Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Should troll Fancy Pelosi be allowed to stay?
This poll is closed.
Yes 160 32.92%
No 326 67.08%
Total: 486 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Post
  • Reply
mdemone
Mar 14, 2001

Rodenthar Drothman posted:

gently caress gently caress noooooo.

California politics suck rear end and we’re probably going to elect her.
God dammit.

There is no way in hell she can stay afloat through a whole state-wide campaign. I would be absolutely gobsmacked if she wins the primary, much less the general.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Kalit
Nov 6, 2006

The great thing about the thousands of slaughtered Palestinian children is that they can't pull away when you fondle them or sniff their hair.

That's a Biden success story.

mdemone posted:

There is no way in hell she can stay afloat through a whole state-wide campaign. I would be absolutely gobsmacked if she wins the primary, much less the general.

I mean... doesn't CA love to elect pop-culture icons as Governor?

E: VVV :laffo: I didn't realize that. No wonder why.

Kalit fucked around with this message at 16:14 on Apr 23, 2021

Craptacular!
Jul 9, 2001

Fuck the DH

mdemone posted:

There is no way in hell she can stay afloat through a whole state-wide campaign. I would be absolutely gobsmacked if she wins the primary, much less the general.

You clearly aren't aware of how the California recall process works. There isn't a primary. There isn't parties. Anyone with a smidgen of friends to sign a document can be added to the ballot. The "debate" last time was fifteen people yelling over each other. A porn star, and a woman who became an LA billboard meme, and literally Gary Coleman were on the ballot. Someone sold a deck of cards featuring them all.



EDIT: Oh gee, I forgot to add Gallagher the watermelon-smashing guy, and also people who had names that were identical to famous people but weren't actually famous for anything themselves.

Craptacular! fucked around with this message at 16:13 on Apr 23, 2021

Rust Martialis
May 8, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

Goatstein posted:

But you didn't disprove anything. Your defense was she didn't create the debtor's prison, she just ran it. No one said she created it. The original tweet said she ran it. Here it is again:

https://mobile.twitter.com/equalityAlec/status/1385222123598274564

This by one of the lawyers who represented the plaintiffs. You then proceeded to yell about ragebait and dishonesty because you knew it would distract the detritus left after a decade of you banning everyone who noticed you're an aggro fanboy for the Democratic party apparatus. These are the actual facts you requested.

She wasn't running it, though. A lot of it was outside the judge's control. The bit the judges needed to fix was the inquiry into ability to pay - the typical inquiry was perfunctory and pro forma. Totally blame her for that.

If you read the complaint, the Sheriff's department was running a ton of this outside the control of the courts. They'd get notified someone hadn't paid by the city fees department, then toss people into jail until they paid and not even notify the court.

I think she's poo poo for being part of it, but she wasn't "running it". It was a huge team effort to be that poo poo. Maybe you think I'm warped, but I think she should be disqualified from any public office for her role AND I think the lawyer tweeting about it is kinda distorting the facts to make her look even worse. Probably because most people won't read the actual case.

mdemone
Mar 14, 2001

Craptacular! posted:

You clearly aren't aware of how the California recall process works. There isn't a primary. There isn't parties. Anyone with a smidgen of friends to sign a document can be added to the ballot. The "debate" last time was fifteen people yelling over each other, A porn star, and a woman who became an LA billboard meme, and literally Gary Coleman were on the ballot. Someone sold a deck of cards featuring them all.



EDIT: Oh gee, I forgot to add Gallagher the watermelon-smashing guy, and also people who had names that were identical to famous people but weren't actually famous for anything themselves.

Wait, this is a recall effort? I lived out there when they recalled Davis but I hadn't realized this was a recall of Newsom.

Okay you're right. This is gonna be a bigger shitshow than I even could have imagined.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Craptacular! posted:

You clearly aren't aware of how the California recall process works. There isn't a primary. There isn't parties. Anyone with a smidgen of friends to sign a document can be added to the ballot. The "debate" last time was fifteen people yelling over each other. A porn star, and a woman who became an LA billboard meme, and literally Gary Coleman were on the ballot. Someone sold a deck of cards featuring them all.



EDIT: Oh gee, I forgot to add Gallagher the watermelon-smashing guy, and also people who had names that were identical to famous people but weren't actually famous for anything themselves.

A lot of blue states seem really poorly run. Like New York and California elections, the amount of legislation done through referenda, like - fix y'alls poo poo.

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

zoux posted:




https://twitter.com/orlandosentinel/status/1385581448363716608
I know this is supposed to make me mad and brother - it loving delivers


Literally an appeal to my immersion, which one of yall wrote this as a bit

i just wanted to boost this to the new page because its even more insane than i thought it would be.

quote:

My family and I have been loyal Disney customers for decades. We vacation at Disney World every year. We take a Disney cruise every year or two. Consequently, we spend way too much money in Orlando.

Unfortunately, I am strongly rethinking our commitment to Disney and, thus, Orlando. The more Disney moves away from the values and vision of Walt Disney, the less Disney World means to me. Disney is forgetting that guest immersion is at the core of its business model. When I stand in Galaxy’s Edge or Fantasyland, I know I am in a theme park but through immersion and my willingness to set the real world aside, something magical happens.

That spell is broken when the immersive experience is shattered by the real world. And boy, has Disney been breaking the immersion.

Recently, Disney announced that cast members are now permitted to display tattoos, wear inclusive uniforms and display inclusive haircuts. Disney did all of this in the name of allowing cast members to express themselves.



What’s next, is Disney going to end the rule barring on stage cellphone use by cast members as an infringement on self-expression.


More broadly, like many corporations, Disney has been politicizing its business. Full disclosure: I am a Christian and a conservative Republican, so the people who run Disney and I do not see eye to eye.

Regardless, corporations have always made politically motivated decisions. Usually, it is due to the desire to make a profit, but sometimes it is due to the values of the people in the corporation. Walt Disney used his corporation to express his patriotism during World War II and his pro-capitalism beliefs afterward. The difference today is that the people who run Disney use social media to scream to the whole world that a decision has been made for political reasons.

Disney is in the process of taking the woke scalpel to the Jungle Cruise. Trader Sam is out because he might offend certain people. Every grown-up in the room realizes that Trader Sam is not a representation of reality and is meant as a funny and silly caricature. It is no more based in racism than every Disney caricature of an out-of-touch white American dad.

The next time I ride Jungle Cruise I will not be thinking about the gloriously entertaining puns of the skippers, I will be thinking about Disney’s political agenda. That’s a mood killer.

Disney proclaims that Splash Mountain must change because of its association with “Song of the South.” Disney owns Splash Mountain so it can do what it wants. But if Disney screams at the top of its corporate voice, which is pretty loud, that it is changing it to appease a certain political point of view, now every time I look at the ride I am thinking about politics.

The same with Pirates of the Caribbean. Disney has made significant changes to Pirates of the Caribbean over the years. Whether Disney caved to political pressure or really thought the alterations were necessary is irrelevant.

Pirates used to be one of my favorite attractions. My family would always ride it first on our first day at the Magic Kingdom. Now, we do not even ride it every trip. When my family rides Pirates now, each of the changed scenes takes us out of the illusion because they remind us of reality and the politics that forced the changes.

Disney World is going to lose us as customers if it continues down this path. I do not want to have Disney World taken away from us because Disney cares more about politics than happy guests.

This should matter to the people of Orlando because, if Disney drives away customers like me, Orlando loses money. I can take my tourist dollars elsewhere. I would rather keep spending them in Orlando but people like me feel more and more excluded by Disney’s decisions.

The parks are less fun because immersion and thus the joy is taking a back seat to politics.

Disney, please return to the values and vision of Walt. The customer experience should be the core of your business model. Immersion should not be sacrificed on the altar of political correctness and appeasing the Twitter mob.

Oracle
Oct 9, 2004


Now let's see them get off their asses and actually vote.

Doctor Butts
May 21, 2002

I don't get it, does the guy basically want to go to an amusement park that celebrates being a terrible person?

Maybe go to the Ark experience or that thing with the dinosaurs. Picnic at that stone mountain place.

Craptacular!
Jul 9, 2001

Fuck the DH

zoux posted:

A lot of blue states seem really poorly run. Like New York and California elections, the amount of legislation done through referenda, like - fix y'alls poo poo.

Since I left California it's the thing I miss most. I'd rather major political issues be fought in giant ad campaigns blasted directly at voters through TV and YouTube ads than people being lobbied quietly.

I would take twenty propositons every two years over something like various Nevada politicians from both parties going, "we spent a billion dollars to get the NFL, we didn't let you vote for it but your support is assumed since you voted for us :keke:"

SirPablo
May 1, 2004

Pillbug
This is going to be an epic poo poo show. Cyber Ninjas.

https://twitter.com/JMShumway/status/1385448066396786689?s=20

fart simpson
Jul 2, 2005

DEATH TO AMERICA
:xickos:


well, this is depressing

BRAKE FOR MOOSE
Jun 6, 2001

Rust Martialis posted:

I think she's poo poo for being part of it, but she wasn't "running it". It was a huge team effort to be that poo poo. Maybe you think I'm warped, but I think she should be disqualified from any public office for her role AND I think the lawyer tweeting about it is kinda distorting the facts to make her look even worse. Probably because most people won't read the actual case.

This is my take, though I don't know that it's fully disqualifying as much as a very significant black mark. It's certainly disqualifying for a prestige position like this. We can elevate people out there who aren't willing participants in systems that are as obviously corrupt and contemptible as this. It's not a particularly hard standard to meet - even if it means nobody from the Orleans Parish court can be US Attorney.

Hawkperson
Jun 20, 2003

zoux posted:

A lot of blue states seem really poorly run. Like New York and California elections, the amount of legislation done through referenda, like - fix y'alls poo poo.

People loving love our proposition system, and I don't loving get it. Like people irl get really testy when I'm like "our proposition system sucks"

Youth Decay
Aug 18, 2015

fart simpson posted:

well, this is depressing

Why? What past President was doing better things for college-aged voters? Remember the voting age was only lowered to 21 in 1971, and since then the best ones would be...maybe Clinton and Obama had the charisma but were big on their austerity bullshit. I know Carter was probably the least war-criminal-y (although still pretty war criminal-y) but he presided over a massive recession and gas crisis. And none of them actually presented a stimulus package anywhere close to the ARP.

e: didn't see that this poll only covered 21 years, point still stands.

Youth Decay fucked around with this message at 16:51 on Apr 23, 2021

Kalit
Nov 6, 2006

The great thing about the thousands of slaughtered Palestinian children is that they can't pull away when you fondle them or sniff their hair.

That's a Biden success story.

fart simpson posted:

well, this is depressing

Why? I can't say that he's done any worse so far than any presidents in the last 21 years. Which isn't a high bar, of course.

James Garfield
May 5, 2012
Am I a manipulative abuser in real life, or do I just roleplay one on the Internet for fun? You decide!

Rodenthar Drothman posted:

gently caress gently caress noooooo.

California politics suck rear end and we’re probably going to elect her.
God dammit.

She's a Republican and you're in California. Trump lost by 30 percent. The recall isn't going to succeed.

fart simpson
Jul 2, 2005

DEATH TO AMERICA
:xickos:

Youth Decay posted:

Why? What past President was doing better things for college-aged voters? Remember the voting age was only lowered to 21 in 1971, and since then the best ones would be...maybe Clinton and Obama had the charisma but were big on their austerity bullshit. I know Carter was probably the least war-criminal-y (although still pretty war criminal-y) but he presided over a massive recession and gas crisis. And none of them actually presented a stimulus package anywhere close to the ARP.

e: didn't see that this poll only covered 21 years, point still stands.

because any hope of fixing things electorally kinda depends on leftward movement, not college students shifting more towards the democrats

Kalit posted:

Why? I can't say that he's done any worse so far than any presidents in the last 21 years. Which isn't a high bar, of course.

it's such a low bar as to be devoid of meaning imo. the last 21 years of presidency have been incredibly awful and i don't think continuing to fail is deserving of additional support

fart simpson fucked around with this message at 16:56 on Apr 23, 2021

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

zoux posted:

Literally an appeal to my immersion, which one of yall wrote this as a bit

Thanks to woke culture, I just can't get myself immersed in realistic children's movie worlds where a flower turns you into a horrible beast and the only way to turn back is to get laid before your 118th birthday

Youth Decay
Aug 18, 2015

fart simpson posted:

because any hope of fixing things electorally kinda depends on leftward movement, not college students shifting more towards the democrats

There was no polling option for Hypothetical Socialist President.

Rodenthar Drothman
May 14, 2013

I think I will continue
watching this twilight world
as long as time flows.

James Garfield posted:

She's a Republican and you're in California. Trump lost by 30 percent. The recall isn't going to succeed.

If there’s one thing Californians love, it’s famous people.
If there’s another thing Californians love, it’s cutting off our nose to spite our face.
And if there’s a last thing Californians love, it’s believing bullshit backed up by a lot of rich people money.

To be clear, I don’t actually think this will work. However, it’s the only way I could see Newsom getting ousted and I have to mentally prepare myself for the worst :v:

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

fart simpson posted:

well, this is depressing

they're still maturing so hope is not yet lost for the remaining third

Inferior Third Season
Jan 15, 2005

Dapper_Swindler posted:

i just wanted to boost this to the new page because its even more insane than i thought it would be.
After years of the right pushing culture war issues and politicizing everything, I love stories like this because most corporations realize that the left is filled with people that love to spend money and have a good time while the right are penny-pinching misers who demand that their meal be comped because the waiter forgot to bring them a fifth free refill on a $1.99 soda.

I hope they follow through on all of their boycotts, so that I can enjoy cool things without them, and they can enjoy dining at Chik-Fil-A and vacationing at Hobby Lobby.

Dietrich
Sep 11, 2001

zoux posted:

A lot of blue states seem really poorly run. Like New York and California elections, the amount of legislation done through referenda, like - fix y'alls poo poo.

Most states with a completely ineffective opposition party attract the biggest grifters in politics who aren't really interested in doing anything. Doesn't matter if it's red or blue.

Kalit
Nov 6, 2006

The great thing about the thousands of slaughtered Palestinian children is that they can't pull away when you fondle them or sniff their hair.

That's a Biden success story.

fart simpson posted:

it's such a low bar as to be devoid of meaning imo. the last 21 years of presidency have been incredibly awful and i don't think continuing to fail is deserving of additional support

Sorry that people are approving of his policies/actions more than the past 21 years and disagree with your assessment of "continuing to fail".

How are u
May 19, 2005

by Azathoth

fart simpson posted:

well, this is depressing

Why's that?

e: oh my bad you answered already

fart simpson posted:

because any hope of fixing things electorally kinda depends on leftward movement, not college students shifting more towards the democrats


it's such a low bar as to be devoid of meaning imo. the last 21 years of presidency have been incredibly awful and i don't think continuing to fail is deserving of additional support

It's just an approval poll. It wasn't asking the kids "is joe biden doing everything you've ever dreamed of, and not one bit more?"

I really approve of a lot of what Biden is doing, but quite clearly there is so much more that needs to be done.

How are u fucked around with this message at 17:10 on Apr 23, 2021

Grouchio
Aug 31, 2014

Rodenthar Drothman posted:

gently caress gently caress noooooo.

California politics suck rear end and we’re probably going to elect her.
God dammit.
Why do you think she'd win against Newsom or even win the primary?

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Rodenthar Drothman posted:

gently caress gently caress noooooo.

California politics suck rear end and we’re probably going to elect her.
God dammit.

Probably not though? I don't know a whole lot about CA politics, but the last Republican governor was Schwarzenegger, and his winning coalition was all Republicans, moderate Democrats, and dumbasses who will vote for any celebrity.

Jenner is a far-right nutjob who loves Ted Cruz, I don't see her replicating the moderate pro-sex climate-change-believer Schwarzenegger's success with Democrats, and I certainly don't see any Republican voting for a trans person. People like her are their new boogeyman destroying America, plus they're all bigoted fucks.

Maybe like a few rich, socially liberal Republicans would vote for her, but the GOP's Klanifornia base, lol no way.

Saxophone
Sep 19, 2006


VitalSigns posted:

Probably not though? I don't know a whole lot about CA politics, but the last Republican governor was Schwarzenegger, and his winning coalition was all Republicans, moderate Democrats, and dumbasses who will vote for any celebrity.

Jenner is a far-right nutjob who loves Ted Cruz, I don't see her replicating the moderate pro-sex climate-change-believer Schwarzenegger's success with Democrats, and I certainly don't see any Republican voting for a trans person. People like her are their new boogeyman destroying America, plus they're all bigoted fucks.

Maybe like a few rich, socially liberal Republicans would vote for her, but the GOP's Klanifornia base, lol no way.

Though I wouldn't put it past them to get her elected so they can trot her out like they do their ever-dwindling POC members and be like "see? We have trans and black friends!"

Rodenthar Drothman
May 14, 2013

I think I will continue
watching this twilight world
as long as time flows.

Grouchio posted:

Why do you think she'd win against Newsom or even win the primary?

Scroll up to see an explanation of California’s recall elections.

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

VitalSigns posted:

Probably not though? I don't know a whole lot about CA politics, but the last Republican governor was Schwarzenegger, and his winning coalition was all Republicans, moderate Democrats, and dumbasses who will vote for any celebrity.

Jenner is a far-right nutjob who loves Ted Cruz, I don't see her replicating the moderate pro-sex climate-change-believer Schwarzenegger's success with Democrats, and I certainly don't see any Republican voting for a trans person. People like her are their new boogeyman destroying America, plus they're all bigoted fucks.

Maybe like a few rich, socially liberal Republicans would vote for her, but the GOP's Klanifornia base, lol no way.

If the recall succeeds, whoever gets a plurality of votes on the accompanying clown car of replacement candidates instantly becomes governor. So, basically, whatever republican has the best name recognition. She would certainly lose re-election but could sneak in if enough democrats just don't like Newsom and don't quite realize who replaces him if he's recalled.

Unclear to me if democrats are having a safety candidate like the lt. gov so that if he is recalled they can retain the governorship.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Doctor Butts posted:

I don't get it, does the guy basically want to go to an amusement park that celebrates being a terrible person?

He wants everything to always stay exactly as it was in his childhood, with no growth or change. Nothing from his childhood involved politics, it was just The Way Things Are, changing things from the way they are into something different is politics.

He's the guy who loves riding the same ride over and over with all of the exact same lines and puns that he knows by heart

Some people's entire personality is "I like this thing, I'm the guy who loves this thing", if that thing changes then they don't know who they are anymore.

generic one
Oct 2, 2004

I wish I was a little bit taller
I wish I was a baller
I wish I had a wookie in a hat with a bat
And a six four Impala


Nap Ghost

Craptacular! posted:

You clearly aren't aware of how the California recall process works. There isn't a primary. There isn't parties. Anyone with a smidgen of friends to sign a document can be added to the ballot. The "debate" last time was fifteen people yelling over each other. A porn star, and a woman who became an LA billboard meme, and literally Gary Coleman were on the ballot. Someone sold a deck of cards featuring them all.



EDIT: Oh gee, I forgot to add Gallagher the watermelon-smashing guy, and also people who had names that were identical to famous people but weren't actually famous for anything themselves.

Don’t forget Larry Flynt!

The whole thing was a convoluted poo poo show of gigantic proportions. Bleh.

VideoGameVet
May 14, 2005

It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion. It is by the juice of Java that pedaling acquires speed, the teeth acquire stains, stains become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion.

Rodenthar Drothman posted:

gently caress gently caress noooooo.

California politics suck rear end and we’re probably going to elect her.
God dammit.

The recall will fail because it's clear who's behind it.

I had my fit of anger over the French Laundry nonsense, but I'm not going to empower the QAnon idiots by kicking Gavin out.

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



zoux posted:

:hmmyes:

https://twitter.com/JStein_WaPo/status/1385569362753556486

Incredible, look at the significant drops around both the December and March stimulus payments. Also I think it's clear that these weren't for "economic stimulus" so much as "desperately needed federal aid" and I guess that's just lexical inertia from 2009?

I think this kind of got lost since the judge thing came up again but I'm really looking forward to progressive spreadsheet wonks like Matt Bruenig to really quantify how much suffering was reduced and lives saved by these relief payments/systems that were the biggest in 100 years and only ones that were direct and simple in....just as long?

I think the numbers will be staggering for no other reason than we've painted ourselves into a corner where wealth has been the primary predictor of outcomes in so many areas of our lives that simply by addressing poverty one can solve dozens of pressing and dire issues.

Zaphod42
Sep 13, 2012

If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now.

Dapper_Swindler posted:

i just wanted to boost this to the new page because its even more insane than i thought it would be.

Pirates with... tattoos?! Unthinkable!

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Epic High Five posted:

I think this kind of got lost since the judge thing came up again but I'm really looking forward to progressive spreadsheet wonks like Matt Bruenig to really quantify how much suffering was reduced and lives saved by these relief payments/systems that were the biggest in 100 years and only ones that were direct and simple in....just as long?

I think the numbers will be staggering for no other reason than we've painted ourselves into a corner where wealth has been the primary predictor of outcomes in so many areas of our lives that simply by addressing poverty one can solve dozens of pressing and dire issues.

It's stunning how much material benefit we can offer people for relatively little money, conservative performative austerity has caused unbelievable amounts of harm.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

evilweasel posted:

If the recall succeeds, whoever gets a plurality of votes on the accompanying clown car of replacement candidates instantly becomes governor. So, basically, whatever republican has the best name recognition. She would certainly lose re-election but could sneak in if enough democrats just don't like Newsom and don't quite realize who replaces him if he's recalled.

Unclear to me if democrats are having a safety candidate like the lt. gov so that if he is recalled they can retain the governorship.

lmao I forgot that it's plurality with no runoffs, but still Schwarzenegger got 48% of the vote in 2003. Which sure is not a majority, but it's similar to what happens all the time in FPTP gubernatorial elections with a spoiler candidate, it wasn't some comedy outcome where he got it with 12% of the vote because everyone fractured behind 100 clown car candidates. Also it seems likely Schwarzenegger would have won with ranked choice or a runoff because the third-place finisher was also a Republican with 13%. Voters pretty much coalesced behind the top three.

Even if the opposite happens this time and voters all splinter behind 100 candidates, I am skeptical Jenner would be the one who would come out on top. Right now there's no other celebrities running because "No" is polling at +15, but I'd imagine if that tightens and the recall starts looking like it would succeed more celebrities would jump in who would be better known/liked than her anyway.

SirPablo
May 1, 2004

Pillbug
They're gonna knock on doors to ask people if they voted lol. How would that even be legal?

https://twitter.com/srl/status/1385628992863043584?s=20

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

College Slice

fart simpson posted:

because any hope of fixing things electorally kinda depends on leftward movement, not college students shifting more towards the democrats

You can have both. You can be a leftist and a democrat! Like AOC! It is in fact the most effective way to make lasting change as we're currently seeing with Biden who has tacked hard to the left since taking office.

College students are seeing a President who is actually getting progressive stuff done and after 4 years of Trump and IIRC 6 years of Republican obstruction under Obama it is an incredible relief to see and as a result you're going to have a generation of voters who are going to be more amendable to support progressives for office.

fart simpson posted:

it's such a low bar as to be devoid of meaning imo. the last 21 years of presidency have been incredibly awful and i don't think continuing to fail is deserving of additional support

I think passing over a trillion dollars in covid relief and stimulus is not continuing to fail, plus the upcoming infrastructure bill which is at least another 1 trillion$ is just success being built on top of success.

Raenir Salazar fucked around with this message at 17:53 on Apr 23, 2021

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply