|
Dapper_Swindler posted:we have at least a couple who are signalling they want witnesses. we will probably know more during the dinner break at 6. I love how they're always able to capture a picture of Mitch looking like he just poo poo himself.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 00:04 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 11:36 |
|
Lemming posted:I dunno, I'm still feeling that Bolton would just be like "yep everything was on the up and up, I made up that stuff to sell books" I hear you. Except I don't think Bolton likes Trump. Like at all. Xaiter posted:WTF is this defense? I'm gonna go with "contradictions" and "outright lies". I counted at least 4 or 5 straight up falsehoods for the little time I could stomach listening to it. I love how W Bush sucked so hard and so loudly that even Republicans realized it and the lesson they took from it was that they weren't sucking hard enough. I mean, in my lifetime, I've gotten Watergate, the S&L crisis, Iran Contra, 9/11, two Iraq Wars and now this poo poo. And that's just the big stuff.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 00:07 |
|
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ed18_story.html Here is the Democrats chance to gently caress it up.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 00:10 |
|
Scooter_McCabe posted:Think of how many politicians kids get a leg up on their poo poo because of who mommy or daddy is. No one wants that gravy train hosed with and calling Hunter highlights that issue more than anything else. There will be some pissed politicians if a law about your children getting patronage or what constitutes patronage comes out of this. Yeah, team Trump going on and on about nepotism and calling it a crime is pretty rich.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 00:17 |
|
Ringo Star Get posted:I love how they're always able to capture a picture of Mitch looking like he just poo poo himself. At his age, it's probably harder to NOT catch him after he just poo poo himself.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 00:18 |
|
SubG posted:Motherfucker literally just argued that you can't impeach the President because the economy is good. And it's really not.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 00:22 |
|
Djarum posted:https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ed18_story.html It's a really easy idea to talking point around though, every D should just be pulling some variation of, "Rs control the chamber, they can call any witness they want, and I'll support bringing forth any witness relevant to Trump's misconduct."
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 00:23 |
|
BiggerBoat posted:Yeah, team Trump going on and on about nepotism and calling it a crime is pretty rich. Trump's electoral argument is: "ALL elected officials are scum and I'm just YOUR scum who makes the people you hate angry." It's extremely effective. mcmagic fucked around with this message at 00:26 on Jan 28, 2020 |
# ? Jan 28, 2020 00:24 |
|
Papercut posted:It's a really easy idea to talking point around though, every D should just be pulling some variation of, "Rs control the chamber, they can call any witness they want, and I'll support bringing forth any witness relevant to Trump's misconduct." but you know coons is going to gently caress us all over. He really should be running as a republican.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 00:27 |
|
It's honestly incredible that the GOP doesn't seem to have a single intelligent person who can speak on their behalf. An entire political ideology devoid of intelligence.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 00:39 |
|
twice burned ice posted:It's honestly incredible that the GOP doesn't seem to have single intelligent person who can speak on their behalf. An entire political ideology devoid of intelligence. Even if they did, there's no intelligent argument to be made so... it may very well be the most intelligent ones are just intelligent enough to realize there's no point.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 00:40 |
|
empty whippet box posted:Trump is so loving stupid he even manages to piss off the one person in the country who truly has the power to remove him from office if he decides it's what he wants to do. They all knew this was gonna come out, probably even Mitch, they just hoped they could get the trial over with before Bolton’s manuscript leaked.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 00:44 |
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:oh gently caress off with the nothing matters bullshit. The only thing to say about this is "lol"
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 00:49 |
|
twice burned ice posted:It's honestly incredible that the GOP doesn't seem to have a single intelligent person who can speak on their behalf. An entire political ideology devoid of intelligence. It's the end result of a policy of anti-intellectualism
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 00:53 |
|
https://twitter.com/Yamiche/status/1221928590385852416?s=20 https://twitter.com/Yamiche/status/1221942918304411648 lol
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:11 |
|
https://twitter.com/RadioFreeTom/status/1221608904150462464 https://twitter.com/RadioFreeTom/status/1221610108519690241 Thread on Bolton and the book. Makes good points. On executive privilege..I'm not a lawyer but I will note the Parnas stuff came out only after the courts let it be released so the argument that Bolton just let is spill like Parnas ignores that Parnas sought and got court permission for releasing everything.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:20 |
|
Robert Ray is doing a shittastic job here. I mean he is basically making the case of encouraging Republicans to impeach him. At least he is trying to make the effort, abit a awful one, to explain why he is contradicting himself unlike Starr. "Professor" Dershowitz is going to be a laugh riot I am sure.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:21 |
|
Djarum posted:Robert Ray is doing a shittastic job here. I mean he is basically making the case of encouraging Republicans to impeach him. At least he is trying to make the effort, abit a awful one, to explain why he is contradicting himself unlike Starr. whats he saying? some kinda "do it fuckers, i dare you"?
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:22 |
|
DarkHorse posted:It's the end result of a policy of anti-intellectualism Nah, in a lot of these interviews there's just no intelligent defense that can be made, so it's better to play dumb and essentially duck the question instead of demonstrating that you do understand the facts but choose to not follow them to the obvious conclusion. eg https://twitter.com/BGrueskin/status/1221844703718641666
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:25 |
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:https://twitter.com/RadioFreeTom/status/1221608904150462464 I doubt Bolton himself leaked it. I would assume it would be someone from the publisher or someone in government. I'd assume it would be government due to the timing and where it went to. Likely it probably came from the White House itself, like the call record, thinking that it would play much differently than it has. If the NY Times has something it ALWAYS is a purposeful leak from the White House.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:26 |
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:whats he saying? some kinda "do it fuckers, i dare you"? He went through this giant, rambling story about how he interned for a Congressman who voted on the Nixon stuff and went through how Republicans voted for it as well and they weren't afraid. Now he is making a bad arguement that Trump did nothing and that impeachment is not constitutional.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:29 |
|
Djarum posted:Likely it probably came from the White House itself, like the call record, thinking that it would play much differently than it has. If the NY Times has something it ALWAYS is a purposeful leak from the White House. Remember all those times leaks would happen about the administration having meetings about how people were leaking? The White House had a copy, sure, but it doesn’t mean they wanted it to leak.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:34 |
|
generic one posted:Remember all those times leaks would happen about the administration having meetings about how people were leaking? The White House had a copy, sure, but it doesn’t mean they wanted it to leak. Yup I do. They still have never caught anyone who has leaked. I can see them leaking it thinking that Fox and the Right would use it to smear Bolton as a "never Trumper" and whatnot so they would have some cover for not voting for Witnesses. It would also get the heat off of the legal team. Like releasing the call record of the Ukraine call, it only makes sense to worm brains.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:40 |
|
Djarum posted:He went through this giant, rambling story about how he interned for a Congressman who voted on the Nixon stuff and went through how Republicans voted for it as well and they weren't afraid. hmmmm...I wonder what is fundamentally different about the country now than during the seventies...I wonder?
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:41 |
|
https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson/status/1221956108035743744 https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1221957297720778752 Charlz Guybon fucked around with this message at 01:45 on Jan 28, 2020 |
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:42 |
|
Welp, he's fired. https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/1221955550642044938?s=19
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:45 |
|
Is this Robert Ray guy just running out the clock or what.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:47 |
|
Charlz Guybon posted:https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson/status/1221956108035743744 Lou Dobbs has freaking lost it. I guess they are in damage control mode and are just throwing poo poo at the wall to see what sticks.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:48 |
|
https://twitter.com/EricColumbus/status/1221957445813264384
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:49 |
|
Wow... Just wow. I mean...
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:50 |
|
Oh poo poo, digital yarn work. Like Glenn Beck moved into the 21st century.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:51 |
|
"Professor" Dershowitz is on for prime time.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:52 |
|
Charlz Guybon posted:https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson/status/1221956108035743744 i love how these dickheads eat each other.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:52 |
|
Djarum posted:"Professor" Dershowitz is on for prime time. he spends 3 hours talking about age of consent.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:53 |
|
https://twitter.com/LoopEmma/status/1221937331973824513?s=19
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 01:58 |
|
Imagine if it was that Mike Duffy
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 02:04 |
|
I'm going to hate it if that fuckstick Anonymous source that's already been vetted by the NYT leaked the draft to them.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 02:05 |
|
mik posted:Imagine if it was that Mike Duffy The dream.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 02:11 |
|
Dershowitz: One of the things that impeachment is for is as a remedy for abuse of power. Also Dershowitz: You can't be impeached for abuse of power.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 02:16 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 11:36 |
|
has no one speculated the publisher or someone there might have leaked it?
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 02:16 |