|
Smiling Jack posted:The governor specifically stated that there would be a grandfather clause. You can read through the main bill here: https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?201+ful+SB16 /efb. Untagged fucked around with this message at 17:05 on Jan 6, 2020 |
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 17:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 09:43 |
|
|
Smiling Jack posted:I would appreciate a reputable link to the restrictions you have cited, I can't find any. This. Please read the bills that have been put up for consideration. I'm not trying to be a dick either, but I used to work retail so spare me the story and bring a receipt or you're not getting a refund
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 17:07
|
|
Tythas posted:You're correct in so far as the grandfather clause requires you to register your weapon Okay, reading the definition there, it's a semi-auto with a fixed magazine that can take 10+ rounds and has one banned feature, or a semi-auto with any size detachable magazine with one banned feature.
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 17:07
|
|
egyptian rat race posted:This. Please read the bills that have been put up for consideration before clicking "share" on a social media post. Clicking on the link in the bill for the definition of assault weapon takes you to some law about street sweepers, scroll all the way to the bottom for the proposed definition.
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 17:08
|
|
|
Smiling Jack posted:Clicking on the link in the bill for the definition of assault weapon takes you to some law about street sweepers, scroll all the way to the bottom for the proposed definition. Got it. Yeah that's a pretty broad definition, possibly more restrictive than CA? I haven't lived there in over a decade. I can't see that passing in current form. It's VA so anything can happen, even with a majority in both houses. I'd personally like to see universal background checks pass, and I'm not frightened of cosmetic feature bans due to a childhood on the west coast where I still managed to hunt/shoot a shitload of guns without my freedoms being tread upon
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 17:15
|
|
|
 for corpse photos https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7855039/Graphic-photos-Jeffrey-Epsteins-autopsy-reveal-bloodied-neck.html Epstein even more obviously didn't kill himself also lol at keeping a whole month of prescription meds in his cell
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 17:18
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1214185109441650694?s=19 https://twitter.com/MaximoSPQR/status/1214142377788657664?s=19 https://twitter.com/xSiyy_/status/1214154587025952768?s=19 https://twitter.com/Abducid0/status/1214155145807876098?s=19 We still haven't recovered from Maria btw
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 17:24
|
|
|
Cannot stop laughing that the thing everyone knew would happen to epstein did
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 17:25
|
|
|
Pentagon Chief of Staff just resigned. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 17:37
|
|
Burt posted:Pentagon Chief of Staff just resigned. Not the JCS, he's the chief of staff for SecDef. Relax.
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 17:40
|
|
|
Tythas posted:You're correct in so far as the grandfather clause requires you to register your weapon
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 17:47
|
|
|
shame on an IGA posted:
You know the Dr. Baden in that article claiming Epstein's suicide is suspicious is the same Dr. Baden who defended OJ Simpson and Phil Spector, right?
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 17:55
|
|
|
Crakkerjakk posted:I think the main thing people were making GBS threads on Jack Ryan for was the good guys CIA helping out the vaguely leftist opposition against the right wing dictator in Venezuela. I meant office jim falling for the most obvious honey-pot ever
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 17:57
|
|
|
what the gently caress https://twitter.com/frankthorp/status/1214228209908277248?s=19 well that could be fun, if the Senate gets 50 to call him (iffy)
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 17:58
|
|
|
Smiling Jack posted:Not the JCS, he's the chief of staff for SecDef. Relax. Lol, look at this guy's official photo 
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 17:59
|
|
|
Milo and POTUS posted:...what was the honey trap Probably a fleshlight filled with honey.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 18:00
|
|
|
facialimpediment posted:what the gently caress Can't chief justice Roberts subpoena him if he's in charge of the shindig?
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 18:01
|
|
|
Milo and POTUS posted:...what was the honey trap A horse.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 18:07
|
|
|
You can't declare war on Iran without me! You will regret this!
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 18:12
|
|
|
facialimpediment posted:what the gently caress "these dicks stole my move! They STOLE MY MOVE! BOMBING IRAN IS MY MOVE, DONALD!"
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 18:14
|
|
|
Benagain posted:You can't declare war on Iran without me! You will regret this! Oh goodness it's this isn't it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 18:14
|
|
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:Oh goodness it's this isn't it. Oh yeah absolutely. I was thinking about this a few days ago
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 18:21
|
|
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:Oh goodness it's this isn't it. It's equally as likely that he has a party line to provide false testimony with and since its a republican controlled committee they will gladly let him spew it for hours on live TV without giving the same time to any credible sources.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 18:25
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 18:28
|
|
|
M_Gargantua posted:It's equally as likely that he has a party line to provide false testimony with and since its a republican controlled committee they will gladly let him spew it for hours on live TV without giving the same time to any credible sources. I know a lot of people feel this way, and I don't blame them at all, but watching some people (not here) use this as a second round excuse as to why he shouldn't be subpoenaed is incredibly dumb. Like full on using it as a cover for why the House was right to not subpoena him. It's loving stupid. Call him to testify and see what happens.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 18:40
|
|
|
Oh I'm all for subpoenaing everyone and having them testify under oath. I also just assume a lot of that will be lies and they'll never be prosecuted for false testimony.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 18:45
|
|
|
egyptian rat race posted:This. Please read the bills that have been put up for consideration. Please stop I'm getting flashbacks
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 19:03
|
|
|
M_Gargantua posted:Oh I'm all for subpoenaing everyone and having them testify under oath. I imagine most of them are smart enough to not lie, just a whole shitload of "Not to my recollection, Senator" and "I cannot recall, Senator" That being said Bolton could walk up and lead them in a sing along of the Animaniacs theme song and nothing would happen to him
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 19:04
|
|
|
THE KING IS DEAD LONG LIVE THE KING https://youtu.be/YQssl0sM9As https://twitter.com/ABC11_WTVD/status/1214215565654577154?s=19
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 19:20
|
|
|
facialimpediment posted:THE KING IS DEAD life finds a way
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 19:30
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ash_lonehunter/status/1213904685280591873 If someone points out this was larger than Trump’s inauguration, we’ll be at war within hours.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 19:39
|
|
|
Finally. I hope his case gets lost in processing. https://twitter.com/LAcrimes/status/1214254858351415296?s=19
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 19:43
|
|
|
facialimpediment posted:I almost posted that yesterday, but I have no idea who the dude is, nor if his connections/quotes are bullshit or not. https://www.huffpost.com/author/reza-marashi Looks legit.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 19:43
|
|
|
Can anyone give me an actual, legit reason why Iran shouldn't have the bomb? Because the only reason I've been given is "they hate America!" And their rhetoric against Israel- which is a two way street.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 20:01
|
|
|
Yes, but my argument hinges more on nuclear weapons being horrible and unethical in general.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 20:02
|
|
|
EBB posted:Yes, but my argument hinges more on nuclear weapons being horrible and unethical in general. That's fair. But since a bunch of other dude's have them, why shouldn't Iran?
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 20:06
|
|
|
bulletsponge13 posted:Can anyone give me an actual, legit reason why Iran shouldn't have the bomb? Because the only reason I've been given is "they hate America!" And their rhetoric against Israel- which is a two way street. It's really rich that Iran continues to be the big bad boogeyman whilst Donnie continues to suck of Mohammed Bone Sawman on the reg.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 20:06
|
|
|
bulletsponge13 posted:Can anyone give me an actual, legit reason why Iran shouldn't have the bomb? Because the only reason I've been given is "they hate America!" And their rhetoric against Israel- which is a two way street. Nuclear proliferation in itself is bad. That being said, we regularly rattle the saber by spending hundreds of billions on conventional warfare and no one can afford to match that its the only parity option available.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 20:07
|
|
|
bulletsponge13 posted:Can anyone give me an actual, legit reason why Iran shouldn't have the bomb? Because the only reason I've been given is "they hate America!" And their rhetoric against Israel- which is a two way street. There is no legit reason beyond proliferation in general is bad. Nobody should have the loving bomb, and the more who have it, the higher the risk of someone setting off a nuclear war.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 20:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 09:43 |
|
|
Stultus Maximus posted:There is no legit reason beyond proliferation in general is bad. Nobody should have the loving bomb, and the more who have it, the higher the risk of someone setting off a nuclear war. The anti-proliferation stance makes sense, but that isn't the stance of most who are against it. I'm just trying to figure out the mental math that we use to decide who is allowed and who isn't
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2020 20:18
|
|