|
Powered Descent posted:Somewhere in the Northwest Angle of Minnesota, or in Point Roberts, Washington, someone is cackling and shouting "Welcome to my world! Enjoy going through immigration to get to the grocery store!" Wow someone else who knows about Pt Roberts. most Washingtonians don't even know about that place.
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2019 19:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 06:11 |
|
|
Ugato posted:you have an inflated opinion of Tennessee. and probably wv too but I’m not from there. i'm from tennessee and the fact that we have dolly alone means we are more qualified to run it than anyone in kentucky. would still vote to burn it down though, it's a hellstate.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2019 22:30
|
|
|
Bugsy posted:https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/1171042024759418880
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 00:45
|
|
|
Shaffness posted:Wow someone else who knows about Pt Roberts. most Washingtonians don't even know about that place. Never been there; I just ran across it on a Wikipedia binge about border oddities.  e: I didn't actually remember its name so I googled "that place in puget sound that's america but you have to go through canada to get there" and it came right up.
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 00:59
|
|
|
Serf posted:i wonder who will end up owning their land. weird how that always seems to be the giant agricorps Why is it so loving hard for people to see this? The destruction of small farming doesn't matter to agribuisness, which is what the right actually means when they say "farmers." Every parcel of land that used to belong to a family being owned by an international business that's just vertically integrating their supply chain isn't a bug, it's a loving feature of these policies. Why won't people just stand up for themselves?
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 01:10
|
|
|
if enough small farmers get crushed and absorbed you can just nationalize the agrocorps. now instead of going after farmer hickass your fighting a massive business interest,much better optics
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 01:11
|
|
|
Grondoth posted:Why is it so loving hard for people to see this? The destruction of small farming doesn't matter to agribuisness, which is what the right actually means when they say "farmers." Every parcel of land that used to belong to a family being owned by an international business that's just vertically integrating their supply chain isn't a bug, it's a loving feature of these policies. Why won't people just stand up for themselves? because brown people
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 01:20
|
|
|
Grondoth posted:Why is it so loving hard for people to see this? The destruction of small farming doesn't matter to agribuisness, which is what the right actually means when they say "farmers." Every parcel of land that used to belong to a family being owned by an international business that's just vertically integrating their supply chain isn't a bug, it's a loving feature of these policies. Why won't people just stand up for themselves? because if a good thing happens to me but it also happens to a brown person, then somehow i got screwed! i would rather create a living hell for myself if it reduces the chance of a nice thing happening to a brown person
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 03:23
|
|
|
Grondoth posted:Why is it so loving hard for people to see this? The destruction of small farming doesn't matter to agribuisness, which is what the right actually means when they say "farmers." Every parcel of land that used to belong to a family being owned by an international business that's just vertically integrating their supply chain isn't a bug, it's a loving feature of these policies. Why won't people just stand up for themselves? to give you a serious answer: because no one is offering an alternative. the neoliberal order is fine with agricorps swallowing up small farmers, because that's what the market has decided is best. and no one is offering them anything else. so what should they do, other than succumb?
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 04:19
|
|
|
Serf posted:to give you a serious answer: because no one is offering an alternative. the neoliberal order is fine with agricorps swallowing up small farmers, because that's what the market has decided is best. and no one is offering them anything else. so what should they do, other than succumb? re-register as a democrat and vote for bernie is what they should do
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 04:20
|
|
|
DragQueenofAngmar posted:re-register as a democrat and vote for bernie is what they should do while i mostly agree, there's no one running for local office that is echoing bernie. and people out in the sticks really care about local elections
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 04:33
|
|
|
Serf posted:while i mostly agree, there's no one running for local office that is echoing bernie. and people out in the sticks really care about local elections we need more Posadists running at the local level in rural areas, I'd be willing to bet it's a more appealing pitch to rural voters than either chud or lib ones
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 04:36
|
|
|
tbf with climate change and the certainty of massive crop failures the only solution is collective farming policies directly impacting small farmers is bad but hastens the inevitable of indirect policies that create global warming and austerity/boom-bust cycle
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 04:57
|
|
|
Avirosb posted:
How did FOX go on to explain why all this is really the fault of democrats in this piece?
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 11:47
|
|
|
VitalSigns posted:dying of diabetes to own the libs 
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 11:57
|
|
|
Agean90 posted:if enough small farmers get crushed and absorbed you can just nationalize the agrocorps. now instead of going after farmer hickass your fighting a massive business interest,much better optics and big business in the US has such a strong record of being nationalized, such as
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 18:55
|
|
|
hey, you only need to win once
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2019 20:15
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/jaredlholt/stat...ingawful.com%2F
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 20:43
|
|
|
Requesting thread change to reflect the Trump voters realizing that they're Not going to die of vaping-related health complications
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 20:52
|
|
|
Agean90 posted:until trump gets out of office that's the more frustrating proposition for me - even when he does finally leave (assuming he does) it's not like all these god-awful people and their racism and general insanity are going to go back to pretending to be normal. that cat is out of the bag, and i almost feel like any serious opposition candidate needs to have an actual plan for how they plan to address the massive behemoth of racism and nazism that's necessarily going to still be around after trump is gone. even if you could snap your fingers and completely remove him and every one of his cronies from a position of power, what the hell do you do with the 100 million racist shitbirds that have become out and loud about their harmful ideology?
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 20:55
|
|
|
as soon as Trump is out of office everyone in media is going to work doubletime to rehabilitate the chuds and lecture us all that they are a valuable contribution to The Discourse with opinions as valid as anybody's and the real problem with the country is a crisis of civility, and most of the country is going to listen to them. it's not like Republicans only started being Republicans in 2016, and most people were perfectly willing to accept their various ghoulish state regimes, the Bush administration, etc. until their figurehead started being rude to celebrities on TV; things are going to continue to get worse rapidly until someone manages to fundamentally change the nature of the game this kind of poo poo will become as respectable and everyday as "if you don't like the Iraq War you're a traitor" https://twitter.com/jaredlholt/status/1171844540107493382 A Wizard of Goatse has issued a correction as of 21:18 on Sep 11, 2019 |
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 20:58
|
|
|
Freaking Crumbum posted:that's the more frustrating proposition for me - even when he does finally leave (assuming he does) it's not like all these god-awful people and their racism and general insanity are going to go back to pretending to be normal. that cat is out of the bag, and i almost feel like any serious opposition candidate needs to have an actual plan for how they plan to address the massive behemoth of racism and nazism that's necessarily going to still be around after trump is gone. I highly doubt their children laid it out like that, this is probably just their way of interpreting being cut out of their lives. It's not because they're toxic lunatics determined to make everybody's life hell, it's because they're just upset that Trump won and once that's gone everything will be fine again
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 21:17
|
|
|
Freaking Crumbum posted:that's the more frustrating proposition for me - even when he does finally leave (assuming he does) it's not like all these god-awful people and their racism and general insanity are going to go back to pretending to be normal. that cat is out of the bag, and i almost feel like any serious opposition candidate needs to have an actual plan for how they plan to address the massive behemoth of racism and nazism that's necessarily going to still be around after trump is gone. i seem to recall mao had some thoughts on changing the culture in a nation
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2019 22:11
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1171957284802629638?s=20
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2019 02:23
|
|
|
Freaking Crumbum posted:even if you could snap your fingers and completely remove him and every one of his cronies from a position of power, what the hell do you do with the 100 million racist shitbirds that have become out and loud about their harmful ideology? Dust them too
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2019 02:49
|
|
|
Byzantine posted:Dust them too Perfect balance...
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2019 04:08
|
|
|
spoiler: they won't talk to you after, either
|
|
#
?
Sep 12, 2019 04:16
|
|
|
The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > C-SPAM: Unintelligible Garbage for Insane People > Post Trump voters realizing that they're not going to die under Trump here, and getting real mad about that
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2019 23:53
|
|
|
imagine if your a single issue voter and it’s vaping how sad
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2019 23:58
|
|
|
imagine if you’re a single issue voter and your issue is “pro-racism”
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2019 00:03
|
|
|
i'm the vaper's family super pissed that they won't have fat clouds of grape flavor hanging around the house anymore
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2019 00:12
|
|
|
Militant Lesbian posted:imagine if you’re a single issue voter and your issue is “pro-racism” welcome to the GOP
|
|
#
?
Sep 14, 2019 00:20
|
|
|
Militant Lesbian posted:imagine if you’re a single issue voter and your issue is “pro-racism” Still better than vaping IMO At least racism can be justified by economic hardship if you're ignorant about causalities. Whats the argument for voting based on vaping?!
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2019 18:40
|
|
|
The Mash posted:Still better than vaping IMO FREEDOM! 
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2019 18:53
|
|
|
The Mash posted:Still better than vaping IMO Being able to smoke in a non-smoking area and UM ACKTUALLY-ing your way out of it
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2019 19:02
|
|
|
I took in waaaaaay more nicotine ( and maybe did more damage to my lungs im hearing now?) using a juul then smoking cigarettes tbh. it’s so easy to just walk around puffing it all day since it doesn’t really smell or have a butt to throw away and it’s harder to ration your use
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2019 19:05
|
|
|
CharlestheHammer posted:imagine if your a single issue voter and it’s vaping
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2019 19:37
|
|
|
DragQueenofAngmar posted:I took in waaaaaay more nicotine ( and maybe did more damage to my lungs im hearing now?) using a juul then smoking cigarettes tbh. it’s so easy to just walk around puffing it all day since it doesn’t really smell or have a butt to throw away and it’s harder to ration your use I remember thinking this exact thing when the first ones appeared on the market. How the gently caress were these ever legal?
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2019 20:02
|
|
|
Heath posted:I remember thinking this exact thing when the first ones appeared on the market. How the gently caress were these ever legal? It's always been legal to chainsmoke or have a cigar, vapes just don't signal "you've consumed x amount of nicotine" like cigarettes do edit: nicotine vapes aren't the dangerous ones either, 80% of cases are from thc vapes and it's probably a higher % because some people don't want to admit to drug use Overnight Blaze has issued a correction as of 20:30 on Sep 15, 2019 |
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2019 20:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 06:11 |
|
|
Vaping is dumb Just get cancer you big babies
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2019 00:06
|
|
