Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

Xaiter posted:

I keep thinking this, logically, yes. It seems like there's no way this is avoidable.

But there's another part of my brain, like... A pre-Trump era political persona that argues that while that outcome seems completely unavoidable "logically", politics doesn't work this way obviously. There is a 0% chance the justice system of this nation will ever charge a president with a crime once they leave office, even if they did shoot someone on 5th Avenue in broad daylight. There's a whole buttload of political reality decorum arguments to made.

They're all stupid and self-undermining, but you can imagine the reality of the situation. Polarization is bad now, we'd probably end up with literal blood in the streets given ammunition the GOP would get from this.

"DEEP STATE COUP, THEY'RE LITERALLY LOCKING US UP"

I suspect more than a few unhinged Trumpians would take the messaging as a sign for more mass shootings (see PJ's white supremacy attack theories). And given this is Trump, you can imagine him literally calling for murder and political coup from his padded cell if he was to actually get sentenced. Few people to hear him, few would care, but enough to incite even more violence than as if any other president had been sentenced.

It doesn't mean we shouldn't do it. But I'm trying to imagine the reasons it won't happen because it's never happened because :decorum:. And using mushbrained thinking, this anticipated spike in polarization and violence would dissuade the ruling class in charge of the justice system from actually using it to punish Trump.

But seriously, I don't know he'll actully go to jail despite the massive, obvious crimes. One part of me is absolutely positive he has to, or we admit our rule of law is fundamentally broken and the President is LITERALLY allowed to do anything. Another part of me is also absolutely positive he can't because it would completely and utterly throw a wrecking ball through our political machine unlike anything we've ever seen before, and the folks in charge of deciding if justice actually gets carried out REALLY doesn't want to risk breaking the whole thing by doing their drat job for once.

Every single South Korean president has been locked up after office and democracy is only getting healthier here over time.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lote
Aug 5, 2001

Place your bets

Charlz Guybon posted:

Every single South Korean president has been locked up after office and democracy is only getting healthier here over time.

That and one of their Presidents was likely killed by the KCIA.

Xaiter
Dec 16, 2007

Everything is AWESOME!

Charlz Guybon posted:

Every single South Korean president has been locked up after office and democracy is only getting healthier here over time.

I don't know poo poo about South Korea outside of internet stereotypes, so I'll take your word for it. But every president? Is there some massive corruption issue or what the gently caress is going on?

That said... It wouldn't shock me, wow, enforcing the drat laws in a democratic society is good for re-enforcing those democratic values. It does seem self-evident.

It's just American political discourse, as described in my rambling nonsense, is absolutely bonkers and makes no sense with mission critical rules for a functional democracy only operating on pinky promises. Even when there's actual violations of the law, the potential "shame" it would bring our nation to charge someone exceeds our will to actually enforce those laws.

And sadly, every time we compromise with :decorum:, we're left in a more precarious position as faith in the rule of law erodes. Which means when we finally do drop the hammer, the polarization that will result from "Wait, why are we enforcing the rules NOW? WITCH HUNT!!1!" will be pretty drat harsh.

In the long run, totally makes sense enforcing the rules, re-enforces the values of a society. If enforcing those rules inflicts pain upon the political body of a Nation, then it has strayed from that society's values.

Enforcing the drat rules wouldn't make us a perfect society or the best democracy by a long shot (glares at the existence of the Senate), but it would get us a heck of a lot closer to a functional society that can self-correct without violence, as is the goal of any democratic society.

shitpost complete beep boop (gently caress didn't mean to be that long winded again)

EDIT:

Lote posted:

That and one of their Presidents was likely killed by the KCIA.

Jesus. That's bad.

Xaiter fucked around with this message at 07:02 on Nov 1, 2019

hadji murad
Apr 18, 2006

Charlz Guybon posted:

Every single South Korean president has been locked up after office and democracy is only getting healthier here over time.

This is incorrect. Kim Dae Jung and Roh Moo Hyun weren't. Probably more.

e: yup, and going back to the dictatorships it seems that more President's haven't been locked up than have been

hadji murad fucked around with this message at 07:06 on Nov 1, 2019

Freudian slippers
Jun 23, 2009
US Goon shocked and appalled to find that world is a dirty, unjust place

Motion to change thread title to Florida Man Fucks Up Again

SocketWrench
Jul 8, 2012

by Fritz the Horse

Lightning Knight posted:

I just saw this on Twitter and I keep thinking about how unhappy the two older ones look and how they’ll probably cite this exact picture in therapy in like a decade lmao.

Yeah, it should be child abuse to force your kids to do stupid poo poo like this because you're a fucktard. I don't care what side of the political aisle someone's on, pushing kids to display your stupidity is flat out wrong. Same as those mothers that enter their kids in beauty competitions

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Blind Rasputin
Nov 25, 2002

Farewell, good Hunter. May you find your worth in the waking world.

USPOL Fall: The Bugs Bunny GIF is now canon

Ershalim
Sep 22, 2008
Clever Betty

Blind Rasputin posted:

USPOL Fall: The Bugs Bunny GIF is now canon

I remember the thread where that just got empty quoted for pages and pages. Good times. I hope when Florida really does float away it takes that bloated ignoramus with it and then we can do that again.

TulliusCicero
Jul 29, 2017




Going to assume that this was 2 years ago because "Good Ole Boy" Johnny doesn't see the kids anymore, because "reasons"

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

hadji murad posted:

This is incorrect. Kim Dae Jung and Roh Moo Hyun weren't. Probably more.

e: yup, and going back to the dictatorships it seems that more President's haven't been locked up than have been
I was only talking about democratically elected presidents.

Roh Moo Hyun killed himself because of bribery allegations.

You're correct about Kim Dae Jung, only his minister of Justice was arrested.

So amend my statement from all to most.

hadji murad
Apr 18, 2006

Charlz Guybon posted:

I was only talking about democratically elected presidents.

Roh Moo Hyun killed himself because of bribery allegations.

You're correct about Kim Dae Jung, only his minister of Justice was arrested.

So amend my statement from all to most.

Roh Tae Woo - not incarcerated

Kim Young Sam - not incarcerated

Kim Dae Jung - not incarcerated

Roh Moo Hyun - not incarcerated, investigated before suicide

Lee Myung Bak - sentenced to 15 years

Park Geun Hye - sentenced to 25 years

Hwang Kyo Ahn - not incarcerated

ManBoyChef
Aug 1, 2019

Deadbeat Dad



Ate My Balls Redux posted:

I'm relatively certain if hundreds of photos of a male politician in sexual poses with their staffers were taken and released, they'd also be forced to resign.

It's possible to acknowledge that the revenge porn aspect is gross and should be punished harshly, but also the circumstances are a lot more severe here than in most similar cases

I think the photos really put it in your face and make it real. Secondly, a lot of people still cannot accept that some women are attracted to women and some men are attracted to men. Its really just sad. Its 2019.

ManBoyChef
Aug 1, 2019

Deadbeat Dad



Ate My Balls Redux posted:

Yeah, laws are the thing that stops him

touche

lifetime supply of Pocky
Aug 19, 2003

TulliusCicero posted:

Going to assume that this was 2 years ago because "Good Ole Boy" Johnny doesn't see the kids anymore, because "reasons"

how dare that family court discriminate against his economic anxiety

thin blue whine
Feb 21, 2004
PLEASE SEE POLICY


Soiled Meat

i am harry posted:

How dare you insinuate that I am Donald Trump Junior what the hell

wow not even Donald Trump Jr wants to be Donald Trump Jr

Rincewinds
Jul 30, 2014

MEAT IS MEAT

What the hell?

https://twitter.com/Chinchillazllla/status/1190153980212662272

https://www.morganton.com/news/local/man-charged-in-hit-and-run-that-left-woman-dead/article_eff54570-4622-11e6-9994-cb2756aea6f9.html

Rincewinds fucked around with this message at 12:38 on Nov 1, 2019

oxsnard
Oct 8, 2003
Jesus Christ

Shifty Pony
Dec 28, 2004

Up ta somethin'


ManBoyChef posted:

I think the photos really put it in your face and make it real. Secondly, a lot of people still cannot accept that some women are attracted to women and some men are attracted to men. Its really just sad. Its 2019.

Katie Hill is bi too, which has a whole 'nother layer of people denying it exists.


(except when hetero men want a threesome, at which point they usually insist that actually all women are bi because in our society every single sexual orientation and gender identity has this really odd way of being primarily defined from the prospective of cis men).

SpannerX
Apr 26, 2010

I had a beer with Stephen Harper once and now I like him.

Fun Shoe

The original got deleted. I wonder why?

Captain Invictus
Apr 5, 2005

Try reading some manga!


Clever Betty

SpannerX posted:

The original got deleted. I wonder why?
it was of the now apparent murderer's kids dressed as a maga chud flashing the OK sign with one hand and holding a chain in the other that led to his chained up slave siblings, one in blackface and the other I forget dressed as what. The chud-dressed one seemed too young to even know what he was doing and the other two looked positively despondent to be in the picture

boy, that wasn't where I expected things to go. Is it possible this sort of thing could get him charged with murder instead of a mere hit-and-run? Knowing he's a towering, colossal racist like this, makes it way more plausible he targeted her rather than just an accident.

skylined!
Apr 6, 2012

THE DEM DEFENDER HAS LOGGED ON
They were dressed as trump, obama and hillary.

SidneyIsTheKiller
Jul 16, 2019

I did fall asleep reading a particularly erotic chapter
in my grandmother's journal.

She wrote very detailed descriptions of her experiences...
From a few pages back now:

AhhYes posted:

https://twitter.com/ArdenFarhi/status/1189948192986714118?s=20

Don't think I've seen this discussed. This IIRC is the first testimony to proactively say they didn't think anything illegal was said on the call.

Tayter Swift posted:

Didn't this guy resign his position yesterday? This seems like an... odd path.

A reminder in this case that even if the call was technically legal that's by no means an exoneration. Even without the quid pro quo the call still represents an atrocious abuse of power that justifies impeachment on its own. There being an actual crime just makes it that much more clean-cut and damning.

Data Graham
Dec 28, 2009

📈📊🍪😋



Besesoth posted:

Article III of Impeachment against Richard Nixon:

quote:

In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, contrary to his oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has failed without lawful cause or excuse to produce papers and things as directed by duly authorized subpoenas issued by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives on April 11, 1974, May 15, 1974, May 30, 1974, and June 24, 1974, and willfully disobeyed such subpoenas. The subpoenaed papers and things were deemed necessary by the Committee in order to resolve by direct evidence fundamental, factual questions relating to Presidential direction, knowledge or approval of actions demonstrated by other evidence to be substantial grounds for impeachment of the President. In refusing to produce these papers and things Richard M. Nixon, substituting his judgment as to what materials were necessary for the inquiry, interposed the powers of the Presidency against the lawful subpoenas of the House of Representatives, thereby assuming to himself functions and judgments necessary to the exercise of the sole power of impeachment vested by the Constitution in the House of Representatives.

I've seen this cited a couple of times lately and I just can't help but wonder, was "papers and things" really the best wording they could come up with? Is that some kind of legalese?

How hard would it have been to say "papers and other materials"?

eke out
Feb 24, 2013



Data Graham posted:

How hard would it have been to say "papers and other materials"?

there's a supreme court case from a few years ago about whether a fish is a "tangible object"

the ruling split 4-4-1

Fritz Coldcockin
Nov 7, 2005

SidneyIsTheKiller posted:

From a few pages back now:



A reminder in this case that even if the call was technically legal that's by no means an exoneration. Even without the quid pro quo the call still represents an atrocious abuse of power that justifies impeachment on its own. There being an actual crime just makes it that much more clean-cut and damning.

Also Morrison is not a legal expert and is in no way positioned to say whether or not what he heard was illegal.

Sir Lemming
Jan 27, 2009

It's a piece of JUNK!

Shimrra Jamaane posted:

I think there’s a chance he just improvs the whole thing.

Since that's what he accused Adam Schiff of doing, yeah, that's exactly what he will do.

SidneyIsTheKiller posted:

From a few pages back now:



A reminder in this case that even if the call was technically legal that's by no means an exoneration. Even without the quid pro quo the call still represents an atrocious abuse of power that justifies impeachment on its own. There being an actual crime just makes it that much more clean-cut and damning.

Well he did say "I was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed" which I read as "yeah it was illegal, but I'm not concerned about it"

AhhYes
Dec 1, 2004

* Click *
College Slice
So the NSC attorney who placed the call on the codeword server is expected to testify:

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/nsc-lawyer-who-placed-trump-zelensky-call-in-code-word-system-expected-to-testify/

One thing about that I've never really understood. My understanding is that placing calls on that server is unusual (illegal?) and also makes the information much harder to get rid of due to access issues and regs surrounding the disposal of classified information. Putting the call there has been presented mostly as an abuse of the classification system. But I have been wondering about that.

If the goal was to make that information tough to access, why not just break the presidential records acts and destroy the transcripts/recordings? You're breaking the law either way. It seems to me that placing it on the secure server both draws attention to it and makes it much harder to get rid of.

Could it be that this attorney did it to preserve evidence? Or is that giving them way too much credit?

punishedkissinger
Sep 20, 2017

AhhYes posted:

So the NSC attorney who placed the call on the codeword server is expected to testify:

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/nsc-lawyer-who-placed-trump-zelensky-call-in-code-word-system-expected-to-testify/

One thing about that I've never really understood. My understanding is that placing calls on that server is unusual (illegal?) and also makes the information much harder to get rid of due to access issues and regs surrounding the disposal of classified information. Putting the call there has been presented mostly as an abuse of the classification system. But I have been wondering about that.

If the goal was to make that information tough to access, why not just break the presidential records acts and destroy the transcripts/recordings? You're breaking the law either way. It seems to me that placing it on the secure server both draws attention to it and makes it much harder to get rid of.

Could it be that this attorney did it to preserve evidence? Or is that giving them way too much credit?

You're giving the Trump admin way too much credit. They literally put less thought into it than you have. Trump told them to do it, and they did it. That's it.

Data Graham
Dec 28, 2009

📈📊🍪😋



Why wouldn't Trump's instinct have been "just tear it up and eat it"?



Oh yeah, he thinks it was perfect

Shifty Pony
Dec 28, 2004

Up ta somethin'


AhhYes posted:

So the NSC attorney who placed the call on the codeword server is expected to testify:

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/nsc-lawyer-who-placed-trump-zelensky-call-in-code-word-system-expected-to-testify/

One thing about that I've never really understood. My understanding is that placing calls on that server is unusual (illegal?) and also makes the information much harder to get rid of due to access issues and regs surrounding the disposal of classified information. Putting the call there has been presented mostly as an abuse of the classification system. But I have been wondering about that.

If the goal was to make that information tough to access, why not just break the presidential records acts and destroy the transcripts/recordings? You're breaking the law either way. It seems to me that placing it on the secure server both draws attention to it and makes it much harder to get rid of.

Could it be that this attorney did it to preserve evidence? Or is that giving them way too much credit?

Putting it onto the codeword system isn't illegal, just unusual as hell.

The people in the administration basically thought they had found One Weird Trick™️ to effectively hide their crimes while not technically violating the records act.

Pants Donkey
Nov 13, 2011

I imagine Junior is fixated on the Biden thing because he’s incredibly jealous of Hunter and his relationship with his father. I’m not even sure if Hunter and Joe are even that close, but probably better than Trump, who would turn on his son to save himself in a heartbeat.

Tibalt
May 14, 2017

What, drawn, and talk of peace! I hate the word, As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee

Shifty Pony posted:

Putting it onto the codeword system isn't illegal, just unusual as hell.

The people in the administration basically thought they had found One Weird Trick™️ to effectively hide their crimes while not technically violating the records act.
The initial impetus was preventing the leaks of embarrassing calls after the incident with the Australian PM, not covering up crimes.

At least, that's the story the WH told.

theflyingorc
Jun 28, 2008

ANY GOOD OPINIONS THIS POSTER CLAIMS TO HAVE ARE JUST PROOF THAT BULLYING WORKS
Young Orc

Shifty Pony posted:

Putting it onto the codeword system isn't illegal, just unusual as hell.

The people in the administration basically thought they had found One Weird Trick™️ to effectively hide their crimes while not technically violating the records act.

It basically works unless things get so bad they launch an impeachment inquiry

Boogalo
Jul 8, 2012

Meep Meep




Here's the costume tweet. Thanks discord embeds.

skylined!
Apr 6, 2012

THE DEM DEFENDER HAS LOGGED ON
Jobs numbers are better than predicted.

Promoted Pawn
Jun 8, 2005

oops


Boogalo posted:

Here's the costume tweet. Thanks discord embeds.



Pretty sure this guy either just deleted his account or at the very least deleted all his tweets.

Fritz Coldcockin
Nov 7, 2005

skylined! posted:

Jobs numbers are better than predicted.

They predicted 89,000 and got 128,000, that's only going from "abysmally terrible" to "real bad"

FizFashizzle
Mar 30, 2005







And will probably be "adjusted" in three months.

Captain Invictus
Apr 5, 2005

Try reading some manga!


Clever Betty

skylined! posted:

They were dressed as trump, obama and hillary.
oh okay it was hard to make out much on mobile. makes chud-sense.

Boogalo posted:

Here's the costume tweet. Thanks discord embeds.


drat yeah really obvious on desktop

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mr Ice Cream Glove
Apr 22, 2007

https://mobile.twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1190252151269969920

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply