Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
slidebite
Nov 6, 2005

Good egg
:colbert:



:swoon:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

KYOON GRIFFEY JR
Apr 12, 2010



Runner-up, TRP Sack Race 2021/22

Nebakenezzer posted:

So the first transatlantic flight is going to reach its centennial on June 14th - 15th. I've been reading a book on the flight as I didn't know a great deal about it. The Vickers Vimy Alcock and Brown flew generated non-engine electricity by a little wind generator. First question: why? Did the Rolls-Royce Eagle engines not have an alternator? I don't get why they'd have two different electrical systems.


the Eagle used an ignition magento system that could probably only deliver enough high voltage in pulses to fire the spark plugs. magnetos were used rather than alternators (or other form of generators) because they are extremely dead reliable and don't require external power - so you don't need a battery. a magneto with a capacitor only provides an impulse for spark plugs, though, and doesn't generate enough power for the other systems (lights, heated suits, etc) as well as the HV impulse for the spark plug. they used a wind turbine rather than an alternator because a) the Eagle didn't have an alternator and b) the little turbine was probably more reliable than an early alternator.

karoshi
Nov 4, 2008

"Can somebody mspaint eyes on the steaming packages? TIA" yeah well fuck you too buddy, this is the best you're gonna get. Is this even "work-safe"? Let's find out!
yep, my hunch was right: there's a meme (sorry for watermark-strata)

BalloonFish
Jun 30, 2013



Fun Shoe

Nebakenezzer posted:

So the first transatlantic flight is going to reach its centennial on June 14th - 15th. I've been reading a book on the flight as I didn't know a great deal about it. The Vickers Vimy Alcock and Brown flew generated non-engine electricity by a little wind generator. First question: why? Did the Rolls-Royce Eagle engines not have an alternator? I don't get why they'd have two different electrical systems.

Electrical systems (for anything except engine ignition, which would be provided by the magnetos) was virtually unheard of for aircraft in 1919, especially for military aircraft (or, in Alcock and Brown's case, mil-surplus) like the Vimy. So no, the Eagle at that time didn't have a drive for a dynamo (alternator technology suitable for use on automotive and aero engines was about four decades in the future).

The magnetos only generate the spark needed for the ignition - 12,000+ volts for a fraction of a second to fire the spark plugs. They really produce electrical energy rather than electrical current.

Nebakenezzer posted:

Second: here is a list of Brown's navigation equipment. I understand what some of these are (like charts and a sextant, obviously) but some of the others are a little obscure to me: Mercantor's chart with two overlays for shooting current sun and stars, Naval sextant with special extra deep grooves for easy reading with vibration, a six inch drift bearing plate (?), an artificial split level horizon (?) [apparently different from a gyro artificial horizon], a baker navigation machine (?), an Appleyard [great brand name] course and distance calculator (?), transverse tables for dead reckoning calculation, and aircraft compass.

"Mercantor's [sic - old-skool way of spelling Mercator] chart with two overlays for shooting current sun and stars" - These would have been paper or acetate sheets on which Brown (or someone) would have drawn Sumner Lines. These are lines along which the aircraft must be if whichever astronomical body is at the calculated angle of altitude at the calculated time. Brown would have drawn a series of these pre-calculated lines for the sun and more for a few (probably half a dozen, maybe up to ten) major navigational stars. This was simply doing as much of the maths beforehand and would allow Brown to quickly interpolate any readings that fell between his pre-drawn lines.

"Naval sextant with special extra deep grooves" - Not sure about this one. It's either refering to the shape of the sextant's handle (which was rather like a pistol grip) so it wasn't joggled about when in use, to the engraved markings on the instrument itself so they're more easily visible when your eyeballs are being pummelled by vibration and slipstream, or to the actual teeth on the sextant's vernier so that the arm doesn't get jogged out of position.

"six-inch drift bearing plate" - I think this is what is more normally called a Wind-Gauge Bearing Plate in RAF terminology. It was a kind of circular slide rule which was mounted in the aircraft's slipstream and used to calculate drift - the effect of the winds aloft on the aircraft's course and movement in the air. Looking at the cockpit layout of the Vimy, I'm not sure how Brown would have used it. I think it would have to have been mounted on the fuselage behind the cockpit and Brown would have had to stand and face backwards to adjust and read it. Hardly the most dangerous thing he would do during the flight, I suppose! This was a smaller, manual, simplified version of a machine originally developed by the Royal Navy in the 1900s for calculating the wind effect of shells over long ranges and incorporated into the first Dreyer Fire Control Table.

"artificial split level horizon" - I'm pretty sure this is a typo for 'spirit level' horizon - just a bubble in a chamber of liquid. Later RAF-pattern sextants included an in-built bubble chamber so the navigator would know when the instrument was perfectly level, since they wouldn't always be shooting to the actual horizon.

"Baker navigation machine" - I can find tantalising references to this but they're all in RAF documents which assume you know what one is! It seems to have been an early form of manually-operated moving map display, with the map for the entire trip printed on it and then wound from one roller to the other as the plane progressed. There are references to it being used both to track star/sun movements and to carry the running navigational plot of the plane's actual course (which is how we would think of a 'moving map' today).

"Appleyard course and distance calculator" - an early, British-developed version of the Dalton E6B dead reckoning calculator still used by pilots today. Another sort of circular slide rule. Appleyard was the RFC officer who developed it.

"transverse tables for dead reckoning calculation" - This should be "traverse tables". They're pre-printed tables to take the work out of doing trigonometric calculations for dead reckoning. They let you quickly work out how your latitude and longitude has changed from your last known position, even if in between your departure point and the DR position you're trying to work out you've been heading in several different directions at various different speeds.

It really is incredible. I'm in awe of people who can do good astro-nav on boats. I can get fairly decent results if I'm taking sightings on land and I take a lot of time both taking the sight and doing the calculations (or cheating and using modern pre-done look-up tables...) and I've tried it at sea and I can get it to the 'we're somewhere south of England but north of France' region which would be vaguely reassuring if all the GPS went down in fog in the Channel. But to do accurate, mission-critical navigation in a Vickers Vimy, in freezing cloud and with snapshot sightings taken in a matter of seconds and then reduced to positions working in the cockpit on your knees is crazy.

Nebakenezzer posted:

Third: So I totally forgot the first flight across the Atlantic was a competition started by the Daily Mail with a 10,000 pound reward. I'm reading a book from the 1950s on the flight, and it has a...story about one of the other entrants, the Martinside Raymor. [A single wing version of the Martinsyde (if you believe wikipedia) Buzzard biplane].

It should be 'Martinsyde' - the company was a collaboration between Henry Martin and George Handasyde.

Nebakenezzer
Sep 13, 2005

The Mote in God's Eye

Cool, thank you. I'm glad to hear there's some mildly archaic things in this text and its not just me; the author spelled 'role' with a upward facing chevron (like a house roof).

BIG HEADLINE
Jun 13, 2006

"Stand back, Ottawan ruffian, or face my lumens!"

shame on an IGA posted:

that's literally an Air Koryo palette swap and my rage is boundless

It's literally a blending of this:



And this, reversed (with dark blue instead of look-how-bond-villain-I-am black):

Cat Mattress
Jul 14, 2012

by Cyrano4747

Nebakenezzer posted:

Cool, thank you. I'm glad to hear there's some mildly archaic things in this text and its not just me; the author spelled 'role' with a upward facing chevron (like a house roof).

Those are called circumflex accents.

Jonny Nox
Apr 26, 2008





That was basically my response but it got me to look up the childfucker.

The Google result was "Financier, Philanthropist, Registered Sex Offender" which I hope they put on his tombstone.

Ola
Jul 19, 2004


It was a few pages back, and it's a party pooping opinion like few, but I still feel quite melancholy about the half life of the world's collective WW2 fighter collection.

meltie
Nov 9, 2003

Not a sodding fridge.

Nebakenezzer posted:

Cool, thank you. I'm glad to hear there's some mildly archaic things in this text and its not just me; the author spelled 'role' with a upward facing chevron (like a house roof).

Cat Mattress posted:

Those are called circumflex accents.

and it's not archaic; it's current British English - a little bit aristocratic but I still see it in use here occasionally.

Platystemon
Feb 13, 2012

BREADS

BalloonFish posted:

"artificial split level horizon" - I'm pretty sure this is a typo for 'spirit level' horizon - just a bubble in a chamber of liquid. Later RAF-pattern sextants included an in-built bubble chamber so the navigator would know when the instrument was perfectly level, since they wouldn't always be shooting to the actual horizon.

You’re right about the typo, but the device is slightly more complicated than that.

A sextant user needs to measure that distance between heavenly bodies and known reference on the Earth. The sea horizon is used when available.

What if you can’t see the horizon because there are clouds or it’s night time or you’re a landlubber? There’s a trick you can use to create your own reference.

The free surface of a liquid, on a stable craft, becomes parallel with the ideal surface of the Earth.

What you do is you measure the height of a heavenly body against its own reflection on the surface of the liquid. Divide the angle in half and that’s the body’s height above the horizon.



Terrestrial explorers used to carry a jar of mercury so they had an ideal liquid for this purpose. Used motor oil was used in the first half of the twentieth century. Its viscosity is greater than water and its dark colouring makes the reflection clearer. Even cold black tea is better than pure water.



So, in a plane, there are issues seeing the true sea horizon. At altitude, it’s quite far away. There are lots of opportunities for clouds to interrupt it. Even if you can see it, the corrections to your measurements are pronounced and dependant on your true (not pressure) altitude and even the tides.

You want an artificial horizon.

Yet a pan of mercury or motor oil is not ideal. What to do?

Well, the reason you used the surface of a liquid is because it’s 1) reflective and 2) parallel to the geoid. What if you use a solid reflective object and guaranteed it was level through other means?

That’s exactly what an “artificial spirit level horizon” is. It’s a mirror with spirit levels affixed to it so you can level it out.



Later, purpose‐built ærial sextants dispensed with the middleman and got the sextant itself level.

Platystemon fucked around with this message at 00:52 on Jun 14, 2019

Ola
Jul 19, 2004

Absolutely loving this old nav tangent, well done guys.

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane

Ola posted:

Absolutely loving this old nav tangent, well done guys.

Seconded. Thank gently caress I don't have to deal with it, but it is a fascinating subject.

See also: range approaches.

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

Won’t the spirit levels read level in a coordinated turn?

Timmy Age 6
Jul 23, 2011

Lobster says "mrow?"

Ramrod XTreme
The Smithsonian Air & Space Museum on the Mall has a cool gallery on the history of navigation all the way from cross-staves up to this breadboard version of the first Magellan GPS.

BalloonFish
Jun 30, 2013



Fun Shoe

Platystemon posted:

You’re right about the typo, but the device is slightly more complicated than that.
..........
That’s exactly what an “artificial spirit level horizon” is. It’s a mirror with spirit levels affixed to it so you can level it out.

Thanks for this - really interesting! My limited knowledge of astro-nav is ground-based, so I assumed it was just a bubble-level. Never thought it would literally be an artificial horizon. I am even more boggled that Brown (or anyone else) was able to use such a thing in an open cockpit over the Atlantic at night!

vessbot
Jun 17, 2005
I don't like you because you're dangerous

hobbesmaster posted:

Won’t the spirit levels read level in a coordinated turn?

Yes, but that's difficulty when using the instrument to judge what level is.

If they're flying straight&level (&unaccelerated) as judged by other means, then it's fine.

Finger Prince
Jan 5, 2007


This ancient navigation thing is pretty cool. Today we're all like :aaaaa: you measure the reflection of stars in a puddle of mercury whaaaaaat???
So the ancient mariner asks: yeah, so what do you do to navigate?
Well, we put a satellite - thats a machine that orbits the earth - in the sky, and the satellite has a device that counts the elemental particles decaying off a radioactive isotope... You're just gonna have to trust me that's a thing... Anyway because those particles come off at an extremely regular interval, you've basically got an extremely accurate clock. Now you know all about navigating with accurate clocks, right? So this satellite transmits the time on it's clock over wireless radio to anyone with an appropriate radio receiver, so they can know exactly where they are withing a couple of meters. You can buy one for the equivalent of a couple of shillings.

Timmy Age 6
Jul 23, 2011

Lobster says "mrow?"

Ramrod XTreme

Finger Prince posted:

This ancient navigation thing is pretty cool. Today we're all like :aaaaa: you measure the reflection of stars in a puddle of mercury whaaaaaat???
So the ancient mariner asks: yeah, so what do you do to navigate?
Well, we put a satellite - thats a machine that orbits the earth - in the sky, and the satellite has a device that counts the elemental particles decaying off a radioactive isotope... You're just gonna have to trust me that's a thing... Anyway because those particles come off at an extremely regular interval, you've basically got an extremely accurate clock. Now you know all about navigating with accurate clocks, right? So this satellite transmits the time on it's clock over wireless radio to anyone with an appropriate radio receiver, so they can know exactly where they are withing a couple of meters. You can buy one for the equivalent of a couple of shillings.

Anyway, they’re great and hey why are you tying me to this stake on a pile of firewood?

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

vessbot posted:

Yes, but that's difficulty when using the instrument to judge what level is.

If they're flying straight&level (&unaccelerated) as judged by other means, then it's fine.

Also I guess the idea for a transatlantic crossing back then was to hit Europe and then figure out precisely which part of the coast you were over based on landmarks?

In that case precision the way we think of it today isn’t necessary. The pacific would be a huge problem though and that’s confirmed by the number of disappearances that occurred.

Nebakenezzer
Sep 13, 2005

The Mote in God's Eye

hobbesmaster posted:

Also I guess the idea for a transatlantic crossing back then was to hit Europe and then figure out precisely which part of the coast you were over based on landmarks?

In that case precision the way we think of it today isn’t necessary. The pacific would be a huge problem though and that’s confirmed by the number of disappearances that occurred.

I think that was the rough idea, though it turns out Alcock and Brown were uniquely suited to the task. Both were flyers, and both understood engineering. Brown trained as an engineer, while Alcock built himself a fighter out of spare parts in his spare time while in the Mediterranean. Brown was a recon flyer and really interested in Navigation; Alcock flew bombing raids on Constantinople in a HP O/400. Both also spent extensive time as POWs, which gave them a lot of time to dream about flying the Atlantic; Brown working out better ways to navigate by air, and Alcock....OK, he went though some pretty poo poo times in the Turkish POW camps

TL;DR Alcock had big, long distance aircraft flying experience, Brown was on the cutting edge of navigation

Jealous Cow
Apr 4, 2002

by Fluffdaddy
How can we connect this with spirit cooking and spirit airlines?

Wingnut Ninja
Jan 11, 2003

Mostly Harmless
That Air Force One design still had a long way to go on the 'Murrica scale.

rscott
Dec 10, 2009

Jealous Cow posted:

How can we connect this with spirit cooking and spirit airlines?

And Spirit Aerosystems

CarForumPoster
Jun 26, 2013

⚡POWER⚡

Wingnut Ninja posted:

That Air Force One design still had a long way to go on the 'Murrica scale.



Can't wait until all of those ugly E-2Cs are replaced with the much better looking E-2D.

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

While we’re on the subject of old school navigation I came upon this incident a while back while perusing Wikipedia:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_188_Pacific_rescue

I’ll just in-line it..

quote:

Jay Prochnow, a retired US Navy pilot, was delivering a Cessna 188 from the United States to Australia. Prochnow had a colleague who was flying another Cessna 188 alongside him. The long trip would be completed in four stages. On the morning of 20 December, both pilots took off from Pago Pago. His colleague crashed on take off but was unharmed. Prochnow landed and set out the following day to Norfolk Island.

When Prochnow arrived at the region where he believed Norfolk Island was, he was unable to see the island. He informed Air Traffic Control (AATC), but at this point, there was no immediate danger. He continued searching; after locating more homing beacons from other islands, he realised his automatic direction finder had malfunctioned and he was now lost somewhere over the Pacific Ocean. He alerted AATC and declared an emergency.

There was only one aircraft in the vicinity, Air New Zealand Flight 103, a McDonnell Douglas DC-10 travelling from Fiji to Auckland. The flight had 88 passengers on board. The captain was Gordon Vette, the first officer was Arthur Dovey, and the flight engineer was Gordon Brooks. Vette knew that if they did not try and help, Prochnow would almost certainly die. Vette was a navigator, and at the time of the incident, he still held his licence. Furthermore, another passenger, Malcolm Forsyth, was also a navigator; when he heard about the situation he volunteered to help. As neither Prochnow nor the crew of the DC-10 had any real idea of where the Cessna was, the crew had to devise creative ways to find it. By this time, contact between both aircraft had been made on long-range HF radio. Prochnow had crossed the international date line, and the date was now 22 December. Vette was able to use the setting sun to gain an approximate position of the Cessna. He instructed the Cessna to point directly at the setting sun. He did the same and noted the difference in heading between the aircraft as four degrees. After making an allowance for the different altitudes of the aircraft, the difference in sunset times between the aircraft and Norfolk Island was also noted. This data allowed the crew to calculate that the Cessna must be southwest of the DC-10 by about 400 nautical miles. About 25 minutes after turning in that direction, contact on short-range VHF radio was established. This had a range of 200 nautical miles. It was hoped the DC-10 would be making a vapour trail to make it more visible. After contacting Auckland it was determined that weather conditions were not suitable for a trail. Brooks knew that by dumping fuel they could produce a vapour trail. As the search was getting more and more desperate, they decided to try it. Prochnow did not see the trail, and it was starting to get dark. Vette wanted all the passengers to be involved, so he asked them to look out of the windows and invited small groups to come to the cockpit.

As it got darker and darker, Prochnow considered ditching, but Vette did not want to give up. So they also used a technique known as "aural boxing" to try to pinpoint the small plane; this took over an hour to complete. Once it had been done, they had a much better approximation of Prochnow's position. The DC-10 used its strobe lights to try to make itself more visible to the Cessna. It took some time, but eventually, Prochnow reported seeing light. This was not the DC-10, it was an oil rig, and Prochnow went towards it. This was identified as Penrod, which was being towed from New Zealand to Singapore. This gave Prochnow’s exact position. After some confusion about the exact position of the Penrod, it was finally established that the estimates of the crew of the DC-10 were very accurate. Prochnow was able to make it to Norfolk Island with his remaining fuel. He touched down on Norfolk Island after being in the air for twenty-three hours and five minutes.

Lost in the middle of the Pacific Ocean in a small crop duster is the stuff of nightmares.

Arson Daily
Aug 11, 2003

There is a TV movie with Scott backula about that very story!

Edit: it’s called “Mercy mission: the rescue of flight 771”

Double edit: there’s a book called Air Vegabonds about a guy who delivered airplanes for piper all over the world back in the 70s. The story about him crossing the Atlantic in winter in a tomahawk is my favorite.

Arson Daily fucked around with this message at 05:38 on Jun 14, 2019

MisterOblivious
Mar 17, 2010

by sebmojo

Arson Daily posted:

There is a TV movie with Scott backula about that very story!

Edit: it’s called “Mercy mission: the rescue of flight 771”

Double edit: there’s a book called Air Vegabonds about a guy who delivered airplanes for piper all over the world back in the 70s. The story about him crossing the Atlantic in winter in a tomahawk is my favorite.

C'mon dude, you can't just drop that factoid and not link the video!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4_f3T8AzJo

JingleBells
Jan 7, 2007

Oh what fun it is to see the Harriers win away!

The BBC have a great article on the 100th Anniversary of Alcock & Brown's transatlantic flight.
Also I do like this picture of their landing:

Syrian Lannister
Aug 25, 2007

Oh, did I kill him too?
I've been a very busy little man.


Sugartime Jones
Any landing you can walk away from is a good landing

monkeytennis
Apr 26, 2007


Toilet Rascal
Didn’t Alcock and Brown’s descendants later cross the ocean in a Phantom? I’m sure I have a signed photo of them somewhere that my dad gave me in the 80’s when he was still the RAF and I think the F-4 in question may have been at RAF Finningley (where we lived) open day that year.

drunkill
Sep 25, 2007

me @ ur posting
Fallen Rib
Airbus did a thing

https://youtu.be/JS6w-DXiZpk

Wingnut Ninja
Jan 11, 2003

Mostly Harmless
That's pretty neat.

Kerosene19
May 7, 2007


United plunked one down good in EWR.

https://twitter.com/FAANews/status/1139956804912406528/photo/1

Ooof

Kerosene19 fucked around with this message at 21:44 on Jun 15, 2019

StandardVC10
Feb 6, 2007

This avatar now 50% more dark mode compliant

That's cool as hell. The nitpicky part of me wishes they'd have scrounged up an A300 or A310 too though.

Blue Footed Booby
Oct 4, 2006

got those happy feet

Finger Prince posted:

This ancient navigation thing is pretty cool. Today we're all like :aaaaa: you measure the reflection of stars in a puddle of mercury whaaaaaat???
So the ancient mariner asks: yeah, so what do you do to navigate?
Well, we put a satellite - thats a machine that orbits the earth - in the sky, and the satellite has a device that counts the elemental particles decaying off a radioactive isotope... You're just gonna have to trust me that's a thing... Anyway because those particles come off at an extremely regular interval, you've basically got an extremely accurate clock. Now you know all about navigating with accurate clocks, right? So this satellite transmits the time on it's clock over wireless radio to anyone with an appropriate radio receiver, so they can know exactly where they are withing a couple of meters. You can buy one for the equivalent of a couple of shillings.

Atomic clocks use vibrations. Decay events are random, to the point where you can use slivers of radioisotopes to drive hardware random number generators for e-gambling.

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

StandardVC10 posted:

That's cool as hell. The nitpicky part of me wishes they'd have scrounged up an A300 or A310 too though.

A340 is missing as well. They explicitly call it out as "in production" aircraft so that makes sense. Though that should exclude the beluga technically?

edit: oh it could've been a beluga xl?

hobbesmaster fucked around with this message at 06:21 on Jun 16, 2019

MrChips
Jun 10, 2005

FLIGHT SAFETY TIP: Fatties out first

So, uhh, this is kind of :stare: -

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/superjet-accident-probe-studies-heavy-handed-pilot-i-458934/

Cat Mattress
Jul 14, 2012

by Cyrano4747

hobbesmaster posted:

A340 is missing as well. They explicitly call it out as "in production" aircraft so that makes sense. Though that should exclude the beluga technically?

edit: oh it could've been a beluga xl?

Yeah that livery is for the XL.

They could have added an A400M though. There was at least one company that was interested in a civilian version.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Carth Dookie
Jan 28, 2013

Blue Footed Booby posted:

Atomic clocks use vibrations. Decay events are random, to the point where you can use slivers of radioisotopes to drive hardware random number generators for e-gambling.

Would a quantum computer be able to accurately model the decay, similar to how it can be used to model the outcome of coin flips?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply