|
I can't vote I hope the people of this country loving wake up and Labour wins AD 303 - Emperor Diocletian launches the last major persecution of Christians in the Empire. A bad time was had by all. Pochoclo fucked around with this message at 23:07 on Oct 29, 2019 |
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:04 |
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2024 06:32 |
|
Josef bugman posted:Also I am very tired, I think that playing Disco Elysium is (whilst fun) bumming me out a bit because I have no idea if I am doing things right. I'm not really sure there's a wrong way to play. I just finished it and am looking forward to using CheatEngine to scum my way through all the dialogue choices so I can have an "optimal" playthrough with all successes, but it's not like I was unsatisfied with my own playthrough. I'd also maybe like to do an absolute shithead playthrough, going for liberalism rather than Mazovian Good Lad. I will say, for a game that has quite so much death, it'd be nice if it autosaved more often. I had to retrace my steps a lot because I kept forgetting to save frequently.l
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:06 |
|
Halisnacks posted:Is there a mistake in this video? “Fox hunting ban = gone/blocked”, as a Labour victory? IIRC May's manifesto wanted to repeal the fox hunting ban but that was scrapped when she lost her majority. The video could be clearer.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:07 |
|
RabidWeasel posted:So when does the "BBC has to pretend to not be biased" period start? Purdah is 6 weeks, the broadcast neutrality bit has historically been ~5 weeks but that's convention not law.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:07 |
|
LMAO a pissflaps original uk election thread so he can finally post again. He must be so happy.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:07 |
|
Junior G-man posted:LMAO a pissflaps original uk election thread so he can finally post again. He must be so happy. Can someone be banned from their own thread?
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:08 |
|
Weird we've not had a dedicated election thread for any of the elections or referendum while I've been reading UKMT. Wonder why someone would think we need one now.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:10 |
|
Steve2911 posted:Can someone be banned from their own thread? The question is just how long has been been sitting on that OP thinking 'Finally, this is my chance!'.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:11 |
|
Beefeater1980 posted:Yes, I’m still on the electoral register. Made a donation. Nice! And if you do know any other people living in Brazil that are able to vote in the UK or know of any expat networks that's another really good way to potentially get more votes for Labour.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:11 |
|
Pochoclo posted:I can't vote I'm not advocating breaking the law but you could probably find a neighbour who can vote and is probably a gammon and just turn up to the polling station, give them your name & address & then vote Labour. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:13 |
|
imagine being that pathetic just loving imagine it
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:13 |
|
forkboy84 posted:Weird we've not had a dedicated election thread for any of the elections or referendum while I've been reading UKMT. Wonder why someone would think we need one now. Scot independence referendum got silo-ed out. I'm fine with it, it's not like you have to read that thread to hear what's happening in the election.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:14 |
If Labour and the SNP went into a coalition. then Scotland had another referendum and that is successful. What happens? Does Labour need to find another government partner or is another GE held
|
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:15 |
|
It'll be interesting to see if the Tories get their wish for a Brexit election. They're right that people are sick of it, but there's a real chance that means they're sick of talking about it during an election campaign and want to talk about something else instead.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:16 |
So who got closest on that poll on the google doc that I've apparently lost the link to?
|
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:16 |
|
RockyB posted:The question is just how long has been been sitting on that OP thinking 'Finally, this is my chance!'. loving Corbyn, call an election already dammit! I need attention! Braggart fucked around with this message at 23:20 on Oct 29, 2019 |
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:18 |
|
CyberPingu posted:If Labour and the SNP went into a coalition. then Scotland had another referendum and that is successful. What happens? Does Labour need to find another government partner or is another GE held
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:18 |
|
namesake posted:Scot independence referendum got silo-ed out. I'm fine with it, it's not like you have to read that thread to hear what's happening in the election. Forgot that ScotPol thread was an offshoot of the indyref and not the other way round. Still, it's a pointless exercise for one boring poster to get around their thread ban.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:20 |
|
namesake posted:Sounds like 'billions of pounds more for the NHS that won't get creamed off by private companies' seems like the sort of thing they might like. These people don't deal in facts. They just say 'Boris will sort em all out' and 'that Corbyn better not come round here the dick'. You could literally tell them Boris is going to nonce their beloved grandchildren and they would still vote for him. Just have to hope the wave of newer voters outnumbers this old school 'sports team' style thinking.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:22 |
|
xtothez posted:Finally did something long overdue Nice. For anyone that doesn't want to formally join the Labour Party for X reason (ie they are poo poo on free speech) or can't afford the monthly direct debit you can still get involved, google your constituency + momentum or + the local candidate and sign up to the mailing list for volunteering.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:26 |
|
Angepain posted:My election prediction is that on December 13 I definitely will not go back and edit this post so that it looks like I predicted the result And I definitely won't point at this quote of your duplicity.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:35 |
|
Chuff McNothing posted:haha! You might want to stop huffing the turps if that's your level of reading comprehension.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:37 |
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:And I definitely won't point at this quote of your duplicity. much more fun to let the people too stupid/hungover to look for the last edited timestamp out themselves
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:41 |
Never expected to actually do this but here we are:
|
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:48 |
|
Diet Crack posted:You might want to stop huffing the turps if that's your level of reading comprehension. You were doing the purity test victims of racism thing that’s so loving obnoxious it’s almost comedic at this point. In the same week Mussolini’s granddaughter has been caterwauling at football fans because they told Lazio to go and follow her granddad off a makeshift gallows
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:50 |
|
So what was the actual point of the FTPA? It seems like the whole point of a parliamentary system is that either the PM or the opposition calls elections on a regular basis when governing breaks down, instead of having a regular schedule. The FTPA supposedly "got rid" of that, but is that actually better? Also it seems like part of the point of the act was to dilute a PM's power to control the timing of elections, so the whole process was more "fair". But isn't the whole mess that's going on right now basically coming from the PM deciding on the date of an election? What did the legislation actually do in effect, other than add additional predetermined dates for elections if governments don't break down for other reasons?
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:52 |
|
wocobob posted:So what was the actual point of the FTPA? the short-term gain of making it more difficult for the 2010 coalition to dissolve. they said it was about fairness and democracy and all that at the time but it was fairly transparent
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:54 |
|
wocobob posted:So what was the actual point of the FTPA? It seems like the whole point of a parliamentary system is that either the PM or the opposition calls elections on a regular basis when governing breaks down, instead of having a regular schedule. The FTPA supposedly "got rid" of that, but is that actually better? Also it seems like part of the point of the act was to dilute a PM's power to control the timing of elections, so the whole process was more "fair". But isn't the whole mess that's going on right now basically coming from the PM deciding on the date of an election? It was a poorly thought out act to stop the Tories backstabbing the Lib Dems without thinking what happened after the first election.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:54 |
|
Supermajorities to avoid the government holding too much power, balancing back to legislature. Parliament has decided that there’ll be an election, not the Executive
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:55 |
|
I remain pessimistic that it'll be a Labour majority, but I really hope it works out for you folks in England
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:56 |
|
e: nm
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:57 |
|
Angepain posted:much more fun to let the people too stupid/hungover to look for the last edited timestamp out themselves Or - because we have multiple political threads - you post different predictions in each and then point at the correct one. Of course the true pro way is to post an image hosted on a server you control (or at least can control the naming of files on) and change the image. I might have done this more than once on slower-moving forums.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:58 |
|
I want a Labour manifesto and I want it now
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:58 |
|
Total Meatlove posted:Supermajorities to avoid the government holding too much power, balancing back to legislature. Oh wait, did it used to be the case that the PM could just dissolve parliament by fiat, instead of having to get a vote through?
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:59 |
|
Chuka Umana posted:I want a Labour manifesto and I want it now You can't leak it to the press in advance this time Chuka!
|
# ? Oct 29, 2019 23:59 |
|
Why get Chuka to leak it when Jessflaps can do it for us?
|
# ? Oct 30, 2019 00:00 |
Crossing over from the pissflaps thread, but: my normally very Tory aunt in Tunbridge Wells is voting LD this time round and thinks that they will unseat the conservatives. So while I think it’s a good idea to vote Labour in *almost* any circumstances, if it’s a close Tory/LD race and Labour is very very distant third, maybe worth tactical voting on the grounds that 90% likely to be poo poo is better than 100% guaranteed to be poo poo. That said, my constituency is super Labour, but I worry about LD effect there. Fingers crossed all that strategic ambiguity doesn’t bite us in the arse.
|
|
# ? Oct 30, 2019 00:02 |
|
Total Meatlove posted:You were doing the purity test victims of racism thing that’s so loving obnoxious it’s almost comedic at this point. Oh come off it for fucks sake, if you can't recognise that football has some inherent and systemic problems with racism, and England fans decry at others when they're the biggest loving hypocrites is pretty pathetic. Diet Crack fucked around with this message at 00:07 on Oct 30, 2019 |
# ? Oct 30, 2019 00:04 |
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:I might have done this more than once on slower-moving forums. 25.1.1.1/index/NeverWrong.jpeg stopped resolving yet?
|
# ? Oct 30, 2019 00:10 |
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2024 06:32 |
|
The Lib Dems on Newsnight seriously suggesting they'll win a majority and Jo Swinson can be PM. And then we revoke Article 50 and "never talk about Brexit again". Utter, utter delusion.
|
# ? Oct 30, 2019 00:19 |