|
Kalit posted:
She started rambling after a bit and the reporter ended up cutting her off.
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:41
|
|
I stopped listening after about 5 seconds, so I didn't even know that's what she was talking about.
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 09:34 |
|
|
Kalit posted:
"Should we interview the impacted communities of color about their feelings on the upcoming verdict?" "No."
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:42
|
|
|
GhostofJohnMuir posted:they say you can't predict based on timing, but this feels like it has to be guilty on at least one charge. this wasn't enough time to be a hung jury and i pray to all merciful god that they can't possibly unanimously acquit This is my thought process as well. It's definitely not hung anyway, since they wouldn't say they'd reached a verdict if it was.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:42
|
|
|
Wow, they just showed a view from outside the court house, and there are a LOT of people gathered.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:43
|
|
|
Fingers crossed they get the bastard.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:43
|
|
|
Jaxyon posted:It's not about winning arguments and the fact that you see it this way is pretty telling. If you're trying to help people actually figure out their biases you're not giving them that space and it just comes off as you wanting people to tell you that your right. If you want them to gently caress off than you're doing it right but you're too aggro if you're trying to make some sort of learning moment. Nothing wrong with telling people to gently caress off though if that's your goal.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:43
|
|
|
My anxiety is on 11 right now.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:46
|
|
|
Gumball Gumption posted:If you're trying to help people actually figure out their biases you're not giving them that space and it just comes off as you wanting people to tell you that your right. If you want them to gently caress off than you're doing it right but you're too aggro if you're trying to make some sort of learning moment. Nothing wrong with telling people to gently caress off though if that's your goal. I don't think people are willing to examine their biases in a forum discussion in D&D because it's constantly about dunking on your posting enemies and your ego. It's hard enough to get people to examine their biases in spaces where they are supposedly doing anti-racism work, let alone in a "I must be right" thunderdome. I get that people are going to argue with me about this. It still needs to be said. I'm done talking about this because the verdict is about to be read. vvvv yep Jaxyon fucked around with this message at 21:50 on Apr 20, 2021 |
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:46
|
|
|
Gumball Gumption posted:If you're trying to help people actually figure out their biases you're not giving them that space and it just comes off as you wanting people to tell you that your right. If you want them to gently caress off than you're doing it right but you're too aggro if you're trying to make some sort of learning moment. Nothing wrong with telling people to gently caress off though if that's your goal. that's a long and exhausting process for everyone involved and doesn't work online with strangers anyway. the only reasonable response to people complaining about maxine waters in this thread on this day is "gently caress off"
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:49
|
|
|
Manslaughter would be the worst possible result since nobody will be satisfied. But surely they have to go for Murder 3 at least, going by the evidence.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:49
|
|
|
Thoughtless posted:Manslaughter would be the worst possible result since nobody will be satisfied. That's my thought. Not guilty on murder 2, guilty on murder 3 and manslaughter. To me, that's an acceptable punishment of this crime.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:50
|
|
|
Thoughtless posted:Manslaughter would be the worst possible result since nobody will be satisfied. Conservatives will not be satisfied until every single African American is either a corpse or in chains. The worst possible result I think is easily acquital because it is tantamount to making what we already known to be true a legal precedent: the police can murder anyone at anytime for any reason and face no consequences for doing so.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:51
|
|
|
Cmooooon. Read the verdict. "Verdict will be read between 3:30 and 4." *verdict read at 3:55*
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:53
|
|
|
RoboChrist 9000 posted:Conservatives will not be satisfied until every single African American is either a corpse or in chains. The worst possible result I think is easily acquital because it is tantamount to making what we already known to be true a legal precedent: the police can murder anyone at anytime for any reason and face no consequences for doing so. Yeah but what I'm thinking is there will be riots from both the right and the left if he gets manslaughter. One because he wasn't acquitted and the other (rightfully, really) because it clearly wasn't enough. I mean acquittal is worse when it comes to any kind of justice yes, but maybe not for the consequences.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:54
|
|
|
Velocity Raptor posted:Cmooooon. Read the verdict. Didn't realize Comcast ran this courtroom.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:54
|
|
|
Cops are out everywhere. https://twitter.com/s_m_i/status/1384604958989819905?s=21
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:54
|
|
|
Waiting until 3:59 so the cops can get ready is reaaaaaaaally not giving me a good feeling.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:55
|
|
|
Jaxyon posted:Waiting until 3:59 so the cops can get ready is reaaaaaaaally not giving me a good feeling. My anxiety was at 11. Now it's at 12.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:55
|
|
|
how would the cops know what the verdict is before the judge does? calm down a bit people..
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:56
|
|
|
Jaxyon posted:Waiting until 3:59 so the cops can get ready is reaaaaaaaally not giving me a good feeling. The courts don't know what the verdict is yet. All they know is one has been reached.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:56
|
|
|
Starsfan posted:how would the cops know what the verdict is before the judge does? Yeah cops and the justice system has always been completely and utterly fair and just and always follows protocol
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:57
|
|
|
Starsfan posted:how would the cops know what the verdict is before the judge does? it is possible that the judge knows, but it is not typical or ethical.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:58
|
|
|
Lets not tell people to "calm down" about an incredibly tense and serious situation.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:58
|
|
|
Skyarb posted:Yeah cops and the justice system has always been completely and utterly fair and just and always follows protocol Like I'm pretty sure the jurors write their verdict on a piece of paper and then hand it to the judge for him to read out to the room, no one but them knows what's on it right now. Everything going on is just assumptions of the worst case scenario of protests.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:58
|
|
|
Jaxyon posted:Lets not tell people to "calm down" about an incredibly tense and serious situation. Thank you. I was going to give a harsher response but you spelled out what I wanted to say in a more sane way.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:59
|
|
|
Skyarb posted:Yeah cops and the justice system has always been completely and utterly fair and just and always follows protocol Sure but you'd better believe that if every major police force in the USA knew the verdict then it would have 100% been leaked.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 21:59
|
|
|
Kirios posted:Didn't realize Comcast ran this courtroom. Apparently they are. They've missed the appointment.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 22:00
|
|
|
Skyarb posted:Yeah cops and the justice system has always been completely and utterly fair and just and always follows protocol Is the theory here that the judge and police have conspired to shake down the jury for the "not guilty" verdict early, for a whole 30 minutes of "preparation" that they would make use of for... reasons? Even though it would possibly invalidate the verdict and need the trial to start over again.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 22:01
|
|
|
It's starting!
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 22:05
|
|
|
Jaxyon posted:Lets not tell people to "calm down" about an incredibly tense and serious situation. Sure, but Twitter is a fertile breeding ground for panicked misinformation. Discouraging the reposting content that isn't from credible sources isn't a bad idea.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 22:05
|
|
|
Kirios posted:That's my thought. Not guilty on murder 2, guilty on murder 3 and manslaughter. heck, manslaughter with a half-decent sentence would be... fine too bad sentencing isn't also tonight
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 22:05
|
|
|
here we go
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 22:06
|
|
|
1st count guilty
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 22:06
|
|
|
waiting on pins and needles
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 22:06
|
|
|
2nd count guilty!
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 22:06
|
|
|
GUILTY 2ND MURDER
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 22:06
|
|
|
GUILTY
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 22:07
|
|
|
YES GET hosed
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 22:07
|
|
|
SECOND DEGREE gently caress YES
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 22:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 09:34 |
|
|
GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS!!!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 22:07
|
|