Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
1stGear
Jan 16, 2010

Here's to the new us.
John Oliver had a segment on civil forfeiture. Spoilers: It is utter bullshit 90% of the time and is basically legalized theft for cops.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kEpZWGgJks

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

vyelkin
Jan 2, 2011

EvilGenius posted:

I agree.

I suppose what I'm a disagreeing with is that someone could have that much cash on them with no immediate, plausible explanation, and it not be linked to crime.

I think your problem is you're assuming the cops will listen to an immediate, plausible explanation and not respond "that's exactly the kind of excuse a drug dealer would say" and take the money anyway.

Midnight Voyager
Jul 2, 2008

Lipstick Apathy

1stGear posted:

John Oliver had a segment on civil forfeiture. Spoilers: It is utter bullshit 90% of the time and is basically legalized theft for cops.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kEpZWGgJks

Maybe my link and the other guy's link needed to explicitly say it was a John Oliver segment on civil forfeiture...

https://twitter.com/SirajAHashmi/status/1095742875294461952

If it's not clear, Alex Jones is the idiot here.

nerdz
Oct 12, 2004


Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature more difficult to explain than simple, statistically probable things.
Grimey Drawer

EvilGenius posted:

I agree.

I suppose what I'm a disagreeing with is that someone could have that much cash on them with no immediate, plausible explanation, and it not be linked to crime.

Here's something that happened to a friend of mine

"Oh you got $200 in cash, that's way too much for a black person. Where did you get it?"

They do whatever the gently caress they want and it obviously will hit poor people and minorities the hardest.

Please shut up

Technocrat
Jan 30, 2011

I always finish what I sta
https://twitter.com/classiclib3ral/status/1096035721654296576?s=19

Eiba
Jul 26, 2007


EvilGenius posted:

I agree.

I suppose what I'm a disagreeing with is that someone could have that much cash on them with no immediate, plausible explanation, and it not be linked to crime.
Why do you think an immediate plausible explanation would get someone out of a situation like that? The cops have no incentive to give the money back, and every incentive to keep it and make the person jump through hoops to get it back.

The cops in the original tweet weren't bragging about bringing an rear end in a top hat to justice, they were bragging about getting to keep all this money.

Things could work the way you think (assuming the cops aren't just power-tripping assholes which I'm sure many here would disagree with), if it weren't for the fact that they get to keep the money. Once you add that into the equation there's no way to have faith in the cops. They have been given no reason to act fairly or reasonably. They are literally being paid to be assholes at that point.

Mr. Fall Down Terror
Jan 24, 2018

by Fluffdaddy

EvilGenius posted:

I suppose what I'm a disagreeing with is that someone could have that much cash on them with no immediate, plausible explanation, and it not be linked to crime.

you're inventing the step of "immediate, plausible explanation" because without extensive paperwork cops will just assume it's for drugs, take you to court, and at that point it's an uphill battle to prove that your property which you have possession of is in fact yours and that the cops can't just take it

you're giving the cops the benefit of the doubt here because your perspective on life is limited and your knowledge restricted

Eiba posted:

Why do you think an immediate plausible explanation would get someone out of a situation like that?

the goon making this argument is likely someone who has never been on the wrong side of the law and is shielded by privilege

"why can't anyone just ring up their barrister at a moment's notice to explain to the police what is going on?"

Somfin
Oct 25, 2010

In my🦚 experience🛠️ the big things🌑 don't teach you anything🤷‍♀️.

Nap Ghost
EvilGenius, can you account for your car's whereabouts every hour of the last three months? Was it on camera for that entire time?

If not, it can be seized.

darkwasthenight
Jan 7, 2011

GENE TRAITOR

EvilGenius posted:

I agree.

I suppose what I'm a disagreeing with is that someone could have that much cash on them with no immediate, plausible explanation, and it not be linked to crime.

I have just under a thousand GBP in cash in me right now with no real audit trail because I sold a bunch of music gear through gumtree. It'll go in the bank tomorrow but right now I have no proof of how I got it beyond an absence of guitars in my house.

Araenna
Dec 27, 2012




Lipstick Apathy

sneakyfrog posted:

in the US there are now little devices that they will straight up drain your bank and ATM and prepaid cards

http://oklahomawatch.org/2016/06/07/new-front-in-civil-forfeiture-okla-authorities-get-devices-to-seize-funds-loaded-onto-prepaid-cards/

but no im sure they are really good about giving it back

quote:

Although the device does not allow funds from non-prepaid cards to be frozen or seized, it can provide the officer information about those cards such as the card number, the name on the card, expiration date and the card issuer.

That data, along with any accompanying notes, is then saved in a case management database for future use, allowing law enforcement agencies to search for additional illicit funding by analyzing other card seizures, transactions and trends associated with the card issuer. The agencies also identify any accounts linked to the seized card, the patent and contract documents show.

Oh yes, just what I want, some random cops being able to see all my bank card information whenever they want. I'm also sure closing all those accounts and opening new ones won't get a flag in the system and get you in even more poo poo either.

Serf
May 5, 2011


EvilGenius posted:

I agree.

I suppose what I'm a disagreeing with is that someone could have that much cash on them with no immediate, plausible explanation, and it not be linked to crime.

why should that matter to the cops?

Frog Act
Feb 10, 2012



Serf posted:

why should that matter to the cops?

Because someone somewhere might be both non white and high...on drugs!

Somfin
Oct 25, 2010

In my🦚 experience🛠️ the big things🌑 don't teach you anything🤷‍♀️.

Nap Ghost

Araenna posted:

Oh yes, just what I want, some random cops being able to see all my bank card information whenever they want. I'm also sure closing all those accounts and opening new ones won't get a flag in the system and get you in even more poo poo either.

Withdrawing cash? Looks like an attempt to avoid the surveillance state, citizen. You'll have to turn it over until you prove it wasn't about to be used to purchase drugs.

Brawnfire
Jul 13, 2004

🎧Listen to Cylindricule!🎵
https://linktr.ee/Cylindricule

Cash is legal tender

Anyone can have any amount of cash

Nobody should have to explain the source or destination of the cash unless caught in the commission of an illegal transaction

Accusation from law enforcement creates a standard of guilt the accused must defend against

The ability and resources of the accused to defend themselves may be minimal, especially in light of having money taken from their person.

The usual standard is innocent unless proven guilty. This is an obvious case of guilt being applied to an act ANYONE is capable of committing (public holding of cash) meaning the assumption of guilt can be used against anyone with cash, providing incentive for law enforcement who want money.

What the gently caress evil genius

Somfin
Oct 25, 2010

In my🦚 experience🛠️ the big things🌑 don't teach you anything🤷‍♀️.

Nap Ghost

Frog Act posted:

Because someone somewhere might be both non white and high...on drugs!

Stop resisting! Stop resisting! Stop resisting! I need backup!

Sunswipe
Feb 5, 2016

by Fluffdaddy

Remember kids: if a paedophile starts creeping on you, just talk to them. You'll probably be able to debate them out of their lust for child flesh, especially if you arrange to meet them in private somewhere without telling anyone else where you're going.

Alien Sex Manual
Dec 14, 2010

is not a sandwich

Frog Act posted:

Because someone somewhere might be both non white and high...on drugs!

I’m starting to think EvilGenius might be John McAfee’s account!

Also holy tits that wired article was a wild ride.

Wrath of Mordark
Jul 25, 2006

Foster liked his brand new wand!
Fun Shoe

Sunswipe posted:

Remember kids: if a paedophile starts creeping on you, just talk to them. You'll probably be able to debate them out of their lust for child flesh, especially if you arrange to meet them in private somewhere without telling anyone else where you're going.

https://twitter.com/classiclib3ral/status/1096039355850915840

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

Brawnfire posted:

What the gently caress evil genius

Only the first half is true here.

Rockman Reserve
Oct 2, 2007

"Carbons? Purge? What are you talking about?!"

EvilGenius posted:

Yes I get that the law is massively prone to corruption, and opposition to it seems to be proportional to how corrupt you believe the police are. I believe in the majority of cases where thousands of cash is discovered, in the UK, the police honestly and correctly believe it's linked to crime, based on the circumstances of the discovery of the money. Call me naive if you like.

TLDR: wow a lot of drug dealers itt.

reminder that this guy is so gobsmackingly loving stupid that he started this whole conversation claiming that "they wouldn't just take the money" in a comment responding to police bragging about doing literally exactly that

god drat dude you suck incredibly badly

Metrofreak
Mar 17, 2009

THUNDERDOME LOSER

EvilGenius posted:

I agree.

I suppose what I'm a disagreeing with is that someone could have that much cash on them with no immediate, plausible explanation, and it not be linked to crime.

Please, reveal to me the portal to this magical parallel realm of yours where cops listen to an immediate, plausible explanation. I would like to leave this hellverse where they loving disregard anything you say unless they can use it to throw you into the prison industrial complex.

TehRedWheelbarrow
Mar 16, 2011



Fan of Britches

darkwasthenight posted:

I have just under a thousand GBP in cash in me right now with no real audit trail because I sold a bunch of music gear through gumtree. It'll go in the bank tomorrow but right now I have no proof of how I got it beyond an absence of guitars in my house.

in you huh :allears:

Jurgan
May 8, 2007

Just pour it directly into your gaping mouth-hole you decadent slut
I assume that a lot of criminals have had their assets seized that were the product of crime. That doesn’t matter. Police officers should not be able to seize your property based on a hunch. Penalties are supposed to come at the end of a legal procedure, not the beginning. If even one person is being abused, that’s a problem, and while you can’t eliminate abuse you can change the law to reduce incentives. The police department being able to keep the money themselves is begging for abuse. Even if they think they wouldn’t take from an innocent person, people are really good at rationalizing self-serving actions. A cop can tell himself the guy was certainly guilty of something, even without any evidence, and if there’s no one who’s able to push back, they will.

Sandwich Anarchist
Sep 12, 2008
The ACLU ended up pretty much banning civil asset forfeiture in New Mexico after a man and his son got pulled over on the way to a casino and had all the gambling money they had withdrawn stolen, along with their car.

EvilGenius is a loving dumbass.

JigglyPuff
Jun 3, 2002

food court bailiff posted:

reminder that this guy is so gobsmackingly loving stupid that he started this whole conversation claiming that "they wouldn't just take the money" in a comment responding to police bragging about doing literally exactly that

god drat dude you suck incredibly badly

Just to remind everyone that this is UK police not US police. They are not the same legal system. The police are not organised into police departments the same way they are in the US. I know in the US it is ridiculous how this is done. You can not just assume that it is the same in every other country of the world. You are reading a hell of a lot into that one tweet. I am not trying to make some bold claim about police corruption or anything here. It is literally not the same system or legal frame work at all. Every country has to have a way to deal with the problem of finding a guy with a pallet loaded with cash in the back of his truck who won't say where it came from. I am not saying that to defend the UK one, but it is in no way related to how the US deals with it so going crazy at someone who does not know how bad it is in the US on the assumption that it is like that everywhere is stupid.

As someone who lives in the UK I would be shocked to hear of any of the stories about asset forfeiture that come from the US happening here. I have not heard of anything like that going on. To seize that money they have to take the guy to court and if he has any explanation at all he will keep it. The money will go to the state but not to that local police department. The police are not organised like that here.

Stoatbringer
Sep 15, 2004

naw, you love it you little ho-bot :roboluv:

Sandwich Anarchist posted:

The ACLU ended up pretty much banning civil asset forfeiture in New Mexico after a man and his son got pulled over on the way to a casino and had all the gambling money they had withdrawn stolen, along with their car.

Sounds like they were just going to lose it all (and probably the car) anyway. Think of the time they saved!

CharlestheHammer
Jun 26, 2011

YOU SAY MY POSTS ARE THE RAVINGS OF THE DUMBEST PERSON ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH BUT YOU YOURSELF ARE READING THEM. CURIOUS!
So your point is that the UK and the US aren’t the same except the way in which it’s hosed up where they are the same?

SulfurMonoxideCute
Feb 9, 2008

I was under direct orders not to die
🐵❌💀

Cops are power hungry assholes who get paid to bully the working class and defend the interests of the upper class.

My former boss would drop me off from work at night, I live in a poorer neighbourhood, she was a tiny Italian woman dressed to the nines in Chanel and Louis Vuitton 24/7 and drove a huge black SUV with tinted windows and came from a richer area. We got pulled over by the cops all the time because they assumed that someone in my area with that vehicle must have been a drug dealer. Why should we have to prove we aren't? What did we do wrong? Please explain why that was justified. Pulling someone over for the type of car they drive. My husband and I would get pulled over at least once a month or followed home when we drove a red Fiero too, because they assume "young man in red sporty car must be up to no good somehow, let's see what we can ding him for". We had cops tail us for 3 blocks right to our front door and they sat there watching us until we pulled out our groceries and went inside. We're both white as hell. Imagine if we weren't. They could have spent that time doing literally anything more productive than profiling two white dorks who like 80s cars.

Being profiled by cops sucks and should not be allowed. Period. But it's encouraged and justified and I hate it. gently caress off.

Rockman Reserve
Oct 2, 2007

"Carbons? Purge? What are you talking about?!"

JigglyPuff posted:

To seize that money they have to take the guy to court and if he has any explanation at all he will keep it. The money will go to the state but not to that local police department. The police are not organised like that here.

this is literally exactly what has been being discussed this entire time you tea drinking ninny

Son of Thunderbeast
Sep 21, 2002

JigglyPuff posted:

I have not heard of anything like that going on. To seize that money they have to take the guy to court and if he has any explanation at all he will keep it. The money will go to the state but not to that local police department. The police are not organised like that here.

How sure are you? Because the words of the cops themselves seem to contact everything you said. Also you have heard of something like that going on, in this very tweet in fact

Sandwich Anarchist
Sep 12, 2008

Stoatbringer posted:

Sounds like they were just going to lose it all (and probably the car) anyway. Think of the time they saved!

Well yeah, which is why they saved that cash up and withdrew it specifically to gamble with on their vacation, rather than bankrupting themselves.

CharlestheHammer
Jun 26, 2011

YOU SAY MY POSTS ARE THE RAVINGS OF THE DUMBEST PERSON ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH BUT YOU YOURSELF ARE READING THEM. CURIOUS!
How big of a bootlicker do you have to be to argue with the cops about what they are doing.

TehRedWheelbarrow
Mar 16, 2011



Fan of Britches
one of my consultants retired from a UK police department one of the primary reasons is because of the way they started recently emulating american policing styles.

Slippery
May 16, 2004


Muscles Boxcar

Lemniscate Blue posted:

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that an incel man in possession of a anime avatar, must be in want of a swirlie.

this is awesome hope you know that

I'm gonna steal it 'cause it owns :)

Strom Cuzewon
Jul 1, 2010

My great-aunt was a hoarder, and didn't trust banks. When she died my Dad found several thousand pounds in pre-decimal money in shoeboxes and, i believe, stuffed into tights. He was stopped by police on the way to the bank, and had a very amusing conversation with them young bobby before going on his merry way.

I wonder what the difference is between my Dad and the people in the tweet....

Sandwich Anarchist
Sep 12, 2008

Strom Cuzewon posted:

My great-aunt was a hoarder, and didn't trust banks. When she died my Dad found several thousand pounds in pre-decimal money in shoeboxes and, i believe, stuffed into tights. He was stopped by police on the way to the bank, and had a very amusing conversation with them young bobby before going on his merry way.

I wonder what the difference is between my Dad and the people in the tweet....

Obviously your dad wasn't a criminal and clearly explained why he had the money and FARTTTTTTT

EL BROMANCE
Jun 10, 2006

COWABUNGA DUDES!
🥷🐢😬



Lived in the UK for more than 30 years. To the shock of nobody here bar one, the cops there are bastards too. Thank god only a handful have guns and most of the rest don’t have the creativity to murder people without them.

JigglyPuff
Jun 3, 2002

Son of Thunderbeast posted:

How sure are you? Because the words of the cops themselves seem to contact everything you said. Also you have heard of something like that going on, in this very tweet in fact

No, it isn't what is happening in that tweet. That has not even gone to court. They can not just keep it in the UK. I can find a hundred stories of people unfairly having their assets seized in the US but not a single one in the UK. Find a case in the UK where some poor innocent has had their assets taken that way. Stop thinking that everywhere in the world is like the US. Police corruption is a problem everywhere, but not like it is in the US. Find a case in the UK where someone was going to the casino and had their cash taken and never given back. We have different problems to you. Our police have different problems to you. You may have a hate boner going right now but that doesn't mean that some boastful police tweet means that we have suddenly adopted an insane american law. It just doesn't work like that anywhere but where you live.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

CharlestheHammer
Jun 26, 2011

YOU SAY MY POSTS ARE THE RAVINGS OF THE DUMBEST PERSON ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH BUT YOU YOURSELF ARE READING THEM. CURIOUS!
That is literally how it works, you don’t need to adopt the American law by your own admission that is how it already works. Are you insane

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

TehRedWheelbarrow
Mar 16, 2011



Fan of Britches

JigglyPuff posted:

No, it isn't what is happening in that tweet. That has not even gone to court. They can not just keep it in the UK. I can find a hundred stories of people unfairly having their assets seized in the US but not a single one in the UK. Find a case in the UK where some poor innocent has had their assets taken that way. Stop thinking that everywhere in the world is like the US. Police corruption is a problem everywhere, but not like it is in the US. Find a case in the UK where someone was going to the casino and had their cash taken and never given back. We have different problems to you. Our police have different problems to you. You may have a hate boner going right now but that doesn't mean that some boastful police tweet means that we have suddenly adopted an insane american law. It just doesn't work like that anywhere but where you live.

... so the tweet has been taken down and the person responsible for it has been reprimanded and demoted and guy got his money back then?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply