|
I ran a marathon the day after Pfizer 1, which turned out to not be a fantastic idea as I was miserable for most of it. e: el gato 
|
#
?
May 18, 2021 22:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 08:02 |
|
|
I felt like poo poo the night after the first Az shot and the morning of the next day. That was last Wednesday and I have had weird, shaky legs and bad balance since then.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2021 23:01
|
|
|
I just had a bit of a fever and joint ache after AZ1, just took a couple of solpadol and slept through it. Got AZ2 on thursday, so will report my experiences after that.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2021 23:26
|
|
|
I had more symptoms two/three days after Pfizer #1 than after Pfizer #2, but that may have been due to being in a city hospital during cold and flu season for the first time after nearly a year of viral shielding measures when I was there for the first dose. I hope some lessons are learned from this, but judging by 1-2 decades after other Western respiratory virus epidemics it's going to be a probable 'nah' 
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2021 23:34
|
|
|
JeremoudCorbynejad posted:The bit I'm enjoying most is the 3% of self-describing woke people thinking nigel farage is woke
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2021 23:34
|
|
|
WhatEvil posted:So I've never done the "start with flour and wash out the starch" method... I just buy straight up wheat gluten powder and mix up a dough with it and cook it. Turns out really well and is much quicker by the sound of it. Thanks for the link. :-) It's cost & convenience versus time for me and time is what i have plenty of these days. I wasn't too rigorous with my initial kneading either and still got a decent result. Bought actual bread flour today as it has a higher gluten content, will see if that changes anything next time i make it.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 00:09
|
|
|
I, too, can report feeling like poo poo, continual pain and extended bouts of exhaustion. I haven't had the vaccine yet, mind, I just live in the UK
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 01:07
|
|
|
LOL  this country is an awful shithouse yes 
crispix fucked around with this message at 01:11 on May 19, 2021 |
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 01:09
|
|
|
Finally got my first vaccine appointment in Canada today. They were due to be making all over 30s eligible on Monday morning, but Monday came around and nothing... and then on Monday evening they say "lol we're making all over 18s eligible tomorrow". So it was a bit of a shitshow. Lots of people weren't able to book. The bookings were supposed to open at 8am and I was trying on the website and got into the queue at 7:55, after trying 30 seconds before, to find 15,000 people in the queue ahead of me. Fun times. Anyway, booked in for June 16th so a month to go, then October for the second one. Woop woop.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 03:28
|
|
|
Lobster God posted:https://twitter.com/adavies4/status/1394709870784417800?s=19 The fact that government after government has tried to brush this under the carpet is frankly horrifying. For those who aren't aware the long and short of it is a private investigator tried to sell the news of the world a story about corrupt police officers running a drug ring with and was found shortly thereafter with an axe in his head. There is a theory that the corrupt police were also selling stories to the news of the world so the NotW tipped them of so they could deal with the leak. Obviously beyond linking the Murdoch press to organised crime and a literal murder the whole story also threatens to expose a bunch of police officers as being drug dealers so it has been repeatedly suppressed.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 07:33
|
|
|
Trickjaw posted:Titles being considered: Curb your Enthusiasm I guess you could also go with Curb your Vote Share Both of which need the same music.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 08:05
|
|
|
Fond Late-90s Goth Memories  Also my Pfizer 1st and 2nd shots were so uneventful side-effects-wise that a more conspiracy-minded person might have posted about in on a .info domain blog.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 08:28
|
|
|
I reckon the next conspiracy will be about the lateral flow tests. You see the government are getting us to do scrapings, then put those scrapings into an individually numbered container, then put the details of that container along with our personal details onto a governmental database. It's how the government are going to get a hold of our DNA for the national database. It's how they get you maaaannnnn.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 08:35
|
|
|
Guardian has just shat itself again.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 08:47
|
|
|
jiggerypokery posted:Lol no, she shagged him for years for about 25 grand. It's ridiculous how cheap it all is with political bribery.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 08:48
|
|
|
Given how much this has been shared it's probably the most successful clickbait they've done in years
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 08:50
|
|
|
I mean that's just pure clickbait right? "here's why this wildly popular thing is bad actually"
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 08:50
|
|
|
I make that exact Shrek face when I read any guardian columnist
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 08:54
|
|
|
It's the most blatant one since probably that "Pratchett, what a hack" one by Jonty Jones-Joens or whoever.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 08:56
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:It's the most blatant one since probably that "Pratchett, what a hack" one by Jonty Jones-Joens or whoever. Jonathan Jones exists purely to angry up the blood
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 08:59
|
|
|
JeremoudCorbynejad posted:I mean that's just pure clickbait right? To be fair, Shrek does totally suck
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:00
|
|
|
Noxville posted:To be fair, Shrek does totally suck *furiously clicks ur post*
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:01
|
|
|
shrek was an anti-semite, was he
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:02
|
|
|
Noxville posted:To be fair, Shrek does totally suck True, but the Guardian are probably only having a go at it now because Boris has gone full Farquaad on Covid and he's getting memed for it.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:03
|
|
|
He's right
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:05
|
|
|
Wildly popular with both critics and audiences but does not engage with the key demographic of 'media failsons paid by the line' required to become high art.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:06
|
|
|
Well, personally speaking, the effects in Disney's Bambi made in 1942 are just not up to much. It doesn't look a bit real.   And that computer we had in the office in 1983 - you know the one, with two 5.25" floppy disk drives, that each department could book an hour a week on, not up to much that. How dare they have a computer like that in an office 38 years ago when now you can get one that does all kinds of whizzy things and calls 'programs' 'apps' and has pretty pictures to press instead of going c:\dosomething\grep ¬¬ add 2+2 or whatever. (ed: this is not a serious command line as it is mixing MSDOS with Linux just a jokey line). I've seen Shrek, it's reasonably entertaining, but not something I'd go out of my way to watch but then I'm not 7 now. Meanwhile, in happy mode: just got an alert saying my research (can't believe it's 20 years old now!) has been cited in a NEW book - which I can't see the chapter of because it costs $42 to download the pdf of a single article. Jaeluni Asjil fucked around with this message at 09:17 on May 19, 2021 |
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:12
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:Wildly popular with both critics and audiences but does not engage with the key demographic of 'media failsons paid by the line' required to become high art. Other than the aforementioned Farquaad speech and Puss in Boots doing anime eyes, can anyone remember a single joke from Shrek? I can't.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:14
|
|
|
Shrek was responsible for busting Smashmouth out of the 90s Phantom Zone they'd been rightfully consigned to and for that everyone involved should be eaten by fire ants.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:16
|
|
|
The only reason this got written is because Shrek’s become a meme and the only reason it’s a meme is because loads of people like it “ironically”, so this whole article is just “kids these days” with extra steps
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:21
|
|
|
Jedit posted:Other than the aforementioned Farquaad speech and Puss in Boots doing anime eyes, can anyone remember a single joke from Shrek? I can't.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:21
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:Wildly popular with both critics and audiences but does not engage with the key demographic of 'media failsons paid by the line' required to become high art. STOP LIKING THE WRONG THINGS YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO LIKE STARMER NOT SHREK YOU STUPID PUBLIC!
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:22
|
|
|
TACD posted:The only reason this got written is because Shrek’s become a meme and the only reason it’s a meme is because loads of people like it “ironically”, so this whole article is just “kids these days” with extra steps Exactly. And without Shrek creating Shrek memes we might never have Neil Cicierega's Mouth albums and the world would be poorer for it
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:26
|
|
|
Jedit posted:Other than the aforementioned Farquaad speech and Puss in Boots doing anime eyes, can anyone remember a single joke from Shrek? I can't. The little singing diorama. The blind mice. Do you know the muffin man. Ogres are like an onion.a bunch of fart jokes. I think I only saw each movie once but they're not any more forgettable than anything of its ilk
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:29
|
|
|
Jedit posted:Other than the aforementioned Farquaad speech and Puss in Boots doing anime eyes, can anyone remember a single joke from Shrek? I can't. It's a cliche now, but Shrek was one of the first kids movies to push back against the whole Disney Princess plot.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:30
|
|
|
Jaeluni Asjil posted:Meanwhile, in happy mode: just got an alert saying my research (can't believe it's 20 years old now!) has been cited in a NEW book - which I can't see the chapter of because it costs $42 to download the pdf of a single article. I have institutional access to basically everything scientific ever so if you want I can look it up for you.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:31
|
|
|
Hard to believe that the Shrek Defenders Have Logged On. That film is widely regarded as bad, now. And I find it hard to disagree with anything in that article. This might be one of the least controversial pieces the paper has ever published.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:32
|
|
|
Saros posted:I have institutional access to basically everything scientific ever so if you want I can look it up for you. I'd love to see why I was cited, as my 'big' paper was 20 years ago now, most of my recent cites have been what I call 'courtesy' cites. Do you have PM?
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:34
|
|
|
Comrade Fakename posted:Hard to believe that the Shrek Defenders Have Logged On. That film is widely regarded as bad, now. And I find it hard to disagree with anything in that article. This might be one of the least controversial pieces the paper has ever published. It's fine. But also this is true https://twitter.com/HKesvani/status/1394935513585524739?s=19
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 08:02 |
|
|
Jaeluni Asjil posted:I'd love to see why I was cited, as my 'big' paper was 20 years ago now, most of my recent cites have been what I call 'courtesy' cites. I think it's platinum a.k.a. the little grenade icon which adds PMs.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2021 09:52
|
|
