Powershift posted:

Some rare 4 layer truckfuckling

Nenonen posted:

Per India Today:
'However, in a statement issued Tuesday, the power plant, located off the Bay of Bengal in Tamil Nadu's Tirunelveli district, denied the reports and said both the reactors were functional at the moment.

"Some false information is being propagated on the social media platform, electronic and print media with reference to the cyber attack on Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant," R. Ramdoss, training superintendent and information officer at the power plant, said.

"This is to clarify Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project (KKNPP) and other Indian Nuclear Power Plants Control Systems are stand alone and not connected to outside cyber network and Internet. Any cyber attack on the Nuclear Power Plant Control System is not possible," Ramdoss said. "Presently, KKNPP Unit-1 &2 are operating at 1000 MWe and 600 MWe respectively without any operational or safety concerns."'

Pickled Tink posted:

Heh. The 11'8'' bridge claimed another truck on the 13th of September, and the guy hadn't posted it yet. It is now up:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nquHli7P5s

It got another truck on the 19th:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDTV1uHjyIM

Pickled Tink posted:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nquHli7P5s

iospace posted:

12'4" will spare a lot of rental box trucks, but a lot of full sized box trucks are 12'6", so we'll probably get a hit from time to time.

C.M. Kruger posted:

WHY WOULD YOU PUT A NUCLEAR REACTOR ON THE INTERNET?!?

bonelessdongs posted:

Putting your nuclear power plant on the internet is a power move that makes it infinitely easier to administrate from home and maintain with consumer hardware. Everyone else is just jealous they didn't think of it first.

Nocheez posted:

Don't they underestimate the height a few inches? Is it possible a 12'6" will squeeze barely under it?

FCKGW posted:

No, because if you did but didn't publish how off from the actual height you are people would make up their own guesses and keep slamming into poo poo anyways.

haveblue posted:

So long as none of your tools are written in Java!

Nocheez posted:

I assumed they would give a number slightly lower than the minimum clearance to account for things like when a train is going over the bridge, or when temperatures change, etc.

fisting by many posted:

Trucks are like boats, going faster pushes them lower. The safest way to squeeze under a bridge is to gun it.

CommieGIR posted:

Well, he is right.

They have a seprate corporate network, THAT is what is compromised

AzMiLion posted:

Because you can?

Proteus Jones posted:

Utilities are a nightmarish trash-fire of ignored security policies.

Proteus Jones posted:

I guarantee you somewhere, on some Linksys consumer-grade switch buried in a coat closet, there's a cable or cables linking the corporate network to the SCADA network. I'd also give it even odds that there is more than one critical system with active admin/admin credentials.

Utilities are a nightmarish trash-fire of ignored security policies.

bonelessdongs posted:

Lmao @ u if you don't write electron apps for all your industrial controls

FCKGW posted:

No, because if you did but didn't publish how off from the actual height you are people would make up their own guesses and keep slamming into poo poo anyways.

quote:

Is the clearance signage accurate?

The clearance signage displays a maximum safe clearance – and yes, in that sense it is accurate. The actual clearance of the crash beam right in front of the trestle is 11 feet 10.8 inches, which gives it a 2.8 inch safety margin. The MUTCD allows for a maximum of 3 inches difference between the signage and the actual clearance.

starkebn posted:

https://i.imgur.com/IGPgagp.mp4

people are guessing some weak shoring let go

terrenblade posted:

Late but,
If shoes knocked off = dead whats hardhat knocked off?

terrenblade posted:

Late but,
If shoes knocked off = dead whats hardhat knocked off?

Memento posted:

Tell that to the uranium enrichment facilities at Natanz

terrenblade posted:

Late but,
If shoes knocked off = dead whats hardhat knocked off?

Powershift posted:

schmug posted:

OSHA

thetedster posted:

I heard this story on the radio the other day:
https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/snapjudgment/episodes/other-hand-love-radio-snap-judgment

Man befriends/mentors teenager who blew his hand off trying to make a pipe bomb. After helping the young man to learn to cope with his new challenges, he decides to cut his own arm off with a tablesaw. Shockingly, the young man finds this disturbing and cuts off contact with him.

Cojawfee posted:

There was some actor who wanted to be different to get parts, so he cut his own arm off, built his own prothesis, and then pretended to be a disabled veteran.

Cojawfee posted:

There was some actor who wanted to be different to get parts, so he cut his own arm off, built his own prothesis, and then pretended to be a disabled veteran.

Cojawfee posted:

There was some actor who wanted to be different to get parts, so he cut his own arm off, built his own prothesis, and then pretended to be a disabled veteran.

The Lone Badger posted:

Wouldn't it have been easier to build the prosthesis then cut his arm off?