|
quote:"It's ok when we do it because we're the white
|
#
?
Mar 20, 2019 21:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 00:14 |
|
|
Warmachine posted:There wasn't a whole sci-fi franchise made around why this is a bad idea. Definitely not any former empires where this happened in human history either.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2019 01:43
|
|
|
Otteration posted:"Trump Has Now Shifted $1.3 Million Of Campaign-Donor Money Into His Business" Posted in the USPOL place. If anyone reading is a sleeper-freeper, this might be fun for a reaction. Would have to have an outrageous cover story to deflect and season the pot at the same time though, I guess.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2019 02:06
|
|
|
Otteration posted:Posted in the USPOL place. If anyone reading is a sleeper-freeper, this might be fun for a reaction. Would have to have an outrageous cover story to deflect and season the pot at the same time though, I guess. Can't find anything with the word Campaign in the title since the 7th. They are good at ignoring stories that make trump look bad sometimes.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2019 02:14
|
|
|
Plinkey posted:Can't find anything with the word Campaign in the title since the 7th. They are good at ignoring stories that make trump look bad sometimes. In all likelihood it probably doesn't even filter into their own curated bubbles. It's not something they can get mad about so the few who do see it won't give it any traction and the rest never even see it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2019 02:37
|
|
|
Otteration posted:Posted in the USPOL place. If anyone reading is a sleeper-freeper, this might be fun for a reaction. Would have to have an outrageous cover story to deflect and season the pot at the same time though, I guess. He did the same thing with his 2016 campaign. They'll just say he's such a smart business man, and then they'll move on.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2019 13:22
|
|
|
Otteration posted:Posted in the USPOL place. If anyone reading is a sleeper-freeper, this might be fun for a reaction. Would have to have an outrageous cover story to deflect and season the pot at the same time though, I guess. You might think, but no, they'll just retcon it as a master stroke of their "common man" president
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2019 16:16
|
|
|
The Top Ten Evilest People of All-Time The article from Spectator is saying that the top two are Karl Marx and Margaret Sanger, because of course. But let's see how Freep weighs in! quote:To: Twotone quote:To: Twotone quote:To: Twotone quote:To: Twotone quote:To: Twotone quote:To: faithhopecharity quote:To: ealgeone quote:To: laweeks
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2019 23:45
|
|
|
I can't wait until all these people die.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2019 23:59
|
|
|
The problem in listing the top 10 evillest wo/men is first deciding which of them are actually anti-christs ie devils not humans.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2019 00:01
|
|
|
My top 10 is nobody because everyone I hate is Satan. Consequently, I'm fairly new to this thread but it looks like a human being hasn't posted on freep for many years. It's a wasteland of hateghosts and lonely, screaming devils.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2019 00:15
|
|
|
Crunch Buttsteak posted:The Top Ten Evilest People of All-Time Lol, they (and The American Spectator) are so utterly unhinged and out of touch with reality it’s hard to accept that their entire existence isn’t a brilliant performance art installation.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2019 02:03
|
|
|
I was almost curious to see what their thread was on the Brunei gay stoning situation, but then I decided to do something much, much better with my time.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2019 02:15
|
|
|
Ubiquitous_ posted:I was almost curious to see what their thread was on the Brunei gay stoning situation, but then I decided to do something much, much better with my time. Most of Freep doesn't know what a Brunei is and those that do care more that Obama spent some time there in his youth. quote:To: lee martell
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2019 02:59
|
|
|
Jagged Jim posted:Most of Freep doesn't know what a Brunei is and those that do care more that Obama spent some time there in his youth. I'll never get over the "Obama is a narcissist, let's love the guy who literally put's his name on everything"
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2019 13:07
|
|
|
Crunch Buttsteak posted:
Herbert Spencer otoh was directly inspired by Darwin, and was a giant libertarian dickweed who came up with Social Darwinism and survival of the fittest. He's buried opposite Marx.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2019 20:33
|
|
|
thing bad, other thing bad, they are obviously connected 
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2019 04:12
|
|
|
Crunch Buttsteak posted:The Top Ten Evilest People of All-Time quote:A rogues gallery of US bad men and women would be especially interesting. That list would be 100% unique between Marxists and Patriots. Top of the list for Marxists: Lincoln. Top of the list for Patriots: Obama. Wait, they think that Marxists would hate Lincoln more than any other US President?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2019 19:16
|
|
|
Just look at the Abe Lincoln Brigades fighting for the Republic against the fascists (leftists).
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2019 19:34
|
|
|
Jefferson Davis: The First Communist Not Lee though, he was good Man the schizophrenic view the american right has on the civil war really puts me in a tizzy
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2019 20:18
|
|
|
God I really want to touch the poop to show freep... What Marx had to say to Lincoln.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2019 04:13
|
|
|
Crunch Buttsteak posted:The Top Ten Evilest People of All-Time Just think, 5 years ago Trump would have made that list for Freep. Amazing how lickspittle these morons are they just blindly toss their hat behind whoever the party says they should Ragnar34 posted:My top 10 is nobody because everyone I hate is Satan. Consequently, I'm fairly new to this thread but it looks like a human being hasn't posted on freep for many years. It's a wasteland of hateghosts and lonely, screaming devils. Well, welcome. Kick back, take your shoes off and watch what happens to people when they put party alignment before everything else There'll be some uprising around election time, but they'll purge again and all will be well Dylanthulhu posted:God I really want to touch the poop to show freep... What Marx had to say to Lincoln. It won't do anything. You'll get a few replies telling you to get your racist liberal hate boner off their site and then be banned immediately and your post deleted SocketWrench fucked around with this message at 09:19 on Apr 11, 2019 |
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2019 09:13
|
|
|
SocketWrench posted:It won't do anything. You'll get a few replies telling you to get your racist liberal hate boner off their site and then be banned immediately and your post deleted I've been banned from worse places but it'd make me feel better. I know it's like opening a window and screaming into the loving void. Remember when the Ron Paul crowd were the most obnoxious right wingers you came across day to day? 
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2019 17:57
|
|
|
Hey, remember the days when posting death threats and calls to violence on Freep was a no-no and got your posts deleted? Well, apparently not anymore, ever since the government-mandated Hormone Squads started going from door to door to inject are kids!! State-coerced child gender ‘transitioning’ is here. Parents are horrified quote:To: workerbee quote:To: workerbee quote:To: workerbee quote:To: workerbee quote:To: workerbee quote:To: workerbee quote:To: Varda
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2019 23:51
|
|
|
quote:But don't expose your kids to Measles, 'cause that's bad parenting... I know there's a lot there, but even so that line definitely stood out to me.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2019 01:23
|
|
|
So... what are they actually talking about? What's happening in the real world and not their freakish funhouse mirror version? I can usually tell, but I wouldn't even be able to make a confident guess here.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2019 03:24
|
|
|
Cleretic posted:So... what are they actually talking about? What's happening in the real world and not their freakish funhouse mirror version? I can usually tell, but I wouldn't even be able to make a confident guess here. Followed a few links - teenagers are consenting to hormone therapy and the Canadian government says that one child doesn't need their parents' permission.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2019 03:35
|
|
|
Wow, what tyranny.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2019 04:52
|
|
|
freedom for me, not for thee
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2019 08:37
|
|
|
If you think for yourself and do real research, you'll find that mountie death squads are forcibly injecting estrogen into proud, virile young white boys.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2019 16:45
|
|
|
Clunk Tap It posted:Followed a few links - teenagers are consenting to hormone therapy and the Canadian government says that one child doesn't need their parents' permission. And that "child" is like 16, right? But this will get brought up without clarification in discussions about 5-year-olds.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2019 19:48
|
|
|
Edgar Allen Ho posted:If you think for yourself and do real research, you'll find that mountie death squads are forcibly injecting estrogen into proud, virile young white boys. Is there a way we could arrange for them to take a swing down to Pennsylvania? Asking for a me.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2019 20:54
|
|
|
pookel posted:And that "child" is like 16, right? But this will get brought up without clarification in discussions about 5-year-olds. In the case I'm thinking of: 14, but one parent is okay with it and one isn't. Unfortunately it's the loud father who isn't and he's pledged to go to the Supreme Court of Canada (they were in the BC Supreme Court previously - provincial, not federal). He got slapped down hard by the provincial court. Edit: Or did it actually hit federal courts yet? I didn't think they'd had enough time to. Prism fucked around with this message at 22:04 on Apr 12, 2019 |
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2019 21:58
|
|
|
It'd be funny, because if their court is anything like the SCOTUS, they might just refuse to hear the case because "why the gently caress are you bothering us when this has only come to one lower court? Call me back when two federal circuits disagree. loving losers." At least if I remember my conlaw right. They can look at it and go, "nah, there's no reason to get involved here."
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2019 22:45
|
|
|
Warmachine posted:It'd be funny, because if their court is anything like the SCOTUS, they might just refuse to hear the case because "why the gently caress are you bothering us when this has only come to one lower court? Call me back when two federal circuits disagree. loving losers." Our court is not laid out like SCOTUS and we don't have multi-state circuits like you do. In an extremely basic summary, a provincial supreme court's ruling can be taken to the (same province's) court of appeal - the BCCA, or the Court of Appeal of British Columbia in this case. It is possible to appeal a ruling from the BCCA to the Supreme Court of Canada, but the Canadian Supreme Court is not obliged to actually take it up unless it's a nationwide concern or an actual area of unsettled law; they can otherwise just say 'no, go away, the provincial Court of Appeal ruling stands'. Whether someone is allowed to petition for an appeal is usually decided by a small panel of Supreme Court judges (I think it is three?) but is guaranteed in some cases. In this case I would assume they would take it up since it's an area of unsettled law, but it would go to the BCCA first. The other thing the Supreme Court of Canada can do is answer a question from the federal Cabinet about whether a thing is legal, if they're asked. Prism fucked around with this message at 00:33 on Apr 13, 2019 |
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2019 00:31
|
|
|
Prism posted:Our court is not laid out like SCOTUS and we don't have multi-state circuits like you do. So the BCCA will have to hear this, but there's no guarantee the guy gets to drag it on even farther than that?
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2019 00:32
|
|
|
Feinne posted:So the BCCA will have to hear this, but there's no guarantee the guy gets to drag it on even farther than that? As I understand it, yes, but I haven't taken a civics class in twenty years and I haven't been following the case closely. The BCCA is allowed to punt or declare it outside their bounds if they want to; if they do, that's one of the things that guarantees the right of appeal to the Supreme Court. Usually this mostly comes up with Constitutional issues where they would want a reference question (edit: a reference is when the government officially asks the Supreme Court for a law check, either to a provincial Supreme Court or the federal one depending on the question), but they could do it on a hot-button topic like this to try to get a federal ruling, if they wanted to. Mostly I just wanted to point out that the Canadian court system is absolutely not the same as the American one and is sometimes difficult to map precise equivalents to. Prism fucked around with this message at 00:44 on Apr 13, 2019 |
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2019 00:35
|
|
|
Prism posted:In the case I'm thinking of: 14, but one parent is okay with it and one isn't. Well of course, because if my son is girlified that means I am less of a man because I couldn't raise a strapping young man like myself!
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2019 14:57
|
|
|
Freepers: they have no idea of the irony when they call us Nazis
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2019 15:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 00:14 |
|
|
kik2dagroin posted:Freepers: they have no idea
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2019 15:28
|
|