|
Yeah I get why people would react that way to her tweet. I still prefer the use of specific and accurate language instead of language meant to inflame people's emotions, especially from someone whose opinions are highly read such as her.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2019 15:37 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 15:24 |
|
Katie Herzog is a transphobic piece of poo poo. Dan Savage is a racist piece of poo poo. The Stranger is garbage, and I don't really care about making arguments against the neo-liberal trash that love their crap.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2019 15:51 |
|
I usually just go with "kidfucker"
|
# ? Jul 12, 2019 15:51 |
|
Her piece on detransitioners was about as fair and evenhanded an article as is possible on trans issues these days. Everyone has such strong kneejerk reactions to any dissenting takes even though it's an incredibly deep, complex, and nuanced subject. I personally experience gender dysphoria from the paraphilic sexual orientation that leads to becoming a late onset transwoman and I think her writing on the subject has been fair and not hateful at all.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2019 16:01 |
|
Turtle Blogger posted:Her piece on detransitioners was about as fair and evenhanded an article as is possible on trans issues these days. Everyone has such strong kneejerk reactions to any dissenting takes even though it's an incredibly deep, complex, and nuanced subject. I personally experience gender dysphoria from the paraphilic sexual orientation that leads to becoming a late onset transwoman and I think her writing on the subject has been fair and not hateful at all. You are giving off really strong reactionary vibes. Your arguments for defending Herzog are the same arguments made by crypto-fash.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2019 16:11 |
|
Turtle Blogger posted:Yeah I get why people would react that way to her tweet. I still prefer the use of specific and accurate language instead of language meant to inflame people's emotions, especially from someone whose opinions are highly read such as her. This implies you think there is a qualitative difference between raping a ten year old and raping a thirteen year old (I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you don't actually think this). And that's really why people roll their eyes/get disgusted by "it's actually ephebophilia" because there is an implicit argument that "it's a different thing so it's not as bad." Pedophile as used by the general public has a meaning that is broader than the specific Latin term as used in academic publications. Language is like that. Don't carry water for pedophiles.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2019 16:16 |
|
hey guys did you hear about the earthq....
|
# ? Jul 12, 2019 16:19 |
|
I’m only offended by the fact that you all think all those words are Latin when of course they’re Greek.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2019 16:50 |
|
xrunner posted:This implies you think there is a qualitative difference between raping a ten year old and raping a thirteen year old (I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you don't actually think this). And that's really why people roll their eyes/get disgusted by "it's actually ephebophilia" because there is an implicit argument that "it's a different thing so it's not as bad." I understand the point you are making in terms of the aesthetics/narrative value of using the word pedophile even if it's not the word that sexology academics would use. The general public does indeed use the word as you say they do. I think that kids can't consent and that all of it is rape--whether ephebophilia, hebephilia, or pedophilia. I agree with you on that. I still don't think someone should be maligned for being accurate and specific with their word usage.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2019 17:17 |
|
DevNull posted:You are giving off really strong reactionary vibes. Your arguments for defending Herzog are the same arguments made by crypto-fash. I'm left wing and anti-authoritarian as gently caress, actually. If you have an argument aside from trying to rhetorically paint someone you disagree with as the enemy(and therefore bad and wrong), then I'm open to hearing it.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2019 17:21 |
|
Turtle Blogger posted:I'm left wing and anti-authoritarian as gently caress, actually. If you have an argument aside from trying to rhetorically paint someone you disagree with as the enemy(and therefore bad and wrong), then I'm open to hearing it. Listening to chapo and cumtown doesn't make you left wing. In fact, they have really awful politics that aren't really leftist at all.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2019 17:41 |
|
Turtle Blogger posted:I'm left wing and anti-authoritarian as gently caress, actually. If you have an argument aside from trying to rhetorically paint someone you disagree with as the enemy(and therefore bad and wrong), then I'm open to hearing it. I’d argue that in the most charitable reading it comes across as needlessly pedantic and showing off how much smarter than everyone else you are. Like “read the room” And the less charitable is that you’re drawing lines and giving cover to rapists “it was only ephibophilia come on guys it’s not like it was a little kid!”
|
# ? Jul 12, 2019 17:45 |
|
Turtle Blogger posted:I still don't think someone should be maligned for being accurate and specific with their word usage. twodot fucked around with this message at 18:48 on Jul 12, 2019 |
# ? Jul 12, 2019 18:45 |
|
xrunner posted:I’d argue that in the most charitable reading it comes across as needlessly pedantic and showing off how much smarter than everyone else you are. Like “read the room” Whenever I see someone explaining the distinctions between terms loving underage people I really think it's the definition of winning the battle but losing the war. But we had an earthquake!!
|
# ? Jul 12, 2019 18:59 |
|
Unoriginal Name posted:I usually just go with "kidfucker" Can we just word filter both to "kidfucker" so this never comes up again
|
# ? Jul 12, 2019 20:35 |
|
Turtle Blogger posted:I understand the point you are making in terms of the aesthetics/narrative value of using the word pedophile even if it's not the word that sexology academics would use. The general public does indeed use the word as you say they do. I think that kids can't consent and that all of it is rape--whether ephebophilia, hebephilia, or pedophilia. I agree with you on that. I still don't think someone should be maligned for being accurate and specific with their word usage. But this isn't an example of someone being accurate and specific with their word usage. This is someone going out of their way to correct other people's word usage, needlessly, pedantically, and in a way that minimizes the monstrous repeat crimes of a child rapist. Do you not understand the difference between using irony correctly yourself and needing to defend a child rapist? And we're not just talking private life, this is a public person, a reporter, using her fame to offer justification for a serial child rapist, because oh they're not technically a child rapist, at least that hasn't been precisely alleged yet in the years and years and years of repeated child rapes, oh no he's been doing years and years and years of teen rape.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2019 21:42 |
|
Turtle Blogger posted:Katie Herzog is right in saying he's not a pedophile. The proper label based on the ages I've seen mentioned is either ephebephile or hebephile.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2019 23:01 |
|
amazing that anybody continued talking to that guy after he made pedophile libertarian argument number one right off the bat
|
# ? Jul 12, 2019 23:05 |
|
Venuz Patrol posted:amazing that anybody continued talking to that guy after he made pedophile libertarian argument number one right off the bat I don't think anyone was doing it because they though they could change that posters mind. They were doing it in case anyone else wasn't aware of the dangers of the bad faith arguments.
|
# ? Jul 13, 2019 00:55 |
Someone was throwing molotovs at a concentration camp in Tacoma and got killed by the guards
|
|
# ? Jul 13, 2019 19:52 |
|
Someone find his name. That person had a name. Say their name.
|
# ? Jul 13, 2019 22:38 |
|
twodot posted:Nah gently caress this. If you are a doctor, and in your medical paper intended to be read by other doctors you find it useful to distinguish between different sorts of child-loving, then great, I'm glad doctors have technical terms for that. If you are a lay person or talking to lay people and you need terms other than pedophile, you are providing cover for child-fuckers. they're just using accurate language there's no reason to freak out about it
|
# ? Jul 13, 2019 23:42 |
|
Better language would not be to call Epstein a pedophile. We should call him an admitted, convicted sex offender who rapes children
|
# ? Jul 13, 2019 23:56 |
|
JK Fresco posted:Better language would not be to call Epstein a pedophile. We should call him an admitted, convicted sex offender who rapes children So, a kid fucker.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2019 00:13 |
|
ulex minor posted:they're just using accurate language there's no reason to freak out about it JK Fresco posted:Better language would not be to call Epstein a pedophile. We should call him an admitted, convicted sex offender who rapes children Yeah these.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2019 00:14 |
|
therobit posted:So, a kid fucker. Hey, don't short change the guy. He also was a kid fucker trafficker.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2019 00:15 |
|
poo poo POST MALONE posted:Someone find his name. That person had a name. Say their name. If he was an incel who sprayed people with ar fire at the Tacoma Mall his name and photo would have been front and center in that story.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2019 00:18 |
|
ulex minor posted:they're just using accurate language there's no reason to freak out about it
|
# ? Jul 14, 2019 00:25 |
|
poo poo POST MALONE posted:Someone find his name. That person had a name. Say their name. https://twitter.com/Jake_Hanrahan/status/1150202427452383233 This is what I've found about him, and saw it repeated a couple other places so for right now I'm pretty certain his name was Will Van Spronsen.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2019 04:47 |
|
He was arrested in 2018 for defending a 17 year old protestor after the kid was attacked by a cop. https://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/article232647262.html
|
# ? Jul 14, 2019 06:23 |
|
Will Van Spronsen, that sounds an awful lot like John Brown to my ear.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2019 06:47 |
|
From the info that has been put out so far, it sounds like he wasn't attacking main building. He was across the street burning the buses that were being used for transport. So targeting infrastructure, and *not* putting people in danger. Edit: I forgot a very important word... DevNull fucked around with this message at 20:08 on Jul 14, 2019 |
# ? Jul 14, 2019 17:03 |
|
Good summary of ICE incident. https://youtu.be/KNQR6kAHSdI (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Jul 14, 2019 18:36 |
Scionic posted:Good summary of ICE incident. This is a right wing propaganda channel and gently caress you for posting it
|
|
# ? Jul 14, 2019 18:49 |
|
DevNull posted:From the info that has been put out so far, it sounds like he wasn't attacking main building. He was across the street burning the buses that were being used for transport. So targeting infrastructure, and putting people in danger. Targeting infrastructure = putting people in danger = bad. Targeting a building full of prisoners that definitely would be left to die if the building was set on fire = not putting people in danger = good?
|
# ? Jul 14, 2019 18:51 |
|
22 Eargesplitten posted:Targeting infrastructure = putting people in danger = bad. Sorry, I meant to type "not" putting people in danger. I shouldn't post before coffee apparently. I corrected my post.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2019 20:10 |
|
Oh, okay. Sorry, that’s actually the type of sentiment I would expect to hear from some people. It didn’t mention whether he actually used his rifle at all, and I would think that ICE would have trotted that out front and center if he had. I wonder if he only even had it to make sure that they would try to kill him rather than just arresting him again.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2019 20:45 |
|
Scionic posted:Good summary of ICE incident. this hosed up my youtube recommended and now im a right wing terrorist thanks for nothing
|
# ? Jul 14, 2019 20:59 |
|
Overhead that 4 or 5 people were on administrative leave for the shooting. And that the guy was trying to start a fire around some propane tanks.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2019 21:24 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 15:24 |
|
BrandorKP posted:Overhead that 4 or 5 people were on administrative leave for the shooting. Paid leave. A free vacation as a reward. As usual.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2019 22:20 |