Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
crispix
Mar 28, 2015

Grand-Maman m'a raconté
(Les éditions des amitiés franco-québécoises)

Hello, dear

Jedit posted:

If, back in 2010, the people of Britain had risen up and killed every member of the Conservative Party, it would have caused only a fraction of the pain and death we have suffered from their ensuing rule and all that suffering would have fallen on the deserving evil. And there's much more and much worse to come. Anyone who still "leans right" as late as the 2019 GE is either evil or stupid, if not both. If they're evil, they deserve demonisation; if they're stupid, there's no "right approach" because they won't listen to reason.

E: obviously I'm not advocating the mass slaughter of the Tories. It's a hypothetical.

Yeah but that's just your opinion m8 isn't it :manning:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jedit
Dec 10, 2011

Proudly supporting vanilla legends 1994-2014

Inexplicable Humblebrag posted:

that's a very right-leaning position

It's probably best to put the disclaimer on it, all things considered.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
Especially now we have academic proof that mass murder is bad.

Plus in the case of 2010 you'd have to include the Lib Dems and most of Labour.

nurmie
Dec 8, 2019

Zedsdeadbaby posted:

Posts on this page alone gets very close to dehumanising them altogether

Wrong approach

I'd actually agree with this, with a caveat

To me, empathy to other human beings is the foundation and the defining feature of any ideology that's on the left. The core of it is understanding that every human being is just that - a human being. Dehumanisation and demonisation run counter to empathy, and thus should be avoided at all costs - leave that poo poo to the people on the right lol

The caveat here is that empathy and understanding doesn't mean agreement, or support. Like, I can understand what drives, say, a billionaire, or a Nazi death camp guard (to take two extremely right-wing examples) - and this understanding kind of makes me despise them much more than any demonisation or dehumanisation would, I'd imagine. It's perfectly fine, I think, to dislike or hate people and wish harm on them (or even do harm, in certain circumstances) for opinions that they hold or actions they commit, *without* denying them their humanity.

Mesopotamia
Apr 12, 2010
I always have a knee jerk sense of being patronised when people say Northern towns "don't know what they voted for" or "are victims" when it comes to Brexit/Tories/UKIP/whatever. Sure there are some, but most I know share the same mindset of every middle class Tory wanker I've met from Surrey. Only difference is they're poor or crass so it's easier to dismiss them as doing it out of ignorance.

We all grew up in the same "poo poo hole" Northern ex mining town and everything that came with that. But not everyone decided to become a right wing dickhead.

Cefte
Sep 18, 2004

tranquil consciousness

nurmie posted:

To me, empathy to other human beings is the foundation and the defining feature of any ideology that's on the left
If this is meant to be descriptive and not prescriptive, it is profoundly ahistorical.

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


bustin keaton posted:

I always have a knee jerk sense of being patronised when people say Northern towns "don't know what they voted for" or "are victims" when it comes to Brexit/Tories/UKIP/whatever. Sure there are some, but most I know share the same mindset of every middle class Tory wanker I've met from Surrey. Only difference is they're poor or crass so it's easier to dismiss them as doing it out of ignorance.

We all grew up in the same "poo poo hole" Northern ex mining town and everything that came with that. But not everyone decided to become a right wing dickhead.

Yeah but it's not patronising really. The middle class Tory wanker is acting in their own interests, the working class northern Tory wanker is lied & propagandised to in order for them to vote/act against their own class interests. It's not a matter of being stupid, it's a matter of being brought up in a society that brainwashes you that you will be able to "better" yourself, that striving to jump into the middle class is a desirable & realistic target. Manufactured consent & all that, false consciousness. Press use immigrants & that to deflect blame & if it didn't work so well they wouldn't do it.

knox_harrington
Feb 18, 2011

Running no point.

It's OK and usually good to try and understand people's motivation for their political viewpoints, but the reality is that lots of Brexiters and UKIPers are just terrible cunts and have been all along, but the current situation has allowed them to express themselves.

I do think that a lot of the motivation is caused by fear of their own precarity and potential inadequacy, and due to lead poisoning or whatever they fail to spot that a mutually supportive approach is better for everyone than loving up people they perceive to be lower on the greasy pole.

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer
Lmao at all of this but particularly the ending

https://twitter.com/ThisIsTomLittle/status/1317224995970555907?s=19

jabby
Oct 27, 2010

forkboy84 posted:

Yeah but it's not patronising really. The middle class Tory wanker is acting in their own interests, the working class northern Tory wanker is lied & propagandised to in order for them to vote/act against their own class interests. It's not a matter of being stupid, it's a matter of being brought up in a society that brainwashes you that you will be able to "better" yourself, that striving to jump into the middle class is a desirable & realistic target. Manufactured consent & all that, false consciousness. Press use immigrants & that to deflect blame & if it didn't work so well they wouldn't do it.

Ehhh, most middle class Tories are acting against their own best interests, and especially the interests of their children. They might see more money in their pocket if they vote Tory, but the evidence from other countries suggests they'd be happier living in a country with higher taxes but better public services. Plus they're also, usually, one accident or illness away from relying on the social safety net they keep voting to dismantle.

Personally I think the left needs to ditch the "working class" and "middle class" labels and go back to simply labour or capital. I mean I live a very middle-class lifestyle on my doctor's salary, but I have a lot more class interests in common with the hospital cleaner than with a property magnate.

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro



The punchline is extremely good

knox_harrington
Feb 18, 2011

Running no point.

jabby posted:

I mean I live a very middle-class lifestyle on my doctor's salary, but I have a lot more class interests in common with the hospital cleaner than with a property magnate.

I always find it jarring to see how many US doctors are chuds. Particularly in the UK most of the medical profession seems a bit lefty or at least centrist, but working with US docs and reading r/medicine there's a huge FYGM mindset.

Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.
Looks like it was a response to this genuine The Telegraph video from last year

"'I was told to kill myself for being Tory': Conservatives share abuse they've suffered"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJjRwtwipXA

quote:

Comments are turned off. Learn more

SHOW YOURSELF COWARDS

Oh dear me
Aug 14, 2012

I have burned numerous saucepans, sometimes right through the metal

nurmie posted:

It's perfectly fine, I think, to dislike or hate people and wish harm on them (or even do harm, in certain circumstances) for opinions that they hold or actions they commit, *without* denying them their humanity.

I think that makes 'humanity' some sort of fetish, when I'd regard someone as defective if they did not have empathy for animals.

nurmie
Dec 8, 2019

Cefte posted:

If this is meant to be descriptive and not prescriptive, it is profoundly ahistorical.

It's sort of a bit of both, really. I'd be really interested to learn why you think it's ahistorical though

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer
oh good

https://twitter.com/MikeOtsuka/status/1317723089074065412?s=20

MeinPanzer
Dec 20, 2004
anyone who reads Cinema Discusso for anything more than slackjawed trolling will see the shittiness in my posts

knox_harrington posted:

I always find it jarring to see how many US doctors are chuds. Particularly in the UK most of the medical profession seems a bit lefty or at least centrist, but working with US docs and reading r/medicine there's a huge FYGM mindset.

This has everything to do with attitudes towards socialised medicine. In the US, many people think of being doctor the same way they do being a lawyer -- it's a prestigious, highly paid profession, and if you happen to do some good as one, that's a bonus, but ultimately secondary.

In countries where people know going in that they're going to be working within a socialised medical system, they tend to think of it in more balanced terms.

This is my experience as a Canadian having lived in both the US and UK for some time and known medical professionals in all three countries, at any rate.

jabby
Oct 27, 2010

knox_harrington posted:

I always find it jarring to see how many US doctors are chuds. Particularly in the UK most of the medical profession seems a bit lefty or at least centrist, but working with US docs and reading r/medicine there's a huge FYGM mindset.

We work in a state-run system and our training is highly subsidised, they pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to train and then work in an ultra-capitalist environment. As a junior they get poo poo on worse than us but as a senior they earn way more. I think it basically encourages a "gently caress you, got mine" mindset because they suffer ridiculously to get to the pinnacle of being rich, so being rich is clearly the result of hard work and effort right?

Plus we see huge numbers of the poorest people in the NHS, and see the good socialised medicine can do. I've never worked in America but I'd imagine they're a lot more insulated from the lowest rung of society by virtue or refusing to treat them.

e:
https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1248906136285319168
WHEN WILL YOU STOP KILLING, COMMUNISM

jabby fucked around with this message at 12:05 on Oct 18, 2020

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro



I tried to do a memorial to Victims of Capitalism but couldn't count how many died from being unable to afford medication or food or likewise.

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer

reminder they include all nazi's killed in ww2 in their figures lol

Ash Crimson
Apr 4, 2010

mods please change my name to michael gove's gimp tia

Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.
Reminds me of that group that calculated total deaths from nuclear power and came out with the number "potentially everyone" cause nuclear power > nuclear proliferation > nuclear war > everyone dead

Cefte
Sep 18, 2004

tranquil consciousness

nurmie posted:

It's sort of a bit of both, really. I'd be really interested to learn why you think it's ahistorical though
You said this:

quote:

To me, empathy to other human beings is the foundation and the defining feature of any ideology that's on the left. The core of it is understanding that every human being is just that - a human being. Dehumanisation and demonisation run counter to empathy, and thus should be avoided at all costs - leave that poo poo to the people on the right lol
I'm assuming you meant the plain meaning of what you wrote, that empathy is, to you, an antonym to dehumanisation. To accept that statement as factual, and as descriptive, not prescriptive, you need to believe either that historical left classicide in Russia, China, Vietnam, etc, was conducted with empathy and involved no dehumanisation, or that classicide was somehow incidental to the ideological underpinnings of those events, or that none of the regimes who conducted or encouraged popular classicide represented left ideology.

There are absolutely left movements that are founded on empathy for universal human dignity, but they are by no means every leftist movement, which is why I responded to your statement that such a principle is the defining feature of any ideology that's on the left.

Cefte fucked around with this message at 12:56 on Oct 18, 2020

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


The destruction of the capitalist class is an absolute requisite for socialism to work & last.

Communist Thoughts
Jan 7, 2008

Our war against free speech cannot end until we silence this bronze beast!


A bunch of tories are just people who correctly recognise that the country is insanely right wing so think its pointless to say "well things could be better" coz they won't be.
Then they think that all they can do is look after themselves and their families by working hard.
The ones who succeed have their views reinforced and the ones who fail have a whole industry of people blaming Sjws to explain it for them.

That individualist view ends up with them thinking every person can just work hard so if you fail at life it's because of personal failings or neo bolshevism. This view is reinforced by 80% of the media.
Once you go down this rabbit hole it becomes morally wrong to help people, since they will never learn the value of work and self agency but also cause they fear every collective project is bound to become millions dead in gulags.

Imo the vulnerability for them is that right wing politics don't actually work to make the economy or their lives better, unless theyr a millionaire or an MP or the relative of one.

It's a politics of selfishness but given our country it is coherent and understandable.

I'm pro MP euthanasia but wishing death on just random tories, and the apparent total inability to understand them, as the kids say This ain't a good look, yeet

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

ronya posted:

(albeit it's not clear that LAB could have sustained the strategy of transparently trying to have it both ways, either - this course may be the least bad of its options, as I said last year over the party's Brexit turn after the Euros)
The tories do seem to have a knack for creating situations that they have a clear but awful stance on, and that Labour can't take a stance on.


JeremoudCorbynejad posted:

"'I was told to kill myself for being Tory': Conservatives share abuse they've suffered"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJjRwtwipXA
Why are those mean lefty trolls telling me to kill myself I wonder, as I take up a political position that has killed hundreds of thousands of people.

In that respect at least, there is very much a utilitarian argument for Tories to kill themselves.

Bobby Deluxe fucked around with this message at 13:17 on Oct 18, 2020

ronya
Nov 8, 2010

I'm the normal one.

You hate ridden fucks will regret your words when you eventually grow up.

Peace.
Humanist socialism as a tendency dates to the New Left in the 1960s

Classical Marxism would have regarded it as bourgeois individualism... the crux of the problem is whether humanist concepts (like empathy, or alienation, or exploitation) should be interpreted to refer to interactions between classes or individuals, and in general classical (ahem) Marx is pretty hot on the idea that the answer is class. Given the reduction of all social history to class struggle as scientific natural law, the moral subject of political philosophy very definitely not the individual autonomous human

nurmie
Dec 8, 2019

Cefte posted:


I'm assuming you meant the plain meaning of what you wrote, that empathy is, to you, an antonym to dehumanisation. To accept that statement as factual, and as descriptive, not prescriptive, you need to believe either that historical left classicide in Russia, China, Vietnam, etc, was conducted with empathy and involved no dehumanisation, or that classicide was somehow incidental to the ideological underpinnings of those events, or that none of the regimes who conducted or encouraged popular classicide represented left ideology.

There are absolutely left movements that are founded on empathy for universal human dignity, but they are by no means every leftist movement, which is why I responded to your statement that such a principle is the defining feature of any ideology that's on the left.

Fair enough! Yeah, the "classicides" and their sheer pointlessness (see that research paper mentioned earlier in the thread) and brutality - not to mention the indiscriminate actualities of them with regards to the actual social class of the large part of the victims - is precisely what makes me extremely uncomfortable when dehumanisation gets intermixed with leftist ideas.

The bolded bit of your quote is where I personally lean towards - at least wrt say, Stalin and modern China. So I suppose that earlier statement of mine leans towards being prescriptive lol

edit: also, everything jabby said a couple of posts down

nurmie fucked around with this message at 13:35 on Oct 18, 2020

Gravastars
Sep 9, 2011

Communist Thoughts posted:

its pointless to say "well things could be better" coz they won't be.

The self-perpetuating feedback loop of British politics and the failure of the melancholic left.

jabby
Oct 27, 2010

Cefte posted:

You said this:

I'm assuming you meant the plain meaning of what you wrote, that empathy is, to you, an antonym to dehumanisation. To accept that statement as factual, and as descriptive, not prescriptive, you need to believe either that historical left classicide in Russia, China, Vietnam, etc, was conducted with empathy and involved no dehumanisation, or that classicide was somehow incidental to the ideological underpinnings of those events, or that none of the regimes who conducted or encouraged popular classicide represented left ideology.

There are absolutely left movements that are founded on empathy for universal human dignity, but they are by no means every leftist movement, which is why I responded to your statement that such a principle is the defining feature of any ideology that's on the left.

Empathy is not the opposite of violence, empathy is a powerful motivator of violence. Protests, riots and revolutions often spring up on the back of unjust deaths or the mistreatment of groups of people.

Of course violence has a way of getting out of control and becoming self-perpetuating, and as people gain power they tend to become more corrupt and wish to hold onto it. Often people who want power will try to co-opt people's empathy to build anger against someone else. But that doesn't mean brutal regimes that emerge from left ideology didn't start from a place of empathy, at least among the ordinary people supporting them.

jabby fucked around with this message at 13:34 on Oct 18, 2020

Communist Thoughts
Jan 7, 2008

Our war against free speech cannot end until we silence this bronze beast!


Gravastars posted:

The self-perpetuating feedback loop of British politics and the failure of the melancholic left.

Imo that's the tory line, the melancholic left line is "things could be better but they probably won't be, I'm still not going to shut up about them"

Z the IVth
Jan 28, 2009

The trouble with your "expendable machines"
Fun Shoe

knox_harrington posted:

I always find it jarring to see how many US doctors are chuds. Particularly in the UK most of the medical profession seems a bit lefty or at least centrist, but working with US docs and reading r/medicine there's a huge FYGM mindset.

There is one chuddish rear end in a top hat in one of the FB groups I'm in. If I could only get their GMC number I would report them for spreading fake news.

knox_harrington
Feb 18, 2011

Running no point.

Z the IVth posted:

There is one chuddish rear end in a top hat in one of the FB groups I'm in. If I could only get their GMC number I would report them for spreading fake news.

Are they an orthopaedic or possibly vascular surgeon?

radmonger
Jun 6, 2011

forkboy84 posted:

The destruction of the capitalist class is an absolute requisite for socialism to work & last.

True, for values of destruction that amount to ‘they no longer count as a distinct socioeconomic class’. Which has nothing to do with cigarettes and blindfolds, and everything to do with capital not being a meaningful constraint on what does and doesn’t happen.

The UK and France are equally non-feudal. Not because of who did or didn’t get their head cut off, but because the ability to personally raise and command military forces simply doesn’t politically matter.

At least, as of now; not making any predictions for next year.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Zedsdeadbaby posted:

At the risk of being flamed to hell and back, the demonisation in this thread of people who lean right is scary

Posts on this page alone gets very close to dehumanising them altogether

Wrong approach

I'll stop when they give me another choice.

jabby
Oct 27, 2010

Z the IVth posted:

There is one chuddish rear end in a top hat in one of the FB groups I'm in. If I could only get their GMC number I would report them for spreading fake news.

lol I'm fairly sure I know the guy you mean (from FB, not personally).

Cefte
Sep 18, 2004

tranquil consciousness

jabby posted:

Empathy is not the opposite of violence, empathy is a powerful motivator of violence. Protests, riots and revolutions often spring up on the back of unjust deaths or the mistreatment of groups of people.
And profound in-group empathy is a core aspect of many historical right-wing movements, along with, you know, the necessary dehumanisation of the out-groups. But that wasn't the statement that was made, which was an absolute statement of foundational empathy towards all human beings, necessarily thus covering oppressors, landlords, class enemies, what have you. To take your statement as responsive to the original point, you need to:

quote:

believe [...] that historical left classicide in Russia, China, Vietnam, etc, was conducted with empathy and involved no dehumanisation
Or somehow disassociate it from the ideology in the first place.

quote:

But that doesn't mean brutal regimes that emerge from left ideology didn't start from a place of empathy, at least among the ordinary people supporting them.
I think one of the issues with this take is that it characterises the worst excesses of classicide as being regime-driven, exonerating the 'ordinary people' who presumably supported the ideology (but not the violence) in the first place. That certainly was not the case in China in the early 50s, where there was a deliberate effort to devolve purges to the most local level, not conducted by the party security apparatus, and leveraging the catharsis produced by the resulting unrestrained public sadism to increase the standing of the Party.

Cefte fucked around with this message at 13:59 on Oct 18, 2020

Z the IVth
Jan 28, 2009

The trouble with your "expendable machines"
Fun Shoe

knox_harrington posted:

Are they an orthopaedic or possibly vascular surgeon?

Anaesthetist, apparently, which was a real surprise. My first guess was also "Orthopod with a vast private practice".

jabby posted:

lol I'm fairly sure I know the guy you mean (from FB, not personally).

:commissar: needed. I'm shocked the admins haven't booted him yet since he's 1. Using a false name and 2. Clearly spreading poo poo around.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

For what it's worth I agree that you can start an authoritarian, violent political movement that uses empathy between adherents to justify violence against outgroups, and you can also have it be nominally leftist insofar as I think authoritarians can be leftist, which I would take issue with given my anarchistic leanings but yes they could be MLs or other ideologies like that and may even believe it is the way to a left wing future. Which is why despite the nagging idea that it might be a quick and effective way to solve all the problems I still don't think violent revolution to install a new government would help people in the long run, because it doesn't seem to historically.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Bobstar
Feb 8, 2006

KartooshFace, you are not responding efficiently!

Hey, an article about the thing I predicted would happen (no deal being averted by a "deal" that's as solid as a load-bearing coat of paint)

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/oct/18/experts-claim-boris-johnsons-thin-eu-deal-will-cause-major-economic-upset

Though I am now tending more towards no-deal happening, mainly because the UK people think they're clever negotiators playing mega-chicken hardball, and the EU think they're a bunch of idiots.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply