|
Vintersorg posted:Please god kill me. So Tony's has the name of their restaurant on the inside of the door?
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 01:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 03:52 |
|
|
Krankenstyle posted:i havent seen the movie but i like the awkwardness of the poster a lot The dialogue gets into awkward territory a little, in a fun way https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2tGz4wDaQM
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 01:51
|
|
|
duz posted:So Tony's has the name of their restaurant on the inside of the door? It's on of the doors where the top and bottom separate, so the bottom can stay closed, but the top can swing out and act as signage.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 02:02
|
|
|
flashy_mcflash posted:The dialogue gets into awkward territory a little, in a fun way nice, thats one of those trailers i stop before they tell me too much
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 02:06
|
|
|
Vintersorg posted:Please god kill me. You gotta hand it to them, they perfectly captured that look dogs have when made to sit for a photo.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 02:52
|
|
|
muscles like this! posted:They must have offered Bill Hader a giant sack of money seeing as he doesn't need to do this poo poo anymore. it's Disney, i'm pretty sure at this point "giant sack of money" is their standard lead actor fee
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 04:23
|
|
|
It was also filmed in 2017 and was supposed to come out last November before they decided to put it on a shelf for nearly two years that February specifically for Disney+.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 04:31
|
|
|
How does something like that work if the actor's contract states they get a percentage of the box office? Meaning a film that was originally supposed to get a theatrical release now being punted to a streaming service.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 12:49
|
|
|
Pope Corky the IX posted:How does something like that work if the actor's contract states they get a percentage of the box office? Meaning a film that was originally supposed to get a theatrical release now being punted to a streaming service. Maybe they get a percentage of subscriptions fees from users that watch the movie?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 15:31
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:Rupert Murdoch bought NG a few years ago and he sold it to Disney with all the Fox stuff. ...I tried to forget Rupert Murdoch buying NatGeo. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 16:39
|
|
|
Jedit posted:Mr Spiky Hair is standing several feet behind the girl front and centre, but his eyepiece is in front of her shoulder. Maybe it telescopes out.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 16:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 18:30
|
|
|
Good think Kylo was holding his sword back like that or he might have poked Rey when he tripped.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 18:37
|
|
|
This trilogy is such a loving mess
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 18:39
|
|
|
That's some sinister-rear end Lukeface going on there. Pretty terrible teaser apart from the colors.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 18:44
|
|
|
That's Palpatine.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 18:52
|
|
|
I see both Luke and Palpatine, I think it's supposed to be ambiguous maybe?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 18:59
|
|
|
Why does he look like clone wars Palpatine?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 19:01
|
|
|
Taintrunner posted:This trilogy is such a loving mess I think it would have been pretty cool if JJ Abrams had actually had the barest of outlines for the whole trilogy when he made Episode 7. Oh well. Better luck next trilogy.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 19:03
|
|
|
Waffleman_ posted:That's Palpatine. gently caress they're fighting on a pylon of the old Death Star II aren't they?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 21:31
|
|
|
TFA and TLJ are decent movies on their own, but they absolutely do not work together, and RoS is probably gonna walk back a lot of TLJ because it made nerds mad so it'll be more disjointed. Say what you will about the prequels, they knew what they wanted to do.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 21:40
|
|
|
CharlestheHammer posted:Why does he look like clone wars Palpatine? Seriously lmao Smooth as silk
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 21:46
|
|
|
Waffleman_ posted:Say what you will about the prequels, they knew what they wanted to do. Seems like the PT had a clear story intent but the execution sucked. New Trilogy has decent execution but doesn't know what it's saying.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 21:53
|
|
|
It's like a not-good version of The Empire Strikes Back poster.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2019 23:29
|
|
|
If you'd shown me that in a different context I'd think it was a mediocre fan poster.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2019 01:16
|
|
|
feedmyleg posted:If you'd shown me that in a different context I'd think it was a mediocre fan poster. Right. It looks like a similar CG style to the clone wars or something to me.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2019 01:18
|
|
|
There's something about Skywalker being in the title that bugs me. Almost as if it's too obvious about being Star Wars maybe? Like I know Star Wars titles are no stranger to using proper names/titles specific to Star Wars like Sith or Jedi or Force but for some reason it's different when it's Skywalker.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2019 01:40
|
|
|
Rise of Skywalker is just dumb because TLJ spent great lengths to say "Chosen One stories don't work past their Call to Action and the hero can gently caress up and perpetuate more harm by buying into that B.S." So unless we get a whole Grey Jedi/Living Force order founded by Rey called Skywalkers...
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2019 02:01
|
|
|
feedmyleg posted:If you'd shown me that in a different context I'd think it was a mediocre fan poster.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2019 02:03
|
|
|
Ian's 75 years old; I wouldn't be surprised if they decided to CGI his face instead of using prosthetics.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2019 02:44
|
|
|
Lobok posted:There's something about Skywalker being in the title that bugs me. Almost as if it's too obvious about being Star Wars maybe? Like I know Star Wars titles are no stranger to using proper names/titles specific to Star Wars like Sith or Jedi or Force but for some reason it's different when it's Skywalker. Actually I think I figured it out. It's not that I dislike the Skywalker name being part of a title but how the lovely and overused to the point of ridicule "Rise of ___" phrase cheapens the whole thing so that Skywalker ends up sounding so much more generic than it is.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2019 03:02
|
|
|
The previous movies already hosed up the naming conventions, so it's kind of weird to return to it for the third one... (Article, Adjective, Noun) The Phantom Menace/A New Hope (Four Word Phrase Including a Group and a Violent or forceful verb) Attack of the Clones/The Empire Strikes Back (R word "of the" Noun) Revenge of the Sith/Return of the Jedi The Last Jedi having the naming conventions of a first film in the cycle is kind of fun for how it remixes things though and I wonder if that was intentional.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2019 03:16
|
|
|
What really struck me when looking at that official timeline Disney put up is that each movie in the original trilogy has a cool, unique logo whereas each movie in the prequel/sequel trilogy has the exact same logo with a minor variation
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2019 03:56
|
|
|
Before franchise branding was a thing and after franchise branding was a thing, basically
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2019 04:09
|
|
|
Local rep cinema put this up. Now that's minimalism.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2019 06:15
|
|
|
Davros1 posted:Ian's 75 years old; I wouldn't be surprised if they decided to CGI his face instead of using prosthetics. I imagine that just means they'd have to use less prosthetics  I really hope the movie's not going to walk back TLJ. Maybe it'll be a fakeout and it's not Palpatine! ....
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2019 06:33
|
|
|
davidspackage posted:I imagine that just means they'd have to use less prosthetics One theory is that Palpatine is how they are not walking back on TLJ. Like, Rey is not the daughter of some powerful Jedi or Sith, because Palpatine created her like he did Anakin. And anytime someone like Kylo acts seemingly the opposite of they did in TLJ, it's because Palpatine is mind controlling them.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2019 06:49
|
|
|
I for one miss the focused auteurs vision of the original trilogy, the series of movies that were all directed and written by different people and co-produced by Fox.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2019 12:31
|
|
|
Lobok posted:Actually I think I figured it out. It's not that I dislike the Skywalker name being part of a title but how the lovely and overused to the point of ridicule "Rise of ___" phrase cheapens the whole thing so that Skywalker ends up sounding so much more generic than it is. I don't think the phrase "Rise of" is the problem, it's that loving Skywalker had been rising for 7 movies now and only by the 8th was there a promise that we were finally done with it. In a just world, the word Skywalker would never be uttered in this last movie .
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2019 12:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 03:52 |
|
|
FilthyImp posted:Oh you're right! The idea goes back to TFA if you read the rather neat concept art book - they've been wanting to revisit the wreck of the Death Star II since the beginning. In the original concept for TFA, the heroes found the location of Starkiller Base by going to Endor and diving to the sunken wreck of the Death Star to recover the planet's location from the Emperor's spire.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2019 13:26
|
|
