|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 18:56 |
|
|
but do you currently need planning permission to add stories under your home?
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:21
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:Extra walls for landlords. For the love of God, Guavanaut!
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:25
|
|
|
AceClown posted:but do you currently need planning permission to add stories under your home? Yeah, probably. This is an old country, so just about everything is built on something else.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:25
|
|
|
Some smart targeted advertising going on here. Links to https://4il.org.il/1396/ Purple Prince fucked around with this message at 11:35 on Sep 30, 2019 |
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:28
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/SteveDoherty1/status/1177991779007832066?s=19 Hope it stays empty.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:30
|
|
|
My partner and I keep floating the idea of adding a first story extension to add an extra bedroom to our house rather than moving house when we need the extra space in the future (purely theoretical at the moment!). I would personally rather have to go through planning permission than be able to add the extension without needing it, especially with the amount of student housing around where we live and the associated landlords.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:31
|
|
|
Doctor_Fruitbat posted:https://twitter.com/SteveDoherty1/status/1177991779007832066?s=19 The Labour conference had a security barricade around the Brighton Centre too, although at least they weren't crass enough to have a 'designated protest area'.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:32
|
|
|
AceClown posted:but do you currently need planning permission to add stories under your home? More recently this has been amended to state that any 'major works' require prior approval, but not planning permission. So you'd have to tell the council, water board, gas board, etc. if you were bringing in earth movers to excavate, but you don't have to go through the planning process. However on top of this the High Court (E&W) has recently stepped in to say that the Common Law right to dig down to Hell realistically meant digging a basement or root cellar, not the Kola borehole, and so they have ruled that the no planning permission rule only applies to a single storey, you can't have infinite subbasements.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:32
|
|
|
One of my volunteers at work tried to make me some marmite on toast https://imgur.com/EVMWBAT
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:33
|
|
|
I suppose you could also read this as the High Court ruling that Hell begins 15'-20' down, which explains the Northern Line.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:35
|
|
|
Flipswitch posted:One of my volunteers at work tried to make me some marmite on toast
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:35
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/LeftieStats/status/1178615568762626048?s=19 https://twitter.com/OxfordDiplomat/status/1178347986033745920?s=19
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:36
|
|
|
lol apparently the government just hasnt been mailing out visas even if your application is successful
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:36
|
|
|
Flipswitch posted:One of my volunteers at work tried to make me some marmite on toast What the gently caress
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:37
|
|
|
It's basically like our Parliament is a microcosm of the country, unable to decisively pick what they want to happen. There has to be another referendum with only 2 questions on the ballet - leave at any cost vs remain
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:38
|
|
|
Flipswitch posted:One of my volunteers at work tried to make me some marmite on toast
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:39
|
|
|
Esther Mcvey absolutely forcing applause, stopping the conversation and shouting at the audience. Now 2 'scousers, Mcvey and Berry, and he just said Liverpool are champions of Europe, and awkward silence followed. Then talked about how good Boris is doing for the north by doing 2 whole speeches up here
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:40
|
|
|
Flipswitch posted:One of my volunteers at work tried to make me some marmite on toast I don't see the problem 
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:43
|
|
|
Flayer posted:There has to be another referendum with only 2 questions on the ballet - leave at any cost vs remain No, because then people might actually vote for no deal.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:44
|
|
|
Flipswitch posted:One of my volunteers at work tried to make me some marmite on toast I can't really blame them, I probably would have done the same thing up until a few years ago. When someone asks you to take a poo poo on their toast, it doesn't really occur to those unaccustomed to scatology that there's only supposed to be only a light smearing of faecal matter
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:46
|
|
|
Do two back to back referendums (on same paper if you like). 1) Leave or remain 2) Leave with whatever deal is negotiated vs leave without a deal
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:47
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:Traditionally no, you can go down to the depths of Hell within your freehold (ad inferos). Sweet, I can still get my man-cavern excavated
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:48
|
|
|
Flipswitch posted:One of my volunteers at work tried to make me some marmite on toast
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:49
|
|
|
Purple Prince posted:Do two back to back referendums (on same paper if you like). I think we should have a referendum on whether to do this or not first.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:50
|
|
|
What are the common law restrictions on accessing the other outer planes? Can I dig through the firmanent straight to the elemental plane of fire, for example? Or do I need to get planning permission?
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:50
|
|
|
Rarity posted:No, because then people might actually vote for no deal. Going to vote no deal to kill posters I don't like not really I don't dislike anyone itt
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:50
|
|
|
Jose posted:not really I don't dislike anyone itt 🙋
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:53
|
|
|
I'm still a bit pissed off with Labour's Brexit policy convulsions as the 'correct' position seems obvious to me (Support Norway with confirmatory referendum) but Labour keeps shooting around that target and if they'd had that policy before the Euro elections - and had put any effort into those euro elections - we'd probably not have to deal with the Lib Dems at all, instead they're going to split the vote and...ugh.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:55
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:What are the common law restrictions on accessing the other outer planes? Can I dig through the firmanent straight to the elemental plane of fire, for example? Or do I need to get planning permission?
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:56
|
|
|
You're a Weasley brother life is bad enough for you already
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:56
|
|
|
Norway with confirmatory referendum is literally labour's brexit position.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 11:57
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:Norway with confirmatory referendum is literally labour's brexit position. No it's not. It was (more or less) briefly, after the euro elections and before the latest conference decision, but now its 'Negotiate (more or less) Norway. Refuse to say what you actually want through the coming election. Have a conference to decide after the election, then referendum.' It's that 'refuse to say what you actually want' through an election that will be the killer. It's a pastiche of what FBPE says Labour's policy has been.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 12:00
|
|
|
mediadave posted:No it's not. It was (more or less) briefly, after the euro elections and before the latest conference decision, but now its 'Negotiate (more or less) Norway. Refuse to say what you actually want. have a conference to decide, then referendum.' No, it's negotiate something akin to norway, call a referendum between that and remain, and let people decide, because that's what a referendum is. And that's not remotely "not saying what you want" because what they want is for people to decide. A referendum where the invigilators of the referendum have one outcome they want to happen is a farce. What do you want a referendum for if you're not prepared to entertain an outcome you don't want?
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 12:01
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:Norway with confirmatory referendum is literally labour's brexit position. Well it's Norway + a customs union - EFTA membership + bespoke Switzerland shaped regulatory deals
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 12:02
|
|
|
Archaeology Hat posted:I don't think they've thought through very much. One of the longest running bits of drama from the village I lived in as a kid was when a guy called Phil built a bunch of admittedly groverhaus-like dumb and ugly shacks on his land and a load of homeowners went went completely crazy over it. I can't see this being all that popular with the 'maintain the character of our community' types. yeah don't house owners generally really, really dislike neighbors ruining their view and stuff? being a violation of their property rights etc. i'm not a house guy but i wouldn't expect every house foundation/walls to be able to handle another couple stories on top of them.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 12:04
|
|
|
They can't negotiate a deal in good faith if they've already committed to opposing any deal. And they can't commit to supporting a deal until they've negotiated it and know what it is
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 12:04
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:A referendum where the invigilators of the referendum have one outcome they want to happen is a farce. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 12:06
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:A referendum where the invigilators of the referendum have one outcome they want to happen is a farce. What? It's pretty standard for the Government to have a preferred position and recommend that. Indeed, it's what will eventually (too late) happen. If Labour does get into the position to have a referendum it will ultimately support and recommend one of the outcomes. Obviously you then have to carry out the decision. But It's stupid to be in the position basically of arguing: We had a referendum. Leave won. We accept that referendum. We support a new referendum. We have no opinion on the outcome of that referendum at the moment. But we will in the future, but after the coming election.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 12:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 18:56 |
|
|
Qwertycoatl posted:They can't negotiate a deal in good faith if they've already committed to opposing any deal. And they can't commit to supporting a deal until they've negotiated it and know what it is I mean, I think the obvious and defendable position would be to support a Norway-like deal with confirmatory referendum.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2019 12:08
|
|