|
looks like YouTube is banning a bunch of people today too, like Stefan Molyneux, David Duke, and American Renaissance
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 19:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 22:27 |
|
|
BrutalistMcDonalds posted:
Ahhh, thank you!
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 20:02
|
|
|
aware of dog posted:looks like YouTube is banning a bunch of people today too, like Stefan Molyneux, David Duke, and American Renaissance
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 20:07
|
|
|
aware of dog posted:looks like YouTube is banning a bunch of people today too, like Stefan Molyneux, David Duke, and American Renaissance it's probably a coincidence but reddit, twitch and youtube all taking action on the same day is such a gift to the "radical left tech companies oppressing conservatives" narrative not that they'll do anything about it besides make a parler account or whatever the next clone site is then come back to the big sites when they get no engagement there
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 20:07
|
|
|
aware of dog posted:looks like YouTube is banning a bunch of people today too, like Stefan Molyneux, David Duke, and American Renaissance Maybe all these places have figured out that they're gonna bitch about being CENSORED anyway you might as well get the upside of actually getting rid of them too. lol just kidding they're scared because Unilever isn't having it anymore.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 20:08
|
|
|
since these companies only give a poo poo about money the far right could fight back with their own boycotts 
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 20:22
|
|
|
Wait, so this all comes off the back of Unilever saying "We're not on brand with hate speech anymore, so we'll not allow our adds on facebook." Is Unilever really such a big moneymaker?
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 22:19
|
|
|
Yeah, Unilever is a gigantic conglomerate, one of those businesses that it turns out actually owns everything https://www.unilever.com/brands/
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 22:23
|
|
|
corporate axe is gonna come for the left soon enough, i guess the chapo subreddit is the start of that
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 22:25
|
|
|
xtal posted:Yeah, Unilever is a gigantic conglomerate, one of those businesses that it turns out actually owns everything Huh, you think stuff like that'd be illegal, I mean...that would give unilever some sort of...unfair bargaining advantage. Oh well, I guess in this case it worked out but maybe unhinged capitalism isn't that great? I dunno, might need more info on this.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 22:28
|
|
|
Unilever is basically one of those Shadowrun Corporations.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2020 22:37
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:lol they took a legit mansion and decorated the interior so poorly that everyone thinks it’s a McMansion. The interior is an accurate restoration of the original
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 00:07
|
|
|
Facebook has lost $60,000,000,000 of it's stock value in two days direct action works
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 00:41
|
|
|
xtal posted:Yeah, Unilever is a gigantic conglomerate, one of those businesses that it turns out actually owns everything the hell. this is like that situation when i learned of Alphabet, a company so massive it owns loving GOOGLE, despite never hearing of them before
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 02:54
|
|
|
Mr Interweb posted:the hell. this is like that situation when i learned of Alphabet, a company so massive it owns loving GOOGLE, despite never hearing of them before google made alphabet as an umbrella company for itself and all of its spinoff companies. it’s not like they were an independent company that bought out google
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 02:56
|
|
|
theflyingexecutive posted:google made alphabet as an umbrella company for itself and all of its spinoff companies. it’s not like they were an independent company that bought out google ohhh, i see. i thought it was like some big chinese company or something (like that one that controls china's biggest youtube-like video site)
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 03:44
|
|
|
brugroffil posted:The interior is an accurate restoration of the original Classic Edwardian originals like the Yor, Hunter from the Future painting and knock-off AR-15.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 04:08
|
|
|
Mr Interweb posted:ohhh, i see. i thought it was like some big chinese company or something (like that one that controls china's biggest youtube-like video site) sign of the times I suppose that we might as well just assume China owns google and we’d be like yeah why the gently caress not at this point
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 04:13
|
|
|
1980s Japan looks on, crying.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 04:33
|
|
|
unilever is old as poo poo, next time you go shopping you’ll notice the logo everywhere. petty sure they sell poo poo in every country except NK
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 05:33
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/feralgrass/status/1277819590790258688?s=19
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 08:41
|
|
|
Link warriors, assemble: Some bottom feeder on a friends wall has bought into replacement theory, that the moosleem arabbers will replace pig coloured danish heroes. What are good, digestible statistics that other demographics aren't outbreeding ethnic europeans?
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 10:29
|
|
|
brugroffil posted:The interior is an accurate restoration of the original So the tacky gubbins are a faithful reproduction of sightly older tasteless bullshit
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 10:38
|
|
|
Tias posted:Link warriors, assemble: Some bottom feeder on a friends wall has bought into replacement theory, that the moosleem arabbers will replace pig coloured danish heroes. These people won't be convinced by rational discourse or empirical evidence, just goatse him.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 10:44
|
|
|
Tias posted:Link warriors, assemble: Some bottom feeder on a friends wall has bought into replacement theory, that the moosleem arabbers will replace pig coloured danish heroes. Just post the sowing/reaping meme.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 10:45
|
|
|
Shaun has a good video on this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUbxVfSqtt8 Unfortunately, the chance of getting those people to actually watch a video or read an article they don't agree with are exactly nil.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 10:47
|
|
|
Avirosb posted:Just post the sowing/reaping meme. What's this?
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 11:08
|
|
|
jfc for his services in protecting the security state from accountability, he has been remunerated with enough to purchase a century old mansion filled with decadent kitsch. what a world
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 12:24
|
|
|
Tias posted:What's this?  Just add a line about colonization first.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 12:58
|
|
|
Tias posted:Link warriors, assemble: Some bottom feeder on a friends wall has bought into replacement theory, that the moosleem arabbers will replace pig coloured danish heroes. Do literally anything else with your time, I beg you
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 13:53
|
|
|
Dixie Cretin Seaman posted:https://twitter.com/uhshanti/status/1277444660844048387 
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 14:12
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLWgVpmo1e0 though the miracles of russian medicine and an all meat diet, he’s back also molyneux did a twitch stream and got permabanned after 50 minutes
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 15:11
|
|
|
BrutalistMcDonalds posted:i recently became aware of a strange behind-the-scenes business in the corporate world which is companies who are contracted to set up backchannel, private communication between executives in various, specific layers or sectors of big enterprises. like there's an executive in charge of sustainability and how they will adjust business practices to meet certain goals and so forth and communicate with other executives in different companies doing the same thing. it kinda makes me wonder whether there's someone with a job like that but it's in terms of anti-discrimination / hate speech / violent speech, and the people in charge of that (or whatever is something equivalent to that) have been working together to smash the ban button on a bunch of this stuff all at once. I don't think we'll ever get confirmation, but I think it is pretty clear that there is at least loose coordination between the heavy hitters regarding bans like this. Now, I don't mean that there's a shadowy Slack where they all discuss who to ban next, but more that they all keep each other appraised of internal thinking and if one platform decides to ban someone big, everyone else gets a little notice. I don't think it's any kind of moral stance, just that they've figured out the revenue hit from banning someone like Molyneaux is outweighed by the positive press they get. I'd also bet, but will also never get confirmation, that they have metrics which show that banning someone like Molyneaux doesn't meaningfully affect how much time users spend on the site. That is, they tracked what the users who watched banned personalities did after a ban and they just pick a different dipshit instead of reducing time spent watching. Now, there's certainly a point where that ceases to be true, but as long as all the major platforms don't deviate from each other too much (hence the informal or even formal coordination), no one's really gonna get out over their skis.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 15:52
|
|
|
I gotta say it is pretty satisfying to see molyneaux banned. He is such a smug loving prick. something about dumb guys acting like intellectuals is particularly grating to me
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 17:04
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 17:15
|
|
|
starring Dustin Hoffman and  and Jessica Walters
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 17:46
|
|
|
Filthy Hans posted:Facebook has lost $60,000,000,000 of it's stock value in two days It's going to be really loving ironic if the counter to geriatric ultra-rich assholes throwing money at right-wing shits turns out to be megacorporations saying "you know, supporting hate speech is hurting our profits".
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 19:39
|
|
|
Reclines Obesily posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLWgVpmo1e0 probably best for him tbh, the real time interactivity and difficulty of having the sort of complete control over the venue and your audience that these guys rely on isn't really possible with Twitch, which is why it's to the left what YouTube is to the right
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 19:40
|
|
|
NYT covered the murder I mentioned: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/30/world/europe/denmark-bornholm-race.html
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 19:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 22:27 |
|
|
/r/chapotraphouse doxxed right wingers and engaged in some brigading and of course had lots of posts about killing cops. pretty sure those were the reasons they were banned. like /r/the_donald, they were quarantined for a while but a month or two ago got reopened because the mods complied with the reddit admins. this is just what i understand from loosely asking about it on twitter, idk how accurate any of it is. real chapo heads go to /r/moretankiechapo anyway.
|
|
#
?
Jun 30, 2020 20:00
|
|
