snyder films first before getting mad about poo poo that's not actually in 'em
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:58 |
|
I said come in! posted:If that is what you want to pretend go ahead. See, because you're objectively wrong, I don't have to pretend. Films that no one wants or likes don't make three quarters of a billion dollars.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:58 |
|
Now that we're talking about SS, I just realized that I've never seen anyone arguing that Diablo/Harley/Katana/Flagg/Deadshot needed their own solo movies before being brought together for the Squad.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:59 |
|
Brother Entropy posted:surprise, we're beyond people even being able to watch snyder films first before getting mad about poo poo that's not actually in 'em The point is that a director that would even consider putting that in the film is questionable.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 06:59 |
|
RatHat posted:The point is that a director that would even consider putting that in the film is questionable. Right, but that's on Matthijs van Heijningen, the director who considered including it. Not the who had nothing to do with it but is still blamed by the twitter dipshit.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 07:01 |
|
I said come in! posted:If that is what you want to pretend go ahead. The movie did well, despite you not liking it. I'm very sorry for the pain this has caused you.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 07:42 |
|
Sir Kodiak posted:Right, but that's on Matthijs van Heijningen, the director who considered including it. Not the who had nothing to do with it but is still blamed by the twitter dipshit. This is exactly io9's strategy - because Snyder was just a producer on the 2011 version but will be director on the 2019 version, they can label both as "Snyder's Army of the Dead" so they can pin the bullshit of the 2011 director on him, which creates an amazing bizarro world scenario where io9 is accusing Snyder of being a rape-loving creepo despite the rape going away as he took over. It's perfectly in line with io9's typical MO.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 07:47 |
|
Look, loving Aquaman made a gazillion buckaroos, Infinity war made even more than than that, can we please stop pretending that box office numbers have any correlation to movie quality?
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 08:31 |
|
McCloud posted:Look, loving Aquaman made a gazillion buckaroos, Infinity war made even more than than that, can we please stop pretending that box office numbers have any correlation to movie quality? No one said poo poo about quality, the question was whether it was popular. Popularity =/= quality, and vice versa.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 08:38 |
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:No one said poo poo about quality, the question was whether it was popular. I guess that post was still aimed at I said come in! because it feels like they are very confused about what they originally said, otherwise they wouldn't double down on their stupidity like that.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 08:55 |
|
McCloud posted:Look, loving Aquaman made a gazillion buckaroos, Infinity war made even more than than that, can we please stop pretending that box office numbers have any correlation to movie quality? Aquaman is dope, though. Also, no one is pretending this. Several people are having arguments without ever touching anything anyone else has said. Snowman_McK fucked around with this message at 09:37 on Jan 31, 2019 |
# ? Jan 31, 2019 09:35 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 08:09 |
|
Grendels Dad posted:I guess that post was still aimed at I said come in! because it feels like they are very confused about what they originally said, otherwise they wouldn't double down on their stupidity like that. look, it's early, I skimmed the discussion, and I hadn't had my coffee, mea culpa. I mean, I still stand by it as a general statement that popularity does not denote quality in any way because far too many people think box office records has a correlation with quality,, but that's not really related to the discussion going on here so oops. It's bizarre stating SS wasn't popular though, considering how batshit craycray people went for Harley. Like, it was so well received it's getting a sequel and a spinoff with BoP (i think it's a spinoff at least) Snowman_McK posted:Aquaman is dope, though. It's a feast for the eyes but little else imo.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2019 10:25 |