|
FizFashizzle posted:"Of course the President never declared executive privilege, he did nothing wrong " According to the news in the break room, the White House gave the ol' "no comment." E:. Well crap, tax is tricky by phone. Phobic Nest fucked around with this message at 13:22 on Apr 18, 2019 |
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:18 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 17:50 |
pkay posted:I know you shouldn't laugh. But its like watching a little kid do some stupid poo poo and its just too funny to discipline/scold him. Knowing that he undoubtedly thinks it actually helps him look better / convinces people he's right when he does this, there's no way I can't laugh.
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:22 |
|
Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:This seems big
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:24 |
selec posted:Facebook cannot be chipped away or gently guided. It must be roughly handled at least, burnt to ashes at best, and this handling must be done at a scale that billionaires quake to oppose it. I'm not a fan of patronizing companies in league with white supremacists, but I'm not surprised you don't think it's a big deal. 🤷🏾♀️
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:26 |
|
eke out posted:for what it's worth, they've repeatedly claimed the answer is no until now, so it could be that they're bringing it up to suck trump's dick over how he was so magnimonious and cooperative and didn't even invoke something he clearly couldn't successfully invoke I think they are priming the public for the incoming subpoenas that they will inevitably try to claim executive privilege on.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:26 |
|
Trump is retweeting a lot
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:26 |
|
selec posted:Don’t worry about deleting your Facebook unless it’s having an individual, personal negative impact on your life. Nah personal consumption choices are one of the few things we have direct control over in this stage of capitalism and gently caress facebook
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:31 |
|
Koalas March posted:I'm not a fan of patronizing companies in league with white supremacists, but I'm not surprised you don't think it's a big deal. 🤷🏾♀️ Honestly, hes right. Literally like 95% of what they need from you they already have. Here is my main concern, what is going to happen when/if facebook goes out of business? What happens to those extremely large data sets? Like I can literally see no good outcome in that situation.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:33 |
|
pkay posted:Honestly, hes right. They literally 95% of what they need from you they already have. Here is my main concern, what is going to happen when/if facebook goes out of business? What happens to those extremely large data sets? Like I can literally see no good outcome in that situation. Lol what cowards people are now. "Stop using Facebook and hopefully it'll get regulated better soon" is met with "well, you might as well use it anyways because they have all your poo poo and any other outcome I can think of is worse" Jfc
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:34 |
|
Pretty good statement, especially the last paragraph
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:35 |
|
The dems need to start playing the disinformation game "We have concluded our two year ingestigation and found no wrong doing by the FBI or the Obama administration". And they need to do something right the gently caress now to spin this nonsense Barr is pulling.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:36 |
|
Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:Trump is retweeting a lot But her emails. Surely the Mueller report is good news for Donnie T if he's spending all morning retweeting Hillary conspiracies.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:37 |
|
Koalas March posted:I'm not a fan of patronizing companies in league with white supremacists, but I'm not surprised you don't think it's a big deal. 🤷🏾♀️ I don’t have a Facebook account, but that doesn’t seem to have impacted their bottom line, weirdo. If you’re that worried about patronizing companies in league with white supremacists, maybe you should stop trying to be a YouTuber. Neo Rasa posted:I hate how much people "need" Facebook. I have a bunch of friends on it that only ever communicate with anyone on it. And whenever some news drops reaffirming how horrible Facebook is it's always brought up how like, we can text each other all the conversations/group stuff/memes we want and there's a ton of other ways to keep in touch but no one ever bites or responds. But more and more it's like, do I even need to talk to these folks anymore? Like people really have come to rely on Facebook's algorithm for structuring when it's okay to talk to folks online. This is all true, and for people who have Normal Folk in their lives, you’re gonna feel pretty compelled to use the platform. I quit immediately after the 16 election, but it absolutely has impacted my social life, and I find out a lot of stuff secondhand from my wife, who does still have an account. But you’re not making things “better” by securing your account better. Facebook is as much or more about harvesting your data. You do not patronize them in a normal model, you are the product, and the patrons are the companies and political groups that leverage the data. You are the eyeballs being sold. But as I said, collective action is required because the platform has way too much of a footprint in our society (much like the problems of climate change or bigotry) to be solved by individual action. Some folks (even in this thread) have ideologies too incoherent to see themselves insisting that the people to blame are individual users and their choices, but it’s a problem only solved through solidarity and collective effort. No one individual has nearly the power or resources of a company funded by, run by and beloved by the billionaire class. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:37 |
drat, that's the kind of statement you see in like, newspaper opinion columns from 1927.
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:38 |
|
Terror Sweat posted:
We need more people using the power of just not giving a gently caress for good.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:38 |
|
Caros posted:Seems like the answer here is probably yes, given the fact he is bringing it up, but maybe I'm just reading into it. By bringing the topic up, it makes it likely the answer is definitely "yes", but Barr will say the answer is "no". Goddamned dishonest rear end in a top hat is making it really easy to dive into conspiracy theory with him. When he's been dishonest about so much so far, you pretty much have to start from a position of "he's lying" and once you're there anything becomes possible.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:38 |
|
Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:Trump is retweeting a lot https://twitter.com/CarolLeonnig/status/1118852985604407297?s=19
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:39 |
|
Do we have a list of all the things Barr has done that cast doubt on his handling of the case?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:40 |
|
If it proved his innocence as he's claiming, why wouldn't he be waving around an unredacted copy at every press covered thingy?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:40 |
|
I got home from work at 4 PST and you better believe I'm staying up for this, even though the news conference is gonna be complete BS.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:41 |
|
I hate how much people "need" Facebook. I have a bunch of friends on it that only ever communicate with anyone on it. And whenever some news drops reaffirming how horrible Facebook is it's always brought up how like, we can text each other all the conversations/group stuff/memes we want and there's a ton of other ways to keep in touch but no one ever bites or responds. But more and more it's like, do I even need to talk to these folks anymore? Like people really have come to rely on Facebook's algorithm for structuring when it's okay to talk to folks online. If anyone here's thinking of leaving, if you have a few people that only ever use Facebook that you want to keep in touch with, you can make a new messenger account without having a Facebook account and let them know+add them all to it. But if you close your Facebook account you can't use that same account on Messenger anymore. You could also use Facebook's settings to wall it off from everything except for a small group of people and ads for things you already purchased 48 hours ago.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:42 |
|
KickerOfMice posted:If it proved his innocence as he's claiming, why wouldn't he be waving around an unredacted copy at every press covered thingy? Also if it exonerates him completely, why are his lawyers working on a response to the report?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:42 |
Terror Sweat posted:
Woah, this guy rules
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:43 |
|
https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1118855820219908099?s=20 https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1118844851498442752?s=20
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:44 |
terrorist ambulance posted:Lol what cowards people are now. "Stop using Facebook and hopefully it'll get regulated better soon" is met with "well, you might as well use it anyways because they have all your poo poo and any other outcome I can think of is worse" People are afraid of changes. selec posted:I dont have a Facebook account, but that doesnt seem to have impacted their bottom line, weirdo. Hell yeah, drag me! Been to any purity balls lately?
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:44 |
|
Did we cover this yesterday? https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1118655464282234880?s=19
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:48 |
|
does barr think he's not going to be dragged in front of congress after they get the report?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:48 |
|
Koalas March posted:People are afraid of changes. Hey can you maybe...not have a weird public grievance about me? It’s pretty weird for me to be targeted by somebody who thinks being co-workers with Pewdiepie is okay, if we’re gonna be tendentious.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:50 |
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/Newsweek/status/1118854203600973826
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:50 |
|
One of the side effects of living in a post-truth world is that shameless liars don't even need to bother with maintaining internal consistency to their web of lies. It doesn't matter anymore if the different excuses contradict each other. They can now completely modularize the lying and split into teams without even bothering to coordinate.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:50 |
|
Groovelord Neato posted:does barr think he's not going to be dragged in front of congress after they get the report? Who’s going to drag him?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:51 |
|
Rudy just said they already have a 30-page rebuttal prepared and ready to go.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:52 |
selec posted:Hey can you maybe...not have a weird public grievance about me? It’s pretty weird for me to be targeted by somebody who thinks being co-workers with Pewdiepie is okay, if we’re gonna be tendentious. Bruh you can't try to come for someone and get mad when they @ you back. Also yeah I see PewDiePie at the water cooler and give him the stink eye like every day
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:52 |
|
selec posted:Don’t worry about deleting your Facebook unless it’s having an individual, personal negative impact on your life. This isn't climate change. It's just a loving website. It doesn't have to be fixed or need protests in the streets. Just don't go to the website.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:53 |
|
BigBallChunkyTime posted:Rudy just said they already have a 30-page rebuttal prepared and ready to go. If there is one thing that proves innocence, it is a thirty page rebuttal to your crimes. Koalas March posted:Bruh you can't try to come for someone and get mad when they @ you back. Can you throw a brick at him instead?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:53 |
|
lol owned selec posted:Hey can you maybe...not have a weird public grievance about me? Its pretty weird for me to be targeted by somebody who thinks being co-workers with Pewdiepie is okay, if were gonna be tendentious. lol this is like saying someone eating cookies with Nestle in them is functionally the exact same as the pmc clubbing an Indian kid to death for trying to get water you creepy gently caress
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:53 |
|
Koalas March posted:Bruh you can't try to come for someone and get mad when they @ you back. he's just jealous you can leave the white supremacists behind when you go home (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:54 |
|
Probably not an unreasonable request at all.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:54 |
|
Wait is he saying that because you have, a YouTube channel?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:54 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 17:50 |
|
Koalas March posted:Bruh you can't try to come for someone and get mad when they @ you back. In the model you’re describing (patronizing sites that white supremacists are using) you are trying to put money in the same coffers he is drawing from. You’re giving money to white supremacists by contributing content to sites that pay them. You think that’s a good look though, I guess. Insert eyes rolling gif here. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 13:54 |