Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Best girl?
Yen
Triss
Goku
View Results
 
  • Post
  • Reply
A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

stev posted:

(POC getting acting gigs will never be a bad thing, unless a character being white is super loving important to the story).
This is incidentally why I think it's good that the extras are just a bunch of white people in white people land, because it underscores the backwater nature of many locales. Having the sorcerers be more diverse than in the books strengthens that, creating a real contrast between the people thinking on a continental scale and the people who have never even left their village. It's basically a souped-up version of how the nobility of medieval Europe was marrying across the continent, while the peasants were so tied to the land that they sometimes saw the next village over as foreigners.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

DeadFatDuckFat
Oct 29, 2012

This avatar brought to you by the 'save our dead gay forums' foundation.


Water Buffalo mozzarella is in fact much tastier than the cheese made from the cow, due to its higher fat content.

Also shut up about loving race swapping or whatever the gently caress. The novels were written by some lovely genre author who cares what people looked like in the books

DeadFatDuckFat fucked around with this message at 10:04 on Dec 24, 2019

NoNotTheMindProbe
Aug 9, 2010
pony porn was here
So Yennefer did a huge non-consensual magical orgy.

Eau de MacGowan
May 12, 2009

BRASIL HEXA
2026 tá logo aí

NoNotTheMindProbe posted:

So Yennefer did a huge non-consensual magical orgy.

yeah i just got to this bit if you're going to do a hot take get on team #yentherapist

Runaway Legs
Oct 11, 2012

Not a hat
Fun Shoe
I don't agree with what some of you itt are saying that one need to know the source material to enjoy or understand the show. Anecdotal of course, but my friends and I had slim to no knowledge before watching and we're all liking it a lot. And while I'm sure that we're missing a lot of the nuances and depth that book readers know, it's not that difficult to follow along. Watching a show that assumes that you pay attention and rewards you when you do is pretty fun.

Some general examples that have been mentioned itt as hurdles for newcomers, spoilerd because the touch on some plotlines:
Geralt drinks potions, his eyes goes weird and he's better at fighting. He's older than he looks and knows a little bit of magic, but he's not as old and good at magic as the mages and sorceresses. And Yen making fun of Jaskier for getting older shows us that humans age normal.
The good guys don't use portals when they prepare the ambush/defense at Sodden because any magic user can spot and follow portals. Portals that can't be traced are super difficult to make and needs high level magic to pull off. Magic can get depleted, so conserving power is smart.
When Geralt killed Renfrei in episode 1 it was with regret and because his hands were tied. It set him up as a good person in a poo poo situation and as someone who would try to do the right thing instead of settling for the lesser evil. I didn't need a deep backstory to understand that they were both seen as monsters and that he identified with and understood her situation and motivations.
It's also pretty obvious that there's history between Yennefer and Geralt between episodes, and that their relationship is complicated.
And sometimes dragons can disguise themselves as men in order to save their eggs from lovely humans. Because humans are bastards who destroy magic forests, drive the elves from their homelands and throw djinns into rivers. But, you know, humans gonna human


My point is that the show isn't nearly as obtuse as some book readers might believe. A lot of the stuff you guys have been posting about are things that I'm looking forward to learn more about, like the potion stuff that seems really cool. But I don't need the details to enjoy the show. Little droplets of exposition lets me know that there's a bigger world that I'll get to learn about later. And in my opinion that's preferable to huge infodumps of details. If I want to know more, I got threads like this one to read through. Or the books and the games.

By the time season 2 rolls around I'm invested enough to really appreciate it if they go into more details. Until they do, I'm satisfied with what I've been shown so far, and I trust that I'll enjoy what comes next.

Perestroika
Apr 8, 2010

Just got finished with the season, and well this turned out to be a major pleasant surprise. I was super leery of Cavill as Geralt, but he actually delivered a really respectable performance and channeled that growly laconic wit pretty well. Jaskier/Dandelion somehow also managed to be more entertaining than aggravating, which is a fine line to walk.

I'd say one of the larger weaknesses of the show was that it doesn't signpost very clearly that the early episodes are not in the same chronology. I've read the books so I knew what to expect, but that feels like something that can be pretty easy to miss if you're not expecting it, leading to confusion further down the line.

Also, "Toss a Coin to your Witcher" owns
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHoIQa_kXkA

Perestroika fucked around with this message at 11:12 on Dec 24, 2019

the_enduser
May 1, 2006

They say the user lives outside the net.



Yo but, Portals Yen and Istredd used a untraceable portal in ep2 and ep3 with the flowers. That poo poo is rare but lmao they were using it loving around so they must have some for this event?? It just seemed like a pointless goofy scene imo

Show could benefit with a bit more cinematography too. This was pretty much the Netflix Marvel production team.

the_enduser fucked around with this message at 11:15 on Dec 24, 2019

Strom Cuzewon
Jul 1, 2010

Tertius Oculum posted:

Yo but, Portals Yen and Istredd used a untraceable portal in ep2 and ep3 with the flowers. That poo poo is rare but lmao they were using it loving around so they must have some for this event?? It just seemed like a pointless goofy scene imo

Show could benefit with a bit more cinematography too.

Istredd used the magic elderblood flower to do that, and also it didn't work

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

NoNotTheMindProbe posted:

So Yennefer did a huge non-consensual magical orgy.

What I absolutely loved about that scene is that it's full on GoT-style gratuitous nudity, except that unlike GoT they put a character in the middle who is extremely aware of how gratuitous it all is. Very well played

Perestroika posted:

Just got finished with the season, and well this turned out to be a major pleasant surprise. I was super leery of Cavill as Geralt, but he actually delivered a really respectable performance and channeled that growly laconic wit pretty well. Jaskier/Dandelion somehow also managed to be more entertaining than aggravating, which is a fine line to walk.

I'd say one of the larger weaknesses of the show was that it doesn't signpost very clearly that the early episodes are not in the same chronology. I've read the books so I knew what to expect, that feels like something that can be pretty easy to miss if you're not expecting it, leading to confusion further down the line.

Also, "Toss a Coin to your Witcher" owns
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHoIQa_kXkA

Literally just finished the last episode - very similar feelings. The show is clearly made by people who cared. They don't have a massive budget and you can see they're making every penny work. The sword stuntwork is fantastic. I was okay with the chronology. By episode three it's clear that they're doing the chronology thing. By episode 4 it's clear why - the season is about establishing why the characters are in the mindsets they are in when they reach the end. It's also clear that 'time passes' between each episode - Dandelion promises to make Geralt famous and the very next episode starts with him being acclaimed as the White Wolf. I thought it was well handled.

I think the best point I can make though is that I spend the first half of the season getting upset at the changes they were making from the book versions of the stories, but by the end of the episode I could see exactly why they needed to make that change.

e: Doubling up on the Joey Batey acclaim. I think Dandelion is an extremely difficult character to play because he needs to be annoying to Geralt but endearing to the viewer, and it would be so easy to get on the wrong side of the line on that. Batey nails it every time.

Alchenar fucked around with this message at 11:25 on Dec 24, 2019

Herostratus
May 1, 2013
I really enjoyed the show, and it seems that not knowing anything about the books / games was a major contributing factor.

For instance, I just gathered early on that the setting is racially diverse and rolled with it. Would not have occured to me it would annoy some people without reading this thread.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



It's amazing how many people are mad about the races of wizards, but give no shits about beautiful Mousesack being killed for the sake of a lovely doppelganger plot that lasts five minutes.

Herostratus
May 1, 2013

stev posted:

It's amazing how many people are mad about the races of wizards, but give no shits about beautiful Mousesack being killed for the sake of a lovely doppelganger plot that lasts five minutes.

Maybe he's a big deal in the books?
In the show he was on for 5 minutrs prior to that. Didn't feel like a major character.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Herostratus posted:

Maybe he's a big deal in the books?
In the show he was on for 5 minutrs prior to that. Didn't feel like a major character.

He doesn't appear again in the books but he doesn't get done dirty like that. :colbert:

And they highlighted the fact that dopplers have the memories and skills of the person they're impersonating, then immediately forgot it so Ciri could suss the guy out with the old 'you're eating sushi but you're allergic to fish' routine. It was all very dumb.

stev fucked around with this message at 11:56 on Dec 24, 2019

Runaway Legs
Oct 11, 2012

Not a hat
Fun Shoe

Tertius Oculum posted:

Yo but, Portals Yen and Istredd used a untraceable portal in ep2 and ep3 with the flowers. That poo poo is rare but lmao they were using it loving around so they must have some for this event?? It just seemed like a pointless goofy scene imo



Strom Cuzewon posted:

Istredd used the magic elderblood flower to do that, and also it didn't work

Yeah, I didn't know what flower he used or why it was special, but my impression was that what he did and used was powerful and not ordinary. So a nerdy older student using a powerful spell to impress a freshman rang true to me.
It didn't even occur to me that the sorceresses not using magic to get in position later could be seen as inconsistent until I read this thread.

CJ
Jul 3, 2007

Asbungold
I was a bit worried when people were saying that all of Nilfgaard would be black during production because it would be kind of odd for everyone to call them the "black ones", but they didn't do that so it's not a big deal.

Lord Frankenstyle
Dec 3, 2005

Mmmm,
You smell like Lysol Wipes.
Wow. I was expecting this to just be a string of "Hey, remember this part of the video game?" scenes and not an actually good show. Having not read the books I loved the twisting chronology of the story. On the second or third episode my wife asked me "uh, did we skip some episodes or something?", and I dropped out to the list because I wasn't exactly sure. Have they decided on a second season yet?

CAPTAIN CAPSLOCK
Sep 11, 2001



Frankenstyle posted:

Wow. I was expecting this to just be a string of "Hey, remember this part of the video game?" scenes and not an actually good show. Having not read the books I loved the twisting chronology of the story. On the second or third episode my wife asked me "uh, did we skip some episodes or something?", and I dropped out to the list because I wasn't exactly sure. Have they decided on a second season yet?

It was renewed for a second season a month or so before it was released.

LinYutang
Oct 12, 2016

NEOLIBERAL SHITPOSTER

:siren:
VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO!!!
:siren:

CJ posted:

I was a bit worried when people were saying that all of Nilfgaard would be black during production because it would be kind of odd for everyone to call them the "black ones", but they didn't do that so it's not a big deal.

Thronebreaker localized this as "blackclads" which was more elegant.

Zeta Acosta
Dec 16, 2019

#essereFerrari

stev posted:

It's amazing how many people are mad about the races of wizards, but give no shits about beautiful Mousesack being killed for the sake of a lovely doppelganger plot that lasts five minutes.

The show shitted on brokilon, cahir and Ciri. The more i think it about the less i like it. The dudes at CDPR did a better job with the writer material

Arc Hammer
Mar 4, 2013

Got any deathsticks?
An issue with the battle of Sodden is that it is never actually shown in the books so a lot of the characters present really don't get a lot of time to shine and feel shoehorned in (even though they were there, they feel shoehorned because there's just not a lot of material for them). Like, I'm happy that Gelvissig and Coral are shown at Sodden, but neither of them really have substance in the books either so in a show that has to pare down elements for time constraints, they have even less to do. Hell, I don't think Coral had a major part to play until in any book Seasons of Storms and that book came out fifteen years after Lady of the Lake. Sabrina got like one scene in Time of Contempt and had a far larger part in Witcher 2 after she was loving dead.

JBP
Feb 16, 2017

You've got to know, to understand,
Baby, take me by my hand,
I'll lead you to the promised land.

Frankenstyle posted:

Have they decided on a second season yet?

Yeah it got "renewed" before it went to air. I don't understand how Netflix works.

Alkabob
May 31, 2011
I would like to speak to the manager about the socialists, please

JBP posted:

Yeah it got "renewed" before it went to air. I don't understand how Netflix works.

There is enough material for a few seasons, a built in fan base, a void created by GoT and D&D isn't writing it.

CJ
Jul 3, 2007

Asbungold

JBP posted:

Yeah it got "renewed" before it went to air. I don't understand how Netflix works.

They commission a new show to try and get new subscribers, announce a second season before it comes out to try and build hype, then cancel after the second season if it isn't a megahit so they can the repeat the process with another show aimed at another demographic.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Yeah I fully expect season 2 to blast through the first two novels and for that to be all we get.

Maybe a third season will be on the cards it it really takes off.

chaosapiant
Oct 10, 2012

White Line Fever

I've got a feeling that the next season or two, while pulling from the saga, will butcher/rearrange/remove a lot of it. I'm hoping that's not the case.

LinYutang
Oct 12, 2016

NEOLIBERAL SHITPOSTER

:siren:
VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO!!!
:siren:
The more I think about it, the more I feel that adapting the books is and was a bad idea. The games really elevated the material by using the world but avoiding dealing directly with Sapowski's cliche writing. The world and characters felt fully fleshed without needing to overexplain their origin stories.

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

But if you’re not familiar with the books you might do something dumb like romancing Triss.

Bobbin Threadbare
Jan 2, 2009

I'm looking for a flock of urbanmechs.

I always find it fascinating when a show or movie produces such an exceptional range of reactions as this.

chaosapiant
Oct 10, 2012

White Line Fever

LinYutang posted:

The more I think about it, the more I feel that adapting the books is and was a bad idea. The games really elevated the material by using the world but avoiding dealing directly with Sapowski's cliche writing. The world and characters felt fully fleshed without needing to overexplain their origin stories.

They were fully fleshed out because of Sapkowski's writings. Having the game be based on a series of seven books gave it a huge advantage in developing characters and relationships.

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



chaosapiant posted:

They were fully fleshed out because of Sapkowski's writings. Having the game be based on a series of seven books gave it a huge advantage in developing characters and relationships.

That's the point - they were able to build on the (kind of shaky) foundation. The games wouldn't have been nearly as good if they'd just adapted the books straight.

Ubiquitous_
Nov 20, 2013

by Reene
Episode 6 was a down point for me. So much melodrama and lovely special effects. The fight scenes were embarrassing, too.

LinYutang
Oct 12, 2016

NEOLIBERAL SHITPOSTER

:siren:
VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO!!!
:siren:

stev posted:

That's the point - they were able to build on the (kind of shaky) foundation. The games wouldn't have been nearly as good if they'd just adapted the books straight.


Yes. Like Yennefer is really introduced late in the game series but her and Geralt's relationship feels thoroughly grounded because of the dynamics the story establishes, their alluding to common adventures, and so on.

Like I felt the adaptation/followup of Last Wish in the game was way more moving and more effective than the short story, especially as it comes after a sequence where Yennefer is driven out of a town for her brazenness and reminded again of how alone she is, besides for Geralt.

Arglebargle III
Feb 21, 2006

stev posted:

It's amazing how many people are mad about the races of wizards, but give no shits about beautiful Mousesack being killed for the sake of a lovely doppelganger plot that lasts five minutes.

I think the only people really mad about the race of wizards are everybody who dogpiles anyone who dares to say they didn't like it.

chaosapiant
Oct 10, 2012

White Line Fever

My head-canon is that Mousesack survived and went back to Skellige to lick his wound's, where he's back advising Crach an Craite and awaiting Geralt's arrival in Witcher 3. In my head, the games are canon sequels to the books and it's all one big-rear end story line.

Bananasaurus Rex
Mar 19, 2009

Arglebargle III posted:

I think the only people really mad about the race of wizards are everybody who dogpiles anyone who dares to say they didn't like it.

Nah go read all the 0 star reviews on metacritic and you will see how 99% have no real critiques other than complaining about wokeness and sjws. Or how they ruined the slavic atmosphere of the books and games.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

It's a good production move though - they get to use the same actor for much more of the story but don't actually need to keep him around much longer. The kind of decision that makes it clear they were making every penny count.

Kaedric
Sep 5, 2000

LinYutang posted:

The more I think about it, the more I feel that adapting the books is and was a bad idea. The games really elevated the material by using the world but avoiding dealing directly with Sapowski's cliche writing. The world and characters felt fully fleshed without needing to overexplain their origin stories.

His writing is actually pretty good, and not really cliche at all. He doesn't generally have the badass hero valiantly winning the day etc. It's one of the reasons I really like his work, in that there's actual stakes and almost always things never work out perfectly (no happily ever after, as it were).

Which actually reminds me: they messed up The Lesser Evil in the show. The whole point was that even though Geralt made a choice, as opposed to staying neutral, it didn't matter and was in fact still the wrong thing to do. In the show he confronts Renfri's crew and kills them to prevent them from murdering the townspeople as leverage against Stregobor, then Renfri shows up and flat out says she will kill everyone in Blaviken until Stregobor comes down (while holding a little girl hostage with a sword against her neck, no less). This is essentially 'dumbing down' the conflict, because it very simply makes Geralt justified to kill Renfri at that point. There's no wrong choice here. He can be sad about it after, but in the end he had no choice, right? After this Stregobor comes in and incites the townspeople to violence against Geralt, because you see, he's a BAD GUY(tm).

In the books: Geralt confronts Renfri's crew in the town square, fights them, and then Renfri shows up. She states that Stregobor refuses to leave his tower, no matter how many people she would end up killing, so she gave up. However, seeing that Geralt killed all of her friends, she fatalistically decides to fight him, and loses. Stregobor shows up after and still wants to take her body to autopsy, but when Geralt refuses, Stregobor insists Geralt come with him and leave the town, since the townspeople won't understand why Geralt killed these people, and will think him a monster. Geralt refuses, and the townspeople show up and start throwing stones until the Alderman comes and stops them, and he tells Geralt to never come back.

Here you have a situation that could have been completely avoided, no one would have died. Choosing the 'lesser evil' was a mistake (as it always is). No one in the story is an out and out moustache-twirling villain, as they are in the show. It's magnitudes better.

Kaedric fucked around with this message at 19:16 on Dec 24, 2019

Proteus Jones
Feb 28, 2013



Kaedric posted:

So I guess you tell me which one is more cliche.

Please! There is no fighting in the War Room!

Kaedric
Sep 5, 2000

NoNotTheMindProbe posted:

So Yennefer did a huge non-consensual magical orgy.

Naw, they reference a couple times that the town is a bit ... repressed, sexually, and all she was doing was some magic Spanish Fly, complete with magic safe-word.

JacksLibido posted:

I think there are a lot more people who are annoyed by it than are willing to speak up for fear of being beaten down as "racist", I'm one of them. I don't mind POC being cast in fantasy Europe, it helps break up the "everybody is blonde with blue eyes" type shows you get like with LOTR. However, I think Netflix went off the deep end a bit with Triss, Yen, Fringilla, Istredd, and Vilgefortz all being race swapped. That's a LOT of main characters to be swapped, and it kinda took me out of the slavic fantasy. The boat ride towards Sodden Hill really emphasized just how much they changed it up.

The only ones that bothered me were Fringilla and (not sure if this counts because it's a show-only character, but since elves I don't think were shown as having dark skin) Dara, but not because of their skin color. The problem I had was how.. modern? they looked? Not sure how to exactly describe what I mean, but it's kinda like if one of the white sorceresses was cast as Alicia Silverstone? Like, I would absolutely expect to see those actors in a tween drama. Dara especially was a bit too pretty-boy for a homeless elf I think.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Kaedric
Sep 5, 2000

Proteus Jones posted:

Please! There is no fighting in the War Room!

You're right, that was needlessly incendiary, removed.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply