Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
FronzelNeekburm
Jun 1, 2001

STOP, MORTTIME

Eregos posted:

Even if I mistakenly believed support for impeachment would drastically increase once hearings were underway and people saw the evidence, I still wouldn't want to start it now both because it distracts from policy people care more about and the case will be stronger after the Democrats investigate to gather more evidence.

Investigating Trump is part of a movement toward impeachment. We don't have to impeach literally this very instant, but Democratic leaders shouldn't be shouting, "We don't want to impeach!" from the rooftops now, before we even have all the facts. That's why people are mad at Pelosi. She could've said something neutral, but she has consistently said we shouldn't impeach (at this moment, without the evidence, before we investigate, etc.). Why take that weapon off the table? Because Brazil took a far-right turn, but America won't?

Republicans are flat-out refusing to even discuss good policy because it would be a Democratic victory. McConnell blocks everything that the Democratic House proposes. How does that make Democrats stronger, while investigating Republican crimes makes them weaker?

If we go through all of this, and it doesn't affect Trump in any way, and Republicans still get to burn the country to the ground, then what's the point of investigating? If we believe impeachment is wrong, and that the President can't face any other legal or political consequences, then why bother?

FronzelNeekburm fucked around with this message at 13:08 on Apr 29, 2019

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Deteriorata
Feb 6, 2005

FronzelNeekburm posted:

Investigating Trump is part of a movement toward impeachment. We don't have to impeach literally this very instant, but Democratic leaders shouldn't be shouting, "We don't want to impeach!" from the rooftops now, before we even have all the facts. That's why people are mad at Pelosi. She could've said something neutral, but she has consistently said we shouldn't impeach (at this moment, without the evidence, before we investigate, etc.). Why take that weapon off the table? Because Brazil took a far-right turn, but America won't?

Republicans are flat-out refusing to even discuss good policy because it would be a Democratic victory. McConnell blocks everything that the Democratic House proposes. How does that make Democrats stronger, while investigating Republican crimes makes them weaker?

If we go through all of this, and it doesn't affect Trump in any way, and Republicans still get to burn the country to the ground, then what's the point of investigating? If we believe impeachment is wrong, and that the President can't face any other legal or political consequences, then why bother?

Pelosi has consistently said that we should go where the facts lead us, not get out ahead of them. That's a reasonable position. No one has ever said that impeachment is out under any circumstances. Pay attention to what she actually says, not what some blog post tells you she says.

The other problem is that hearings and such take time. The next election may come before an impeachment vote. It's all pointless unless the Senate Republicans will vote to convict, anyway. The Democrats have no power over Republicans and can't "punish" them in any way. Only the voters can.

The goal is getting Trump out of office ASAP and it may mean letting the voters take care of him. All the Democrats can do is get all the facts into the Congressional Record and the newspapers. If people reelect Trump anyway, that's a much bigger problem.

Alterian
Jan 28, 2003

LeeMajors posted:

They're trying hard to do the same thing in SC but coastal counties are pushing back hard. Most of them have banned them already.

It's loving gross to see such blatant corruption (example #123401384093410934 but still), because like there is no remote principled defensible position to defend plastic bags. It's literally a "we are lobbied to do this and will do this" without any vague philosophy behind it.

God we are hosed.

This seems to be the new environmental "fad" everywhere. Not that I'm saying its a bad thing. I am just curious what was the tipping point with suddenly people shunning plastic bags? I know with the plastic straws it was that turtle video. Was there some sort of video/article I missed that's now pushing this?

Grammarchist
Jan 28, 2013

Alterian posted:

This seems to be the new environmental "fad" everywhere. Not that I'm saying its a bad thing. I am just curious what was the tipping point with suddenly people shunning plastic bags? I know with the plastic straws it was that turtle video. Was there some sort of video/article I missed that's now pushing this?

Plastic bags are a nuisance when discarded improperly, as they always are. As a result, people who care nothing for the wider environment can see the benefit of not having the drat things flying around, getting entangled in your yard or trees etc. Ranchers and farmers are also often allies of these bans, as plastic bags tend to wind up in pastures and can threaten livestock. It's a lot easier to pass a ban on something that's opposed by a wider group of people that can't just be condensed down to liberals and environmentalists.

FoolyCharged
Oct 11, 2012

Cheating at a raffle? I sentence you to 1 year in jail! No! Two years! Three! Four! Five years! Ah! Ah! Ah! Ah!
Somebody call for an ant?

It doesn't hurt that theres been a strong push for reusable bags these days, so there is a stronger alternative than paper bags.

FronzelNeekburm
Jun 1, 2001

STOP, MORTTIME

Deteriorata posted:

Pelosi has consistently said that we should go where the facts lead us, not get out ahead of them. That's a reasonable position. No one has ever said that impeachment is out under any circumstances.

Eregos is saying we should not impeach because it would distract from all the good legislation Democrats are successfully passing now, and that no American will ever change their mind and support impeachment in the future.

Skex
Feb 22, 2012

The great thing about the thousands of slaughtered Palestinian children is that they can't pull away when you fondle them or sniff their hair.

That's a Biden success story.

FoolyCharged posted:

It doesn't hurt that theres been a strong push for reusable bags these days, so there is a stronger alternative than paper bags.

Yeah having bags that don't fall apart at the slightest pressure is a really good selling point for reusable bags. I actually started using them originally for that reason long before the city ordinance banned plastic bags.

Captain Invictus
Apr 5, 2005

Try reading some manga!


Clever Betty
Yeah I've had the same reusable bags since they first introduced them at market basket like 12 years ago and they still hold up albeit are a little rstty, and they hold way more stuff. Plastic is obsolete (though I'll miss being able to use them for trash bags)

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

Banning banning plastic bag is so loving stupid. What else can we ban the banning of?
Lets ban the banning of cigarette smoking in restarauntd

Data Graham
Dec 28, 2009

📈📊🍪😋



Can't wait to see a tidal wave of similar poo poo coming too. Banning banning of plastic straws. Banning banning of giant soda cups. Banning banning of CFC refrigerants.

FoolyCharged
Oct 11, 2012

Cheating at a raffle? I sentence you to 1 year in jail! No! Two years! Three! Four! Five years! Ah! Ah! Ah! Ah!
Somebody call for an ant?

Honestly, the only thing I can imagine when I think about this is Bam Bam from the flinstones.
Ban Ban! Ban Ban!

Internet Explorer
Jun 1, 2005





We already ban the ban of municipal broadband and ban the ban of rent control. Why not go for broke?

LeeMajors
Jan 20, 2005

I've gotta stop fantasizing about Lee Majors...
Ah, one more!


Alterian posted:

This seems to be the new environmental "fad" everywhere. Not that I'm saying its a bad thing. I am just curious what was the tipping point with suddenly people shunning plastic bags? I know with the plastic straws it was that turtle video. Was there some sort of video/article I missed that's now pushing this?

They are awful everywhere but particularly bad in waterways. Submerged they look like jellyfish, a sea turtle’s primary food source. As bad as the straws are, bags are worse.

It’s not a fad to ban them. They are an unnecessary and harmful environmental nuisance.

saintonan
Dec 7, 2009

Fields of glory shine eternal

Oklahoma: The Disaster State

Alterian
Jan 28, 2003

LeeMajors posted:

They are awful everywhere but particularly bad in waterways. Submerged they look like jellyfish, a sea turtle’s primary food source. As bad as the straws are, bags are worse.

It’s not a fad to ban them. They are an unnecessary and harmful environmental nuisance.

I wasn't saying anything against the ban. I'm glad something so obvious is going through. It was frustrating to see my state repeal an 8 year ban that was in place on bags for part of the state. I must not have explained myself very well. Within the last 2 weeks I've seen a large push locally where people are bringing in reusable bags or asking for paper bags when 99.9% of people before a couple weeks ago didn't really care / think about it. Its enough of a sudden change that I wondered if I missed some sort of major article or video that suddenly pushed people who were apathetic about it to be suddenly really into it, similar to plastic straws and the turtle video.

LeeMajors
Jan 20, 2005

I've gotta stop fantasizing about Lee Majors...
Ah, one more!


Alterian posted:

I wasn't saying anything against the ban. I'm glad something so obvious is going through. It was frustrating to see my state repeal an 8 year ban that was in place on bags for part of the state. I must not have explained myself very well. Within the last 2 weeks I've seen a large push locally where people are bringing in reusable bags or asking for paper bags when 99.9% of people before a couple weeks ago didn't really care / think about it. Its enough of a sudden change that I wondered if I missed some sort of major article or video that suddenly pushed people who were apathetic about it to be suddenly really into it, similar to plastic straws and the turtle video.

Oh no worries, I didn't think you were minimizing. I think people are just finally coming around to how harmful reusable plastics are for our environment and plastics bags and straws are simultaneously the most pervasive and the easiest to render obsolete.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010
1.
https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1123210913375559681
Romney was right :ussr:

2.
https://twitter.com/ForecasterEnten/status/1123210823621541888
Hello despair, my old friend

3.
https://twitter.com/LOLGOP/status/1123210778939678720

4.
https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/1123210783788285952
I think there's a lot of this feeling out there, but it's a mistake.

5.
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1123210474701623296
Biden actually says something good

6.
https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1123210283240034304
This is really bad, she was our only hope there

7.
https://twitter.com/NPR/status/1123209888165814272
Yikes!

8.
https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1123209703331368960
They're employees and they should be paid what they're worth!

9.
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1123207894219075584
Good for him

10.
https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1123207875138969602
I feel like this is going to lead to a major arms race.

11.
https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1123206873061236736
Then get new witnesses

12.
https://twitter.com/weareoversight/status/1123206368436080641
Hope it bears fruit

13.
https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1123206218082918400
Fuckin' weak

14.
https://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1122890317626249217


15.
https://twitter.com/GunnelsWarren/status/1123047499617513472
Laser guided at Biden's white working class base

16.
https://twitter.com/windbarb/status/1123053161386782720
:drat:

17.
https://twitter.com/AdamSerwer/status/1122978520228147202
We don't have a bettlejuice emoji?

18.
https://twitter.com/AdyBarkan/status/1123065570742685697

19.
https://twitter.com/davidhogg111/status/1122985092937408512
Take it to 'em Hogg

20.
https://twitter.com/EricLevitz/status/1123048048551133185
Seems very odd. Medicare 4 All and the GND is doable, but free college isn't?

21:
https://twitter.com/joshscampbell/status/1123010717156659200
It's happening here.

22.
https://twitter.com/hourlyFox/status/1123199077888528393
Fox tax

Cythereal
Nov 8, 2009

I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.
https://twitter.com/davidenrich/status/1123046640313622530

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013
Probation
Can't post for 16 hours!
Okay the one-sentence editorializing is getting really old. It feels like Tosh.0 the post.


My understanding so far is these suits are similarly poorly drafted to previous ones, and it's not clear they will succeed.

HelloSailorSign
Jan 27, 2011

Discendo Vox posted:

Okay the one-sentence editorializing is getting really old. It feels like Tosh.0 the post.

Counterpoint: no it's not and you are wrong.

Endymion FRS MK1
Oct 29, 2011

I don't know what this thing is, and I don't care. I'm just tired of seeing your stupid newbie av from 2011.
I'm ok with the quick follow up sentence, personally

Sexual Aluminum
Jun 21, 2003

is made of candy
Soiled Meat

Endymion FRS MK1 posted:

I'm ok with the quick follow up sentence, personally

Yeah a little editorializing is fine.

Cythereal
Nov 8, 2009

I love the potoo,
and the potoo loves you.
Not US news specifically, but, uh, about that climate change...

https://twitter.com/fordm/status/1123043476562743296?s=20

mycomancy
Oct 16, 2016

Cythereal posted:

Not US news specifically, but, uh, about that climate change...

https://twitter.com/fordm/status/1123043476562743296?s=20

There are many reactions and responses to this, but after the last three years, I think I know the exact response to this.

Good, and I can't wait for every other city and our whole species to be wiped from the face of the earth.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Rodenthar Drothman
May 14, 2013

I think I will continue
watching this twilight world
as long as time flows.

Cythereal posted:

Not US news specifically, but, uh, about that climate change...

https://twitter.com/fordm/status/1123043476562743296?s=20

I had a hunch, so I read the article and I was correct - it's subsidence caused by excessive groundwater pumping, not climate change.

Now, are rising sea levels making that better? Not in the least.
At least the central valley in CA and the plains have a bit of space between them and the ocean...

lifetime supply of Pocky
Aug 19, 2003

Sexual Aluminum posted:

Yeah a little editorializing is fine.

Also, I think the poster is doing it based on complaints by people who dislike the twitter updates that "no context am bad," putting the tweet-poster in a bit of a bind. I love twitter dumps, so I'm ok with the one sentence compromise.

mdemone
Mar 14, 2001

Rodenthar Drothman posted:

I had a hunch, so I read the article and I was correct - it's subsidence caused by excessive groundwater pumping, not climate change.

Now, are rising sea levels making that better? Not in the least.
At least the central valley in CA and the plains have a bit of space between them and the ocean...

You should Google about what groundwater is going to do specifically in that area as sea levels rise. Professor from Berkeley was in the news about it in the last few weeks, I want to say.

Pembroke Fuse
Dec 29, 2008

Cythereal posted:

Not US news specifically, but, uh, about that climate change...

https://twitter.com/fordm/status/1123043476562743296?s=20

quote:

Researchers say that large parts of the megacity could be entirely submerged by 2050. North Jakarta sunk 2.5m (eight feet) in 10 years and is continuing to sink an average of 1-15cm a year.

2052: President Trump set to win another term as a combination of both coasts being underwater and tough new anti-voting fraud laws have left just under twenty thousand eligible voters in Peoria, Il. Losing Democratic contender Jack Johnson vowed to continue reaching across the sandbags regardless of how many times the GOP 3% Caucus took pot shots at him from behind them.

When asked to comment on climate change, Trump drooled out a resounding "Bad... Lock her up... Greatest!", affording us a glimpse into his masterful new policy proposals to prevent further panic about the state of the world.

ummel
Jun 17, 2002

<3 Lowtax

Fun Shoe
Edit- wrong thread

ummel fucked around with this message at 00:23 on May 1, 2019

Rodenthar Drothman
May 14, 2013

I think I will continue
watching this twilight world
as long as time flows.

mdemone posted:

You should Google about what groundwater is going to do specifically in that area as sea levels rise. Professor from Berkeley was in the news about it in the last few weeks, I want to say.

You're gonna have to be more specific. My google-fu isn't giving me anything more than "ground going down, water going up."

E: whatever the case, this may be veering off topic, but I am very interested. Pm me?

Rodenthar Drothman fucked around with this message at 21:25 on Apr 30, 2019

GhostofJohnMuir
Aug 14, 2014

anime is not good

Rodenthar Drothman posted:

You're gonna have to be more specific. My google-fu isn't giving me anything more than "ground going down, water going up."

E: whatever the case, this may be veering off topic, but I am very interested. Pm me?

i'm going to assume it has something to do with salt water intrusion into the water table, it's a coastal city

edit: though that would still mean that it's a problem being exacerbated by global warming, not necessarily caused by it

GhostofJohnMuir fucked around with this message at 21:49 on Apr 30, 2019

Rodenthar Drothman
May 14, 2013

I think I will continue
watching this twilight world
as long as time flows.

GhostofJohnMuir posted:

i'm going to assume it has something to do with salt water intrusion into the water table, it's a coastal city

edit: though that would still mean that it's a problem being exacerbated by global warming, not necessarily caused by it

Yeah, but that's also caused mainly by overextraction, and it has, if not a solution, a mitigation method.

Moktaro
Aug 3, 2007
I value call my nuts.


drat, it took THAT long for The Incredible Mr. Limpet to get to Russia?

James Garfield
May 5, 2012
Am I a manipulative abuser in real life, or do I just roleplay one on the Internet for fun? You decide!
Sea level rise isn't helping but Jakarta would have the same problem even if global warming were a hoax.

(and excessive groundwater mining is a problem in the US too)

Name Change
Oct 9, 2005


lifetime supply of Pocky posted:

Also, I think the poster is doing it based on complaints by people who dislike the twitter updates that "no context am bad," putting the tweet-poster in a bit of a bind. I love twitter dumps, so I'm ok with the one sentence compromise.

Those people are angry that they no longer live in a time warp where Twitter doesn't exist, but posting "I agree" after every single tweet is actually worse than that

Deadly Ham Sandwich
Aug 19, 2009
Smellrose

Cythereal posted:

Not US news specifically, but, uh, about that climate change...

https://twitter.com/fordm/status/1123043476562743296?s=20

Even better Schadenfruede, Jakarta did have geologist mayor/governor for a few years, Governor Purnama. He pushed for measures like stop building in sinking areas and build in land, and stop private water companies from pumping the aquifers under the city dry (half of the sinking is due to this). Developers and water companies did not like him. He lost his reelection and was accused of being a blasphemer against Islam.

PerniciousKnid
Sep 13, 2006

Moktaro posted:

drat, it took THAT long for The Incredible Mr. Limpet to get to Russia?

I wonder if the Russian belugas ever honeypot our naval belugas.

Grouchio
Aug 31, 2014

Godamnit CNN. Why must you spin that a senate takeover is impossible next year, many months before election?

Taerkar
Dec 7, 2002

kind of into it, really

The horse race narrative never stops.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

mdemone
Mar 14, 2001

GhostofJohnMuir posted:

i'm going to assume it has something to do with salt water intrusion into the water table, it's a coastal city

edit: though that would still mean that it's a problem being exacerbated by global warming, not necessarily caused by it

Damned if I can remember the details -- and I can't find the link at the moment because my brain is bad. But I'm pretty sure you've got the gist of it.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply