Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
sweet geek swag
Mar 29, 2006

Adjust lasers to FUN!





So the thing this mythology argument gets wrong is that it treats the Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings as 'history," when in fact (in universe) they are heavily redacted texts, self admittedly worked on by multiple authors, detailing a war that ended the mythic period, as well as a journey to the edge of the known world and back.

They're the Iliad and the Odyssey of the Legendarium! They are part of the mythology. No one in any hypothetical world in which these books took the Iliad and the Odyssey's place in our historical and mythological consciousness would give these books any more credit for historical accuracy than the Iliad and Odyssey actually get today. There's even scenes in Gondor and Rohan where they list the generals and all their men, just like the catalogue of ships, from the Iliad.

So the Ainulindale and the Valaquenta and all the stuff pre first age, that is all the creation mythology. Chronos killing his dad and eating his kids, Zeus killing Chronos, that sort of stuff. Then you get all the early human society myths like Persephone or Pandora, and some of the early hero myths like Heracles, and those are the first age. And the later hero myths like Jason are the second age. But the LOTR and the Hobbit represent the only full text of this mythology to come down to us, and they only cover the last part of the mythology.

So the answer to whether all that mythological stuff happened in universe is yes. Of course it did. And this is also why Tolkien's desire to make a demythologized version of the story was so fundamentally misguided.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

skasion
Feb 13, 2012

Why don't you perform zazen, facing a wall?
the round earth Myths Transformed stuff isn't supposed to be a demythologizing or euhemeristic project. it's a mythic universe based on 20th century AD perception of the solar system instead of 20th century BC perception where everything up there is on a sacred canopy and the world is flat because why wouldn't it be. everything is still mythic, the devil tried to rape the sun one time, but the point (such as it is) is that you can see the privileged "modern" knowledge of reality that elves had and stroke your beard wisely about it. basically its a sci-fi myth inspired by CS Lewis' space books.

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

I had no idea what Myths Transformed was and I just looked it up. That’s interesting that Tolkien had similar thoughts to me.

WoodrowSkillson
Feb 24, 2005

*Gestures at 60 years of Lions history*

To be honest I have never cared for the idea of middle earth being our earth. It's a nice idea, and I understand Tolkien's desire to replace the myths lost to time surrounding the english people. However. It just feels off to make such detailed maps that have a passing resemblance to europe and africa but no mechanism to explain how literally everything changed between the 4th age and now. It's too detailed, too realized and too consistent to hold together for me. The moments where the origins of the sun and moon are clearly set up to echo other mythological stories end up contrasting with the consistent world building in a way that ends up bothering me if I dwell on it too long. I end up going down the rabbit hole of what the gently caress happened to Mordor, to the Misty and Blue Mountains, etc etc. Were these events millions of years ago or are all the maps intentionally wrong?

It just sits better for me to treat it as another world and not worry about things like Earandil becoming a star. I feel better calling that a myth within the narrative than having it be a myth within another myth to replace myths lost.

It's tough to explain exactly I guess.

Arc Hammer
Mar 4, 2013

Got any deathsticks?
Just think of Middle Earth existing between the time when the oceans drank Atlantis and the coming of the Sons of Aryas.

skasion
Feb 13, 2012

Why don't you perform zazen, facing a wall?

Arcsquad12 posted:

Just think of Middle Earth existing between the time when the oceans drank Atlantis and the coming of the Sons of Aryas.

Runcible Cat
May 28, 2007

Ignoring this post

Arcsquad12 posted:

Just think of Middle Earth existing between the time when the oceans drank Atlantis and the coming of the Sons of Aryas.

Well, actually the other way round.

SHISHKABOB
Nov 30, 2012

Fun Shoe
It goes Lovecraft Ancient Aliens stuff-> Conan the Barbarian Hyborian Age-> Lord of the Rings.

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound
Hyborian age is the fourth age. All men, no elves.

Blood Boils
Dec 27, 2006

Its not an S, on my planet it means QUIPS

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Hyborian age is the fourth age. All men, no elves.

Sounds hot

skasion
Feb 13, 2012

Why don't you perform zazen, facing a wall?

It is. Mighty thews abound

Tree Bucket
Apr 1, 2016

R.I.P.idura leucophrys
Make your choice, it's either mighty thews or fair brows

skasion
Feb 13, 2012

Why don't you perform zazen, facing a wall?

Tree Bucket posted:

Make your choice, it's either mighty thews or fair brows

Get Eddison in here and we can add curled moustachios to the ideal male body

WoodrowSkillson
Feb 24, 2005

*Gestures at 60 years of Lions history*

basically i just see tolkien as an imperfect and initially amateur writer who was also a genius so there are a ton of awesome ideas that all got crammed together so some of them just don't quite fit, but none of those really matter since the most important stuff is excellent.

Arc Hammer
Mar 4, 2013

Got any deathsticks?

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Hyborian age is the fourth age. All men, no elves.

That tracks. It would be after the fall of Numenor/Atlantis

Data Graham
Dec 28, 2009

📈📊🍪😋



WoodrowSkillson posted:

basically i just see tolkien as an imperfect and initially amateur writer who was also a genius so there are a ton of awesome ideas that all got crammed together so some of them just don't quite fit, but none of those really matter since the most important stuff is excellent.

It's taken me all my life to realize that only someone who is a certifiable genius in his field falling bass-ackwards into being a fantasy author could get away with the approach of "just start writing and see where it takes you". If you told a brand-new budding author that you don't have to plan out all your story beats from beginning to ending, complete with foreshadowing and callbacks and character development arcs and everything, that you can just throw some characters down in a situation and see what happens, you'd be doing them a huge disservice and probably trick them into spinning their wheels unproductively for years.

Data Graham fucked around with this message at 20:20 on Feb 17, 2021

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

I’m not an author but I don’t think slavish consistency to fictional facts is something they should aim for

Zopotantor
Feb 24, 2013

...und ist er drin dann lassen wir ihn niemals wieder raus...

skasion posted:

Get Eddison in here and we can add curled moustachios to the ideal male body

I think you mean horns.

ChubbyChecker
Mar 25, 2018

euphronius posted:

I’m not an author but I don’t think slavish consistency to fictional facts is something they should aim for

yeah

skasion
Feb 13, 2012

Why don't you perform zazen, facing a wall?

Zopotantor posted:

I think you mean horns.

I always forget about the horns because Eddison also forgot about them sometime between chapter 1 and the rest of the book

WoodrowSkillson
Feb 24, 2005

*Gestures at 60 years of Lions history*

euphronius posted:

I’m not an author but I don’t think slavish consistency to fictional facts is something they should aim for

i'm not asking for it, what i was trying to elucidate is that for me the already near slavish consistency of many of the facts surrounding his legendarium leads to a feeling, for me, that the whole mythology concept seems off. Kind of that its too well realized and detailed to then fit with the idea that all of it disappeared to then lead to The Angles in 200BC or whatever. With the myths from our real history, those blend in so well since they were created for people of the bronze age and classical periods. Hercules does not wield a steel sword and Perseus' journeys don't take him to lands that are then suddenly geographically changed.

Its hard for me not to wonder how the gently caress the hopeful end of the third age into the fourth then leads to such a decline that the remaining descendants of the gondorians or the rohirrim forgot everything like ironworking and shipbuilding. Like its outright stated the dwarves are not going anywhere any time soon, the only difference in middle earth post-Sauron would be less Elves, who were barely present by that point anyway, and the elves under thranduil would probably not be taking the ships to valinor any time soon. So what the hell happened between then and when real history begins? Another war involving the Valar that reshapes the world again? where did the Dwarves go? The hobbits?

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

Dwarves and hobbits and even elves are still here if you can find them !!

4th age would transition to modern folklore where faeries (elves) live hidden in the woods and are seldom seen but if you do you’ll be enchanted and maybe die

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

Super hot

:nws:

https://images.app.goo.gl/VynapJhb6rXXZiHJA

https://images.app.goo.gl/qNWN1vo434orTrFo6

ChubbyChecker
Mar 25, 2018

WoodrowSkillson posted:

i'm not asking for it, what i was trying to elucidate is that for me the already near slavish consistency of many of the facts surrounding his legendarium leads to a feeling, for me, that the whole mythology concept seems off. Kind of that its too well realized and detailed to then fit with the idea that all of it disappeared to then lead to The Angles in 200BC or whatever. With the myths from our real history, those blend in so well since they were created for people of the bronze age and classical periods. Hercules does not wield a steel sword and Perseus' journeys don't take him to lands that are then suddenly geographically changed.

Its hard for me not to wonder how the gently caress the hopeful end of the third age into the fourth then leads to such a decline that the remaining descendants of the gondorians or the rohirrim forgot everything like ironworking and shipbuilding. Like its outright stated the dwarves are not going anywhere any time soon, the only difference in middle earth post-Sauron would be less Elves, who were barely present by that point anyway, and the elves under thranduil would probably not be taking the ships to valinor any time soon. So what the hell happened between then and when real history begins? Another war involving the Valar that reshapes the world again? where did the Dwarves go? The hobbits?

the dwarves dug too deep and the hobbits evolved into brythunians

SHISHKABOB
Nov 30, 2012

Fun Shoe
Sometime after the fourth age the Valar decide to put Middle-Earth on the inside of the planet. They call it... Pellucidar.

WoodrowSkillson
Feb 24, 2005

*Gestures at 60 years of Lions history*

Yes i know the hints the and such in the books, especially in the early LOTR when the asides like that occur more often, like the talking fox. It mentions the wood elves diminishing until they are barely recognizable and such. I'm not ignorant of the explanations given, I'm saying they don't sit right with me and just lead to more questions than answers.

I also am just musing about this after the above conversation cause its not like I'm going to go bother someone IRL with this haha

Data Graham
Dec 28, 2009

📈📊🍪😋



I'm probably overlooking a lot of obvious examples but it seems like the trope in fantasy of "an Earth-like world, which is actually our world in the distant past or distant future" almost always has an unrecognizable map. Like even where it's explicitly meant to be our world, like Terry Brooks or even Wheel of Time which literally has a Mercedes-Benz hood ornament as an ancient talisman of greed, the world has been churned about to the point where you can't draw a line either physically or archeologically from here to there.

It seems like there's a lot of possibility in a fantasy world that takes place on a map that the narrative reveals in gradual detail to be precisely our own familiar Earth, just with all the names changed.

skasion
Feb 13, 2012

Why don't you perform zazen, facing a wall?
In retrospect, the discovery of plate tectonics was convenient for a lot of early fantasy authors

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

If you consider at the last glacial maximum the coast lines were radically different it’s not too much hand waving

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

SHISHKABOB posted:

Sometime after the fourth age the Valar decide to put Middle-Earth on the inside of the planet. They call it... Pellucidar.

At least it isn't the anti-earth you know as Gor

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



WoodrowSkillson posted:

Its hard for me not to wonder how the gently caress the hopeful end of the third age into the fourth then leads to such a decline that the remaining descendants of the gondorians or the rohirrim forgot everything like ironworking and shipbuilding. Like its outright stated the dwarves are not going anywhere any time soon, the only difference in middle earth post-Sauron would be less Elves, who were barely present by that point anyway, and the elves under thranduil would probably not be taking the ships to valinor any time soon. So what the hell happened between then and when real history begins? Another war involving the Valar that reshapes the world again? where did the Dwarves go? The hobbits?
I think the Dwarves eventually all huddle up in Moria and then pass out of history, presumably dying out but in that CS Lewis friendly, "It's sad, but that's just the way it is" kind of way where nobody did it, they just ran out of folks.

I assume hobbits eventually became Englishmen, and potentially in time, Boris Johnson.

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

Data Graham posted:

I'm probably overlooking a lot of obvious examples but it seems like the trope in fantasy of "an Earth-like world, which is actually our world in the distant past or distant future" almost always has an unrecognizable map. Like even where it's explicitly meant to be our world, like Terry Brooks or even Wheel of Time which literally has a Mercedes-Benz hood ornament as an ancient talisman of greed, the world has been churned about to the point where you can't draw a line either physically or archeologically from here to there.

It seems like there's a lot of possibility in a fantasy world that takes place on a map that the narrative reveals in gradual detail to be precisely our own familiar Earth, just with all the names changed.

https://images.app.goo.gl/cQxf8YWMVFS8QvfC7

WoodrowSkillson
Feb 24, 2005

*Gestures at 60 years of Lions history*

Data Graham posted:

I'm probably overlooking a lot of obvious examples but it seems like the trope in fantasy of "an Earth-like world, which is actually our world in the distant past or distant future" almost always has an unrecognizable map. Like even where it's explicitly meant to be our world, like Terry Brooks or even Wheel of Time which literally has a Mercedes-Benz hood ornament as an ancient talisman of greed, the world has been churned about to the point where you can't draw a line either physically or archeologically from here to there.

It seems like there's a lot of possibility in a fantasy world that takes place on a map that the narrative reveals in gradual detail to be precisely our own familiar Earth, just with all the names changed.

I actually prefer this form of setting a fantasy in the "real" world than making it be in some indeterminate past. Especially after the development of nukes the concept of us blasting ourselves to indeterminable millennia of stone age society again is not implausible. Add in some gods that might churn the world around enough for all the depleted iron mines and whatnot to not be a problem and you're set.

Nessus posted:

I think the Dwarves eventually all huddle up in Moria and then pass out of history, presumably dying out but in that CS Lewis friendly, "It's sad, but that's just the way it is" kind of way where nobody did it, they just ran out of folks.

I assume hobbits eventually became Englishmen, and potentially in time, Boris Johnson.

They don't die out. They are involved in the Dagor Dagorath, and their own belief is they will assist the Vala in rebuilding the world after second music.

WoodrowSkillson fucked around with this message at 20:56 on Feb 17, 2021

Data Graham
Dec 28, 2009

📈📊🍪😋




Lol. Though this is a really interesting thought experiment, I'm wondering if someone wrote a LotR-esque fantasy tale but just painstakingly described the setting as traversing Literally Europe, with the Alps and the Black Forest and the English Channel and so on — would those natural features work just as well with the story as-is, or would they feel "wrong" or "non-fantasy" somehow? Like the scale would be off, or the transition from one kind of terrain to another is too abrupt or too gradual, or features like seas or rivers or chasms seem just too contrived to be "realistic"?

Anshu
Jan 9, 2019


Shibawanko posted:

mind that i'm talking more about the experience of the reader and the relationship between the silmarillion and the kind of literature it draws from than whether or not the events in the book are "true" (which isn't really an interesting question, it's a work of fiction, and we all know that valinor is real and we are going there after we die right?). tolkien was a medievalist so his influences are premodern literature, the silmarillion is written as a premodern historical account, my main point is that it's more similar to the bible or the iliad or petrarch than the more modern fiction that apes it

like premodern historical writing there's an element of irrationality to it, the story gets more fantastical the closer you get to the gods, similar to how in the iliad you get a somewhat plausible description of what was probably a real war in one moment, and paris choosing aphrodite in the next. within the story, the elves inhabit a premodern universe, while the "dominion of man" at the end of lotr is something like modernity. there's a particular scene at the end of lotr where (i think) aragorn and one of the hobbits climbs up the mountain behind minas tirith and sort of surveys the land, looking at it rationally and with modern, scientific eyes instead of the narrative perspective that the characters had up to that point: the world is losing all magical elements with the destruction of the ring and the elves going to valinor. this is also why ar pharazon sailing to aman was such a big deal, it's analogous to someone in ancient greece climbing olympus to check whether zeus is literally, physically sitting there

i didn't really say that the elves don't believe in their myths, i'm saying that they don't really obey the rules of a scientific universe like men do. for elrond or cirdan or something all of the stuff in beleriand really happened, but they themselves have an ambiguous status, i think there's another scene around the council of elrond where frodo says of either glorfindel or elrond that he's like a character from history come to life, they're as it were half real half mythical

I understand all of these words, but I don't understand how it could be someone's primary type of engagement with the text.

Shibawanko posted:

yeah. the silmarillion is not a closed ontology, there's no "just so" narrator who says that things are what they are and asks you to suspend disbelief that way, which is imo the main thing that differentiates it from "fantasy". this is why i enjoy reading it
That's not even what "closed ontology" means, (at least according to a casual google search), and, uh, is there not a narrator who tells us what things are? What, for example, is this passage, if not a narrator describing things to us?

Of the Ruin of Beleriand and the Fall of Fingolfin posted:

Now Fingolfin, King of the North, and High King of the Noldor, seeing that his people were become numerous and strong, and that the Men allied to them were many and valiant, pondered once more an assault upon Angband; for he knew that they lived in danger while the circle of the siege was incomplete, and Morgoth was free to labour in his deep mines, devising what evils none could foretell ere he should reveal them. This counsel was wise according to the measure of his knowledge; for the Noldor did not yet comprehend the fullness of the power of Morgoth, nor understand that their unaided war upon him was without final hope, whether they hasted or delayed.

Shibawanko posted:

when we call things "genre fiction" the main part of that accusation is that genre fiction isn't in any kind of dialogue with other works (being trapped only in its own genre), having read other works doesn't add anything to your enjoyment of "a song of ice and fire" because while it has this contrivance of being a "realistic" medieval world with people cutting eachothers heads off it's ultimately a just-so story where the author decided what is real and what isn't, things just happen because the author liked them that way and there's almost no structure to the story, it's a series of "and then this happened, and then that happened, and then that happened" like a kid making up a story on the playground
Now maybe I'm just an ignorant pleb who doesn't understand what the phrase "in dialogue with other works" means, but hasn't GRRM been fairly explicit that ASOIAF is written in reaction to the simplistic good vs. evil narratives that have dominated the fantasy landscape?

Runcible Cat
May 28, 2007

Ignoring this post

Data Graham posted:

Lol. Though this is a really interesting thought experiment, I'm wondering if someone wrote a LotR-esque fantasy tale but just painstakingly described the setting as traversing Literally Europe, with the Alps and the Black Forest and the English Channel and so on — would those natural features work just as well with the story as-is, or would they feel "wrong" or "non-fantasy" somehow? Like the scale would be off, or the transition from one kind of terrain to another is too abrupt or too gradual, or features like seas or rivers or chasms seem just too contrived to be "realistic"?

I don't see why they would - there's plenty of post-apocalypse/alien invasion/etc novels that do exactly that. The first ones I thought of are both by John Christopher - the Tripods trilogy is centuries-post-alien-invasion with 3 boys fleeing from England across France to the rebel strongholds in Swiss tunnels, and the Prince in Waiting trilogy is set in centuries-post-nuclear-war Winchester with travel to Stonehenge and Wales (over a lava field, which I admit is not a current feature of the trip).

Anshu
Jan 9, 2019


SHISHKABOB posted:

Did I say that? I forget.


Oh I said this.

quote:

I think it's ok for the story to be ambiguous about its mythic status.

Yes you did, in direct response to me asking if Galadriel would be lying about the First Age:



Which in context pretty clearly implies

reignonyourparade posted:

"they're lying or just smiling smuggly and going 'i dunno, do YOU think it's true' if anyone asks."

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

The English Channel is like not as old as the Sumerians

More or less

Anshu
Jan 9, 2019


Data Graham posted:

It seems like there's a lot of possibility in a fantasy world that takes place on a map that the narrative reveals in gradual detail to be precisely our own familiar Earth, just with all the names changed.

There's a David Weber series that plays with this, where naturally occurring portals link alternate Earths to one another, all with the same gross geology, but nearly all of them have no human inhabitants. The plot kicks off when two human civilizations exploring the portal networks stumble across each other on the frontier and end up in a shooting war.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

WoodrowSkillson
Feb 24, 2005

*Gestures at 60 years of Lions history*

euphronius posted:

The English Channel is like not as old as the Sumerians

More or less

coastlines are not the problem really, as you just demonstrated, those are far more fluid. It's more stuff like where the Blue, Misty, Iron, Ash, and Shadow mountains go. The white mountains seem to be the Alps and bay of belfalas might be the Mediterranean, but that leaves some of the biggest mountains in middle earth about where Germany is.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply