|
Who do you wish to win the Democratic primaries? This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Biden, the Klansman |
|
8 | 0.91% |
| Bernie Sanders, the Hand Flailer |
|
578 | 65.76% |
| Elizabeth Warren, the Plan Maker |
|
185 | 21.05% |
| Kamala Harris, the Cop Lord |
|
4 | 0.46% |
| Cory Booker, the Super Hero Wannabe |
|
0 | 0% |
| Julian Castro, the Twin |
|
3 | 0.34% |
| Kirsten Gillibrand, the Franken Killer |
|
3 | 0.34% |
| Pete Buttigieg, the Troop Sociopath |
|
9 | 1.02% |
| Robert Francis O'Rourke, the Fake Latino |
|
2 | 0.23% |
| Jay Inslee, the Climate Alarmist |
|
4 | 0.46% |
| Marianne Williamson, the Crystal Queen |
|
19 | 2.16% |
| Andrew Yang, the $1000 Fool |
|
19 | 2.16% |
| Tulsi Gabbard, the Muslim Hater |
|
8 | 0.91% |
| Amy Klobuchar, the Comb Enthusiast |
|
1 | 0.11% |
| Just like in real life, nobody voted for Hickenlooper |
|
2 | 0.23% |
| Jeffrey Epstein, the MCC Most Hated |
|
9 | 1.02% |
| KKKillary KKKlinton |
|
16 | 1.82% |
| Some other idiot not in this list |
|
9 | 1.02% |
| Total: | 879 votes | ||
|
The Glumslinger posted:Yeah, its almost undeniably a lovely poll, but its still a good laugh Booker looking good in Utah, I wonder how long he can stay in, or wants to?
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 01:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 22:47 |
|
|
I read the replies and there is a lot of people too online right now.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 01:53
|
|
|
The Glumslinger posted:I dont think I've seen anyone mention the shitshow going on with the Iowa caucus, the DNC just rejected the virtual caucus component after it was found to be too easy to hack and manipulate. Pls no one get me fired and if you live in the Vegas area PM me 
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 01:56
|
|
|
kiss of death
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 02:38
|
|
|
The Glumslinger posted:I dont think I've seen anyone mention the shitshow going on with the Iowa caucus, the DNC just rejected the virtual caucus component after it was found to be too easy to hack and manipulate.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 02:53
|
|
|
It is extremely good for Bernie that the virtual caucus is getting rejected. Younger voters disproportionately were about to register for it, thereby collectively locking themselves out of participation in 90% of the delegate allocation statewide. I'm actually surprised the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee isn't approving the plan, since it would help Biden so much. Apparently they're worried about hacking.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 02:55
|
|
|
This was from Clinton's book tour in 2017. She still sucks today.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 03:16
|
|
|
Which candidate is most sympathetic to an accelerationist narrative (whichever variant)? Which candidate is most /appealing/ to an accelerationist (and which variants)? Which candidate would best /serve/ as accelerating the end of the American Experiment? What percentage of the voting public last election considered themselves (and their vote) to be some variant of 'accelerationist'?
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 04:03
|
|
|
Armack posted:It is extremely good for Bernie that the virtual caucus is getting rejected. Younger voters disproportionately were about to register for it, thereby collectively locking themselves out of participation in 90% of the delegate allocation statewide. I'm actually surprised the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee isn't approving the plan, since it would help Biden so much. Apparently they're worried about hacking. This is also my read. It's good, which means that the DNC has no idea what they just did. Russiagate.... good?!?! gently caress it. Its not like acknowledging Trump won marginal margins in the states that suddenly counted because the Democrats forgot they were states is going to bring about actual change. Might as well play the good board-state well for the wrong reasons.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 04:09
|
|
|
Uglycat posted:Which candidate is most sympathetic to an accelerationist narrative (whichever variant)? Yang Yang Trump Less than 1% but accelerations are rarely self aware enough to self identify. Usually a strong overlap with extreme privilege and lack of empathy or morals. See: white males
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 04:09
|
|
|
Uglycat posted:Which candidate is most sympathetic to an accelerationist narrative (whichever variant)? Yang, Yang, Yang, and Yang respectively.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 04:09
|
|
|
I realize that last isn't quite a perfect answer but i guarantee as much as i'm able as someone without access to such a dataset that the venn diagram between voting, self-ID accelerationists in 2016 and yang gang in 2020 is a loving circle.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 04:11
|
|
|
Willie Tomg posted:I realize that last isn't quite a perfect answer but i guarantee as much as i'm able as someone without access to such a dataset that the venn diagram between voting, self-ID accelerationists in 2016 and yang gang in 2020 is a loving circle. I would second this for sure.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 04:14
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:Trump he has actually hosed up prosecuting two wars through sheer ineptitude. literally anyone else would've done literally something to further aims in syria and venezuela and made the USA Heinlein's Starship Troopers but without any of the good parts of the book because the USA treats its veterans like forgettable dogshit instead of philosopher-kings. Literally anyone other than jared kushner woud've preserved the KSA/UAE alliance. I would've done that for $200k a year, and I would've shot myself in the head after, for doing such. trump has hit the brakes on the american empire and economy in a way literally unfathomable in 2015. thats not necessarily good or even bad, but its not accelerationism. thats a concept with meaning and trump isn't it. Trump on his worst day is a better CiC than Obama was on his best day. Trump on his best day is about as good a CiC as Obama was on a day that ended in y. I mean this sincerely. e; in summary, no seriously, its Yang. I'll go twelve rounds about this but i suspect neither of us really gives a gently caress because the question is absurd. Willie Tomg fucked around with this message at 04:28 on Aug 31, 2019 |
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 04:19
|
|
|
the accelerationist president was obama in 2012, as distinct from obama in 2008, and the result was antifa responses in every urban area by 2017 and a national DSA congress in 2019. That's pretty good progress, historically speaking.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 04:25
|
|
|
I think you could argue Clinton's primary and general election campaign was the true accelerationist's wet dream
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 04:31
|
|
|
A big flaming stink posted:I think you could argue Clinton's primary and general election campaign was the true accelerationist's wet dream I would argue this, except the nativist, protectionist candidate won despite openly sundowning and nobody liking them very much. Which fucks things up a little until you do some adjustments to theory that I'm already to bored making this post to do, being perfectly honest.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 05:26
|
|
|
Unoriginal Name posted:kiss of death Particularly given how many former Clinton staffers/sycophants immediately fell in line behind Harris from the get-go. I, for one, can't imagine why Kamala isn't taking off more as a candidate. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 09:56
|
|
|
Bernie is going to speak at ISNA (Islamic Society of North America)'s yearly conference today, the only real* presidential candidate to do so. It's already getting played up as "Bernie is giving a speech to HAMAS" in the usual places. (As a Muslim, always loved his relationship with our community!) *I refuse to believe that Julian Castro is real. Mormon Star Wars fucked around with this message at 10:40 on Aug 31, 2019 |
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 10:38
|
|
|
Majorian posted:Particularly given how many former Clinton staffers/sycophants immediately fell in line behind Harris from the get-go. for once clinton staffers aren't the ones primarily responsible for a faltering campaign kamala's always been a dead end as a potential candidate. they've tried hyping her up a bunch of times going back almost to late 2016 and it never took. she just doesn't have it
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 10:55
|
|
|
The Muppets On PCP posted:for once clinton staffers aren't the ones primarily responsible for a faltering campaign Are you implying that Hillary wasn't?
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 11:03
|
|
|
she probably could've limped across the finish line with a real campaign
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 11:22
|
|
|
The Muppets On PCP posted:for once clinton staffers aren't the ones primarily responsible for a faltering campaign Who's fault is it that Harris refuses to commit to any given stance? Her own, or the Clinton campaign staffers? Because I think that's the biggest reason she's not going anywhere.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 11:23
|
|
|
no, BAD YANG, BAD!! https://twitter.com/nikoCSFB/status/1167644426010877952
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 12:32
|
|
|
Dante80 posted:no, BAD YANG, BAD!! Lol Yang is and always was techbro trash. I basically understand why leftists fall for Gabbard’s song and dance even tho she’s poo poo but lol forever at Yang stans on the left.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 12:38
|
|
|
Dante80 posted:no, BAD YANG, BAD!! Yang bad, who knew
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 12:40
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61CD8eOTolo
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 13:18
|
|
|
Lightning Knight posted:Lol Yang is and always was techbro trash. Amusingly enough it's for the same reason people fall for Tulsi's poo poo: Idiots who think their "message" (non-interventionalism in Tulsi's case, UBI in Yang's) is what truly important. That the actual intent behind those messages, delivered as they are by these two specific people, is complete and utter loving trash is forcibly irrelevant.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 13:53
|
|
|
A good chunk of the YangGang thingy (at least online) is 4chan MAGA trolls.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 14:09
|
|
|
Uglycat posted:Which candidate is most sympathetic to an accelerationist narrative (whichever variant)? None of them, none of them, pretty much anyone besides Bernie, and a statistically insignificant number. The fact is that most forces capable of destroying America currently operate independently of what the president does, and few candidates have shown any interest in taking any action at all regarding those forces. The question you should be asking isn't "who's going to destroy America", it's "who's going to stop the destruction of America"? When the rising seas swallow up the big coastal cities, is it going to matter whether the president who wasted our last chance to stop climate change with the same old half-assed pro-business garbage was Biden, Harris, or Booker? Only Sanders has proposed the kind of bold action we desperately need to reduce the impact of climate change, and only Sanders had the kind of record that shows he won't simply give in to corporate pushback. Granted, I don't think his plan goes far enough, but it goes several times farther than all the other climate plans on offer in this primary! As for the other candidates, the differences between them are honestly insignificant compared to the level of apathy and disinterest they appear to have toward the impending worldwide disaster.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 14:25
|
|
|
It is rather funny knowing 4ch MAGAtrolls are antisemitic as all hell so every time their meme candidates speak positively about Israel they gnash their teeth hard.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 15:09
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:It is rather funny knowing 4ch MAGAtrolls are antisemitic as all hell so every time their meme candidates speak positively about Israel they gnash their teeth hard. With sufficient irony it can be hard to tell. A lot of them see Israel as proof ethnostates can work.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 15:13
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:It is rather funny knowing 4ch MAGAtrolls are antisemitic as all hell so every time their meme candidates speak positively about Israel they gnash their teeth hard.   
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 15:19
|
|
|
Dante80 posted:no, BAD YANG, BAD!! lol well I suppose he's consistent since he's treating our propping up of foreign militaries as some sort of international UBI. Just cutting checks to oppressive regimes around the globe and then tut-tutting when someone questions how that money is being spent, like saying Israel should maybe stop doing genocide is the moral equivalent of loudly complaining about a SNAP recipients shopping habits.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 16:21
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/GunnelsWarren/status/1167837716404420608?s=19 Can't wait for the media to say how Trump like this is and also continue to claim the wapo isn't biaed against Sanders (and leftists in general)
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 19:23
|
|
|
Armack posted:It is extremely good for Bernie that the virtual caucus is getting rejected. Younger voters disproportionately were about to register for it, thereby collectively locking themselves out of participation in 90% of the delegate allocation statewide. I'm actually surprised the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee isn't approving the plan, since it would help Biden so much. Apparently they're worried about hacking. It's actually quite heartening that chaos swings in a good direction on rare occasions.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 20:50
|
|
|
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...de70_story.html This should be real good
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 21:14
|
|
|
I like how the bill specifically takes aim at the 2005 bankruptcy bill that Biden sponsored too. It's nice to see a politician that can draw contrasts between themselves and the competition through actual policy proposals and bills rather than just rhetoric.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 21:42
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:It is rather funny knowing 4ch MAGAtrolls are antisemitic as all hell so every time their meme candidates speak positively about Israel, they take it as another step toward Solomon's Temple being rebuilt and the vindication of the Revelation, in which the libs finally get what's coming to 'em Ghost Leviathan posted:A lot of them see Israel as proof that open-air genocide can slide under the mainstream radar.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 22:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 22:47 |
|
|
I believe that Richard Spencer has said that alt-right just wants what Jews have in Israel but for whites in America.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2019 22:58
|
|
