Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
https://twitter.com/AaronBastani/status/1390352849729695746

crispix posted:

a big splatter of sad, deflated rubber with a big horrific, warped clown face

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Angepain
Jul 13, 2012

what keeps happening to my clothes

The Perfect Element posted:

This is a fake account.

The Guardian liveblog are posting it as Cummings, so either it's real or the guardian are even worse at journalism than I thought

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


The Perfect Element posted:

This is a fake account.

I don't think it is.

ANYTHING YOU SOW
Nov 7, 2009

goddamnedtwisto posted:

So he's a Blairite with even the slightest sense of fair play. He still backed the invasion of Iraq, opposed the investigation of it, and slavishly followed the line of that people who bought us this shitshow. Just because he's managed to wash a tiny amount of the blood off his hands doesn't mean he won't do exactly what Starmer did if he ever gets into power.

This is probably right, but the right wing Labour staffers in the leaked report hated him, so he cant be all bad.

He does seems much better at politics than most of the Labour right.

His decision to go for Greater Manchester mayor allowed him to mostly stay on the sidlelines for the anti/pro corbyn stuff, while still giving him a big national profile.

If the next general election is in May 2024, that will be same time as the mayoral term ends, he can run as MP in a safe seat. Assuming Kier is stil leader and Labour do very badly, there will be a leadership election a few months later and Burnham will be in a very nice position to win.

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010
https://twitter.com/nicolelampert/status/1390592194873004033

A Daily Mail journalist gives her advice.

therattle
Jul 24, 2007
Soiled Meat

Point 2 isn’t terrible, to be fair.

sebzilla
Mar 17, 2009

Kid's blasting everything in sight with that new-fangled musket.


Paperhouse posted:

David Miliband was the "sexy" one and therefore eminently more electable

Counterpoint: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsAeT7nh5vE

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010

therattle posted:

Point 2 isn’t terrible, to be fair.

It's literally a right wing person blaming a right wing Labour loss on the left wing.

Noxville
Dec 7, 2003


The next tweet is the real banger, where the suggestion is to put Jess Phillips and Lisa Nandy on TV more often and calls Owen Jones ‘far left’

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010
https://twitter.com/Dominic2306/status/1390594515505930241

He's a oval office but "Ignore the journalists, they're vain idiots" is the most solid advice you can get.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
"Labour needs to be more TERF and put Jess Phillips in positions of power."

therattle posted:

Point 2 isn’t terrible, to be fair.
In the context of Mail journos, "Talk about ambition, businesses, the high street as much as food banks." means "draw a wedge between the 'deserving' and 'undeserving' and individualize success and failure as matters of merit rather than systemic issues" which can go to dark places very fast (which, to them, is part of the appeal I guess).

peanut-
Feb 17, 2004
Fun Shoe

I read the whole awful thread and not a single one of her suggestions for what the Labour party need is a policy

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008

Still Dismal posted:

Imo it’s far more likely that Labour are eating poo poo for pretty much the same reason they ate poo poo in 2019: center left and SocDem parties are getting squeezed all over Europe. I don’t think Corbyn made a huge difference in 2019 and I don’t think Starmer made a huge difference this time honestly.

Then again Brexit is a uniquely UK thing, so who the gently caress knows.

Elsewhere in Europe theyre getting squeezed between the Right and parties of the socialist left, though. We don't have the latter here, or rather we do, it's a part of the Labour Party and Starmer, having campaigned for the leadership as a 'unity candidate' with leftwing policies, has spent the last year making GBS threads all over it.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

peanut- posted:

I read the whole awful thread and not a single one of her suggestions for what the Labour party need is a policy
"be more TERF and put Jess Phillips in positions of power" and "draw a wedge between the 'deserving' and 'undeserving' and individualize success and failure as matters of merit rather than systemic issues" are both policies, they're just poo poo ones.

ANYTHING YOU SOW
Nov 7, 2009

therattle posted:

Point 2 isn’t terrible, to be fair.

The Labour right love to talk about suporting people who want to "get on". It's never very effective, maybe because without any concerete policies it comes across as a patronising, meaningless platitude.

therattle
Jul 24, 2007
Soiled Meat

Gonzo McFee posted:

It's literally a right wing person blaming a right wing Labour loss on the left wing.

Her first point labelled 2 isn’t doing that and isn’t terrible.

Guavanaut posted:

"Labour needs to be more TERF and put Jess Phillips in positions of power."

In the context of Mail journos, "Talk about ambition, businesses, the high street as much as food banks." means "draw a wedge between the 'deserving' and 'undeserving' and individualize success and failure as matters of merit rather than systemic issues" which can go to dark places very fast (which, to them, is part of the appeal I guess).

In that context sure, but as an approach I don’t think it’s bad advice. She does say “business etc as much as food banks” so that isn’t being ignored. Anyway, it’s not really worth arguing over. I have no doubt that her politics in general suck but sometimes even utter shits can make good observations.

ANYTHING YOU SOW posted:

The Labour right love to talk about suporting people who want to "get on". It's never very effective, maybe because without any concerete policies it comes across as a patronising, meaningless platitude.

Policies? Who needs those?

therattle fucked around with this message at 10:51 on May 7, 2021

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010
Nobody is talking about the poor as if they're thick. Unless she believes that people who use food banks are by defenition thick. Which she does because she's a racist daily mail oval office.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

ANYTHING YOU SOW posted:

The Labour right love to talk about suporting people who want to "get on". It's never very effective, maybe because without any concerete policies it comes across as a patronising, meaningless platitude.
It's like the "we support equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome" poo poo in the US.

As long as people come from other people (I'm no obstetrician, but I believe that's how it works) and get raised and supported by other people, the two are one and the same thing, and to pretend otherwise is a symptom of our modern hyperindividualism.

Aramoro
Jun 1, 2012




Guavanaut posted:

It's like the "we support equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome" poo poo in the US.

As long as people come from other people (I'm no obstetrician, but I believe that's how it works) and get raised and supported by other people, the two are one and the same thing, and to pretend otherwise is a symptom of our modern hyperindividualism.

Equality of opportunity is just a really alluring idea to people generally, it 'sounds' very fair on the face of it and it implies that any success they get is because they earnt it, which people like feeling.

Noxville
Dec 7, 2003

Lmao

https://twitter.com/johnrentoul/status/1390601462212923396?s=21

Vagabong
Mar 2, 2019
Nothing said by anyone writing for the daily mail should be paid a second of attention. Even if they happen to stumble upon a good point, its only by accident in their life of being an evil bastard; they're certainly not giving sincere advice with the intention of helping Labour win an election.

Darth Walrus
Feb 13, 2012

Gonzo McFee posted:

Nobody is talking about the poor as if they're thick. Unless she believes that people who use food banks are by defenition thick. Which she does because she's a racist daily mail oval office.

The Starmerite branch of the media-political ecosystem are absolutely talking about poor people as if they're thick, and I'm not even talking about the squalling over the current terrible local election results.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I think the people who vote tory are thick but I also don't think they're poor, if anything I think they have far too secure lives if the only thing they care about is brexit and flags.

Jaeluni Asjil
Apr 18, 2018

Sorry I thought you were a landlord when I gave you your old avatar!
Meanwhile in other news:


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/fire-east-london-tower-block-poplar-b1843684.html

quote:

Poplar fire: Blaze breaks out at 19-storey tower block ‘covered in Grenfell-type cladding’

Around 125 firefighters and 20 fire engines are tackling a blaze at a 19-storey block of flats in east London.


Parts of the eighth, ninth and 10th floors are alight at New Providence Wharf on Fairmount Avenue in Poplar, the London Fire Brigade said.

Firefighters have been on the scene since around 9am.

The residential block is thought to be covered with the same type of cladding used on Grenfell Tower.

etc

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Aramoro posted:

Equality of opportunity is just a really alluring idea to people generally, it 'sounds' very fair on the face of it and it implies that any success they get is because they earnt it, which people like feeling.
It sounds fair, but it falls apart given a moments thought. Like with the recent report in The Lancet that Black women in the UK experience worse pregnancies wrt loss and support than other ethnic groups, with implications for the health of the newborn. Unless you're aiming for equality of outcome for the parents there, there's no possible equality of opportunity for the child.

Or quoting Desmond Tutu

quote:

None of us comes into the world fully formed. We would not know how to think, or walk, or speak, or behave as human beings unless we learned it from other human beings. We need other human beings in order to be human. I am because other people are.

Everyone's outcome is someone else's opportunity and vice versa, the difference becomes nothing as soon as you look at more than a handful of people. I get that people enjoy striving and achieving but the "equality of opportunity" people in the US tend towards the social darwinist take-the-brakes-off type of liberalism that has trouble with anything beyond their rational individual in a vacuum that they made up.

Gonzo McFee posted:

Nobody is talking about the poor as if they're thick.

Boris Johnson posted:

If he is blue collar, he is likely to be drunk, criminal, aimless, feckless and hopeless, and perhaps claiming to suffer from low self-esteem brought on by unemployment.
:v:

Regarde Aduck
Oct 19, 2012

c l o u d k i t t e n
Grimey Drawer

Noxville posted:

Labour should not double down. They should triple, or even quadruple down

https://twitter.com/dpjhodges/status/1390586566121250817?s=21

that... that doesn't make sense in his own context? Did he forget a rebuttal?

Aramoro
Jun 1, 2012




Guavanaut posted:

It sounds fair, but it falls apart given a moments thought. Like with the recent report in The Lancet that Black women in the UK experience worse pregnancies wrt loss and support than other ethnic groups, with implications for the health of the newborn. Unless you're aiming for equality of outcome for the parents there, there's no possible equality of opportunity for the child.

Not sure why you think people would think about it? People don't think about things that don't affect them generally. People hear the idea think 'that sounds right' and never think about it again.

bump_fn
Apr 12, 2004

two of them
i cant believe jerminy crinbin lost this election

MikeCrotch
Nov 5, 2011

I AM UNJUSTIFIABLY PROUD OF MY SPAGHETTI BOLOGNESE RECIPE

YES, IT IS AN INCREDIBLY SIMPLE DISH

NO, IT IS NOT NORMAL TO USE A PEPPERAMI INSTEAD OF MINCED MEAT

YES, THERE IS TOO MUCH SALT IN MY RECIPE

NO, I WON'T STOP SHARING IT

more like BOLLOCKnese
Talk of being "aspirational" and "getting on" is meaningless without something concrete behind it. In this day and age the type of people who are going to be encouraged by that kind of rhetoric are also the kind of people who are relying heavily on investments, housing wealth and pensions, and are therefore always going to align closer to the Tories who have made clear their intention to always prop those things up.

In any case when talking about places like Hartlepool the polling is clear that people want radical economic change and fairer distribution of wealth: talking about aspiration in the same way Blair did only works when the economy is booming, not when people are crushed in the middle of a pandemic.

Darth Walrus
Feb 13, 2012

OwlFancier posted:

I think the people who vote tory are thick but I also don't think they're poor, if anything I think they have far too secure lives if the only thing they care about is brexit and flags.

You watch the Owen Jones doc? The Tories around Hartlepool have been making a convincing, well-evidenced case that they will benefit the material interests of low-income voters by rebuilding public services and investing vast amounts of money in the area, while local Labour has been getting sniffy about 'bribery'.

Endorph
Jul 22, 2009

the year is 2167. labour is still trying to tell you how much they hate jeremy corbyn. nobody remembers who jeremy corbyn is.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I mean I do sometimes think about the fact that the furlough scheme, minimum wage increases etc, have helped me more than anything blair ever did.

But I still think most of the tory voters are just flagshagging freaks.

keep punching joe
Jan 22, 2006

Die Satan!

Darth Walrus posted:

You watch the Owen Jones doc? The Tories around Hartlepool have been making a convincing, well-evidenced case that they will benefit the material interests of low-income voters by rebuilding public services and investing vast amounts of money in the area, while local Labour has been getting sniffy about 'bribery'.

This is the same tactic as they used in Scotland for years, SNP would do something popular/progressive, Lab would complain that it was a bribe to fiendishly steal their votes.

bump_fn
Apr 12, 2004

two of them

keep punching joe posted:

This is the same tactic as they used in Scotland for years, SNP would do something popular/progressive, Lab would complain that it was a bribe to fiendishly steal their votes.



in the republicans make this precise complaint about any time democrats do anything even remotely non-evil and of course the democrats are always like "oh no we are so sorry we wont do it again"

eg trump putting his signature on the first bailout checks but biden making sure no polticians name is on the second

bird brains

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Pistol_Pete
Sep 15, 2007

Oven Wrangler
Like I said earlier, Starmer's Labour have this bizarre attitude that actually doing stuff that helps people is cheating: "The Tory candidate irresponsibly went round offering to make people's lives better, whereas we very sensibly promised them nothing at all. How were we supposed to win against such underhand tactics??"

Endorph
Jul 22, 2009

to the well-off centrist, politics is a philosophical and moral battle, not something that actually exists in reality. its debate club. offering to make people's lives better isn't the end goal of political systems, its like if before a debate you went and gave everyone in the audience a fifty.

sinky
Feb 22, 2011



Slippery Tilde
lol eat poo poo terf charity

https://twitter.com/JacquieSwears/status/1390334927149875201?s=20

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010
https://twitter.com/jrc1921/status/1390614944777973761

lol nae tears for Labour Councillors.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Nice to see transphobe idiots wasting their money. Although I guess the money eventually ends up paying solicitors who were willing to take this kinda work so eh

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply