Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: dead gay comedy forums)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
V. Illych L.
Apr 11, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT LUMBER

also now we have a very specific thing to point to to explain why we don't do that kind of thing

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

The elemental quality of the CHAZ was that they were gonna have no democracy, no cops, and support & protect private businesses.

How is this not anarcho-capitalism?

F Stop Fitzgerald
Dec 12, 2010

https://twitter.com/MissPavIichenko/status/1399364001893601286

PoontifexMacksimus
Feb 14, 2012

https://twitter.com/humankindgame/status/1397221028267446289

Has anyone followed this game from an ideological perspective? Civ has always been thoroughly shot through with a lot of end of history liberal dogma (up to making "Liberalism" in Civ 4 a tech that gave you an extra free tech to represent its promethean boost to human development) and has certainly spread some unhealthy ideas about human history, so any counter narrative with the same scope would be good, though I don't think this will really be it...

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

The elemental quality of the CHAZ was that they were gonna have no democracy, no cops, and support & protect private businesses.

How is this not anarcho-capitalism?

It was anarcho-capitalism to the point that a strongman immediately moved in and subjugated everyone to his whim

the system works! :confuoot:

Stickfigure
Sep 4, 2011

by Nyc_Tattoo
True CHAZ has never been tried

F Stop Fitzgerald
Dec 12, 2010

Stickfigure posted:

True CHAZ has never been tried

it has, its called the DPRK :c00l:

PoontifexMacksimus
Feb 14, 2012

Hodgepodge posted:

60s counterculture had its true believers, but it was doomed to be stripped of any serious critique in favour of an easily commodified and purely aesthetic politics. the boomers had a lot of anxiety around selling out, mostly because a lot of people who had sold out needed to convince themselves they hadn't/someone else was worse.

I feel like "authenticity politics" if that's even a term, is one if the bigger hidden narratives of capitalism, especially as it ties into colonialism (including of black culture in the US) and valorization of war as an "authentic" experience/sacrifice. Has anyone written on this topic or something similar?

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Subcultures can never be truly transformative because they're defined by their relationship to normativity.

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

PoontifexMacksimus posted:

Has anyone followed this game from an ideological perspective? Civ has always been thoroughly shot through with a lot of end of history liberal dogma (up to making "Liberalism" in Civ 4 a tech that gave you an extra free tech to represent its promethean boost to human development) and has certainly spread some unhealthy ideas about human history, so any counter narrative with the same scope would be good, though I don't think this will really be it...

I dunno about this Humankind game or whatever, but iirc in Civ having a communist government gave you production bonuses. I just checked the wiki for civ 6 and that still holds. You get defensive bonuses for the military and a slight production boost.

Pener Kropoopkin has issued a correction as of 19:24 on May 31, 2021

PoontifexMacksimus
Feb 14, 2012

Demon Semen posted:

That is also why hippies and anarchist organizations are tolerated by the capitalist class, and marxists are not, hth

All of Europe lived in anarchist communities called "villages", and their feudal masters could be happy to let them govern their internal affairs as long as sufficient tax and corvee labour was provided by the community. Similar methods were also employed for providing labour in parts of the Spanish colonial empire, which should be telling.

Once capitalism was advanced enough and it was more profitable to dissolve the village communes or turn their members into outright serfs, these disparate local communities across Europe ultimately failed to resist the rise of the capitalist state.

Basically, local communal self governance can easily be incorporated into a capitalist system (as they will be weak enough to easily crush if needed). Is there anything in anarchism that isn't ultimately medievalist?

PoontifexMacksimus has issued a correction as of 19:26 on May 31, 2021

PoontifexMacksimus
Feb 14, 2012

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

I dunno about this Humankind game or whatever, but iirc in Civ having a communist government gave you production bonuses. I just checked the wiki for civ 6 and that still holds. You get defensive bonuses for the military and a slight production boost.

Civ 2 still holds the crown with the Fundamentalist government making so none of your citizens could ever be unhappy

Yossarian-22
Oct 26, 2014

PoontifexMacksimus posted:

Basically, local communal self governance can easily be incorporated into a capitalist system (as they will be weak enough to easily crush if needed). Is there anything in anarchism that isn't ultimately medievalist?

I'd argue there are many anarchists who are about class struggle and believe in the Marxist idea of worker self-governance but are naive enough that they think you can simply skip the state phase entirely. Unfortunately the utopian thinking therein causes many to indulge in weird back to the earth agrarian fantasies, and the anarchists who are less dense probably become Marxists most (not necessarily all) of the time

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

A lot of posters in this thread had an anarchist phase before accepting Marxism. Myself included.

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

I think anarchism is the defacto philosophy that you turn to when you realize what liberalism is.

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

I avoided all of this by directly going from lib to jucheism. All hail the glorious revolutionary Kim Il-sung.

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

i described myself as a libertarian socialist

in 8th grade

F Stop Fitzgerald
Dec 12, 2010

i went through the liberal->social fascist->squishy anti-revionist dumbass->stalinism-dengoidism genocide denier Pipeline

MLSM
Apr 3, 2021

by Azathoth

PoontifexMacksimus
Feb 14, 2012

Dreddout posted:

You're putting the superstructure before the base rather than the other way around.

The fact of the matter is that if counter culture could convince the masses to rise up it would've happened already.

The dominant values of any given state will be the values of the ruling class. If a counter culture is allowed to exist it is precisely because the establishment does not view it as a serious threat to the status quo.

The vast majority of Russian workers didn't consider themselves to be socialists before 1917. Then WW1 happened and the Bolsheviks were the only ones providing leadership with an acceptable solution. gently caress the war, we'll take territorial loss over dying for the ruling class.

Changes in material conditions change people's ideology not the other way around.

So, social criticism that is couched in sufficiently ritual/formalized terms doesn't destabilize society, it helps reinforce it. There are anthropological examples of trial societies ritually "dissolving" at set intervals due to stated incompatibilities and then merging back stronger than before with no material change. Another example coming to mind is how some early modern westerners would be surprised at the freedom of political criticism afforded to famous Sufi holy men in "oriental despotic" states, when allowing that specific form of criticism was part of the ritual assembly that assured the ruler's legitimacy.

StashAugustine
Mar 24, 2013

Do not trust in hope- it will betray you! Only faith and hatred sustain.

PoontifexMacksimus posted:

https://twitter.com/humankindgame/status/1397221028267446289

Has anyone followed this game from an ideological perspective? Civ has always been thoroughly shot through with a lot of end of history liberal dogma (up to making "Liberalism" in Civ 4 a tech that gave you an extra free tech to represent its promethean boost to human development) and has certainly spread some unhealthy ideas about human history, so any counter narrative with the same scope would be good, though I don't think this will really be it...

I've occasionally thought about how you'd have a Civ game that's just a strictly Marxist view of historical development but idk enough to make it work

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

PoontifexMacksimus
Feb 14, 2012

StashAugustine posted:

I've occasionally thought about how you'd have a Civ game that's just a strictly Marxist view of historical development but idk enough to make it work

Not a all marxist and I hope there are better YT critiques but this one still sticks in my mind:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBlEscMLjy0

Also: by the default design language of strategy games you would be playing the villains. I mean, a game were you play out the development from slavery to feudalism to capitalist imperialism from the perspective of the ruling class, explore the world for "virgin" land and key resources to steal from less developed states, and try to stave off the ungrateful working masses with petty luxury goods or military oppression... already describes any given Civ game

The game Imperialism actually featured some interesting and relevant parts, like the drive to conquer smaller countries not just to take their resources, but to secure them as sales markets for your goods, which isn't really a mechanic I have seen in any other strategy game

PoontifexMacksimus has issued a correction as of 21:18 on May 31, 2021

Buck Wildman
Mar 30, 2010

I am Metango, Galactic Governor


emTme3
Nov 7, 2012

by Hand Knit

The Voice of Labor posted:

john lennon felled by an assassin's bullet. judi bari, attempted assassination. I'm sure there are a bunch of other earth first and wto protestors who got suicided. all hippies and anarchists. this thread, allowed to live.

spooks don't give a gently caress about idealogies beyond knowing that they don't like it. I would also suggest that what determines a threat is how broad it's reach is.

food not bombs is allowed to exist because no one wants to eat beans. riot ribs is immediately cointelpro'ed because if you're giving out ribs and hamburgers and other desirable food stuffs, that represents a threat.

so yeah, this lovely thread is allowed to live because any hint of inquiry into a better world or how to go about realizing it is dogpiled for two pages

This lovely thread is allowed to live because it has exactly zero political power or influence and is largely just a bunch of history nerds shooting the poo poo.

Comrade Koba
Jul 2, 2007

loving lol at the idea of riot ribs being “cointelproed”

tokin opposition
Apr 8, 2021

I don't jailbreak the androids, I set them free.

WATCH MARS EXPRESS (2023)
They want to kill us all and have no real distinction beyond "liberals" for everyone from John Oliver to posters itt. Sectarianism is stupid, neither anarchists nor marxists nor whoever else in that term have the kind of numbers and physical means for any of our differences to actually matter. Get a vanguard party and a few actual tanks, or an autonomous commune feeding the homeless with a VW Bus, either one will get you dead by one or more of the spook orgs that run our respective countries.

We all die as humans, not lacunian postmodern anarchists.

Mr. Lobe
Feb 23, 2007

... Dry bones...


Comrade Koba posted:

loving lol at the idea of riot ribs being “cointelproed”

I mean, feds or no, the cops gave them the business hard.

emTme3
Nov 7, 2012

by Hand Knit

tokin opposition posted:

We all die as humans, not lacunian postmodern anarchists.

to die for the revolution is to die a hero.

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

tokin opposition posted:

They want to kill us all and have no real distinction beyond "liberals" for everyone from John Oliver to posters itt.
lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYfgvS0FA7U

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

elements of the state have definitely shown themselves to be knowledgeable about Leftist debates

https://twitter.com/ImReadinHere/status/1084158761814626304?s=20

The only local police department with this level of finesse is possibly the NYPD, because its the Feds who do the real job of sowing chaos within dissident political groups.

Homeless Friend
Jul 16, 2007

PoontifexMacksimus
Feb 14, 2012

The Voice of Labor
Apr 8, 2020

Dreddout posted:

Both the CNT-FAI and Mao's China declared drug use to be a symptom of the despair caused by capitalism. Meanwhile the Soviet Union attempted to stamp out alcohol consumption for it's entire existence.

I can't think of a single socialist movement of any note that didn't crack down on drug use, both illicit and legal.

coincidentally, I'm sure, none is also the number of socialist movements that are active and which wield political power.

mao smoked like 8 packs of cigarettes a day, and these were old school chinese cigarettes, loving hypocrite was running on a constant daily nicotine rush the likes of which is unimaginable today. the soviet union's only interest in stamping out alcohol consumption was to leave more vodka for inner party debaucheries. hypocrites, frauds, all of them. they knew power flows from the neck of a bottle or a pipe and they wanted to hoard it for themselves, like dragons, like capitalists.

hippy drugs of choice are psychedelics and weed which are extra powermoderator dumb things to be down on. like, "what's the biggest obstacle in the way of creating and maintaining a socialist state? drugs that radically increase people's sense of empathy!"

vyelkin
Jan 2, 2011

Dreddout posted:

Both the CNT-FAI and Mao's China declared drug use to be a symptom of the despair caused by capitalism. Meanwhile the Soviet Union attempted to stamp out alcohol consumption for it's entire existence.

I can't think of a single socialist movement of any note that didn't crack down on drug use, both illicit and legal.

Religion is the opiate of the masses, but actual opiates are dope as hell - Karl Marx

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

shocking twist that the poster defending the worst aspects of the New Left also refuses to defend any actually existing socialist state or movement today

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE
i don't think it was hypocritical of mao to want to combat the continuing destructive impact of the opium wars on china's populace

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?

The Voice of Labor posted:

coincidentally, I'm sure, none is also the number of socialist movements that are active and which wield political power.

Google EZLN, and their drug policy

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

The Lao PDR is still around and doing its best

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

The Voice of Labor
Apr 8, 2020

bagual posted:

there's plenty of countries with populations way more educated than the US that nevertheless act like pieces of poo poo on the world stage

this is not to say awareness and education aren't important but it's not enough without a collective political project aimed at bringing down the ruling class


the point of contention is that while awareness and education may insufficient in and of themselves to effect change, they have primacy, they must necessarily come first. the proof is simple, the only way someone who is unaware of a problem will do anything to alleviate that problem is by chance. no one will do anything about anything unless they are first aware of it. regardless of what other conditions must be present or what comes next, that is step number one. we haven't done step number one yet. the wealthy countries whose agents butcher and oppress, the average person is unaware that that's the source of their luxury, they're usually at best liminally aware that it happens at all. the bourgeoisie news doesn't report it, the schools don't teach it, no one talks about it.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply