|
eschaton posted:National RAII Association
|
#
?
Aug 15, 2019 21:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 03:38 |
|
|
The only way to stop a bad guy with SFINAE is a good guy with SFINAE
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2019 04:35
|
|
|
eschaton posted:National RAII Association
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2019 05:56
|
|
|
eschaton posted:National RAII Association
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2019 06:04
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:The only way to stop a bad guy with SFINAE is a good guy with SFINAE
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2019 07:21
|
|
|
I know what you're thinking, did he delete that pointer six or seven times? well, what's it gonna be, punk?
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2019 08:55
|
|
|
Sagacity posted:I know what you're thinking, did he delete that pointer six or seven times? well, what's it gonna be, punk?
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2019 12:26
|
|
|
I heard the new guy has to register his template patterns he brings from job to job on a thumbdrive as lethal weapons
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2019 13:00
|
|
|
during the big crash, a bunch of stack pointers jmped out the window
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2019 13:20
|
|
|
yeah you “hate undefined behavior” but I bet YOU dump a big core at least once a day
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2019 13:25
|
|
|
C++ code:
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2019 04:58
|
|
|
oh yeah i'm goin down to the range with the boys Sunday to test out this new beauty *hefts the entirety of Boost*
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2019 09:51
|
|
|
VikingofRock posted:
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2019 15:02
|
|
|
hell yeah my forth is getting better https://twitter.com/LuigiThirty/status/1163338710391431170?s=20
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2019 07:39
|
|
|
I decided to read practical common lisp out of curiosity about why some people rave about it and I think it’s giving me brain worms
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2019 06:28
|
|
|
 you can try it on Linux
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2019 06:53
|
|
|
Arcsech posted:I decided to read practical common lisp out of curiosity about why some people rave about it and I think it’s giving me brain worms i tried to learn common lisp once once
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2019 07:04
|
|
|
eschaton posted:
lol this page is hosed up on mobile, only one word per line.
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2019 07:58
|
|
|
common lisp is fine and has a lot more libraries than say clojure or scheme however you gotta remember that common lisp was like six lisp dialects mashed together into a single language and stdlib to conquer them all so there are a lot of weird things buried in there
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2019 20:14
|
|
|
eschaton posted:
yo this is pretty neat, might give it shot Notorious b.s.d. posted:common lisp is fine and has a lot more libraries than say clojure or scheme i dunno if it has more libraries than clojure if you count that clojure can use java libs really easily yeah the stdlib is weird as gently caress sometimes but at least it's pretty broad and has some neat stuff in it. i do wish it had been updated sometime in the last two and half decades so you could do things like, y'know, threads or http without having to pull in a library. but oh well totally see why people got super obsessed with this poo poo in like the late 90s tho, it's wild how far ahead of (for example) java 1.2 this would have been in 1998. also totally understand why common lisp did not eat the world, this seems great for a project worked on by 1 person or a small group of like-minded folks, trying to work on a large (~60 people or more) project in lisp sounds like a nightmare
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2019 23:46
|
|
|
Arcsech posted:totally see why people got super obsessed with this poo poo in like the late 90s tho, it's wild how far ahead of (for example) java 1.2 this would have been in 1998. also totally understand why common lisp did not eat the world, this seems great for a project worked on by 1 person or a small group of like-minded folks, trying to work on a large (~60 people or more) project in lisp sounds like a nightmare still better than python
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2019 00:19
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:still better than python this is quite possible, i have not used python for anything more than single-file one-offs for a long time might depend on how macro (if lisp) or annotation (if python) crazy the codebase gets tho
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2019 00:28
|
|
|
Arcsech posted:this is quite possible, i have not used python for anything more than single-file one-offs for a long time irl does anyone actually use macros in a common lisp codebase i sure hop enot
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2019 00:30
|
|
|
I dunno how it did it, but the paper "The A+ programming language, a different APL" explained lisp's syntax (function arg1 arg2), thunks (a block of code fixed with its immediate environment, apparently from ALGOL 60), and tail recursion (having the compiler figure out it can just jump to the beginning of the function instead of re-calling it)
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2019 01:48
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:irl does anyone actually use macros in a common lisp codebase yeah but like 90% of it is to make custom with- and define- forms that work like the standard forms look at say cl6502 for an example
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2019 04:43
|
|
|
https://openpowerfoundation.org/the-next-step-in-the-openpower-foundation-journey POWER arch dipping into that risc-v juice it doesn't even have a compact instruction set encoding though afaik though so i dunno how useful it will be
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2019 21:39
|
|
|
Sapozhnik posted:https://openpowerfoundation.org/the-next-step-in-the-openpower-foundation-journey yes and no risc-v is partly an open isa, and partly a way to experiment with wild-rear end isa extensions while having existing compilers and linkers and poo poo for the base isa. power is now gonna be open, but i doubt anyone will want to extend it the way researchers do risc-v so the open isa is cool, and the opening of their interconnects are cooler Sapozhnik posted:it doesn't even have a compact instruction set encoding though afaik though so i dunno how useful it will be is this a joke i hope it's just really un-funny and not something that you actually believe
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2019 01:27
|
|
|
no one isa should have all that POWER
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2019 01:30
|
|
|
Sapozhnik posted:https://openpowerfoundation.org/the-next-step-in-the-openpower-foundation-journey just wait Apache Power ibm tired of chip design
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2019 02:53
|
|
|
didn’t MIPS or someone go nuclear over left-shift instructions while fading into irrelevance
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2019 02:54
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:no one isa should have all that POWER
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2019 09:25
|
|
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:just wait Apache was a 1990s POWER derivative, unrelated to current chips in design
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2019 09:53
|
|
|
Sapozhnik posted:it doesn't even have a compact instruction set encoding though afaik though so i dunno how useful it will be I mean, if you mean like Thumb, neither does 64-bit ARM. If you're aiming at servers rather than microcontrollers that's not a big deal.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2019 10:50
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:Apache was a 1990s POWER derivative, unrelated to current chips in design whoosh
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2019 20:10
|
|
|
Malcolm XML posted:whoosh 
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2019 23:59
|
|
|
feedmegin posted:I mean, if you mean like Thumb, neither does 64-bit ARM. If you're aiming at servers rather than microcontrollers that's not a big deal. x86 is a compact encoding for an underlying risc architecture, don't @ me
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2019 00:01
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:x86 is a compact encoding for an underlying risc architecture, don't @ me christ on a cracker
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2019 00:54
|
|
|
JawnV6 posted:christ on a cracker is a compact encoding for an underlying ritz architecture
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2019 02:33
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:underlying ritz architecture mods?
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2019 02:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 03:38 |
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:is a compact encoding for an underlying ritz architecture
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2019 02:58
|
|