Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Sergg
Sep 19, 2005

I was rejected by the:

That's not even beginning to look into the environment that Ron Watkins grew up in. The interracial son of a white supremacist pedophile, who was also clearly just overall not a nice person. Really super dupes mean. Weirdly I got the impression that Jim Watkins did love his son, and Ron loved his father, and that they were best friends. Was that just me?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Thoughtless
Feb 1, 2007


Doesn't think, just types.

Sergg posted:

If I had to spitball diagnoses based just off the interviews I would say Autism (almost certainly), Sociopathy (definite), and that rapid blinking with those sudden facial movements are mostly consistent with Tourette's Syndrome or the side-effects of antipsychotic medications. I've met a real life hardcore sociopath before and he has that EXACT same flat affect to his speech. The instant I heard him talking I was like "OMG honey this guy sounds just like L***s!"

As someone with a bit of (professionally diagnosed) autism myself I'm not really seeing it in him. Granted it is a pretty wide spectrum, but in my experience it almost never goes with intentionally misleading people long-term. That and he doesn't seem to get as excitable as we regrettably do when talking about something we are interested in.

pop fly to McGillicutty
Feb 2, 2004

A peckish little mouse!
Hey if Rush Limbaugh's biographer says he wasn't political, it must be true. No way he just wrote that to continue the big lie, nope. I mean the guy spent thirty years teaching republicans how to have bad faith arguments and support open fascism, but he was "just a character"


This dumb thought process is the ENTIRE reason republicans keep using it as a defense. They're all true believers, they're all authoritarian, they're all eager to kill anyone who isn't exactly like them. Wake up.

Xand_Man
Mar 2, 2004

If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous


pop fly to McGillicutty posted:

Hey if Rush Limbaugh's biographer says he wasn't political, it must be true. No way he just wrote that to continue the big lie, nope. I mean the guy spent thirty years teaching republicans how to have bad faith arguments and support open fascism, but he was "just a character"


This dumb thought process is the ENTIRE reason republicans keep using it as a defense. They're all true believers, they're all authoritarian, they're all eager to kill anyone who isn't exactly like them. Wake up.

I'm sure some of them are lying to themselves

Halloween Jack
Sep 12, 2003
I WILL CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS BEFORE I VOTE FOR ANYONE THAT IS MORE POPULAR THAN BERNIE!!!!!

Stefan Prodan posted:

my opinion is that Alex Jones doesn't truly believe the things he is saying in one sense and that sense is not that he disagrees with any of it but that he's too stupid to actually agree with all the things that follow from the things he says. like, he has wild inconsistencies in his beliefs and he's a huge hypocrite so in that sense he doesn't "believe" what he says, but it's only because he's a moron, I think when he says things he does agree with them at the time he says them.

goddamnedtwisto posted:

To me it suggests the possibility that he's both performer and true believer (almost certainly a performer first, who's just spent so much time in character and surrounded by true believers that it's completely poisoned his brain) but that Sandy Hook actually broke through his shell.
I think Jones is the type of personality who "believes" whatever makes him feel good and advantages him at the moment.

Like, he's a child of America's white flight suburbs. Anything he sees on paper or a screen is just a "story" that he can believe or not, depending. Conspiracy theories and snake oil is making him money, so he believes in them. Godzilla attacking Tokyo and a mass shooter attacking a high school are just stories. Being able to afford an in-ground pool, now that's real.

Dang It Bhabhi!
May 27, 2004



ASK ME ABOUT
BEING
ESCULA GRIND'S
#1 SIMP

Halloween Jack posted:

I think Jones is the type of personality who "believes" whatever makes him feel good and advantages him at the moment.

Like, he's a child of America's white flight suburbs. Anything he sees on paper or a screen is just a "story" that he can believe or not, depending. Conspiracy theories and snake oil is making him money, so he believes in them. Godzilla attacking Tokyo and a mass shooter attacking a high school are just stories. Being able to afford an in-ground pool, now that's real.

As per the earlier discussion there are certain things he does that absolutely bring him pain and ruin that he has the power to stop by simply admitting fault, something he has also done to zero negative impact in the past, but he refuses to do so because he is committed to these certain insane ideas. Certainly he is also a grifter who uses any raw materials to grift but he is also encumbered by some real "true believer" poo poo.

Dang It Bhabhi! fucked around with this message at 16:46 on Apr 5, 2021

Halloween Jack
Sep 12, 2003
I WILL CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS BEFORE I VOTE FOR ANYONE THAT IS MORE POPULAR THAN BERNIE!!!!!

Antifa Turkeesian posted:

Q people have zero interest in preventing harm to children. I bet a lot of them are now even more comfortable with child sexual exploitation than they were at the start because of the increased likelihood that they’ve been exposed to it by 4chan or Jim Watkins while indulging in their role-play, or because they went looking for the Hillary cannibal video.
Middle-class conservatives have always been fascinated with the gross stuff they claim to be fighting.

RocknRollaAyatollah
Nov 26, 2008

Lipstick Apathy
Asia is full of guys like Jim Watkins, white supremacists creeps and/or pedophiles who share similar political beliefs. They'll often have Asian wives or girlfriends and interracial children from those relationships but they see them as the "good ones." Ron's utility as a programmer and social media person I'm sure also helps their relationship but I would not be surprised if Jim threw Ron under the bus at the first chance because he just seems that type of person. Just a complete psychopathic rear end in a top hat who has no problem murdering a severely handicapped person by proxy.

madeintaipei
Jul 13, 2012

RocknRollaAyatollah posted:

Asia is full of guys like Jim Watkins, white supremacists creeps and/or pedophiles who share similar political beliefs. They'll often have Asian wives or girlfriends and interracial children from those relationships but they see them as the "good ones." Ron's utility as a programmer and social media person I'm sure also helps their relationship but I would not be surprised if Jim threw Ron under the bus at the first chance because he just seems that type of person. Just a complete psychopathic rear end in a top hat who has no problem murdering a severely handicapped person by proxy.

It's not just in Asia. I've seen that here in America, especially with white men married to Phillipinas. IME, the wife either shuts that poo poo down hard or they split.
I'm not talking mail-order brides, more American servicemen who marry while abroad, if that even makes a difference. Now I wonder if that does make a difference.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

madeintaipei posted:

It's not just in Asia. I've seen that here in America, especially with white men married to Phillipinas. IME, the wife either shuts that poo poo down hard or they split.
I'm not talking mail-order brides, more American servicemen who marry while abroad, if that even makes a difference. Now I wonder if that does make a difference.

Yeah, Hank's dad was an archetype on King of the Hill.

Pussy Quipped
Jan 29, 2009

So Ron basically admitted he is/was Q, right?

Dang It Bhabhi!
May 27, 2004



ASK ME ABOUT
BEING
ESCULA GRIND'S
#1 SIMP

I think it was on QAnon Anonymous last year, when they had Frederick Brennan on, that they laid it out:

1 "Q" is Jim and Ron running a team of "writers" who were existing employees on Jim's porn business.
2 The purpose of this appears to be that they offer Q as a medium through which people can pay to push an agenda which brings us to
3 Q's motivations are those of Jim and Ron's customers. Some of Jim and Ron's regular customers include Roger Stone, both for himself and on behalf of Donald Trump, and also Vladimir Putin/the Russian government.

Which makes the most sense out of all of the theories ever floated imo.

edit:

Pussy Quipped posted:

So Ron basically admitted he is/was Q, right?

but yea him admitting it would be quite another thing entirely.

Despera
Jun 6, 2011

Pussy Quipped posted:

So Ron basically admitted he is/was Q, right?

If you could condense 6 hours of filming to one (possibly innocent) slip up I guess.

Phobophilia
Apr 26, 2008

by Hand Knit

pop fly to McGillicutty posted:

Hey if Rush Limbaugh's biographer says he wasn't political, it must be true. No way he just wrote that to continue the big lie, nope. I mean the guy spent thirty years teaching republicans how to have bad faith arguments and support open fascism, but he was "just a character"


This dumb thought process is the ENTIRE reason republicans keep using it as a defense. They're all true believers, they're all authoritarian, they're all eager to kill anyone who isn't exactly like them. Wake up.

The fact that young Rush started out apolitical in a family of dyed-in-the-wool chuds is even more damning, it means he rebelled early, then made a conscious choice later in life to re-enter the fold.

Phobophilia
Apr 26, 2008

by Hand Knit
Anyway the most recent Q-posts have been by the Watkins, and it shows: they're a bunch of boring losers, and the writers in their employ have been phoning it in.


https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/how-three-conspiracy-theorists-took-q-sparked-qanon-n900531

Anyway the original Qs were a bunch of independent 4chan chuds, there are a few candidates like Dreamcatcher (James Brower), who got interviewed by QAnon Anonymous in episode 32. I almost believe him because he said he got involved to push a counter-narrative after the Charlottesville killing (yeah he would be stupid enough to think this was a good way to promote Trump). Other early Q candidates are here: https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/how-three-conspiracy-theorists-took-q-sparked-qanon-n900531

But original Q is barely even relevant these days, it's a decentralized cult that exists on Facebook and Republican-voting social networks.

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Xand_Man posted:

I'm sure some of them are lying to themselves

These damned liberals just can't take a (racist, homophobic, misogynistic) joke is all.

Despera
Jun 6, 2011
I did love how when Ron and Jim were asked questions about what Q would do in specific situations they always had a definitive answer. "What would Q do if Biden wins" well Q would do this that and the other thing without any shred of doubt.

ohjoshdarnit
Nov 2, 2005
Adventurer

Despera posted:

I did love how when Ron and Jim were asked questions about what Q would do in specific situations they always had a definitive answer. "What would Q do if Biden wins" well Q would do this that and the other thing without any shred of doubt.

Yeah, they were so inconsistent and obviously lying it was comical at times. "I'm just not a political guy! I just don't follow it. Welp, here's my political news recording studio." I get that the reporter was playing the long game with these guys for material but he was still way too soft. There should have a lot more pressing them on the contradictions, especially towards the end. I mean the biggest question is, if they were telling the truth, was why did they even care about 8chan at all when they were losing money on it?

Despera
Jun 6, 2011

ohjoshdarnit posted:

Yeah, they were so inconsistent and obviously lying it was comical at times. "I'm just not a political guy! I just don't follow it. Welp, here's my political news recording studio." I get that the reporter was playing the long game with these guys for material but he was still way too soft. There should have a lot more pressing them on the contradictions, especially towards the end. I mean the biggest question is, if they were telling the truth, was why did they even care about 8chan at all when they were losing money on it?

It had the uber political nerdiest name of the "goldwater." Did he like not google Ron Watsons name? Save us an hour of our life and cut through the very thinly veiled bullshit.

I also loved how the only positive review that HBO showcased was from the daily beast. Wonder if spending half an hour with a daily beast reporter had anything to do with it.

Despera fucked around with this message at 07:25 on Apr 6, 2021

pop fly to McGillicutty
Feb 2, 2004

A peckish little mouse!

Phobophilia posted:

The fact that young Rush started out apolitical in a family of dyed-in-the-wool chuds is even more damning, it means he rebelled early, then made a conscious choice later in life to re-enter the fold.

My point was he was never "apolitical". He told people that so he could reframe himself as "a guy not involved in politics who saw how CORRECT the right was". It's a scam. He was a die hard conservative from youth, they just rewrote his history.

He was never a rebel, no republican is. They are status quo.

Improper Umlaut
Jun 8, 2009

https://twitter.com/CassandraRules/status/1379777855480029191

This falls under the more of the general conspiracy theory category but, can anyone help shed some light on what's happening here?

I can't seem to find a follow-up story that gives details outside of the video and I'm having a hard time believing the "Alex Jones saves kids from human trafficking" narrative that's going around Twitter.

Is this an example of Jones getting it wrong and harassing a local church ministry trying to provide humanitarian aid? Or is this him being in the right place at the right time, trying to be a bombastic rear end in a top hat and actually having it turn out well for once?

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Improper Umlaut posted:

https://twitter.com/CassandraRules/status/1379777855480029191

This falls under the more of the general conspiracy theory category but, can anyone help shed some light on what's happening here?

I can't seem to find a follow-up story that gives details outside of the video and I'm having a hard time believing the "Alex Jones saves kids from human trafficking" narrative that's going around Twitter.

Is this an example of Jones getting it wrong and harassing a local church ministry trying to provide humanitarian aid? Or is this him being in the right place at the right time, trying to be a bombastic rear end in a top hat and actually having it turn out well for once?

Um, it's not even remotely human trafficking? They are helping migrants. Yes they should've had seatbelts, but a lot of charities run on a shoestring and make do, in part because of assholes like Trump who abuse "charities" and because of assholes like Jones who constantly push a narrative that all 501(c)3s are bad etc.. If you actually watch the video it's not even about stopping human trafficking. It's about stopping migrants who are brown from getting in to the united states.

But yes, they should've had seat belts. What a hero.

DarklyDreaming
Apr 4, 2009

Fun scary
Sure looks like Alex has another libel lawsuit to look forward to

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Improper Umlaut posted:

https://twitter.com/CassandraRules/status/1379777855480029191

This falls under the more of the general conspiracy theory category but, can anyone help shed some light on what's happening here?

I can't seem to find a follow-up story that gives details outside of the video and I'm having a hard time believing the "Alex Jones saves kids from human trafficking" narrative that's going around Twitter.

Is this an example of Jones getting it wrong and harassing a local church ministry trying to provide humanitarian aid? Or is this him being in the right place at the right time, trying to be a bombastic rear end in a top hat and actually having it turn out well for once?

Cassandra Fairbanks is a nazi. The video is a bunch of nazis trying to stop migrant children from receiving aid. Listen to the poo poo at the start about how the kids "are given debit cards with $1200 on them and released into America." He's doing a stunt to show how he hates migrants.

Mr. Fall Down Terror
Jan 24, 2018

by Fluffdaddy

Improper Umlaut posted:

Is this an example of Jones getting it wrong and harassing a local church ministry trying to provide humanitarian aid? Or is this him being in the right place at the right time, trying to be a bombastic rear end in a top hat and actually having it turn out well for once?

its either a church van full of migrant kids or a church van full of non-migrant kids. either way having a bunch of kids stuffed in a van w/o seatbelts is not the best way to move kids but its not really suspicious, unless you're so delusional that you think any movement of children in public is trafficking

Karma Comedian
Feb 2, 2012

American school buses are only required to have seatbelts in eight states.

Relevant Tangent
Nov 18, 2016

Tangentially Relevant

Karma Comedian posted:

American school buses are only required to have seatbelts in eight states.

Surprised it's that many.

Dang It Bhabhi!
May 27, 2004



ASK ME ABOUT
BEING
ESCULA GRIND'S
#1 SIMP

This is why I never ride on school buses.

Mr. Fall Down Terror
Jan 24, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
same, i only ride in them

pop fly to McGillicutty
Feb 2, 2004

A peckish little mouse!
Nothing Alex Jones does is real, y'all.

Dang It Bhabhi!
May 27, 2004



ASK ME ABOUT
BEING
ESCULA GRIND'S
#1 SIMP

Mr. Fall Down Terror posted:

same, i only ride in them

mods?

Halloween Jack
Sep 12, 2003
I WILL CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS BEFORE I VOTE FOR ANYONE THAT IS MORE POPULAR THAN BERNIE!!!!!
The first time I tried to watch the last episode of Q:Into the Storm, something glitched out and the episode was edited together wrong. Like the episode ended abruptly with a scene that I think was pulled from another episode, then another scene played after the credits. I had to reset my Roku to be able to go back and finish watching the episode. Now what do I do about the bugs inside my Roku and teeth?

Joshlemagne
Mar 6, 2013

Karma Comedian posted:

American school buses are only required to have seatbelts in eight states.

American school buses are designed to be tanks, essentially. If something could do enough damage to one to be a problem seat belts probably wouldn't make much difference.

eSporks
Jun 10, 2011

Joshlemagne posted:

American school buses are designed to be tanks, essentially. If something could do enough damage to one to be a problem seat belts probably wouldn't make much difference.
Uhhh
That's not how Newton's third law or seatbelts work.

The whole reason school buses don't have seatbelts is because it's assumed the driver is safe, and that others drive safe around them. And that installing seatbelts would make them a requirement and create an unenforceable burden and liability on the driver to manage.

Edit:
So I actually looked this up a bit, and it appears we are both right, to an extent.
https://thenewswheel.com/7-reasons-why-school-buses-dont-have-seat-belts/
How close the seats are also prevents movement.

eSporks fucked around with this message at 01:25 on Apr 9, 2021

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Halloween Jack posted:

The first time I tried to watch the last episode of Q:Into the Storm, something glitched out and the episode was edited together wrong. Like the episode ended abruptly with a scene that I think was pulled from another episode, then another scene played after the credits. I had to reset my Roku to be able to go back and finish watching the episode. Now what do I do about the bugs inside my Roku and teeth?

Oh poo poo.

You got the Bill Gates G5 microchip vaccine, didn't you? It's too late now.

You fool.

Phobophilia
Apr 26, 2008

by Hand Knit

eSporks posted:

Uhhh
That's not how Newton's third law or seatbelts work.

The whole reason school buses don't have seatbelts is because it's assumed the driver is safe, and that others drive safe around them. And that installing seatbelts would make them a requirement and create an unenforceable burden and liability on the driver to manage.

Newton's second law is more relevant for this situation. If a bus hits a car (even a big car, like an SUV), the bus is going to keep going, while the car is going to decelerate catastrophically. Which is why it's more important for the person inside the car to be wearing a seatbelt, so they don't go flying around inside their vehicle.

Uglycat
Dec 4, 2000
MORE INDISPUTABLE PROOF I AM BAD AT POSTING
---------------->
I lived in school buses for much of the trump years.
They're built like tanks.
You want a Thomas with a Cat engine, fyi

Karma Comedian
Feb 2, 2012

Karma Comedian posted:

American school buses are only required to have seatbelts in eight states.

The point of this comment is to illustrate how laughable the concern trolling over unbelted kids is

Busses are pretty dope

bird with big dick
Oct 21, 2015

pop fly to McGillicutty posted:

Nothing Alex Jones does is real, y'all.

He porked that lady that poop her pants I think that was real

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Local Weather
Feb 12, 2005

Don't worry, I'll give you a sign. The sign will be that life is awesome

pop fly to McGillicutty posted:

My point was he was never "apolitical". He told people that so he could reframe himself as "a guy not involved in politics who saw how CORRECT the right was". It's a scam. He was a die hard conservative from youth, they just rewrote his history.

He was never a rebel, no republican is. They are status quo.

Years ago I saw a video from the late 80s-early 90s from some kind of radio station trade show/marketing convention. It was right at the point where Rush had started to blow up nation wide and he was a part of a panel discussion about how to succeed in the radio market and he pretty clearly comes out and says he is more or less playing to a market and just trying to fill a gap in the market so that he can make money.

Over the years I think he really became the "El Rushbo" character but at first he might have been right wind or whatnot but he was really just saying what he needed to say to build a market and make money. Essentially he helped destroy American society so he could get rich.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply