|
shrek_fan_69:] hey, weedlord88, sorry to bug u but I need my 1000MM back. my dumbass customers are weak and want theyre money back weedlord88:] no sherek_fan_69:] drat that sucks lol weedlord88:] ikr lmao
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 04:10 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 05:48 |
|
neutral milf hotel posted:shrek_fan_69:] hey, weedlord88, sorry to bug u but I need my 1000MM back. my dumbass customers are weak and want theyre money back
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 04:15 |
|
Zeond posted:isn't the brave browser also run by the guy who was ran out of Mozilla for being a homophobe and donating in support of california's proposition 8? from the man who brought you JavaScript
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 04:34 |
|
i want them to remove the 21 million coin cap and see all the bitcoiners cry that this is fine printing infinite money is what the banksters do its fine!
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 04:35 |
|
Zeond posted:isn't the brave browser also run by the guy who was ran out of Mozilla for being a homophobe and donating in support of california's proposition 8? yeah iirc brave is the official browser of chud alt-right / mra / incel types so lol
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 04:40 |
|
BMan posted:from the man who brought you JavaScript how does one procure a quick hit of bitcoin these days¿
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 04:48 |
|
Amethyst posted:I talked to the coiner about it their white paper doesn't even go into how brave is actually going to achieve any of its goals other than parasitising existing advertising revenue - it's entirely predicated on the idea that malware is solely the result of bad-acting advertising middle-men who do this while weirdly also running a legitimate ad network rather than the result of malware authors posing as advertisers to take advantage of legitimate ad networks. their solution is to simply position themselves as the middle-men and pinky-promise they'll make sure no malware gets in, which is the existing regime except because it's now a monopoly you can't opt out of with an adblocker the surface and possible profits of a "breach" are magnified, making them much more attractive to attempt. that's only assuming their platform can gain a competitive market-share in order to actually be desirable for consumers - the reality is it won't and due to this won't be attractive to legitimate advertisers in the first-place
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 05:18 |
|
Amethyst posted:I have a coiner harrassing me about BAT. the "get paid to watch adverts" scheme was done in the first dotcom bubble (except without the cryptomarbles). turns out that "people willing to run a script to fake clicks on 20 copies of their web browser to collect penny shavings" isn't a hot demographic that advertisers will pay big money for access to
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 05:56 |
|
They claim to be able to detect fraud with a big handwavey thing about "machine learning" which might as well just be called magic
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 07:01 |
|
What if status quo, but I were the fatcat? - Brave, and literally every other butter
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 07:13 |
|
klafbang posted:What if status quo, but I were the fatcat? he started out talking about banking the unbanked and a bunch of high minded stuff, yeah. all t his from an internet ad scheme
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 07:21 |
|
If brave actually gets popular I assume google will sue them into oblivion.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 07:48 |
|
Bitfinex Responds to New York Attorney General's Actions April 26, 2019 Earlier today, the New York Attorney General’s office released an order it obtained – without notice or a hearing – in an attempt to compel Bitfinex and Tether to provide certain documents and seeking certain injunctive relief. The New York Attorney General’s court filings were written in bad faith and are riddled with false assertions, including as to a purported $850 million “loss” at Crypto Capital. On the contrary, we have been informed that these Crypto Capital amounts are not lost but have been, in fact, seized and safeguarded. We are and have been actively working to exercise our rights and remedies and get those funds released. Sadly, the New York Attorney General’s office seems to be intent on undermining those efforts to the detriment of our customers. Bitfinex and Tether have been fully cooperative with the New York Attorney General’s office, as both companies are with all regulators. The New York Attorney General’s office should focus its efforts on trying to aid and support our recovery efforts. Both Bitfinex and Tether are financially strong – full stop. And both Bitfinex and Tether are committed to fighting this gross overreach by the New York Attorney General’s office against companies that are good corporate citizens and strong supporters of law enforcement. Bitfinex and Tether will vigorously challenge this, and any and all other actions, by the New York Attorney General’s office.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 08:22 |
|
...! posted:Bitfinex Responds to New York Attorney General's Actions April 26, 2019
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 08:31 |
|
"the money isn't lost, the thieves still have it"
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 08:56 |
|
Amethyst posted:I have a coiner harrassing me about BAT. no, their hearts are in the wrong place fraudulent claims of partnership with content creators though they eventually backed down Boxturret posted:oh was that the one with the fake donation links? Zeond posted:isn't the brave browser also run by the guy who was ran out of Mozilla for being a homophobe and donating in support of california's proposition 8? BMan posted:from the man who brought you JavaScript yes, yes and yes Brave also featured Vox Day's alt-right Wikipedia clone Infogalactic as one of the search engines you couldn't remove, because Eich wanted it in there - they were told they were fronting for actual loving Nazis, with a citation, but went "lol notabug"
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 09:03 |
|
Qwertycoatl posted:the "get paid to watch adverts" scheme was done in the first dotcom bubble (except without the cryptomarbles). turns out that "people willing to run a script to fake clicks on 20 copies of their web browser to collect penny shavings" isn't a hot demographic that advertisers will pay big money for access to alladavantage dot com and a _really_ dumb applescript got me beer money in college while I was sleeping, so i'd say it was a net good for the world imo
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 09:40 |
|
Qwertycoatl posted:the "get paid to watch adverts" scheme was done in the first dotcom bubble (except without the cryptomarbles). turns out that "people willing to run a script to fake clicks on 20 copies of their web browser to collect penny shavings" isn't a hot demographic that advertisers will pay big money for access to Scripts are too expensive ~china, probably
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 09:45 |
|
bartcoin
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 11:22 |
|
everyone in the house mine the bartcoin
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 11:43 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 11:45 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 13:20 |
|
it is good with hashing things?
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 13:23 |
|
not really, hashing performance is pretty subpar
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 13:28 |
|
The funds... are safe.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 13:29 |
|
Paladinus posted:The funds... are safe. :worng;
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 13:30 |
|
Paladinus posted:The funds... are safe.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 13:36 |
|
Ghostlight posted:you just love funds You are one contentious man, Ghostlight.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 14:06 |
|
divabot posted:no, their hearts are in the wrong place holy poo poo lol he sent me a big list of publishers who had "signed up" before including the guardian etc. I wonder how many were fraudulent
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 14:24 |
|
what ever happened to that guy who wrote buttcoin core in JavaScript? while working at Reddit
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 14:40 |
|
Powershift posted:
it's very sad that fat jony ives is now chaining his children in the basement to watch his ad board for amazon bux
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 14:44 |
|
Amethyst posted:he started out talking about banking the unbanked and a bunch of high minded stuff, yeah. all t his from an internet ad scheme ask him his opinion on ethics in videogames journalism, if he uses brave he definitely has an opinion on ethics in videogame journalism
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 15:24 |
|
The bigger question is why you're still talking to this person instead of filling paperwork for a restraining order
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 16:19 |
|
bitcoin abuse report (self.Bitcoin) submitted 39 minutes ago * by caper72 My personal website was hacked recently and they stole my database (for a hockey pool). They're demanding 0.1 bitcoin in return. I've accepted that I've lost the database but I added a report to the bitcoin abuse site. I noticed that there's 30 reports to this bitcoin user over the last 3 days. Is anything going to happen to this user or is just basically just a list of 30 suckers? I'm so bummed now. Sorry if this is not appropriate for the subreddit. edit: all I'm asking is did I just waste my time by reporting it on bitcoinabuse.com?
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 16:41 |
|
they'll get a big scammer tag and nobody will ever let themselves get hacked by him again
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 16:48 |
|
also bitcoin abuse dot com sounds like a site where you can buy videos featuring a woman telling you how pathetic and small your bitcoin wallet balance is
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 16:49 |
|
Qwertycoatl posted:the "get paid to watch adverts" scheme was done in the first dotcom bubble (except without the cryptomarbles). turns out that "people willing to run a script to fake clicks on 20 copies of their web browser to collect penny shavings" isn't a hot demographic that advertisers will pay big money for access to When I was in college we had AllAdvantage, a program you could install that paid you to have a banner across the bottom of your computer showing ads. Eventually, they made it so there had to be mouse activity every x number of minutes, which is what spawned the creation of mouse jiggler programs. AllAdvantage found a way to detect that, which I vividly remember defeating by attaching my mouse to a nearby oscillating fan by a long piece of string.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 17:48 |
|
quote:Python is a fast language aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 19:38 |
|
rjmccall posted:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh I heard it was close to the metal. It makes sense because snakes are close to the ground (the ground is metal in computers)
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 19:39 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 05:48 |
|
Hammerite posted:I heard it was close to the metal. It makes sense because snakes are close to the ground (the ground is metal in computers) so the fastest language is classic asp just like classic snakes are faster than like, those weird snakey lizards like skinks
|
# ? Apr 26, 2019 20:25 |