Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
radmonger
Jun 6, 2011

Guavanaut posted:

What if you pick a broadcast channel that turns out to be wrong?

It’s kind of funny seeing this thread interweave entirely correct mockery of anarchocapitalism with full-throated defence of it when it comes to the web, and media in general.

Providing up to date political information is a core state function; with the demise of customer-funded news media it is no longer one that can be left to the private sector.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Junior G-man
Sep 15, 2004

Wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma


So which one of us was silly enough to volunteer to make ukmt podcast spreadsheets or something?

Been a bit out of things as I've no roaming in this alpine paradise.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013


You know say what you like about the silent hill movie the practical effects were really good.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

radmonger posted:

Providing up to date political information is a core state function;

lol no it isn't.

radmonger posted:

with the demise of customer-funded news media it is no longer one that can be left to the private sector.

Think about this sentence for a minute...

What exactly makes you think "customer funded news media" is dying? What do you think subscribe to my patreon for 20 million hours of me ranting in your preferred political corner is?

Rarity
Oct 21, 2010

~*4 LIFE*~

Junior G-man posted:

So which one of us was silly enough to volunteer to make ukmt podcast spreadsheets or something?

Been a bit out of things as I've no roaming in this alpine paradise.

Rarity posted:

I made a spreadsheet for people to log interest in being part of UKMP. You can also let everyone know the things you're particularly knowledgeable about/would like to chat about!

AceOfFlames
Oct 9, 2012


I have a really bad cough right now and this made me laugh and cough so hard I got light-headed. Thanks for nearly making me literally die laughing.

oscarthewilde
May 16, 2012


I would often go there
To the tiny church there

CGI Stardust posted:

Going back a bit, the parallels between fascism and neoliberalism are fascinating.

Cribbing from Eco's Ur-fascism strongly here. Both are explicitly hierarchical, but the source of hierarchy differs - fascists tend to rely on nature and myth (traditionalist, spiritual or similar), but neoliberals use success in the market; also, in neoliberalism it's technically possible to shift places in the hierarchy if your behaviour is rewarded by the market. There's a direct comparison with the Nazis here - Hitler was explicit about how the best people to manage the common wealth of the Volk would be those business owners who had proved themselves through market competition thus being the naturally best-suited. Both are also very, very happy to discard those considered weak. Both reject modernity - fascism through appeal to tradition and a mythical past, and neoliberalism through rejecting human rationality, replacing it with the market as both the most rational of actors and the best decision-maker / information aggregator. Neoliberalism is, like fascism, intrinsically undemocratic since, as people are irrational, the market is best-placed to make decisions - markets in a sense become democracy since they're aggregating the decisions of the population. The fascist cult of heroism, action, and death is kind of paralleled by the neoliberal entrepreneurial spirit and pursuit of risk as behavioural corrector. Also there's some similarity between the fascist love of struggle and the neoliberal love of market competition, both are determining fitness-to-exist. Final similarity I noticed - both are suspicious of new knowledge, in the neoliberal case specifically if it hasn't been obtained by market mechanisms.

Some important differences though. It's worth distinguishing the instrumentalised racism in neoliberal societies from the racism of fascist societies - it is theoretically possible to have neoliberalism without racism (or other prejudice), but in practice it tends to utilise existing racism; compare this to fascism, which is dependent on some Other. There's also no fear of difference or disagreement in neoliberalism; the more ideas in the market, the better, since that's the way truth is determined. Appeal to a frustrated middle class is a foundation of fascism, but I'm not sure it applies so much to neoliberalism - might be some parallels with its implementation in the 1970s-80s?

Taking a few definitions of fascism



neoliberalism has nothing to do with national rebirth or populism (it's very anti-populist), it's not necessarily nationalistic or ethnocentric, and not concerned with purity or decline. I'd say that the similarities might make it easy to slide into fascism, but that's just a guess.

Few pages back, but just I was busy helping someone move today so a bit of a late response, but I can't say I agree. Especially when it comes to your characterisation of rationality in neo-liberal politics. Neo-liberalism does in fact rely in great part on a rational modernity and a very particular conception of rationality. As you, quite rightly, say neo-liberalism does in fact rely on a totally rational market as the foundation of their politics, but within this market and within their politics people are completely and totally rational. Their entire conception of man is one of a Homo Economicus, the rational actor in a market situation who would always do what is rational in a particular situation. This gives them the ability to claim that the market does not allow for any kind of discrimination. There would be no need for top-down measures to alleviate in-equality, both in opportunity and outcome, because no market (which is perfectly rational by definition) would allow for this kind of irrational behaviour.

Neo-liberalism is a heinous ideology, only able vaguely combat inequality at a social level while greatly increasing economic inequality, while simultaneously doing everything they can to protect the status-quo, but it is not heinous in the same way (ur-)fascism is. Its 'capitalism with a human face' is much more insidious and ordinary than the complete destruction of status-quo that any fascism will necessarily entail. They're both awful, though, perhaps unfortunately, they're very different.

ShaneMacGowansTeeth
May 22, 2007



I think this is it... I think this is how it ends

AceOfFlames posted:

I have a really bad cough right now and this made me laugh and cough so hard I got light-headed. Thanks for nearly making me literally die laughing.

it's a front and back of the same mascot...

Verizian
Dec 18, 2004
The spiky one.

There's no ring.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

radmonger posted:

It’s kind of funny seeing this thread interweave entirely correct mockery of anarchocapitalism with full-throated defence of it when it comes to the web, and media in general.

Providing up to date political information is a core state function; with the demise of customer-funded news media it is no longer one that can be left to the private sector.
It's fairly easy to pick a broadcast channel that is in fact entirely wrong. Like, Fox News.

Or you can pick one that is state funded and also often entirely wrong, like RT.

Or you can pick one that happens to be mostly right about matters that can be empirically proven, but through selectivity be entirely wrong about other things, like the BBC.

I'm not convinced that the web as media is any more anarcho-capitalist than going back to the 19th century and saying to the anarchist there "ha, bet you paid for those hand printing presses, gotya!" The people who control which flyers stay up and which get torn down the most might be capitalist as hell, but that doesn't make the act of flyering a capitalist one.

Coohoolin
Aug 5, 2012

Oor Coohoolie.
Sam Seder is a pro follow, especially for his hilarious debates with libertarians

https://youtu.be/dlN9plBx6Ho

Junior G-man
Sep 15, 2004

Wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/aug/02/labour-boris-johnson-progressive-pact-greens-lib-dems

Lmao Paul Mason is losing his mind.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Coohoolin posted:

Sam Seder is a pro follow, especially for his hilarious debates with libertarians

https://youtu.be/dlN9plBx6Ho

"John Connor from Los Angeles California"

lol

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

OwlFancier posted:

lol no it isn't.
Providing political consensus is a key state function.

Television didn't arrive in South Africa until the mid-70s, and only under the provision that the only legal broadcaster be state controlled.

So all news that was fed into homes through the television was through the SABC, and all news that was fed into the SABC was through the white minority government.

What that did was provide a consensus, you could be fairly sure that anyone who watched the news got the same news as you, which would allow for discussion reasonably sure that you were occupying the same political universe as the person you were discussing with.

You could talk about the police cracking down on a riot and be liberal (the police were too harsh) or conservative (the police were too lenient), but you'd be 99% sure that you wouldn't be talking with someone completely off table saying "the rioters were aliens" or "it wasn't a riot, it was a peaceful demonstration and police murdered a hundred people."

Unfortunately one of these two was true. Thus is the central advantage and disadvantage of state media. A thousand sources blooming has destroyed that for worse and for better.

And some sources have seemingly always been broken.

Junior G-man
Sep 15, 2004

Wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma


One LibDem favoured stronghold voting Libdem and he wants to have a GroKo with everyone but SNP.

Brilliant Paul, just brilliant.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I agree that the role of the state is to maintain the state and thus occupying the political space with its preferred brand of information is an important element of the state, but I object to characterising that as "up to date political information" as it is highly misleading.

namesake
Jun 19, 2006

"When I was a girl, around 12 or 13, I had a fantasy that I'd grow up to marry Captain Scarlet, but he'd be busy fighting the Mysterons so I'd cuckold him with the sexiest people I could think of - Nigel Mansell, Pat Sharp and Mr. Blobby."

I think Paul thinks that big alliances are always better no matter how nonsensical they are - NATO, EU, etc.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

OwlFancier posted:

I agree that the role of the state is to maintain the state and thus occupying the political space with its preferred brand of information is an important element of the state, but I object to characterising that as "up to date political information" as it is highly misleading.
Up to date information that the state would like you to know before anyone else tells you different.

Communist Thoughts
Jan 7, 2008

Our war against free speech cannot end until we silence this bronze beast!


Since it seems labour aren't likely to win a majority a coalition seems like a good idea, since otherwise the LDs will just go into coaliyion with the cons

The issue is thinking the LDs are progressives or allies of labour.

Greens are alright tho and SNP are pretty ok

Rarity
Oct 21, 2010

~*4 LIFE*~
https://twitter.com/MadeleinaKay/status/1155087564879081473

I take it back can we Brexit today please?

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
#EUsupergirl and NotRacistWolf are a deep cover pro-Brexit org

Rarity
Oct 21, 2010

~*4 LIFE*~

Guavanaut posted:

#EUsupergirl

To be fair, I got mad respect for her hustle

namesake
Jun 19, 2006

"When I was a girl, around 12 or 13, I had a fantasy that I'd grow up to marry Captain Scarlet, but he'd be busy fighting the Mysterons so I'd cuckold him with the sexiest people I could think of - Nigel Mansell, Pat Sharp and Mr. Blobby."

Guavanaut posted:

#EUsupergirl and NotRacistWolf are a deep cover pro-Brexit org

Don't forget the Breunion Boys!

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Rarity posted:

To be fair, I got mad respect for her hustle

Still not as good as belle delphine :colbert:

None of us will ever achieve as much as belle delphine.

Nothingtoseehere
Nov 11, 2010


There's reasons not to deal with the Lib Dems, but there's absolutely no reason labour shouldn't be making a pact with the Greens or at least try to negotiate one. I doubt the Lib Dems would even make a pact with labour that didn't give them everything on a platter though - liberials dislike socialism more than Fascism, and Jo Swindon is similar. Putting the effort in would be useful on the doorstep to convert wavering left-wing remainers thought.

Bardeh
Dec 2, 2004

Fun Shoe

this is giving me intense douche chills

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I would like to see labour co-opt the actual good bits of the greens but I dunno entirely how amenable the whole party would be given that it's arguably more than a little high tory in the "wants to live in a green village forever (by keeping all the paups out)" fashion.

Azza Bamboo
Apr 7, 2018


THUNDERDOME LOSER 2021
Let's make a deal with the greens and bend over backwards to join up with one parliamentary vote from Brighton Pavillion.

Look I love the greens and if I could choose any party to win it'd be them, but I don't see how this is a fair deal for Labour.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

That too, not sure how much the greens could contribute electorally though their assistance on the ground would be helpful.

Rarity
Oct 21, 2010

~*4 LIFE*~
The Greens are also veering more and more liberal as all the socialists have been abandoning them for Labour

Nothingtoseehere
Nov 11, 2010


The point is sweeping up the 2-3% of the vote they gather in most constituencies - in marginal seats those votes can be the difference between taking the seat or not, I'd reckon such a pact would be worth 10ish seats, worth giving the greens a extra one or two. How many of their voters follow central party policy is a different matter, but it also helps burnish labours green credentials with the young (along with the green industrial revolution stuff of course)

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

As I said though I'm not really sure if that would be the case? I doubt the greens would agree not to stand candidates and even fewer of their on the ground activists would help out I think. And I EXTREMELY doubt that many seats would actually vote green rather than labour... And labour would be highly unlikely to go for that arrangement of not standing either.

A formal pact between two really quite different parties both in scale and goals is just... a lot of effort that I don't think would give that many returns.

Miftan
Mar 31, 2012

Terry knows what he can do with his bloody chocolate orange...


Hey I don't have access to a computer and can't edit this on my phone. Will you add me? Topics include philosophy (ethics and political specifically), anarchism, antisemitism, Israel/Palestine. Availability is ever day after 4pm and all day weekends. You can fill in the rest ;)

Jaeluni Asjil
Apr 18, 2018

Sorry I thought you were a landlord when I gave you your old avatar!

OwlFancier posted:

I would like to see labour co-opt the actual good bits of the greens but I dunno entirely how amenable the whole party would be given that it's arguably more than a little high tory in the "wants to live in a green village forever (by keeping all the paups out)" fashion.

My mother's Green and I think she's fairly typical of Greens round here. She'll go tory rather than labour. She has never voted labour in her life. I rather suspect she has voted tory on a number of occasions and lib dem a couple of times.
She felt sorry for Theresa May and admires 'strong women' (as in Thatcher). She did get somewhat sparkly eyed seeing Emily Thornberry in action at PMQs one time and as I was round hers at the time, asked me who she was.

Rarity
Oct 21, 2010

~*4 LIFE*~

Miftan posted:

Hey I don't have access to a computer and can't edit this on my phone. Will you add me? Topics include philosophy (ethics and political specifically), anarchism, antisemitism, Israel/Palestine. Availability is ever day after 4pm and all day weekends. You can fill in the rest ;)



:thunkher:

Angepain
Jul 13, 2012

what keeps happening to my clothes

I'm just glad he's come around on the important issues

Pochoclo
Feb 4, 2008

No...
Clapping Larry

Just loving lol at this amateur hour bullshit, your ukmt.xls doesn't even have a dedicated chocolate_orange_prefs column

ShaneMacGowansTeeth
May 22, 2007



I think this is it... I think this is how it ends

christ I think I just died

baka kaba
Jul 19, 2003

PLEASE ASK ME, THE SELF-PROFESSED NO #1 PAUL CATTERMOLE FAN IN THE SOMETHING AWFUL S-CLUB 7 MEGATHREAD, TO NAME A SINGLE SONG BY HIS EXCELLENT NU-METAL SIDE PROJECT, SKUA, AND IF I CAN'T PLEASE TELL ME TO
EAT SHIT


this entire song is about hating someone

the grift is powerful indeed

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tarnop
Nov 25, 2013

Pull me out

Bardeh posted:

I also like the people screeching about how it'll make us go bankrupt, as if taxing the ultra-wealthy is just completely impossible and unacceptable.

The standard (idiot) response to that is usually "then they'll all just leave the country"

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply