|
in bill nye theme song: jai Hind say yes to war WAR WAR WAR WAR WAR
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 16:02 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 06:25 |
|
is south east asia on fire yet
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 16:09 |
|
UrbicaMortis posted:Seems bad tbh War is good and will be easy.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 16:13 |
|
SLBMdog millionaire
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 16:14 |
|
https://twitter.com/goutam_2010/status/1101126635313655809 everybody in the world is calling up Modi & Khan to tell them not to go to war but BJP #SayYesToWar #JaiHind
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 16:17 |
|
big war, big life
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 16:19 |
|
Do War
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 16:36 |
|
show me your bombis mmmmm
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 16:47 |
|
jai hind
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 16:53 |
|
https://twitter.com/k_pranali/status/1101144221329833984 https://twitter.com/ASHUTOSHTOMAR10/status/1101151188223811584 jai hind
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:08 |
|
Invading our nuclear armed neighbour will be an easy weeks work #sayyestostoneageindia
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:18 |
|
He's definitely not wrong that a full fledged war wouldn't last more than a week.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:19 |
|
These people have no idea what a nuke is.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:20 |
|
Over There posted:These people have no idea what a nuke is. A lot of them probably literally believe there were nukes in the Baghavad Gita. Maybe nuclear annihilation doesn't sound so scary if you think you're going to be reincarnated into a higher caste.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:24 |
|
Realistically if Pakistan and India did by some insane acts of stupidity get into a total war scenario and started lobbing nukes at each other they would not be totally eradicated but they would lose a century of economic progress and would be completely ruined for decades. Wouldn't matter who the "winner" of the war was but it is likely that the whole border would be an irradiated graveyard for the millions of troops mobilized for an offensive from either side and any war would end in mutual defeat.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:26 |
|
War
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:27 |
|
Flayer posted:Realistically if Pakistan and India did by some insane acts of stupidity get into a total war scenario and started lobbing nukes at each other they would not be totally eradicated but they would lose a century of economic progress and would be completely ruined for decades. Wouldn't matter who the "winner" of the war was but it is likely that the whole border would be an irradiated graveyard for the millions of troops mobilized for an offensive from either side and any war would end in mutual defeat. ummm they have enough nukes to wipe out hundreds of millions of each other's population maybe india have enough people left over at the end but pakistan probably own't
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:28 |
|
they've already fought a war after having nukes
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:28 |
|
Typo posted:ummm they have enough nukes to wipe out hundreds of millions of each other's population maybe india have enough people left over at the end but pakistan probably own't The people left over are the unlucky ones.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:29 |
|
Just negotiate peace, geez
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:31 |
|
nothing is going to come of this
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:32 |
|
RaySmuckles posted:nuclear gwar Bring back the bomb!
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:35 |
|
Typo posted:ummm they have enough nukes to wipe out hundreds of millions of each other's population maybe india have enough people left over at the end but pakistan probably own't
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:36 |
|
Flayer posted:Maybe technically but I don't think they would start off by nuking civilians, rather they would try and nuke each others armies and military logistic hubs. As far as is known neither side has more than a couple hundred nukes so they are a finite resource that have strategic value beyond attacking militarily insignificant areas such as civilian population centres. win wars by invoking fear into the hearts of the citizens.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:39 |
|
redo the 1971 war but this time split up Pakistan between Iran, India, and Afghanistan why hasn't Trump disavowed the country that aided OBL, funds the Taliban, and carried out the airlift of evil?
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:39 |
|
we must support Pakistan lest Russia gain a port on the Indian Ocean
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:49 |
|
Flayer posted:Maybe technically but I don't think they would start off by nuking civilians, rather they would try and nuke each others armies and military logistic hubs. As far as is known neither side has more than a couple hundred nukes so they are a finite resource that have strategic value beyond attacking militarily insignificant areas such as civilian population centres. once a single nuke flies they all fly is one of the fundamental truth about nuclear exchanges so yeah the cities are getting nuked
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:55 |
|
svenkatesh posted:redo the 1971 war but this time split up Pakistan between Iran, India, and Afghanistan the pakistanis basically had this fear in the 1970s that the Soviets were gonna come down from the north and the Indians come up from the south and do exactly this and leave punjab and sind as rump pakistan, one of the reasons why they backed the mujaheddin actually
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:56 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eoNLlHzPhI Flying Korans killing Modi
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:58 |
|
svenkatesh posted:redo the 1971 war but this time split up Pakistan between Iran, India, and Afghanistan because those things have all helped trump get into power
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 17:58 |
|
Flayer posted:Realistically if Pakistan and India did by some insane acts of stupidity get into a total war scenario and started lobbing nukes at each other they would not be totally eradicated but they would lose a century of economic progress and would be completely ruined for decades. Wouldn't matter who the "winner" of the war was but it is likely that the whole border would be an irradiated graveyard for the millions of troops mobilized for an offensive from either side and any war would end in mutual defeat. yes but think about the respect they would get internationally for being tuff
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 18:01 |
|
Typo posted:cities -are- often military logistic/transportation hubs Any problems India has facing Pakistan are tripled if you reverse the positions. India would have more success laying siege to Pakistan and forcing them to surrender over a long period of time because India has a significant naval advantage but other countries would probably get involved in helping Pakistan out if that happened.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 18:11 |
|
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 18:13 |
|
Suddenly CNN doesn't look that bad.
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 18:17 |
Typo posted:once a single nuke flies they all fly is one of the fundamental truth about nuclear exchanges has this ever been tested?
|
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 18:21 |
|
we need war
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 18:22 |
|
really queer Christmas posted:in bill nye theme song: jai Hind say yes to war gradenko_2000 posted:SLBMdog millionaire
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 18:24 |
|
https://twitter.com/saadiaafzaal/status/1100820948733841408
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 18:44 |
|
this seems pathetic
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 18:59 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 06:25 |
|
So like are they just thinking a nuclear exchange wouldn't be that bad or that it will just not involve nukes
|
# ? Feb 28, 2019 19:00 |