Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

Ham posted:

That's a whole bunch of words that don't touch the reality of the subject, and Jacobin in general is very out of touch with the realities of the Arab world because they only seem to talk to disaffected Arab socialists pushing an angle. Tunisia's revolution ended up with change for the simple reason that no one really cares about Tunisia.

A lack of significant natural resources, a small population, negligible effect on Arab politics, and minimal reliance on Arab gulf royalty meant it had a negligible amoung of meddling from outside actors. From the start, Egypt was a major battleground in the proxy economic/influence fight between the Saudi/UAE royals and Qatar/Erdogan, with the ascendance of the MB or the military being dependent on currying support and funding from both factions. This led to a zero sum game between the MB and military that led to where Egypt as a country is right now, with the MB either in jail or outside the country, and with Turkey and Qatar being considered enemy states by the Egyptian regime.

Later in the interview it mentions Sudan's unions also being impactful in that revolution, its also not as nearly important to the region as Egypt but having alternate basis of powers helping to facilitate revolutions, ie like in Poland in the early 90s, seems reasonable to me

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Grouchio
Aug 31, 2014

Grip it and rip it posted:

I don't follow what you mean here. Why would Biden's desire for a feasible nuclear deal shift because scientists are getting assassinated?
Iran would be less receptive towards the deal as the US won't stop supporting Israel who just bombed their Oppenheimer?

Kokoro Wish
Jul 23, 2007

Post? What post? Oh wow.
I had nothing to do with THAT.
The easy dismantling of the nuclear deal and now this would basically highlight to Iran that they should probably fast track their nuclear program. America really cannot be relied upon. Hell, worked for North Korea.

Tweezer Reprise
Aug 6, 2013

It hasn't got six strings, but it's a lot of fun.
I'm not sure. The sanctions Iran's under are really, really bad, and Iran would love nothing more than to see them lifted, if only to a limited extent/only the secondary sanctions/etc.

Count Roland
Oct 6, 2013

Tweezer Reprise posted:

I'm not sure. The sanctions Iran's under are really, really bad, and Iran would love nothing more than to see them lifted, if only to a limited extent/only the secondary sanctions/etc.

Yeah well Iran tried to negotiate giving up their program in return for lifting the sanctions and hey look how that turned out.

Now Biden can what, reach out to Iran with a new deal and promise the guy elected in 4 years will maintain it? Not a very appealing deal right there.

Tweezer Reprise
Aug 6, 2013

It hasn't got six strings, but it's a lot of fun.
I think something that might be worth noting is the Iran deal was originally implemented in early 2016, and Trump was elected later that year. It was easier to wipe off the table unceremoniously when it was still rather fresh. If Biden lasts 4-8 years and the deal is reimplemented in 2021, there'll be less inertia to immediately destroy it on a transfer of power, possibly.

I'm not saying that's particularly inspiring if you're Iran/anti-blockade, but it's something.

e: deal finalized in 2015, implemented in 2016

Tweezer Reprise fucked around with this message at 01:50 on Nov 28, 2020

V. Illych L.
Apr 11, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT LUMBER

two issues with that:

first, the iran deal is now fully partisan in yankeeland, as there's precedent for ripping up this exact deal. if biden gets tossed in four years, as seems fairly likely, the incoming admin may very well decide to shred it again

second, iran has its own internal politics and nobody likes looking like a sucker. every breach of an agreement and unanswered act of war strengthens the impression in iran that the yanks are unreliable, belligerent assholes

i imagine that biden might be able to reinstate the deal mostly as it was if he moves quickly, but the more time he spends waffling, the less interesting cooperation becomes from an iranian perspective

Tweezer Reprise
Aug 6, 2013

It hasn't got six strings, but it's a lot of fun.
I think COVID is another factor that might make Iran more desperate (they've already publically said they want to reenter the deal with Biden), because if you've heard of any "humanitarian exceptions" to our sanctions regime to date, they are technically carved out, but in reality they do not function, and people are dying every single day due to the sanctions amplifying COVID, at least more than they otherwise would (because the immiseration is the point)

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



So the forthcoming NSA is already establishing preconditions for restarting the Iran nuclear agreement.

https://twitter.com/shashj/status/1332792786094084098?s=21

SixFigureSandwich
Oct 30, 2004
Exciting Lemon

V. Illych L. posted:

two issues with that:

first, the iran deal is now fully partisan in yankeeland, as there's precedent for ripping up this exact deal. if biden gets tossed in four years, as seems fairly likely, the incoming admin may very well decide to shred it again

second, iran has its own internal politics and nobody likes looking like a sucker. every breach of an agreement and unanswered act of war strengthens the impression in iran that the yanks are unreliable, belligerent assholes

i imagine that biden might be able to reinstate the deal mostly as it was if he moves quickly, but the more time he spends waffling, the less interesting cooperation becomes from an iranian perspective

Would Biden need Congress' support to reinstate the deal?

Redgrendel2001
Sep 1, 2006

you literally think a person saying their NBA team of choice being better than the fucking 76ers is a 'schtick'

a literal thing you think.

https://twitter.com/BarakRavid/status/1333080696282288128?s=19

Starpluck
Sep 11, 2010

by Fluffdaddy
I have always wondered what would happen if Iran captured a bunch of genuine Mossad agents in Iran and was sentenced to death. Would Israel intervene?

FiskTireBoy
Nov 2, 2020

Starpluck posted:

I have always wondered what would happen if Iran captured a bunch of genuine Mossad agents in Iran and was sentenced to death. Would Israel intervene?

Rescuing detained Mossad agents in the middle of Tehran would be an operation so monumental in scale and risk I doubt Israel would even attempt it.

But, the US did attempt to rescue their hostages from Tehran in 1979. It failed terribly, but they did attempt it.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

FiskTireBoy posted:

Rescuing detained Mossad agents in the middle of Tehran would be an operation so monumental in scale and risk I doubt Israel would even attempt it.

But, the US did attempt to rescue their hostages from Tehran in 1979. It failed terribly, but they did attempt it.
Why rescue the missed agents when they can die to raise the national heroism bar a little higher

Starpluck
Sep 11, 2010

by Fluffdaddy

FiskTireBoy posted:

Rescuing detained Mossad agents in the middle of Tehran would be an operation so monumental in scale and risk I doubt Israel would even attempt it.

But, the US did attempt to rescue their hostages from Tehran in 1979. It failed terribly, but they did attempt it.

I was basing my question on this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Entebbe

Thom12255
Feb 23, 2013
WHERE THE FUCK IS MY MONEY

Say what you will about the Mossad but they respect COVID social distancing restrictions.

FiskTireBoy
Nov 2, 2020

Thom12255 posted:

Say what you will about the Mossad but they respect COVID social distancing restrictions.

Or they're just big fans of Breaking Bad

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

FiskTireBoy posted:

Or they're just big fans of Breaking Bad

pff, it's bruce willis in the jackal

Count Roland
Oct 6, 2013


That's wild. I thought it very strange that "gunmen" carried out the attack, as said gunmen would have a very hard time escaping.

Also worth noting that the guy had a significant security escort and still got hit. I imagine a lot of people in Iran are looking over their shoulders right now.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

Count Roland posted:

That's wild. I thought it very strange that "gunmen" carried out the attack, as said gunmen would have a very hard time escaping.

Also worth noting that the guy had a significant security escort and still got hit. I imagine a lot of people in Iran are looking over their shoulders right now.

Iran is and was born encircled by enemies. Death is an expected outcome in iran because bombings and assassinations are so normalized at this point
I would say it's business as usual in the Islamic republic in terms of paranoia.

Haystack
Jan 23, 2005





It strikes me that being able to do a remote assassination like this is a big game changer, particularly for the big scary intelligence agencies. It's damned hard to get someone to risk their life being a triggerman. Getting someone's truck, a gun, a rig, and a remote operator is exponentially easier.

MiddleOne
Feb 17, 2011

This sounds so fantastical that I'm just going to file it under made-up unless a real confirmation is given.

Active Quasar
Feb 22, 2011
In terms of security, is this really much of a game changer compared to the old fashioned remote assassination method of loading up some explosives to a timer or radio?

Haystack
Jan 23, 2005





Disnesquick posted:

In terms of security, is this really much of a game changer compared to the old fashioned remote assassination method of loading up some explosives to a timer or radio?

Well, explosives cause a ton of collateral damage and/or require pretty close proximity.

human garbage bag
Jan 8, 2020

by Fluffdaddy

Disnesquick posted:

In terms of security, is this really much of a game changer compared to the old fashioned remote assassination method of loading up some explosives to a timer or radio?

Yeah avoiding collateral damage is very important. Remember that Israel isn't just engaged in tactical warfare with Iran, but propaganda warfare too. They want the everyday citizens of the world powers to be sympathetic to them. Killing dozens or hundreds of innocent civilians in what amounts to essentially a terrorist attack in order to assassinate one guy is not a good look. But killing one guy with sophisticated tech? Now that's something Tesla-loving techbros can get behind.

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

Was the car parked? The tweet saya it stopped. So I guess theres a chance it was driven remotely.



.......



Anyone know where Elon is?

Fumble
Sep 4, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 12 days!

Shageletic posted:

Was the car parked? The tweet saya it stopped. So I guess theres a chance it was driven remotely.



.......



Anyone know where Elon is?

Elon is a loving bin man, where is Jamie from mythbusters?

spaceships
Aug 4, 2005

i love too dumptruck

guacamole aficionado
we're not returning to any deal with added terms and if you think we are, you haven't been paying attention. this isn't the first time israel has merc'd one of our scientists and it won't be the last. business as usual.

Pistol_Pete
Sep 15, 2007

Oven Wrangler
Why IS Iran's counter-intelligence so, so bad at what it does? It's baffling to me how Mossad seems able to operate with impunity inside Iran's borders and all Iran can respond with is empty threats and fist shaking. What gives?

Zedhe Khoja
Nov 10, 2017

sürgünden selamlar
yıkıcılar ulusuna
Mostly it's because Israel doesn't have to fear retaliation, so they can be more aggressive in their operations. Generally countries don't want it to be too obvious they're slaughtering another countries civilians in the street, but in this case it's a non issue. Killing any particular person isn't actually that difficult, especially if they live any kind of public life and aren't hiding in a cave or bunker. It's all the other stuff that's hard.

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

Pistol_Pete posted:

Why IS Iran's counter-intelligence so, so bad at what it does? It's baffling to me how Mossad seems able to operate with impunity inside Iran's borders and all Iran can respond with is empty threats and fist shaking. What gives?

There are plenty of people in Iran who don't support the government, it's not hard to recruit help.

Pistol_Pete
Sep 15, 2007

Oven Wrangler

Nenonen posted:

There are plenty of people in Iran who don't support the government, it's not hard to recruit help.

Is there really a substantial faction in Iran that's so opposed to the current government there that they're prepared to risk their lives to aid Israeli assassinations? I'm sure that Mossad must be getting some sort of assistance on the ground but just can't picture who'd be providing it.

Redgrendel2001
Sep 1, 2006

you literally think a person saying their NBA team of choice being better than the fucking 76ers is a 'schtick'

a literal thing you think.

Pistol_Pete posted:

Is there really a substantial faction in Iran that's so opposed to the current government there that they're prepared to risk their lives to aid Israeli assassinations? I'm sure that Mossad must be getting some sort of assistance on the ground but just can't picture who'd be providing it.

MEK

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Mujahedin_of_Iran?wprov=sfla1

Haystack
Jan 23, 2005





Pistol_Pete posted:

Is there really a substantial faction in Iran that's so opposed to the current government there that they're prepared to risk their lives to aid Israeli assassinations? I'm sure that Mossad must be getting some sort of assistance on the ground but just can't picture who'd be providing it.

I mean, it's a country of 82 million people. Money and blackmail can get you a long ways if you're not asking anyone to take any active risks.

Zedhe Khoja
Nov 10, 2017

sürgünden selamlar
yıkıcılar ulusuna
It's also Iran and not North Korea. You can just go there. Or you can throw a burlap sack with a dollar sign stuffed with crumpled sweaty 1$ bills at some disgruntled idiot. There's no country where you don't have people willing to do this kind of stuff. Like I said, the big deciding factor on whether a country murders someone or not isn't how hard it is to kill someone, it's how to get away with it once you do.

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
Israel was actively aiding the current Iranian government during the Iran/Iraq war. Contrary to what Western media portrays, not everyone in the Middle East is a wild eyed fanatic.

See also: American counter-intelligence running endless harassment campaigns against Chinese American scientists, because the noble and principled Anglo-Saxon is immune to bribery or corruption. Meanwhile 100% of Republican legislators will literally suck yo dick if you donated a moderately equipped BMW 5 series to their campaigns.

Shageletic
Jul 25, 2007

Pistol_Pete posted:

Why IS Iran's counter-intelligence so, so bad at what it does? It's baffling to me how Mossad seems able to operate with impunity inside Iran's borders and all Iran can respond with is empty threats and fist shaking. What gives?

Feels like they spend most of their time prosecuting Iranians with dual citizenships and anyone who travels to France for fun or something

Sounds like US intelligence during the Cold War

^^^ or now I guess

Shageletic fucked around with this message at 15:26 on Nov 30, 2020

Rust Martialis
May 8, 2007

At night, Bavovnyatko quietly comes to the occupiers’ bases, depots, airfields, oil refineries and other places full of flammable items and starts playing with fire there
Um, my understanding is that your average Iranian really, really hates MEK because they sided with Iraq in the Iran/Iraq War. Sure, lots of Iranians oppose their government, but an external actor (MEK, Israel, USA) attacking Iran is another level, at least from talking to Iranian expats.

One friend whose parents and grandparents were upper class surgeons before the Revolution, is totally atheist, went to school in the USA, hates the regime, said if the USA puts one boot inside Iran he'll fly back and enlist to start shooting US troops.

Zedhe Khoja
Nov 10, 2017

sürgünden selamlar
yıkıcılar ulusuna
Whatever support MEK had in Iran evaporated with the nerve gas in Mehran.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Snipee
Mar 27, 2010

Rust Martialis posted:

Um, my understanding is that your average Iranian really, really hates MEK because they sided with Iraq in the Iran/Iraq War. Sure, lots of Iranians oppose their government, but an external actor (MEK, Israel, USA) attacking Iran is another level, at least from talking to Iranian expats.

One friend whose parents and grandparents were upper class surgeons before the Revolution, is totally atheist, went to school in the USA, hates the regime, said if the USA puts one boot inside Iran he'll fly back and enlist to start shooting US troops.

That is pretty intense nationalism. Does it matter to him how such a hypothetical war gets started?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply