Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->
If that video is legit it's hard to imagine anything BUT it being shot down. Maybe it was a bomb?

Based on what we've seen in Ukraine it's pretty believable that some poorly trained and overeager yahoos would get itchy trigger fingers and shoot down a civilian aircraft. Especially at night when they were presumably seeing a bunch of stuff on the internet and in the media about US planes taking off.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Nitrousoxide
May 30, 2011

do not buy a oneplus phone



Fojar38 posted:

If that video is legit it's hard to imagine anything BUT it being shot down. Maybe it was a bomb?

Based on what we've seen in Ukraine it's pretty believable that some poorly trained and overeager yahoos would get itchy trigger fingers and shoot down a civilian aircraft. Especially at night when they were presumably seeing a bunch of stuff on the internet and in the media about US planes taking off.

A passenger 737 would look NOTHING like an american combat jet or missile on radar. There's no way they would shoot it down

I.G.
Oct 10, 2000

Nitrousoxide posted:

A passenger 737 would look NOTHING like an american combat jet or missile on radar. There's no way they would shoot it down
I'm sure the people on that plane shot down over Ukraine will be happy to hear this.

Absurd Alhazred
Mar 27, 2010

by Athanatos

Fojar38 posted:

If that video is legit it's hard to imagine anything BUT it being shot down. Maybe it was a bomb?

Based on what we've seen in Ukraine it's pretty believable that some poorly trained and overeager yahoos would get itchy trigger fingers and shoot down a civilian aircraft. Especially at night when they were presumably seeing a bunch of stuff on the internet and in the media about US planes taking off.

I.G. posted:

I'm sure the people on that plane shot down over Ukraine will be happy to hear this.

What does that have to do with "what we've seen in Ukraine"? This is a well-trained army, not some militia getting its first chance to play with the new toy the little green men gave them.

RandomBlue
Dec 30, 2012

hay guys!


Biscuit Hider

I.G. posted:

I'm sure the people on that plane shot down over Ukraine will be happy to hear this.

Maybe they weren't actually shot down on accident.

:thunk:

Seph
Jul 12, 2004

Please look at this photo every time you support or defend war crimes. Thank you.

Nitrousoxide posted:

A passenger 737 would look NOTHING like an american combat jet or missile on radar. There's no way they would shoot it down

What is more likely:

1) A literal one in a million catastrophic failure happening on the same day that an on-edge country retaliated against the USA or;

2) A single AA unit misidentifying an aircraft and shooting it down

Of course it's impossible to rule out #1 until we see some evidence of what happened, but the odds strongly point to #2.

Seph fucked around with this message at 05:55 on Jan 8, 2020

Morbus
May 18, 2004

Nitrousoxide posted:

A passenger 737 would look NOTHING like an american combat jet or missile on radar. There's no way they would shoot it down

The USS Vincennes shot down Iran Air 655 (an A300 passenger jet) after supposedly mistaking it for an attacking F-14. It's more likely than you think for poo poo like this to happen.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->
Also keep in mind that even if all of Iran's military units are impeccably trained, their equipment is relatively old and probably not the best maintained and that alone could mean that some radar installation didn't properly pick up the plane and so it was assumed to be hostile.

In addition to the fact that everyone was on alert and possibly more than a little bit paranoid.

Ikasuhito
Sep 29, 2013

Haram as Fuck.

Seph posted:

What is more likely:

1) A literal one in a million catastrophic failure happening on the same day that an on-edge country retaliated against the USA or;

2) A single AA unit misidentifying an aircraft and shooting it down

Of course it's impossible to rule out #1 until we see some evidence of what happened, but the odds strongly point to #2.

Which ever I find more politically palatable.:colbert:

Gervasius
Nov 2, 2010



Grimey Drawer

Absurd Alhazred posted:

What does that have to do with "what we've seen in Ukraine"? This is a well-trained army, not some militia getting its first chance to play with the new toy the little green men gave them.

Iranian army are mostly conscripts that, at this time, are twitchy, nervous and probably not getting much sleep. It's still the most likely explanation.

Gervasius fucked around with this message at 06:03 on Jan 8, 2020

RandomBlue
Dec 30, 2012

hay guys!


Biscuit Hider

Seph posted:

What is more likely:

1) A literal one in a million catastrophic failure happening on the same day that an on-edge country retaliated against the USA or;

2) A single AA unit misidentifying an aircraft and shooting it down

Of course it's impossible to rule out #1 until we see some evidence of what happened, but the odds strongly point to #2.

Those aren't the only two options.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->
Iranian state media is apparently saying that the crash was caused by "mechanical issues" which is an explanation I'm immediately wary of considering they couldn't possibly have known that this quickly.

Zedhe Khoja
Nov 10, 2017

sürgünden selamlar
yıkıcılar ulusuna
Guns and missiles are mechanical.
Story checks out.

Hamelekim
Feb 25, 2006

And another thing... if global warming is real. How come it's so damn cold?
Ramrod XTreme
Barring some insanity from the president we should be at an end in regards to direct military conflict. Glad that the Republican hawks are going to go without their war.

Absurd Alhazred
Mar 27, 2010

by Athanatos

Gervasius posted:

Iranian army are mostly conscripts that, at this time, are twitchy, nervous and probably not getting much sleep. It's still the most likely explanation.

Just because they're conscripts doesn't mean they don't get trained properly. It's conceivable that they've made a mistake but it's not "oh, just like those barely trained insurgents in Eastern Ukraine" likely.

RandomBlue
Dec 30, 2012

hay guys!


Biscuit Hider

Hamelekim posted:

Barring some insanity from the president we should be at an end in regards to direct military conflict. Glad that the Republican hawks are going to go without their war.

Good luck with all of that.

Insanity from Trump would just be crazy abnormal.

America Inc.
Nov 22, 2013

I plan to live forever, of course, but barring that I'd settle for a couple thousand years. Even 500 would be pretty nice.
Maybe it wasn't a good idea to start flying a passenger plane in the middle of a warzone. The people first to blame would be air traffic control.

RandomBlue
Dec 30, 2012

hay guys!


Biscuit Hider

LookingGodIntheEye posted:

Maybe it wasn't a good idea to start flying a passenger plane in the middle of a warzone. The people first to blame would be air traffic control.

Iran wasn't a warzone.

Rip Testes
Jan 29, 2004

I never forget a face, but in your case I'll be glad to make an exception.

Fojar38 posted:

Iranian state media is apparently saying that the crash was caused by "mechanical issues" which is an explanation I'm immediately wary of considering they couldn't possibly have known that this quickly.

Maybe the pilots radioed ATC with a problem?

Zotix
Aug 14, 2011



LookingGodIntheEye posted:

Maybe it wasn't a good idea to start flying a passenger plane in the middle of a warzone. The people first to blame would be air traffic control.


As I stated earlier, throughout the past 5 hours every major airline worldwide flew their aircraft as normal through Iraq and Iran without any deviations.

KOTEX GOD OF BLOOD
Jul 7, 2012

Iran Air 655 was a personnel fuckup IIRC, and the Aegis systems were not reading out an F-14 on attack.

I'm guessing Iranian conscripts are capable of the same type of fuckup.

taqueso
Mar 8, 2004


:911:
:wookie: :thermidor: :wookie:
:dehumanize:

:pirate::hf::tinfoil:

I figure trump must be sedated or somehow locked away from his tweeter.

Doloen
Dec 18, 2004
Maybe people could refrain from reposting some rando on twitter named "The intel crab" posting "unconfirmed reports".

Seph
Jul 12, 2004

Please look at this photo every time you support or defend war crimes. Thank you.

RandomBlue posted:

Those aren't the only two options.

Based on the video and the abrupt end of the ADS-B data it was either a sudden catastrophic failure or it was shot down/blown up. I guess I could have included bomb/other into the #2 category to be comprehensive.

But like I said in previous posts, modern airliners do not suddenly explode for no reason. Basically every plane crash in the last two decades has been pilot error or terrorism, with the exception of the MAX which was a software issue and looked nothing like this.

America Inc.
Nov 22, 2013

I plan to live forever, of course, but barring that I'd settle for a couple thousand years. Even 500 would be pretty nice.

RandomBlue posted:

Iran wasn't a warzone.
Ok, point taken. It's not like it would be acceptable if the same thing happened in California far away from the site of the actual current conflict.

Raine
Apr 30, 2013

ACCELERATIONIST SUPERDOOMER



https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1214776753140518915

everyone on board died

RandomBlue
Dec 30, 2012

hay guys!


Biscuit Hider

KOTEX GOD OF BLOOD posted:

Iran Air 655 was a personnel fuckup IIRC, and the Aegis systems were not reading out an F-14 on attack.

I'm guessing Iranian conscripts are capable of the same type of fuckup.

Oh poo poo an F35 just launched from our airport, fire!

Absurd Alhazred
Mar 27, 2010

by Athanatos

RandomBlue posted:

Oh poo poo an F35 just launched from our airport, fire!

F35 Season!
737 Season!
F35 Season!
737 Season!
F35 Season!
F35 Season!
737 Season, fire!

KOTEX GOD OF BLOOD
Jul 7, 2012

RandomBlue posted:

Oh poo poo an F35 just launched from our airport, fire!
Oh poo poo that aircraft blaring a passenger IFF and steadily climbing away is actually an Iranian F-14, fire!

Rukeli
May 10, 2014

Absurd Alhazred posted:

What does that have to do with "what we've seen in Ukraine"? This is a well-trained army, not some militia getting its first chance to play with the new toy the little green men gave them.

MH17 was shot down by a Russian military unit, not the militia which only guarded the missile launcher

RandomBlue
Dec 30, 2012

hay guys!


Biscuit Hider

KOTEX GOD OF BLOOD posted:

Oh poo poo that aircraft blaring a passenger IFF and steadily climbing away is actually an Iranian F-14, fire!

Did we have an aircraft carrier or airbase in Tehran today? Because that's the only way the situations could possibly be similar if you think we shot down Iran Air 655 on accident.

RandomBlue fucked around with this message at 06:46 on Jan 8, 2020

Thump!
Nov 25, 2007

Look, fat, here's the fact, Kulak!



RandomBlue posted:

Did we have an aircraft carrier or airbase in Tehran today? Because that's the only way the situations could possibly be similar if you think we shot down Iran Air 655 on accident.

There might be a carrier in the Caspian, you don’t know 😤

Delthalaz
Mar 5, 2003






Slippery Tilde
Didn’t the Soviets kill a ton of people shooting down a passenger jet too? But that was air to air if I recall correctly.

Thump!
Nov 25, 2007

Look, fat, here's the fact, Kulak!



Delthalaz posted:

Didn’t the Soviets kill a ton of people shooting down a passenger jet too? But that was air to air if I recall correctly.

Yeah, Korean Air 007 I think it was

KOTEX GOD OF BLOOD
Jul 7, 2012

RandomBlue posted:

Did we have an aircraft carrier or airbase in Tehran today? Because that's the only way the situations could possibly be similar if you think we shot down Iran Air 655 on accident.
:thunk:

Gervasius
Nov 2, 2010



Grimey Drawer

Delthalaz posted:

Didn’t the Soviets kill a ton of people shooting down a passenger jet too? But that was air to air if I recall correctly.

Jets. Plural. Aeroflot 902, KAL 902 and KAL 007. Also, "only" two people died on KAL 902 shootdown. KAL 007 was the deadliest one, soviet jet fighter shot down a 747.

Delthalaz
Mar 5, 2003






Slippery Tilde

Gervasius posted:

Jets. Plural. Aeroflot 902, KAL 902 and KAL 007. Also, "only" two people died on KAL 902 shootdown. KAL 007 was the deadliest one, soviet jet fighter shot down a 747.

Thump! posted:

Yeah, Korean Air 007 I think it was

Ahh yes Korean Air was the one I remember reading about. Goddamn an entire 747.

Vincent Van Goatse
Nov 8, 2006

Enjoy every sandwich.

Smellrose

Delthalaz posted:

Ahh yes Korean Air was the one I remember reading about. Goddamn an entire 747.

With a member of the House of Representatives on board.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

Hamelekim posted:

Barring some insanity from the president we should be at an end in regards to direct military conflict. Glad that the Republican hawks are going to go without their war.

Iranians aren't going to leave it at that. They'll bomb some embassies or something in a month or two. Who knows how Trump will react to that.

Anyways, this seems bad

https://twitter.com/swin24/status/1214780112148860928

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

America Inc.
Nov 22, 2013

I plan to live forever, of course, but barring that I'd settle for a couple thousand years. Even 500 would be pretty nice.

Charlz Guybon posted:

Iranians aren't going to leave it at that. They'll bomb some embassies or something in a month or two. Who knows how Trump will react to that.

Anyways, this seems bad

https://twitter.com/swin24/status/1214780112148860928
Man, Giuliani will work with anyone for the right price.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply