|
Grouchio posted:Where can I find the Economic Downturn thread from 2016? Or do we need to make a new one? Trump will shut the border on the same day and call it Mexit.
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 05:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 20:05 |
|
|
Charlz Guybon posted:Trump will shut the border on the same day and call it Mexit. Sad thing is this is completely plausible.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 14:13
|
|
|
Dems bad ? https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson/status/1113066911737282562 https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson/status/1113067972149604352 https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson/status/1113069270173396993
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 14:51
|
|
|
Yikes https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1113074871913902080 Double yikes! https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1113074867031760896 https://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1113073945031446529 https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1113073898793459712 https://twitter.com/TeaPainUSA/status/1113050481520242688 When Mayor Pete raises 7 million, 12 for a California senator is not that impressive https://twitter.com/IanSams/status/1112876794779262976 That actually looks awesome https://twitter.com/Gizmodo/status/1113072463481630723 WTF https://twitter.com/Elise_Jordan/status/1112754425733529606 https://twitter.com/LOLGOP/status/1113072056734830593 Ugh... https://twitter.com/NPR/status/1113071804686483457
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 15:04
|
|
|
I do appreciate your tweet dumps as much as PPJ's, but would it be possible to number them?
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 15:19
|
|
|
Have the Democrats tried moving him to a new diocese?
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 15:21
|
|
|
Captain Invictus posted:I do appreciate your tweet dumps as much as PPJ's, but would it be possible to number them? Ya. If nothing else it makes quoting them substantially easier.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 15:27
|
|
|
Charlz Guybon posted:Dems bad ? Floridian here, this sadly does match what I've come to know and expect from the Florida Dems. The Democrat party machine in this state, in my experience, is elderly, white, Midwestern centrist types who do everything in their power to ignore young people and racial minorities. Gillum winning the governor nomination was a huge upset won against the Democrat machine here, and the party's done its level best to forget that episode, at best as a cautionary tale against nominating someone like Gillum instead of another old white centrist.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 15:40
|
|
|
Joe biden is such a loving nonstarter for way more reasons than that he's a creep just loving dump him already what the gently caress is this own goal bullshit sorry i know this is practically white noise at this point but gently caress the dems are doing everything they can to lose the moral high ground on this poo poo which should be literally impossible
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 15:41
|
|
|
NiceGuy posted:sorry i know this is practically white noise at this point but gently caress the dems are doing everything they can to lose the moral high ground on this poo poo which should be literally impossible It's white noise because you're freaking out as if Diamond Joe has already been nominated by the Democrats, when he's just one guy in a hilariously overcrowded field who has self-owned every previous time he tried to get nominated. He's only the frontrunner insofar as he has name recognition at a point where 95% of the planet isn't even paying attention yet. sean10mm fucked around with this message at 16:47 on Apr 2, 2019 |
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 15:50
|
|
|
Cythereal posted:Floridian here, this sadly does match what I've come to know and expect from the Florida Dems. The Democrat party machine in this state, in my experience, is elderly, white, Midwestern centrist types who do everything in their power to ignore young people and racial minorities. Gillum winning the governor nomination was a huge upset won against the Democrat machine here, and the party's done its level best to forget that episode, at best as a cautionary tale against nominating someone like Gillum instead of another old white centrist. While true, it does seem like Gillum is trying to ignore them back and do the job they won't. Still way to early to tell how much he's actually going to do and if it will be effective.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 16:24
|
|
|
Cythereal posted:Floridian here, this sadly does match what I've come to know and expect from the Florida Dems. The Democrat party machine in this state, in my experience, is elderly, white, Midwestern centrist types who do everything in their power to ignore young people and racial minorities. Gillum winning the governor nomination was a huge upset won against the Democrat machine here, and the party's done its level best to forget that episode, at best as a cautionary tale against nominating someone like Gillum instead of another old white centrist. Abso loving lutely. The FL Dems are the loving worst. Just look at the non-existent campaign of Bill Nelson against a literal medicare fraudster. They're awful in just about every way. And it's very frustrating.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 17:03
|
|
|
Sanguinia posted:Another state hosed into poverty by GOP economic policy starts waking up. It's going to be very interesting to see how the Democrats approach 2020 from a strategic perspective. If they can nail down Penn and Michigan and the rest of Clinton's map holds (which at the moment there's little reason to think it wouldn't), they only need to win ONE other state. You have to think they're going all-in on North Carolina. They have a Governor's mansion to defend, a court-ungerrymandered House map to work with, there's a Senate seat up for grabs, and it's probably the most purple state in the entire south. We can also expect a strong push to lock up Maine and more-than-necessary effort in Colorado to capture that Senate seat. But beyond those obvious targets, where else do you go? Just so you know...  Prior to 1992, it's more than a century of Democratic dominance.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 22:46
|
|
points you've been saving up and go hard on Arizona to seize McCain's Senate seat? And now maybe do you also ask the question if Louisiana and it's Senate Seat are in the game?
|
Serve! https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1113222109139021829
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 14:33
|
|
|
SUBPOENA MUELLER YOU loving IDIOTS EDIT: SORRY I DID NOT REALIZE WHICH THREAD I WAS IN
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 14:34
|
|
|
But how could that be? Surely the invisible hand would prevent them from cutting corners like that?  https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1113252801268699136 https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/1113288725977600000
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 15:03
|
|
|
Didn't someone here do a bet that they'll do something if it turns out the crashes were because of the plane and not the pilots? Don't think it was actually a toxx.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 15:43
|
|
|
Aaaaaand Subpoena'd. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 17:18
|
|
|
Zanzibar Ham posted:Didn't someone here do a bet that they'll do something if it turns out the crashes were because of the plane and not the pilots? Don't think it was actually a toxx. I did. No one's PM'd me any red text, and I deserve it when that story gets backed up.
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 17:21
|
|
|
Grouchio posted:Aaaaaand Subpoena'd. No, they just gave themselves permission to subpoena for the report. No actual action has been taken yet!
|
|
#
?
Apr 3, 2019 17:44
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/amyfiscus/status/1113582439732064258 https://twitter.com/nycsouthpaw/status/1113647759100456965 https://twitter.com/PhilipRucker/status/1113647316186083329
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 04:47
|
|
|
The Glumslinger posted:https://twitter.com/amyfiscus/status/1113582439732064258 lol it's over if they wanted it public they should've leaked it, idiots
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 09:04
|
|
|
Is it time to investigate Barr?
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 09:19
|
|
|
Pretty sure they can still leak it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 09:34
|
|
|
Telsa Cola posted:Pretty sure they can still leak it. I expect a heavily edited release, denial of edits, conclusive proof of edits, partial unedited release, leak of the whole thing, official denial that the leak is real, conflicting evidence that it's real, then confirmation it's real three days before the next election.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 11:50
|
|
|
Seems to me like the whole point of going to that effort is to set a trap for Barr. Now there's one more person caught in the net who had specific instructions to do the right thing and opted not to. Whether or not Barr's behavior rises to the level of criminal I really couldn't say, but if nothing else he might drop some more "Trump told me to write a report that said no collusion" evidence, and this story is getting more play from legit sources than the initial Barr letter did.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 13:20
|
|
|
BougieBitch posted:Seems to me like the whole point of going to that effort is to set a trap for Barr. Now there's one more person caught in the net who had specific instructions to do the right thing and opted not to. Whether or not Barr's behavior rises to the level of criminal I really couldn't say, but if nothing else he might drop some more "Trump told me to write a report that said no collusion" evidence, and this story is getting more play from legit sources than the initial Barr letter did. I know, right? This guy was a previous AG who buried a huge executive scandal, wrote a letter to the White House advertising himself as an AG candidate who would bury an executive scandal, got confirmed along party lines because he was an AG nominee who would not promise not to bury an executive scandal, and became an AG that promptly buried an executive scandal. It's practically Manafort levels of telegraphing your criminality.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 13:27
|
|
|
Just a reminder that all of the rules around how a Special Counsel is supposed to be handled, from start to finish, are not actually law, just Honor System level poo poo. JUST A SUGGESTION, USE YOUR OWN JUDGEMENT level poo poo  https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/600.10 quote:§ 600.10 No creation of rights.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 13:30
|
|
|
V. Illych L. posted:lol it's over if they wanted it public they should've leaked it, idiots If you wanted your report to have maximum impact, immediately leaking it wouldn't be the way to go. Letting team Donny do this is how you would do it. Especially since there is no way that the thing doesn't get out somehow anyway.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 13:41
|
|
|
Gyges posted:If you wanted your report to have maximum impact, immediately leaking it wouldn't be the way to go. Letting team Donny do this is how you would do it. Especially since there is no way that the thing doesn't get out somehow anyway. They let Manafort hang himself this way, I guess it's possible they gave Barr the rope as well. I'm just so very tired and I want some form of the report to come out. I would take the SCO-written summary at this point, as long as House Judiciary Cmte. gets all the underlying evidence.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 13:42
|
|
|
I want them to read the entire thing into the public record. Just daisychain congresscritters once one gets too tired to read swap'em out for the next one and get the whole thing out there even if it's 400 pages long
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 13:45
|
|
Of course he's a democrat
|
I probably don’t need to tell you all that that nutrition study is bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 14:14
|
|
|
Nutritional studies covered by the news these days are 99.9% of the time complete and total bullshit specifically written to get news coverage. This one is setting off my bullshit detector.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 14:18
|
|
|
Random Stranger posted:Nutritional studies covered by the news these days are 99.9% of the time complete and total bullshit specifically written to get news coverage. This one is setting off my bullshit detector. Okay..so are you just going to turn that detector off and move on to another subject of thought or peruse the information to determine how much data and time was used to compile this study and come to an educated conclusion about its merits?
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 14:32
|
|
|
Flesh Forge posted:Just a reminder that all of the rules around how a Special Counsel is supposed to be handled, from start to finish, are not actually law, just Honor System level poo poo. JUST A SUGGESTION, USE YOUR OWN JUDGEMENT level poo poo Please
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 14:37
|
|
|
Charlz Guybon posted:3. While this is funny, actually reading the article it looks like the Texas AG is being unreasonable about this because it's a chance to kick out a liberal judge on a technicality. E: holy poo poo, quoting the wrong tweet at first inadvertently made "while this is funny" a massively inappropriate comment.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 14:44
|
|
|
i am harry posted:Okay..so are you just going to turn that detector off and move on to another subject of thought or peruse the information to determine how much data and time was used to compile this study and come to an educated conclusion about its merits? No, because when they spout psuedo-science scarewords in their findings, I'm done. There's no need to review things further. A shithead CHUD relative of mine is a "former owner of a West Virginia water treatment plant" and I was hopeful for a second that he had been busted. Random Stranger fucked around with this message at 16:00 on Apr 4, 2019 |
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 15:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 20:05 |
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:Please It occurs to me though, if there are no consequences to Barr putting the report in the shredder, there's no consequences to anybody else down the chain leaking whatever the gently caress they want, excepting strictly classified material, but I think probably most or all of it is classified 
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2019 17:37
|
|