|
This stuff has gotta be prosecutable regardless of impeachment, though, right?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:24 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 01:06 |
"On June 17, 2017, the President called McGahn at home and directed him to call the Acting Attorney General and say that the Special Counsel had conflicts of interest and must be removed. McGahn did not carry out the direction, however, deciding that he would resign rather than trigger what he regarded as a potential Saturday Night Massacre."
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:25 |
|
https://twitter.com/josh_emerson/status/1118897764195348480 The bottom line is that Mueller is a cowardly piece of poo poo who didn't step up to the historical moment.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:25 |
|
coffeetable posted:well this is great in general, but Mulv comes after Mull There are only three name entries in the glossary that are totally redacted, here are the other two. I don't have good guesses on these, but that first might be Mnuchin. edit: I meant Mulvaney.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:25 |
|
Gort posted:This stuff has gotta be prosecutable regardless of impeachment, though, right? oh, totally. problem is the jury's the united states senate, and well.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:26 |
|
Party Plane Jones posted:it does if you think that u is separate from Ü in alphabetical order The latter is often collated as "ue" so it would work.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:26 |
|
canepazzo posted:https://twitter.com/nycsouthpaw/status/1118896790835736576 Need to add this to everyone dumb ”no collusion” meme forever.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:26 |
Pellisworth posted:There are only three name entries in the glossary that are totally redacted, here are the other two. I don't have good guesses on these, but that first might be Mnuchin. Mnuchin is literally listed above the redacted name
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:27 |
|
mcmagic posted:https://twitter.com/josh_emerson/status/1118897764195348480 Yup. At a bare minimum, he should've announced the summary of the report himself, instead of letting Barr do his little coverup routine.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:27 |
|
Hieronymous Alloy posted:"On June 17, 2017, the President called McGahn at home and directed him to call the Acting Attorney General and say that the Special Counsel had conflicts of interest and must be removed. McGahn did not carry out the direction, however, deciding that he would resign rather than trigger what he regarded as a potential Saturday Night Massacre." Oh yeah, I remember this. At the time McGahn also put out a whole bunch of stuff trying to cover his own rear end.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:27 |
|
mcmagic posted:https://twitter.com/josh_emerson/status/1118897764195348480 No republican wants to pull the trigger on another. They want someone else to do it so that they can displace the blame and feel better about.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:27 |
|
Yeowch!!! My Balls!!! posted:oh, totally. problem is the jury's the united states senate, and well. Is it? Is the president immune to state and federal prosecution?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:28 |
|
Obstruction works, so if Justice decides you can't punish the president for obstruction, he may as well obstruct: https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1118897406039461889
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:28 |
|
CyberPingu posted:Mnuchin is literally listed above the redacted name typo, news happens fast, I meant Mulvaney assuming that umlaut-U is alphabetized after regular U which is something I've encountered, not sure what the style guide is here
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:28 |
|
DaveWoo posted:Yup. At a bare minimum, he should've announced the summary of the report himself, instead of letting Barr do his little coverup routine. it turns out that absent the total cooperation of the DoJ in railroading some random muslim teenager Mueller's ability to draw conclusions takes a poo poo and dies who could have guessed
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:28 |
|
1337JiveTurkey posted:The latter is often collated as "ue" so it would work. It could also be Mueller, Robert
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:28 |
|
https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1118897518362992640
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:29 |
|
https://twitter.com/igorbobic/status/1118898470717403137 How the gently caress is this not obstruction?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:29 |
|
Gort posted:Is it? Is the president immune to state and federal prosecution? unsettled point of legal doctrine, that I guarantee you goes directly to the supreme court. ~guess how they're going to rule~
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:30 |
lmao barr lied about all this, and every fragmentary quote he pulled out of context is exactly as bad in context as we thought they'd be i'm sure the victory lappers about how they were TOTALLY VINDICATED SUCK IT LIBS will apologize promptly
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:30 |
|
https://twitter.com/ddale8/status/1118898373854101506 https://twitter.com/igorbobic/status/1118898470717403137
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:30 |
|
BigBallChunkyTime posted:I'm pretty sure a first year law student could put a value on information in a Presidential campaign as more than $2000. Yeah, that's loving preposterous. But, republican cop.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:30 |
|
mcmagic posted:https://twitter.com/josh_emerson/status/1118897764195348480 yeah he definitely hosed up big time.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:30 |
|
eke out posted:lmao barr lied about all this, and every fragmentary quote he pulled out of context is exactly as bad in context as we thought they'd be https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1118899503829004288
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:31 |
|
mcmagic posted:https://twitter.com/josh_emerson/status/1118897764195348480 This is a great juxtaposition to all the "totally exonerated" talk when the report was filed. e: also yeah, Mueller backed away when history called.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:31 |
|
Their strategy of framing the narrative just horribly backfired. The report is honestly juicier than I thought it would be so far, and that's with a ton of redactions still.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:31 |
|
ReidRansom posted:This is a great juxtaposition to all the "totally exonerated" talk when the report was filed. Mueller's cowardice or complicity (it's one or the other) is the reason that happened.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:32 |
mcmagic posted:https://twitter.com/josh_emerson/status/1118897764195348480 He isn't wrong though. He's saying that he isn't positive he could make a criminal case. If we lived in a functional society then the report would be taken up by Congress to begin impeachment proceedings, but here we are.
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:32 |
|
eke out posted:lmao barr lied about all this, and every fragmentary quote he pulled out of context is exactly as bad in context as we thought they'd be i'd advise against partying too hard on that front, as the mechanics for doing anything about it still include the step "Beg Mitch McConnell to do something for the good of the country," but the Michael Traceys of the world are going to have a bad couple of days before the next stupid story breaks
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:32 |
|
this is an orgy of terrible stuff, i can't even pick out what is the worst thing. Trump. Is. Done.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:32 |
|
Moreover, if I'm a mob boss, and I'm paying the prosecutor who decides not to prosecute me, how is that not further obstruction?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:32 |
|
axeil posted:this is an orgy of terrible stuff, i can't even pick out what is the worst thing. He's really not. Swing voters don't give a poo poo about any of this, Republicans have his back, and he has about a 50/50 shot of getting reelected.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:33 |
|
axeil posted:this is an orgy of terrible stuff, i can't even pick out what is the worst thing. No. He's not.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:33 |
Mind_Taker posted:Their strategy of framing the narrative just horribly backfired. The report is honestly juicier than I thought it would be so far, and that's with a ton of redactions still. What's mostly surprising me is that we already knew almost all of this to one degree or another, it's just a matter of it all being together in one place. There's not all that much here that's *new*.
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:33 |
|
axeil posted:Trump. What's your logic here?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:33 |
|
mcmagic posted:https://twitter.com/igorbobic/status/1118898470717403137
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:33 |
|
Gort posted:Is it? Is the president immune to state and federal prosecution? The legal theory that gets batted around that the president is immune to federal prosecution always comes across to me as total bullshit but there are practical problems with federally prosecuting the president so it's understandable why no one wants to do it. State charges, OTOH...
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:33 |
|
This man is actually mentally ill isn't he?
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:33 |
|
I do hope, and think maybe it's possible, that this will finally erode his support somewhat. This is all insanely bad and infuriating.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:34 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 01:06 |
|
why didn't barr redact more of this lmao. he looks even worse than he did this morning.
|
# ? Apr 18, 2019 16:34 |