|
Electric Bugaloo posted:Aw yeah! Thanks so much dude! It's weird because I definitely set it to loop "forever" in Photoshop and my copies here work fine. Maybe it's a MacOS/PC thing? I will add this to the daily QCS Roundup so the proper person sees the request.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2020 07:49 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 17:57 |
|
QCS Floor Manager posted:I will add this to the daily QCS Roundup so the proper person sees the request. Thank you!
|
# ? Jan 28, 2020 00:13 |
|
so this probably shouldn’t be here... It goes to a Patreon page that I’m guessing Lowtax would prefer I not link.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2020 03:45 |
|
I. M. Gei posted:so this probably shouldn’t be here... Seems to link to a page that was taken down, as all I'm getting is the Patreon homepage. What was it linking to?
|
# ? Jan 29, 2020 03:55 |
|
It goes to your Pledges page if you're logged-in.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2020 05:13 |
|
SupSuper posted:It goes to your Pledges page if you're logged-in. Yeah, I don’t have a Patreon account so I couldn’t tell exactly where it went, but I figured it linked to something like this.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2020 09:48 |
|
Doesn't, like, a decent divorce where there isn't a bunch of extra fighting or scary poo poo or time-consuming poo poo or extra legal poo poo cost on the order of $20k? Like, maybe the most "no alarms and no surprises" divorce can be done for $10-15k? Imagine being salty enough that Lowtax has "$50k in savings" to buy an ad about it. Like hoopty-doo he's in his 40s and maybe he can afford to retire for like two years, assuming that those savings don't go literally anywhere else. Guess he's robbing his patreon subscribers blind I tell ya.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2020 02:00 |
|
Electric Bugaloo posted:Doesn't, like, a decent divorce where there isn't a bunch of extra fighting or scary poo poo or time-consuming poo poo or extra legal poo poo cost on the order of $20k? Like, maybe the most "no alarms and no surprises" divorce can be done for $10-15k? Imagine being salty enough that Lowtax has "$50k in savings" to buy an ad about it. Mine cost about $100 I guess it's more if you're rich and have lots of complicated bullshit assets but in that case cry me a river
|
# ? Jan 31, 2020 23:51 |
|
The Bloop posted:Mine cost about $100 Lowtax has kids. Isn't custody the most expensive, time consuming thing?
|
# ? Feb 1, 2020 03:47 |
|
Please keep this thread on topic of Ad issues.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2020 07:05 |
|
QCS Floor Manager posted:I will add this to the daily QCS Roundup so the proper person sees the request. Not to be a bother, but did anything end up coming of this? I haven't heard from anybody and the ad is unchanged.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2020 21:10 |
|
Electric Bugaloo posted:Not to be a bother, but did anything end up coming of this? I haven't heard from anybody and the ad is unchanged. It looks like there's three ads in rotation. Two properly loop, one doesn't.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2020 23:02 |
|
Arrhythmia posted:It looks like there's three ads in rotation. Two properly loop, one doesn't. Yep, I just bought two new ones today and used the gif that SupSuper fixed. At this point, I'm happy to just let the oldest, non-looping, one die once its time runs out if that would be less of a headache, but if it's got a week or two left in it I'd appreciate it if it worked like the other two. Ultimately, it does the job of advertising the thread it's for.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2020 23:06 |
|
Is there a way to view images of ads from long ago? Like how you can find previous avatars of posters except for ads.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2020 06:47 |
|
Putty posted:Like how you can find previous avatars of posters except for ads. Not to add to non ad chat, but is this still possible somewhere? I thought the site that did that died or something. And now that SA is on lock down, I doubt AVs can be archived somewhere (outside of SA itself). It'd be a cool site feature though, pretty sure it's been requested in QCS.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2020 09:25 |
|
I don't know about avs being archived anywhere else, but there's this trick where you just subtract the number at the end of someone's current av's URL by 1 to view what they had before. As far as I know this works indefinitely and is only separated by format, like, you need a gif link to access old gifs and jpg for jpgs.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2020 13:16 |
|
Goons Are Great posted:I don't know about avs being archived anywhere else, but there's this trick where you just subtract the number at the end of someone's current av's URL by 1 to view what they had before. As far as I know this works indefinitely and is only separated by format, like, you need a gif link to access old gifs and jpg for jpgs. Ah-ha - I've been meaning to ask this in the tech thread for a while now, I knew about the idea but could never get it to work right. I hadn't realized there were effectively three different archives for my old avs, so this one is counted as number 0003 despite it being my fifth, because it's the third png one. My fourth was a jpg file though so its counter starts at 0001, and so on. Hopefully that helps if anyone else was similarly confused.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2020 19:52 |
|
Also if an admin uploaded an av for you it can have a totally different thing, like one of my old ones is sluggoreads.png or something like that
|
# ? Feb 5, 2020 05:12 |
|
Someone please get rid of this ad: https://fi.somethingawful.com/safs/goonbas/9/8/7805.0002.gif I rather not be constantly reminded of forum drama when browsing.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2020 20:03 |
|
sincx posted:Someone please get rid of this ad: drat I guess that rando wasn't lying about filing a FOIA request
|
# ? Feb 8, 2020 21:29 |
|
sincx posted:Someone please get rid of this ad: Came here to post this after posting a thread in QCS like a dumb dumb. It's kind of nuts that we don't have any sort of front-end vetting for ads.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2020 23:24 |
|
Got it.
|
# ? Feb 9, 2020 00:26 |
|
came here to post about the lowtax ad, daaaaamn
|
# ? Feb 9, 2020 00:38 |
|
They bought another one.
|
# ? Feb 9, 2020 00:55 |
|
As long they can freely chargeback the ad costs, they will keep doing it.
|
# ? Feb 9, 2020 01:47 |
|
sincx posted:Someone please get rid of this ad:
|
# ? Feb 9, 2020 01:48 |
|
Out of morbid curiosity, since the second ad linked to a less sketchy-looking URL, I went ahead and read through what it contains. And I honestly don't see how it is damning evidence of anything other than the local investigator who wrote most of the entries being an abject embarrassment. Whoever is buying these things seems to be taking a really dumb "CHECKMATE ATHESITS!" approach to it, and it simply doesn't contain anything like what they seem to think it does.
|
# ? Feb 9, 2020 02:12 |
|
Yeah, it really much isn't anything worse than what Lowtax already said, it's just a regular two sides tell different stories thing collected by the police and not really any evidence or whatever. Either way, an ad to embarrass the site owner seems dumb, trying to make more people get into this stuff is even worse and it certainly has no value.
|
# ? Feb 9, 2020 02:53 |
|
I can't believe lowtax doesn't want goons to discuss in depth his failed marriage
|
# ? Feb 9, 2020 03:10 |
|
qnqnx posted:As long they can freely chargeback the ad costs, they will keep doing it. lets be real, $30 isn't really anything these days. doesn't even matter if you can charge it back.
|
# ? Feb 9, 2020 03:54 |
Goons Are Great posted:Yeah, it really much isn't anything worse than what Lowtax already said, it's just a regular two sides tell different stories thing collected by the police and not really any evidence or whatever. From what I can tell, it's the full doc of the incident report lowtax posted the header for in his gbs thread as a triumphant "if I was the bad guy why does this exist" post. Given the contents of the pdf in the ad, if it's genuine, it's not quite the ah ha exoneration it was claimed to be originally. Nevertheless, as pointed out it's just confirmation of he said/she said, with language heavily slanted against lowtax (thus no doubt why the ad was bought). Fayez Butts posted:I can't believe lowtax doesn't want goons to discuss in depth his failed marriage Yet he opened a whole thread on the subject in GBS. I am shocked it has become a hot topic.
|
|
# ? Feb 9, 2020 03:55 |
|
If you don't like Lowtax giving him more ad money seems counter-productive.
|
# ? Feb 9, 2020 04:24 |
|
SupSuper posted:If you don't like Lowtax giving him more ad money seems counter-productive. Two counterpoints: - They know the ad is going to get cancelled and they can just issue a chargeback at that point. - The point of the ad is to hopefully cause goons to stop their Patreon subscription to Gaming Garbage (which has already dropped substantially).
|
# ? Feb 9, 2020 04:35 |
|
<Removing, staying out of the drama>
TheBandOffice fucked around with this message at 17:23 on Feb 9, 2020 |
# ? Feb 9, 2020 04:41 |
|
SupSuper posted:Doesn't seem to be set to loop correctly: Hey- I have another ad gif I need help fixing. Again, it cycles forever on my desktop, etc- but once I send it to imgur it comes out unable to loop properly. I would've sent you a PM about it, but you can't receive those. I'll buy you an upgrade if you help me out!
|
# ? Feb 13, 2020 23:43 |
|
Electric Bugaloo posted:Hey- I have another ad gif I need help fixing. Again, it cycles forever on my desktop, etc- but once I send it to imgur it comes out unable to loop properly.
|
# ? Feb 14, 2020 00:38 |
|
SupSuper posted:Sure, or you can contact me at <username>@gmail.com if you don't wanna derail the thread. I have zero qualms about thread derailing but a great many qualms about basic interpersonal interaction over email, so here's an imgur link: Thank you so much for your help! I really appreciate it.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2020 20:49 |
|
Electric Bugaloo posted:I have zero qualms about thread derailing but a great many qualms about basic interpersonal interaction over email, so here's an imgur link:
|
# ? Feb 20, 2020 22:31 |
|
SupSuper posted:Looped: This rules. You rule. Is there an upgrade I can buy you?
|
# ? Feb 20, 2020 22:51 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 17:57 |
|
Electric Bugaloo posted:This rules. You rule. Is there an upgrade I can buy you?
|
# ? Feb 21, 2020 00:30 |