Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: Nuns with Guns)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Mokinokaro
Sep 11, 2001

At the end of everything, hold onto anything



Fun Shoe

Sininu posted:

OH! This reminds me, is there anything new about what the heck was going on with Dr. disrespect?

Nope. Whatever it was stayed under wraps so likely it was just him being an rear end in a top hat.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Dawgstar
Jul 15, 2017

Sininu posted:

OH! This reminds me, is there anything new about what the heck was going on with Dr. disrespect?

No. The people who claim to know and how huge it was or whatever never said anything and nothing's come out.

https://twitter.com/drdisrespect/status/1331861583517999105

He is trying the 'mobile games aren't REAL games and I prove it by having an expensive computer' if that helps.

josh04
Oct 19, 2008


"THE FLASH IS THE REASON
TO RACE TO THE THEATRES"

This title contains sponsored content.

Apple is one of the few companies who gives a poo poo about colour reproduction so all their mobile devices come really well-calibrated, well above the standard of the average desktop gaming monitor, this "Dr Disrespect" seems like a bit of a clown!

Sininu
Jan 8, 2014

Dawgstar posted:

No. The people who claim to know and how huge it was or whatever never said anything and nothing's come out.

https://twitter.com/drdisrespect/status/1331861583517999105

He is trying the 'mobile games aren't REAL games and I prove it by having an expensive computer' if that helps.

200k multi pc setup? What?

Archer666
Dec 27, 2008

Sininu posted:

200k multi pc setup? What?

Dude probably has multiple high end PC's that he switches between, I guess? And he's got the most overpriced hardware and peripherals cause he's absolutely loaded.

BizarroAzrael
Apr 6, 2006

"That must weigh heavily on your soul. Let me purge it for you."
NEWtalFoods!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dT6QYlTFw0s

Dawgstar
Jul 15, 2017

Archer666 posted:

Dude probably has multiple high end PC's that he switches between, I guess? And he's got the most overpriced hardware and peripherals cause he's absolutely loaded.

I wonder what the precise moment financially was he started to hit diminishing returns.

stillvisions
Oct 15, 2014

I really should have come up with something better before spending five bucks on this.

Arist posted:

One of my big pet peeves is people wanting things meant for children to be more "adult," which generally manifests itself in extremely superficial ways like swearing, gore, lack of humor, etc. It's (ironically) an incredibly childish impulse, a refusal to accept the things one grew up with not growing up with them. There's nothing wrong with enjoying silly things, and going "well, children enjoy gratuitous sex and violence too!" could not possibly be missing the point any harder.

I remember a stage magician a while ago saying "there's a teenage gap between kids and adults where they don't enjoy magic shows; as a kid they're amazed by the magic and as an adult they know it's fake but are entertained by the craft, but in the middle they just say 'this is fake and stupid' and walk away, and people just have to grow a bit to get there".

I kinda feel like well-made children's entertainment (like superhero stuff) is like that; there are two entirely different levels you can watch and appreciate it, but you sorta have to bridge that gap first, and without that fresh set of eyes you're just gonna be stuck in the first level, demanding that kids shows get boobs and guns to make it "mature" instead of changing how you enjoy something and approach stories. Too much of fandom is "I want everything new to also be exactly the same" and there's no growth there.

Vagabong
Mar 2, 2019
On the other hand, 90% of magicians are smug bastards, so I'll not take their word on anything.

Max Wilco
Jan 23, 2012

I'm just trying to go through life without looking stupid.

It's not working out too well...

8one6 posted:

The loving Toxic Avenger got a cartoon.

Oh yeah, I forgot about the Toxic Crusader.

Sydin posted:

The thing with ratings is that a lot of people treat them as shorthand to decide if they should consume that media product or not. Partially because as a species we're pretty mentally lazy about that sort of thing and love shorthand, and partially because there's so much goddamn media available that critically pouring over everything to decide what is and is not worth your time isn't feasible. Like if you're a working parent with three kids you don't have time to tear into all the reviews for the summer releases, you open up the Now Showing page and see the thing rated G with a cute name and go "yeah okay I'll bring my kids to that." A problem that arises though is that ratings really only care about superficial elements like the level and type of violence, sex, and language. They don't really care about themes or target audiences. Which can result in oddities like 2001 Space Odyssey getting a G rating (imagine bringing your ~10 year old kids to that one lol) or Breakfast Club getting an R because it acknowledges that teens experiment with drugs and sex and alcohol, which gates the film off from what is arguably it's target audience.

The thing is, studios know ratings are used as shorthand, and so they will add or withhold certain elements to achieve a rating that matches the audience they're going for. Office Space didn't need tons of swearing - you could rip pretty much all of it out and the story still works - but without it you're looking at a PG movie whose whole thrust relies on the viewer having experience at the very least familiarity with the soul-crushing insanity that is corporate office culture. Kids movies have to bend over backwards to make sure any violent elements are depicted in a ratings board friendly way: the infamous "Disney Villain death" is one such example. So movies with "mature" themes often have gratuitous sex, violence, or swearing thrown in because that bumps the rating up to an "R" and makes adults more likely to show up for it, which conflates those superficial elements with something being "mature". It's not just limited to movies either: TV and video games suffer from the same problem. HBO is a particularly big offender: pretty much any prestige television they make throws in a ton of gratuitous nudity and swearing even when it doesn't serve the story whatsoever, presumably just to get an MA rating and drum up interest.

tl;dr a lot of people who think "Batman but he says "gently caress" and shoots people" is more mature only think that way because the way media ratings incentivize writers in such a way that media aimed at adults often has elements thrown in to artificially pump the rating up to one that matches the target audience.

I think there's an issue with the opposite, where you can't really brand a movie with 'MS for Mature Storytelling' or 'JS for Juvenile Storytelling', because that sort of thing is subjective.

I know I'm in the minority when I say this, but I (to an extent) do like 'edgy' stuff. We were talking about The Boys a while back, and someone said that the comic (which I read through a little while before that) was overly-edgy and mean-spirited at times. I don't really disagree with that, but at the same time, I still enjoyed it, because it was (probably moreso now than when it was originally written) refreshing in a world where superhero media permeates everything. I'm not holding up edgy media as high art, but there is some catharsis to be found in it, if that's what you're looking for.

On the other side of the coin, something that does bother me about a lot of media (outside of superheroes), is that a lot of media does seem dour, or cynical, or mean-spirited, and so on. This is probably going to be considered something of a boomer-esque take, but having watched a share of retro television in the last year or so, there's nothing that has that kind of light-hearted, wholesome, corny/cheesy sort of quality. Like, I watch a mystery show like Diagnosis Murder, or a comedy like M*A*S*H, or even something like the classic Star Trek, and I can't really point to something nowadays that has that same format or general tone. It's the same sort of thing with movies, too.

I'm not saying that media today is bad because of that, and I get that some of it is a result of cultural changes. It's not a rose-tinted glasses sort of thing, because the majority of that stuff came out way before I was born. It's just I watch some of that stuff, and I think, "I can't think of anything nowadays that is like this." It's some sort of intangible quality that I can't really put my finger on.

Goa Tse-tung
Feb 11, 2008

;3

Yams Fan

Sininu posted:

200k multi pc setup? What?

he is a show-man, a profesional liar, op

Zedd
Jul 6, 2009

I mean, who would have noticed another madman around here?



Sininu posted:

200k multi pc setup? What?

Yeah that is BS,even the most over the top actually not "putting my money on fire" PC maxes out at like 15K. If you want a max workstation it's like 50K. And having 4 of those just means you hate money.

Dias
Feb 20, 2011

by sebmojo

Zedd posted:

Yeah that is BS,even the most over the top actually not "putting my money on fire" PC maxes out at like 15K. If you want a max workstation it's like 50K. And having 4 of those just means you hate money.

I don't think Dr. Disrespect is exactly a thrifty, wise person. Just a hunch.

Kim Justice
Jan 29, 2007

TBH with all the sponsors and so on I imagine he paid for precisely jack poo poo.

stillvisions
Oct 15, 2014

I really should have come up with something better before spending five bucks on this.

Zedd posted:

Yeah that is BS,even the most over the top actually not "putting my money on fire" PC maxes out at like 15K. If you want a max workstation it's like 50K. And having 4 of those just means you hate money.

From the few minutes of this guy I've seen his online persona seems to be "online self-aggrandizing internet tough guy without irony" so I'm sure if you ask him he has the president of Gaming on speed dial, if he hasn't declared himself that already.

Or he's including his entire room/studio cost as his "gaming setup".

Bakeneko
Jan 9, 2007

Max Wilco posted:

Oh yeah, I forgot about the Toxic Crusader.


I think there's an issue with the opposite, where you can't really brand a movie with 'MS for Mature Storytelling' or 'JS for Juvenile Storytelling', because that sort of thing is subjective.

I know I'm in the minority when I say this, but I (to an extent) do like 'edgy' stuff. We were talking about The Boys a while back, and someone said that the comic (which I read through a little while before that) was overly-edgy and mean-spirited at times. I don't really disagree with that, but at the same time, I still enjoyed it, because it was (probably moreso now than when it was originally written) refreshing in a world where superhero media permeates everything. I'm not holding up edgy media as high art, but there is some catharsis to be found in it, if that's what you're looking for.

I think I see what you mean. I really love a well-made Youtube Poop, and those things for the most part involves just adding ridiculous edgy jokes to kids cartoons. But there’s a craft to doing it well and the good ones end up being funny because of their sheer absurdity.

Max Wilco posted:

On the other side of the coin, something that does bother me about a lot of media (outside of superheroes), is that a lot of media does seem dour, or cynical, or mean-spirited, and so on. This is probably going to be considered something of a boomer-esque take, but having watched a share of retro television in the last year or so, there's nothing that has that kind of light-hearted, wholesome, corny/cheesy sort of quality. Like, I watch a mystery show like Diagnosis Murder, or a comedy like M*A*S*H, or even something like the classic Star Trek, and I can't really point to something nowadays that has that same format or general tone. It's the same sort of thing with movies, too.

I'm not saying that media today is bad because of that, and I get that some of it is a result of cultural changes. It's not a rose-tinted glasses sort of thing, because the majority of that stuff came out way before I was born. It's just I watch some of that stuff, and I think, "I can't think of anything nowadays that is like this." It's some sort of intangible quality that I can't really put my finger on.

This is something I’ve noticed as well. It’s gotten to the point where when a show uses that more lighthearted tone (like The Librarians series from a few years ago) it kinda feels like it’s come out of a time capsule.

As far as the TV side of things goes, some of the blame likely lies with the move towards serialization that began with shows like Lost and Battlestar Galactica. More involved, season-long storylines results in more complexity, which nudges the tone in a darker direction compared to when you could expect most problems to be resolved by the end of each episode.

Bakeneko fucked around with this message at 22:38 on Nov 26, 2020

Neo_Crimson
Aug 15, 2011

"Is that your final dandy?"

Zedd posted:

Yeah that is BS,even the most over the top actually not "putting my money on fire" PC maxes out at like 15K. If you want a max workstation it's like 50K. And having 4 of those just means you hate money.

The highest I've ever seen is $20k and that's from this fridge sized semi-professional rendering PC. Even then the guy included $1000 of high end audio equipment, and a $2000 laptop as part of the build to inflate the cost.

Terrible Opinions
Oct 18, 2013



Nuns with Guns posted:

I would accept trashy CW Constantine too. Heck, let's do both at the same time. Make them fight out in a cage match for who can get the best disaster garbage drama going.
I was making a joke about the arrow-verse 2015 Constantine show. No idea how good or bad it was other than assumptions due to it being arrow-verse.

Fil5000
Jun 23, 2003

HOLD ON GUYS I'M POSTING ABOUT INTERNET ROBOTS

Terrible Opinions posted:

I was making a joke about the arrow-verse 2015 Constantine show. No idea how good or bad it was other than assumptions due to it being arrow-verse.

It was an odd mix to be honest. They made some odd choices regarding Chas, and he has Zed along with him as well instead of being a lone dickhead, but one of the episodes is an adaptation of the first comic arc (the Gary Lester one) and is surprisingly faithful to it, and I was really expecting them to cop out on the ending. Matt Ryan was good as well. If it had been on a cable network instead of NBC it might still be going.

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

Fil5000 posted:

It was an odd mix to be honest. They made some odd choices regarding Chas, and he has Zed along with him as well instead of being a lone dickhead, but one of the episodes is an adaptation of the first comic arc (the Gary Lester one) and is surprisingly faithful to it, and I was really expecting them to cop out on the ending. Matt Ryan was good as well. If it had been on a cable network instead of NBC it might still be going.

Meanwhile, Legends of Tomorrow fished Constantine out of the TV abyss and made him a main character years ago and it's been great. Matt Ryan really kills it as Jonny C. It also wrapped up all of NBC Constantine's leftover plot threads from when it was canceled.

Fil5000
Jun 23, 2003

HOLD ON GUYS I'M POSTING ABOUT INTERNET ROBOTS

nine-gear crow posted:

Meanwhile, Legends of Tomorrow fished Constantine out of the TV abyss and made him a main character years ago and it's been great. Matt Ryan really kills it as Jonny C. It also wrapped up all of NBC Constantine's leftover plot threads from when it was canceled.

I should really get around to that. I have heard nothing but good things.

Trojan Kaiju
Feb 13, 2012


Fil5000 posted:

I should really get around to that. I have heard nothing but good things.

In my experience catching episodes while my family watches all of the Arrowverse, Legends is consistently the most fun in the set.

muscles like this!
Jan 17, 2005


Fil5000 posted:

I should really get around to that. I have heard nothing but good things.

Shockingly it doesn't shy around the fact that John is bi. He's had both male and female love interests.

Alaois
Feb 7, 2012

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9183p7iJ5E0

Neddy Seagoon
Oct 12, 2012

"Hi Everybody!"

Dawgstar posted:

No. The people who claim to know and how huge it was or whatever never said anything and nothing's come out.

That could just mean everyone's being legally advised to shut the gently caress up until it goes to trial.

Archer666
Dec 27, 2008

Neddy Seagoon posted:

That could just mean everyone's being legally advised to shut the gently caress up until it goes to trial.

Or that it was nothing.

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013

Fil5000 posted:

I should really get around to that. I have heard nothing but good things.

It is an extremely nonsensical show, but it is still more fun than the current Flash



N I C E H I S S

Dabir
Nov 10, 2012

I'm not a gore guy but I think enforcing lower age ratings on superheroes can get a bit silly. You give them all these fantastic powers and weapons with enormous destructive potential, then the universe twists itself into knots to make sure that not a single drop of red blood is ever seen on screen. It's fine to have the heroes be trying to avoid damaging civilians and property, and it's fine to have them be very good at that, but at least let the villains do some real damage. The DCCU took it too far in the other direction imo, but that's good ol' Zack "if an entire city isn't being destroyed why are you even making a movie" Snyder in action.

Catgirl Al Capone
Dec 15, 2007

Dabir posted:

I'm not a gore guy but I think enforcing lower age ratings on superheroes can get a bit silly. You give them all these fantastic powers and weapons with enormous destructive potential, then the universe twists itself into knots to make sure that not a single drop of red blood is ever seen on screen. It's fine to have the heroes be trying to avoid damaging civilians and property, and it's fine to have them be very good at that, but at least let the villains do some real damage. The DCCU took it too far in the other direction imo, but that's good ol' Zack "if an entire city isn't being destroyed why are you even making a movie" Snyder in action.

I don't know I think stakes can be very effectively separated from gore and you can do a lot to communicate urgency without ever needing to explicitly depict ultra-violence instead of suggesting it with visual and narrative tools and let the limits of the audience's imagination do the work

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

fatherboxx posted:

It is an extremely nonsensical show, but it is still more fun than the current Flash


N I C E H I S S

Which sucks, because The Flash started out as “The Fun Show” to Arrow’s dour grimdarkness and slowly lost itself in misery porn as well.

Bakeneko
Jan 9, 2007

nine-gear crow posted:

Which sucks, because The Flash started out as “The Fun Show” to Arrow’s dour grimdarkness and slowly lost itself in misery porn as well.

While ironically Legends followed the opposite path, starting out with lots of drama involving unlikable characters before livening up in season two.

Nuns with Guns
Jul 23, 2010

It's fine.
Don't worry about it.
I went and watched the Patrick H Willems video yesterday and I realized he kind of says a lot of the same things I mentioned in my prior post. I'm not sure I agree that, say, Batman should be solely reserved for all-ages or kid appropriate shows. I think he's right that chasing R-rated superhero films and the kind of content that's added to them is the result of myopic Hollywood assessments of what made Deadpool successful and what people expect in R-rated content. It's funny because it's the same shallow assessment of what made Watchmen and The Dark Knight Returns successful in 1986 that lead to the "darker" comics of the late 80s and 90s.

Patrick's point reminds me a lot of an old Shortpacked comic from back when DC rushed out the nu52 reboot and did another universe reset of most of their characters:



Which is fair, yeah, Comic-Starfire was always written more as a sex prop (her alien culture sees no problem with casual nudity you prude!!!) but the reason the TV show was so successful is that it took the best elements of the old New Teen Titans comics, cut out all the scuzz of 30-year-old-boyfriends and Terra having a sexual relationship with Deathstroke, and was overall just better at writing the characters without resorting to constant shallow drama like "oh Cyborg is having a crisis about his humanity again!" or "oh Raven's losing control of her emotions and going evil again!"

The whole institution around Marvel and DC superheroes is sustained on brand loyalty and taking advantage of people who have been lifelong fans of these comics to hand over new story and character ideas for these decades-old IPs. Plus, the general capitalist "infinite growth" demand means they need to reach a continually larger audience, so on a cynical level trying to make R-rated superhero comics is dumb.

However, on a less corporate-dronethink level, this is less about gating Batman away from kids and more of a bubble where corporations are taking advantage of nerd anxieties around looking immature and artless. The entities that are fine producing shallow splatterfests where caped characters say "gently caress" and "doo-doo" will still recalibrate back to PG-13 or lower things after they've given adult fans what they want. Because most those adult fans don't actually want a mature or realistic execution of superheroes, and corporations don't want to produce that because like Patrick implied when he brought up Miracleman, the ultimate realistic end-state is that superheroes take on the Übermensch-ian role and drastically, rapidly change society, either pushing it into fascism or a utopia. And then you have to get super-duper political about what fascism or a utopia look like in these scenarios and that makes everyone squirm and oops now the world doesn't resemble our own at all and how is this all realistic?

Dabir
Nov 10, 2012

CYBEReris posted:

I don't know I think stakes can be very effectively separated from gore and you can do a lot to communicate urgency without ever needing to explicitly depict ultra-violence instead of suggesting it with visual and narrative tools and let the limits of the audience's imagination do the work

This is true, you can get a lot of very good stories out of superheroes with a minimum of gore, but if you're using Lobo, the man with big guns who kills everyone, or Wolverine, who can regenerate from horrendous injuries and has claws for hands, to tell those stories, one feels you're misusing your tools a bit.

Microcline
Jul 27, 2012

Nuns with Guns posted:

I went and watched the Patrick H Willems video yesterday and I realized he kind of says a lot of the same things I mentioned in my prior post. I'm not sure I agree that, say, Batman should be solely reserved for all-ages or kid appropriate shows. I think he's right that chasing R-rated superhero films and the kind of content that's added to them is the result of myopic Hollywood assessments of what made Deadpool successful and what people expect in R-rated content. It's funny because it's the same shallow assessment of what made Watchmen and The Dark Knight Returns successful in 1986 that lead to the "darker" comics of the late 80s and 90s.

He doesn't even say that The Dark Knight Returns is a bad comic, or that we shouldn't make comics like it, but that it works because it's an elseworlds and that there's something wrong if the dominant version of this colorful children's cartoon is a gritty story about celebrating sadistic violence. I personally think TDKR is a mediocre take on the hyper-violent superhero tho, even before getting into the implications of it being the dominant form. The two ways I see of doing it are to either to depict the uncomfortable consequences of violence (e.g. Alan Moore and Dave Gibbon's Watchmen) or to lean into the goofy, unrealistic spectacle of it (e.g. Blade)


Dabir posted:

This is true, you can get a lot of very good stories out of superheroes with a minimum of gore, but if you're using Lobo, the man with big guns who kills everyone, or Wolverine, who can regenerate from horrendous injuries and has claws for hands, to tell those stories, one feels you're misusing your tools a bit.

Most of the X-Men stories we grew up with were told under the restrictions of the CCA, meaning despite the fact that what Wolverine does best isn't very nice, it also isn't very graphic. That's not to defend the code, but even even in post-code stories like Grant Morrison's New X-Men the violence never gets that graphic. Most colorful sci-fi adventures don't realistically (or hyper-realistically) depict wounds from bladed weapons, and I think that's usually a good decision.

I'm not saying it couldn't be fun, just that it isn't integral to the character.

hump day bitches!
Apr 3, 2011


CYBEReris posted:

I don't know I think stakes can be very effectively separated from gore and you can do a lot to communicate urgency without ever needing to explicitly depict ultra-violence instead of suggesting it with visual and narrative tools and let the limits of the audience's imagination do the work

Man of Steel is PG13 and communicates clearly that people are dying by the truckload without showing a drop of gore ( only gore in that movie is shown on a blink of an eye moment during smallville when a kryptonian makes an Air Force pilots head explode). The entire massacre is communicated through sound design. The screams are everywhere and in the cinema they were extremely clear and the percussion heavy soundtrack would stop so they could be heard.

The dark knight does something similar, cutaway before anything can be shown but establishing it’s going to be bad.That movie has people ripped apart by dogs and burned alive.

There’s a lot to be said about tone and how it influences what people perceive.BvS was a pg13 movie before it got some dashes of blood here and there, winter soldier 911’s three helicarriers into a building and shows a close up of a mangled face.One is unnecessary the other get the audience right. Guardians of galaxy has villains bathe in peoples blood that are defeated in a dance off before getting sandblasted away.

My thinking hasn’t changed that much about his video tho. I think he’s nebulously right for the wrong reasons.I just think it’s much worse that you can show world shattering violence without world shattering consequences. I dislike the happy medium of city invasions but everybody is having the time of their lives

hump day bitches! fucked around with this message at 23:51 on Nov 27, 2020

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

Bakeneko posted:

While ironically Legends followed the opposite path, starting out with lots of drama involving unlikable characters before livening up in season two.

It makes me wish we could see what Season 1 would have looked like with the Season 2-onward mindset of the show. We got tantalizing glimpses of what Fun Vandal Savage looks like, imagine a whole season of that guy as a big bad instead of the miserable rapey tinpot sorcerer we got.

The Hawk people are unsalvagabe though.

Karloff
Mar 21, 2013

The rating systems also focus a lot on repeatability. They don't want kids replicating actually dangerous fight moves on their siblings, which is why the most gruesome contemporary film series at the PG-13 level is Jurassic Park. You get severed arms, people being torn in half and to pieces on screen, waterfalls of blood, one poor dude getting crushed flat and getting stuck to the bottom of a Tyrannosaur's foot and getting repeatedly crushed into pulp. But no kid is gonna eat another kid* so it sneaks through.

*In theory.

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

Maybe parents should teach their kids not to murder and hurt others. Or get them the help they need if their brains keep driving them to violence.

Let’s not make art around those people.

Sydin
Oct 29, 2011

Another spring commute
I mean the Hays Code (the predecessor to the modern MPAA rating system), ESRB, and TV Parental Guidelines all arose from moral panic pearl clutching. Scapegoating media as causing violence by imitation is as old as dirt in this country.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Terrible Opinions
Oct 18, 2013



CelticPredator posted:

Maybe parents should teach their kids not to murder and hurt others. Or get them the help they need if their brains keep driving them to violence.

Let’s not make art around those people.
The video being discussed isn't about kids turning out well, but about adults claiming ownership over something that is for children in a way that denies it or at least makes it less accessible to chidlren. Unless you're just talking about the MPAA in general, in which case yeah the MPAA is dumb and shouldn't exist. Some form of consistent content warning should exist, but the one we have no is awful.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply