|
You're going to have to demand a trial by congress.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 19:29 |
|
|
# ? May 16, 2024 18:21 |
spacetoaster posted:You're going to have to demand a trial by congress. Trial by combat is technically still legal in common-law states. It was not abolished in England until 1819, and so American states that adopted the British common law -- as all 13 colonies did -- technically also adopted trial by combat, and there's been no decisive appellate ruling on it since. Michigan was established in 1837, however, so if it adopted British common law at the time, that would exclude trial by combat, so OP may be out of luck on that front. OTOH if it adopted the common law of the other American states, then trial by combat may still be valid there unless it's been expressly repealed by statute.
|
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 19:33 |
|
Front lawn light brite sovcit billboard was not what I expected to read this afternoon, but I am grateful for the experience.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 19:33 |
Shame OP chickened out. This could have been the sunken bath tub of the legal thread.
|
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 19:51 |
|
Shoutout to VanSandman for his blessed quote of the OP for posterity forever.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 20:04 |
|
Hieronymous Alloy posted:Trial by combat is technically still legal in common-law states. It was not abolished in England until 1819, and so American states that adopted the British common law -- as all 13 colonies did -- technically also adopted trial by combat, and there's been no decisive appellate ruling on it since. I'm afraid you're mistaken. I did not say trial by combat. Break out the legal history book. They're going to need to find up to 6 regular townswomen.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 20:05 |
|
Kimsemus posted:Shoutout to VanSandman for his blessed quote of the OP for posterity forever. I have so much not legal advice to give, most of which is "stop doing that!"
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 20:28 |
|
I just love the "I dont believe in laws or the authority of the court" attitude coupled with him running to a bunch of lawyers for help. What did he expect to happen?
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 20:30 |
spacetoaster posted:I'm afraid you're mistaken. I did not say trial by combat. Break out the legal history book. A trial by congress doesn't make any sense though, this isn't an impotence case?
|
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 20:31 |
|
My head says troll attempt but my heart wants it to be true.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 20:31 |
|
Hieronymous Alloy posted:A trial by congress doesn't make any sense though, this isn't an impotence case? It makes as much sense as his post.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 20:33 |
|
Soothing Vapors posted:Great posts guys. Very helpful. "Nuisance Percy" would be a great band name though.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 20:55 |
|
SovCit thinking his property rights trump his neighbors' and coming to lawyers for help sounds dumb enough to be true, but not nearly enough words were misspelled. 4/10
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 21:04 |
|
Even sovcits have enough brains to use the automatic browser spellcheck but nobody who knows ANYTHING about law could have made that post. I have met this stupid a person before and they could absolutely have asked me this. I bet you the guy will double down after any and all criticism.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 21:41 |
|
Alchenar posted:My head says troll attempt but my heart wants it to be true. His post does not have a gold fringe so that makes it true, except in jurisdictions falling under maritime law.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 22:00 |
|
spacetoaster posted:You're going to have to demand a trial by congress. I love death by SnuSnu.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 22:01 |
|
Still laughing at “nuisance percy”
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 23:33 |
|
Omg that story is incredible quote:My wife and I wrote a very polite but very firm letter back to the Court saying that we did not consent to the jurisdiction of the Michigan Court and so we would not be appearing, as it was none of the Michigan Court’s business. We received a letter back from the Court saying that our letter was an answer, which it obviously was, and there were some dates listed. Lol owned
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 23:35 |
Hey OP, come back, I have a real question for you. How does one not consider willingly living in a state not indicative of consent to be governed by that state Extra Q I’m interested in your feedback on: why do your rights extend to your neighbor’s property but their rights don’t extend to yours? Did you consider that maybe they don’t consent to your rule?
|
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 23:40 |
|
Y'all really need to click the button and read his older posts in this thread. I knew I remembered him posting here about a year ago, and you're missing out if you don't go back and read them.
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 23:50 |
|
Soothing Vapors posted:Hahaha, what the f*ck (excuse my language)? Are the cases not in English? Were they not written with words contained in a dictionary? What "TRAINING" does he need to understand them, exactly? Omg. (That’s not why it’s called common law)
|
# ? Aug 5, 2019 23:54 |
More like “come on, law!”
|
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 00:02 |
|
If you are going to assert the court lacks jurisdiction over you you probably should NOT write it letters * Just an FYI for later Dear Michigan Court You have no jurisdiction over me. Signed, man who lives in and has property in Michigan. * evil lawyers know how to do this but won’t tell you for free
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 00:04 |
|
euphronius posted:If you are going to assert the court lacks jurisdiction over you you probably should NOT write it letters * The case has been removed to an Admiralty Court and I am much happier. All the fringe you could hope for. Thank you for the legal advice provided during the free consultation.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 00:10 |
|
euphronius posted:Omg. I missed this little tidbit and it's extra funny gently caress lawyers and incomprehensible laws tbh should just go back to beating each other to death when we disagree
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 00:24 |
|
My lawyer can beat up your lawyer
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 00:32 |
|
Anonymous Zebra posted:Y'all really need to click the button and read his older posts in this thread. I knew I remembered him posting here about a year ago, and you're missing out if you don't go back and read them. quote:A big part of problem is that most people, yourself included, don't even understand the freeman's ideology. The ABA is an extremely powerful, protectionist organization, and they're out there running NONSTOP interference trying to make freemen who attempt to take the law into their own hands look bad. Look at these f*cking hitpieces run by an allegedly "neutral" organization:
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 01:58 |
|
WHERE IS THE ORIGINAL POST I FUCKIN NEED THIS
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 02:02 |
|
blarzgh posted:WHERE IS THE ORIGINAL POST I FUCKIN NEED THIS quote:So I'm a little frustrated by the Michigan Court right now and I thought maybe one of the guild members in this thread could shine some light on exactly how you get a Court officer to back off.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 02:20 |
|
E: f;b VanSandman quoted it for all of us above, reposting so nothing happens to it: Soothing Vapors posted:So I'm a little frustrated by the Michigan Court right now and I thought maybe one of the guild members in this thread could shine some light on exactly how you get a Court officer to back off. Hey OP why do you think you have the right to dictate what your neighbors do with their sovereign lawns? BonerGhost fucked around with this message at 02:23 on Aug 6, 2019 |
# ? Aug 6, 2019 02:21 |
|
BonerGhost posted:E: f;b He did let them dictate what they did with their sovereign lawns. Then he did the same. [Cue follow-on question about Castle Doctrine and Mk 19s]
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 02:29 |
|
We also installed some floodlighting to accentuate the design and draw attention to it, and rigged some LEDs to make both the snake and the words “DON’T TREAD ON ME” glow. Just lol until the end of time
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 03:12 |
|
Soothing Vapors posted:Great posts guys. Very helpful. If you can find a Freeman Court you can try to file a lien against the Court's assets for any damages they have caused you by their attempt to create joinder with you.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 03:34 |
|
I don’t know what’s real
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 03:39 |
|
I feel like the only applicable law in this case is Poe's Law.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 05:58 |
|
I still want to say that this is a troll by someone who needs something to do when they're stuck indoors in the August heat.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 12:25 |
|
SV is obvious but I can’t tell who he’s actually hooked
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 12:53 |
|
I really appreciate SV's commitment to his craft; trolling a legal advice thread with a series of effort-posts over a span of months requires a certain type of dedication you don't typically see. It's like making carefully crafted shitposts in a lightly travelled knitting thread.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 13:39 |
|
Phil Moscowitz posted:SV is obvious but I can’t tell who he’s actually hooked He got me. I got real mad that he deleted it like "this dumbass..." then I checked the post history because it was too funny to be real.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 14:12 |
|
|
# ? May 16, 2024 18:21 |
|
Don’t feel bad, it was a well executed troll. Let’s move on so he can bag more people in eight months when he comes back.
|
# ? Aug 6, 2019 14:30 |