|
CaPensiPraxis posted:Ah yes, the evil hypocracy of "we care about the welfare of children*, let's not traumatize or kill them by neglect" Maybe it's more the fault of the parents who bring the children along while theyr'e committing a crime. Maybe (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 10:13 |
|
|
The Ultimate Doge posted:Maybe it's more the fault of the parents who bring the children along while theyr'e committing a crime. Maybe Nah pretty sure it's the people running a kiddie death camp.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:29
|
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:Smoothie has a buddy named Milkshake. He is a ridiculous creature: Your cat is broken.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:29
|
|
|
Grape posted:Reagan and Daddy Bush were also much closer to the USSR by the end of the 80's and into the early 90's when it went belly up. The stuff the right gets hard over is more the Andropov/Chernenko and early Gorbachev parts of the 80's. The usual argument is that Reagan's renewed round of defense spending (Star Wars™, but also serious projects) finally drove the USSR into bankruptcy while attempting to keep up with the arms race. However, the USSR's economy had already flatlined more or less on its own in the late 70's. Spending 17-25% of your GNP on the military (estimate circa 1988) certainly wasn't healthy compared to the US's ~6-7%, but it wasn't the primary factor.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:30
|
|
|
"I can almost eat off of the dinner table all by myself. No booster seat. I'm such a big boy now."
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:30
|
|
|
The Ultimate Doge posted:"Families Belong Together" Look at this cool dude and his cool posts
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:31
|
|
|
Kale posted:I honestly was not expecting Gorsuch to be a potential swing vote judge. This also means that Roberts probably voted in the dissenting column which doesn't exactly fill one with much confidence in Supreme Court and the idea that he's any sort of reliable swing vote. Alito, Thomas and Kavanaugh are obviously hot garbage and should be expected to side with the regressive opinion pretty much every time as they always have. The upcoming potential Roe v. Wade saving decision pretty much shakes up like It's going to be worse. Thomas is going to retire this summer, and the court is going to have a 5-seat conservative majority that will likely last for 4 or 5 decades, unless the Democratic Party gets its poo poo together with regard to packing the Supreme Court. Trump has also appointed 1/6th of the judges that currently sit on federal courts, and that number is only going to grow. The Democratic Party has been completely out-maneuvered on the courts.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:31
|
|
|
Feinne posted:Nah pretty sure it's the people running a kiddie death camp. If they just sent them back immediately instead of detaining them the open borders people would complain that they weren't given due process
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:31
|
|
|
The Ultimate Doge posted:Maybe it's more the fault of the parents who bring the children along while theyr'e committing a crime. Maybe You might just seem to know what you are talking about if every single death in our custody wasn’t a child seeking asylum.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:31
|
|
|
The Ultimate Doge posted:Maybe it's more the fault of the parents who bring the children along while theyr'e committing a crime. Maybe The 'crime' of seeking asylum Edit: on second thought, not even going with a rhetorical question here. Dumb opinion you have there CaPensiPraxis fucked around with this message at 16:34 on May 20, 2019 |
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:31
|
|
|
The Sean posted:literally soulless, dead eyes "Like a doll's eyes"
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:33
|
|
|
The Ultimate Doge posted:If they just sent them back immediately instead of detaining them the open borders people would complain that they weren't given due process It's like you could give the people seeking asylum due process and ALSO not hold children in a death camp.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:34
|
|
|
The Ultimate Doge posted:If they just sent them back immediately instead of detaining them the open borders people would complain that they weren't given due process You can detain people without murdering their children, hth.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:34
|
|
|
Kale posted:I honestly was not expecting Gorsuch to be a potential swing vote judge. This also means that Roberts probably voted in the dissenting column which doesn't exactly fill one with much confidence in Supreme Court and the idea that he's any sort of reliable swing vote. Alito, Thomas and Kavanaugh are obviously hot garbage and should be expected to side with the regressive opinion pretty much every time as they always have. I think that's an overly optimistic take on what's happening. Gorsuch voted with the liberals on one of his pet issues where he's somewhat reasonable. Roberts may do the same from time to time. But there's not going to be a swingy, moderate judge that everyone tries to win over, because no one on the court is really a moderate or persuadable. There are just rare, seemingly random, minor issues where one of the right-wingers has quirky views.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:34
|
|
|
The Ultimate Doge posted:Maybe it's more the fault of the parents who bring the children along while theyr'e committing a crime. Maybe They should have known about our child concentration camps when they were fleeing US-backed instability and intense poverty in their home countries! Welcome to SA, MAGA fash.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:35
|
|
|
You guys are responding to a chud troll.The Ultimate Doge posted:It seems weird that right-wingers don't like abortions since they're eugenic. I mean not because of the race gap but because people who get abortions just tend to be stupider. Allowing abortions gets them out of the gene pool to prevent Idiocracy
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:36
|
|
|
Feinne posted:It's like you could give the people seeking asylum due process and ALSO not hold children in a death camp. Junior G-man posted:You can detain people without murdering their children, hth. The media and the Democrats aren't advocating for the conditions to be improved though, they're just saying to stop separating the children and then when they stopped separating the children that was worse somehow. It's because they don't really give a poo poo about children, all they care about is making Trump look bad and weakening the borders
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:36
|
|
|
The Ultimate Doge posted:If they just sent them back immediately instead of detaining them the open borders people would complain that they weren't given due process Mods? Arguing about the definition of death camps was banned last week.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:37
|
|
|
The Ultimate Doge posted:Maybe it's more the fault of the parents who bring the children along while theyr'e committing a crime. Maybe I checked into this and, no, it is actually the fault of the government run child internment camps, and not immigrant refugees.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:37
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:That should be the stock photo that is universally used for him. Uhhh no humanity has that one covered 
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:38
|
|
|
The Ultimate Doge posted:The media and the Democrats aren't advocating for the conditions to be improved though, they're just saying to stop separating the children and then when they stopped separating the children that was worse somehow. It's because they don't really give a poo poo about children, all they care about is making Trump look bad and weakening the borders I think you're confusing this thread with people who are blind democrats or 'the media'?
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:38
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1130497273274818560
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:49
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:50
|
|
|
Reminder that he is dumb as poo poo and will be right every now and then by accident
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:52
|
|
|
He just did this to spite the guy whose wife got deported.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:52
|
|
|
Imagine his advisors running after him to TAKE THAT BACK RIGHT NOW while he's off tweeting about Korea or whatever.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:54
|
|
|
Mush brain can't even stay on message.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:56
|
|
|
He finally started to panic that he won't be able to get abortions for the women he cheats on his wife with anymore.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 16:59
|
|
|
WoodrowSkillson posted:Reminder that he is dumb as poo poo and will be right every now and then by accident Ralepozozaxe posted:He just did this to spite the guy whose wife got deported. Junior G-man posted:Imagine his advisors running after him to TAKE THAT BACK RIGHT NOW while he's off tweeting about Korea or whatever. Wooten posted:Mush brain can't even stay on message. Bakanogami posted:He finally started to panic that he won't be able to get abortions for the women he cheats on his wife with anymore. did any of y'all read the article if so maybe you can tell me where he "denounced" anything at all? because it looks to me like this is poo poo journalism implicitly making him seem far far more reasonable than his actual position is
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 17:02
|
|
|
eke out posted:did any of y'all read the article Yeah that article loving sucks and what he said was “I’m pro life but that bill didn’t handle rapes n poo poo”.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 17:04
|
|
|
its because it affects him. it would make it harder on him to force an abortion on someone.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 17:04
|
|
|
Pollyanna posted:Yeah that article loving sucks and what he said was “I’m pro life but that bill didn’t handle rapes n poo poo”. he didn't even say anything about those bills! he just mentioned the exceptions then went on bragging without in any way connecting it to those bills not having any exceptions you'd think people would've learned the lesson by now before buying into a non-quote headline implying donald trump did something Actually Good
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 17:06
|
|
|
Yeah that's a bad tweet.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 17:07
|
|
|
The Sean posted:"I can almost eat off of the dinner table all by myself. No booster seat. I'm such a big boy now."
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 17:08
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/SamHarrisOrg/status/1130163073082224640?s=19 Lmao
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 17:15
|
|
|
Yeah the connection is extremely tenuous, he says he favors the exceptions and we must stay united or whatever. The headlines are all making it out to be him denouncing the bill, whereas he's just sightly contradicting it. It would've been quite a thing to see, if he actually did -- since it's literally the only reason a not-insignificant subset of voters will go for him in 2020.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 17:16
|
|
|
My guess is that Trump currently has lawsuits or threats to go public from women that he has impregnated, and then paid for their abortions. And by that I mean they got abortions and he never paid for them. Cohen would be the one to ask.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 17:17
|
|
|
Trump has been burned by this before- in 2016 he did some interview where he said that women who have abortions should be punished. Then both sides began screaming in unison and he walked it back after someone managed to get it through his head how much that could hurt him. And now someone signed literally that into law, and the idea that it's bad is still stuck in his brain so it popped out again.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 17:19
|
|
|
eke out posted:he didn't even say anything about those bills! he just mentioned the exceptions then went on bragging without in any way connecting it to those bills not having any exceptions NPR had an interview with Standard Republican Flak #77 this morning where the guy repeatedly stated that Trump had criticized the abortion bills, and then attempted to spin it as a big win for Republicans because Trump "Represents the real Republican party which knows how to put the brakes on, voters know they can trust their President to lead from the front even when his own party gets too heated" or something like that. It was really, really weird. "Actually we meant to criticize our own party for being nutbags!"
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 17:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 10:13 |
|
|
Gorson posted:My guess is that Trump currently has lawsuits or threats to go public from women that he has impregnated, and then paid for their abortions. And by that I mean they got abortions and he never paid for them. Cohen would be the one to ask. please leave weird fanfic out of this thread donald trump openly supports these bills that illegally completely criminalize abortion. he happens to nominally support rape/incest exceptions, but they don't matter and it's just a figleaf and they're not stopping him from supporting these insane bills. if any of this stuff you say was true, it would've already happened
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2019 17:22
|
|